This article discusses the nexus between Raymond Williams’ structure of feelings and the reproduction of military masculinity as cultural citizenship. By placing the gaze upon National Service in the Singapore Armed Forces as a rite of passage into manhood, this work uses representations of the military in popular culture and souvenirs/ephemera to elucidate how structures of feeling are calibrated as masculinity the state wants its citizenry to internalize. These render military masculinity emergent for Singaporean male bodies. With the male body functioning as an important edifice of the military, emotions toward military service are the connective tissue between enactments of the soldier’s body and the country’s social structures. With feelings of security contouring the cultural dimensions of male citizenship, this work historicizes the illiberal state’s visualization of its sanitized ‘figure’ of the conscript to control how the military is reproduced and felt as the masculinist ‘given’.
BarrM (2016) Ordinary Singapore: the decline of exceptionalism. Journal of Contemporary Asia46(1): 1–17.
2.
BashamV (2016) Gender, race, militarism and remembrance: The everyday geopolitics of the poppy. Gender, Place & Culture23(6): 883–896.
3.
BashamV (2024) Everyday modalities of militarization. Critical Military Studies10(2): 142–146.
4.
BlackburnK (2013) The democratization of memories from Singapore’s past. Bijdragen Tot De Taal-, Land-En Volkenkunde169(4): 431–445.
5.
CatignaniSBashamV (2021) Reproducing the military and heteropatriarchal normal. Security Dialogue52(1): 99–117.
6.
ChenPSLeeL (2011) Retrospect on the Dust-laden History: The past and Present of Tekong Island in Singapore. Singapore: World Scientific.
7.
ColemanR (2018) Theorizing the present: digital media, pre-emergence and infra-structures of feeling. Cultural Studies32(4): 600–622.
8.
DawneyL (2013) The figure of authority: The affective biopolitics of the mother and the dying man. Journal of Political Power6(1): 29–47.
9.
DawneyL (2018) Affective war: Wounded bodies as political technologies. Body & Society25(3): 49–72.
10.
DawsonG (2013) Soldier Heroes, Empire and the Imagining of Masculinities. Abingdon: Routledge.
11.
DelantyG (2009) The cosmopolitan imagination: Critical cosmopolitanism and social theory. British Journal of Sociology57(1): 25–47.
12.
DunlapS (2021) Put yourself in my combat boots: Autoethnographic reflections on forms of life as a soldier and veteran. Journal of Community Engagement & Scholarship13(4): 1–14.
13.
EjdusF (2017) Not a ‘Heap of Stones’: Material environments and ontological security in international relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs30(1): 23–43.
14.
EnloeC (2007) Globalization and Militarism: Feminists Make the Link. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
15.
FilmerP (2003) Structures of feeling and socio-cultural formations. British Journal of Sociology54(2): 199–219.
16.
GeeS (2014) Bending the codes of masculinity: David Beckham and flexible masculinity in the new millennium. Sport in Society17(7): 917–936.
17.
GraysonKMawdsleyJ (2019) Scopic regimes and the visual turn in International Relations: Seeing world politics through the drone. European Journal of International Relations25(2): 431–457.
18.
GrzelczykV (2022) The politics of toys: What potential for inter-Korean reconciliation?Asian Studies Review46(4): 668–684.
19.
HermesJ (2020) Tracing cultural citizenship online. Continuum34(3): 314–327.
20.
HermesJ (2023) Cultural Citizenship and Popular Culture. Abingdon: Routledge.
21.
HermesJKopitzL (2022) We can sh*t for another 10 years. Toilet paper, pandemic politics and cultural citizenship. Continuum36(2): 244–259.
22.
KayJ (2021) A life lasts longer than the body through which it moves: An introduction to a special cultural commons section on Raymond Williams. European Journal of Cultural Studies24(4): 1009–1020.
23.
LandeB (2007) Breathing like a soldier: Culture incarnate. Sociological Review55(1): 95–108.
24.
LimC (2022) Gender Equality: The Time Has Come. Singapore: World Scientific.
25.
LoarridgeE (2021) War through the eyes of the toy soldier: A material study of the legacy and impact of conflict 1880 – 1945. Critical Military Studies7(4): 367–383.
26.
LoweJ (2019) Masculinizing national service: The cultural reproduction of masculinities and militarization of male citizenship in Singapore. Journal of Gender Studies28(6): 687–698.
27.
LoweJ (2021) The polemical rhetoric of Jack Neo’s Ah Boys to Men and repertoires of filmic masculinity as sacrifice in Singapore. Asian Studies Review45(3): 471–488.
28.
LoweJ (2022) Toxic Military Masculinities and the politics of conscript after-death remembrance in Singapore. Bijdragen Tot De Taal–, Land – En Volkenkunde178(1): 67–89.
29.
LoweJ (2024) Militarized granularity: Sand’s making of men and masculinity in Singapore. Cultural Studies12: 1–22.
30.
LutzC (2009) The military normal. In: Network of Concerned Anthropologists (eds) The Counter-counterinsurgency Manual. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm, pp.23–37.
31.
Mac an GhaillMHaywoodC (2021) The British State’ reproduction of the. Muslim School. British Educational Research Journal47(2): 265–278.
32.
Mac an GhaillMHaywoodC (2022) On not knowing Muslim young men. Sociological Review70(3): 419–437.
33.
McLeodC (2018) National bodies: Political ontology and migrant rugby. Cultural Studies <-> Critical Methodologies18(2): 123–132.
34.
MayerV (2021) From peat to Google power: Structures of feeling in Groningen. European Journal of Cultural Studies24(4): 901–915.
35.
MirzoeffN (2011) The right to look. Critical Inquiry37(2): 473–496.
36.
OngA (1996) Cultural citizenship as subject-making: Immigrants negotiate racial and cultural boundaries in the United States. Current Anthropology37(5): 737–762.
37.
OrtmannS (2009) Singapore: The politics of inventing national identity. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs28(4): 23–46.
38.
OrtmannS (2024) The anti-death penalty movement in Singapore: Structural and situational opportunities in an illiberal regime. Journal of Contemporary Asia1: 1–20.
39.
RechM (2020) Ephemera(l) geopolitics: The material cultures of British military recruitment. Geopolitics25(5): 1075–1098.
40.
SiuL (2001) Diasporic cultural citizenship: Chineseness and belonging in Central America. Social Text19(4): 7–28.
41.
TidyJ (2015) Forces, sauces and eggs for soldiers: Food, nostalgia, and the rehabilitation of the British military. Critical Military Studies1(3): 220–232.
42.
TidyJ (2019) WarCraft: The embodied politics of making war. Security Dialogue50(3): 220–238.
43.
WalshS (2007) The roar of the Lion City: Ethnicity, gender and culture in the Singapore Armed Forces. Armed Forces & Society33(2): 265–285.
44.
WilliamR (1989) Culture is ordinary. In: GableR (ed.) Resources of Hope. New York: Verso Books, pp.32–38.
45.
WilliamsR (1961) The Long Revolution. London: Chatto & Windu.
46.
WilliamsR (1977) Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
WoodsO (2024a) Topological spaces of embodied becoming: queens, queerness, and (infra)structural subterfuge in Singapore. Journal of Gender Studies33(4): 446–457.
49.
WoodsO (2024b) Gamified bodies and the illusory meaning of muscle. Gender, Place & Culture31(7): 910–931.
50.
WoodwardR (2013) Military landscapes: agendas and approaches for the future. Progress in Human Geography38(1): 40–61.
