This article proposes a critical materialist perspective on the recent transnational mode of streaming production, which combines seamless global flows of capital, talent, technologies and fictional worlds with exploitation of differences in labor costs, national media regulations and financial incentives on the ground. Using concepts of ‘platform imperialism’ and ‘digital peripheries’ as points of departure, the article approaches the global streaming production pipelines from the peripheral, bottom-up, ethnographically-informed perspective, which pays attention to the lived realities of the local production and interpretive communities. It employs this approach to propose a new way of interpreting fictional worlds created by the global streamers as allegories of platform imperialism, using the Amazon series Carnival Row (2019–2023), which was shot in studios and on locations in and around Prague and was the biggest investment for the local screen industry ever made by an incoming producer to date, as a case study.
BenjaminW (2002) The Arcades Project. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
BenjaminW (2003) The Origin of German Tragic Drama. London: Verso Books.
3.
BondebjergIRedvallENHellesR, et al (2017) Transnational European Television Drama Production: Genres and Audiences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
BordwellDStaigerJThompsonK (1985) The Classical Hollywood Cinema: Film Style & Mode of Production to 1960. New York: Columbia University Press.
5.
CaldwellJT (2008) Production Culture: Industrial Reflexivity and Critical Practice in Film and Television. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
6.
CarringerRL (2001) Collaboration and concepts of authorship. PMLA116(2): 370379.
7.
CaygillH (2010) Walter Benjamin’s concept of allegory. In: CopelandRStruckP (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Allegory. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.241–253.
8.
ChristensenJ (2012) America’s Corporate Art: The Studio Authorship of Hollywood Motion Pictures. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
ChungHJ (2018) Media Heterotopias: Digital Effects and Material Labor in Global Film Production. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
10.
ConnorJD (2015) The Studios after the Studios: Neoclassical Hollywood (1970–2010). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
DavisS (2021) What is Netflix imperialism? Interrogating the monopoly aspirations of the ‘World’s largest television network.’Information, Communication & Society26(6): 1143–1158.
ElsaesserT (1998) Fantasy island: Dream logic as production logic. In: ElsaesserTHoffmannK (eds) Cinema Futures: Cain, Abel or Cable? the Screen Arts in the Digital Age. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp.154.
15.
ErnstDKimL (2002) Global production networks, knowledge diffusion, and local capability formation. Research Policy 31(8–9): 1417–1429.
16.
FlewT (2018) Post-globalisation. Javnost – the Public25(1–2): 102–109.
17.
FontaineG (2024) Audiovisual Services Spending on Original European Content. 2024 Edition. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.
HavensT (2023) The fabulous east: On peripheral media capitals and the streaming fantasy television genre. International Journal of Communication17: 3189–3206.
20.
HavensTLotzADTinicS (2009) Critical media industry studies: A research approach. Communication, Culture & Critique2(2): 234–253.
MannD (2009) ‘It’s not TV, It’s brand management TV’: The collective Author(s) of the lost franchise. In: MayerVBanksMCaldwellJT (eds) Production Studies: Cultural Studies of Media Industries. New York: Routledge, pp.99–114.
RamseyPBakerSPorterR (2019) Screen production on the ‘Biggest Set in the World’: Northern Ireland screen and the case of Game of Thrones. Media Culture & Society41: 845–862.
SansonK (2018) Stitching it all together: Service producers and the spatial dynamics of screen media labor. International Journal of Cultural Studies21(4): 359–374.
43.
SteinhartD (2019) Runaway Hollywood: Internationalizing Postwar Production and Location Shooting. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
SzczepanikP (2021) Screen Industries in East-central Europe. London: Bloomsbury.
46.
SzczepanikPMacekJZahrádkaP (2020) Introduction: Theorizing digital peripheries. In: SzczepanikPZahrádkaPMacekJ, et al (eds) Digital Peripheries: The Online Circulation of Audiovisual Content from the Small Market Perspective. Cham: Springer, pp.1–31.
