Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

At a time when the European Union is intensifying its electronic frontier through unmanned aerial vehicles or drones, and remotely piloted aircraft and satellite remote sensing devices, it is crucial to ask what this ‘view from above’ in effect enables. Although creating enhanced visibility in the Mediterranean basin of migrants’ crossings, the technological solutions provided by the European Union do not prioritize search and rescue. In analyzing European Union policy documents regarding visibility-making at Europe’s maritime borders, as well as the rationale presented by the industry delivering the technological backbone, this article shows how the ‘view from above’ is not only constructed through data but feeds back into data-generating ‘vision machines’. The working together of the scopic/visual/ocular and the digital/algorithmic/metrical is coined ‘postvisuality’ – a term highlighting the entanglement of image and code and the subsuming of the visual under the digital, or digitality. Postvisuality is framed by Europe’s long history of racial securitization, which in this case facilitates migrants’ data doubles becoming a key locus for financialization and the generation of a surplus for the security and defense industries.

Keywords

Digitality drones Europe refugees securitization surveillance race UAV visuality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ajana

(2015) Augmented borders: Big data and the ethics of immigration. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 13(1): 58–78.

Akkerman

(2016) Border Wars: The Arms Dealers Profiting from Europe’s Refugee Tragedy. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Stop Wapenhandel and Transnational Institute.

Anderson

(2017) Technologies of Vision: The War between Data and Images. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Balibar

(2016) Europe at the limits. Interventions 18(2): 165–171.

Baucom

(2005) Specters of the Atlantic: Finance Capital, Slavery, and the Philosophy of History. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

BBC (2016) Eurotunnel unveils drones ahead of ‘Brexit migrant surge’. Available at: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-kent-36640844 (accessed 31 January 2018).

Bellanova

Duez

(2016) The making (sense) of EUROSUR: How to control the sea borders? In: Bossong

Carrapico

(eds) EU Borders and Shifting Internal Security. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 23–44. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17560-7_2.

Beller

(2016) Informatic labor in the age of computational capital. Lateral 5(1). Available at: http://csalateral.org/issue/5-1/informatic-labor-computational-capital-beller/ (accessed 31 January 2018).

Bhambra

(2016) Wither Europe. Interventions 18(2): 187–202.

10.

Bigo

(2008) Globalized (in)security: The field and the ban-opticon. In: Bigo

Tsoukala

(eds) Terror, Insecurity and Liberty: Illiberal Practices of Liberal Regimes after 9/11. Abingdon: Routledge, pp.10–48.

11.

Bigo

(2014) The (in)securitization practices of the three universes of EU border control: Military/Navy- border guards/police – Database analysts. Security Dialogue 45(3): 209–225.

12.

Bigo

Guild

(2005) Policing at a distance: Schengen visa policies. In: Bigo

Guild

(eds) Controlling Frontiers: Free Movement into and Within Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp.233–263.

13.

Bischoff

Kafehsy

(2010) Images of Illegalized Immigration. Bielefeld: Transcript.

14.

Broeders

DWJ

Dijstelbloem

(2015) The datafication of mobility and migration management: The mediating state and its consequences. In: Van Der Ploeg

Pridmore

(eds) Digitizing Identities: Doing Identity in a Networked World. London: Routledge, pp.242–260.

15.

Browne

(2012) Everybody’s got a little light under the sun. Cultural Studies 26(4): 542–564.

16.

Browne

(2015) Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

17.

Butler

(1993) Endangered/endangering: Schematic racism and white paranoia. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 13: 58–78.

18.

Calais Research Network (2018) Contractors. Available at: https://calaisresearch.noblogs.org/contractors/ (accessed 31 January 2018).

19.

Chambers

(2008) Mediterranean Crossings: The Politics of an Interrupted Modernity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

20.

De Genova

(2013) Spectacles of migrant ‘illegality’: The scene of exclusion, the obscene of inclusion. Ethnic and Racial Studies 36(7): 1180–1198.

21.

Di Maio

(2014) The Mediterranean, or where Africa does (not) meet Italy: Andrea Segre’s a Sud Di Lampedusa. In: Schrader

Winkler

(eds) The Cinemas of Italian Migration: European and Transatlantic Narratives. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp.41–52.

22.

European Commission (2008) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – Examining the Creation of a European Border Surveillance System (Eurosur). Brussels: European Commission.

23.

European Parliament (2013) Regulation (EU) No 1052/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European border surveillance system (Eurosur). Official Journal of the European Union 295: 11–26.

24.

Frontex (2015) More than 710 000 migrants entered EU in first 9 months of 2015, Greek islands remain most affected, 13 October. Available at: https://twitter.com/frontex/status/653877588985819136 (accessed 1 October 2018).

25.

Frontex (2018) Eurosur. Available at: http://frontex.europa.eu/intelligence/eurosur/ (accessed 31 January 2018).

26.

Georgiou

Zaborowski

(2017) Media Coverage of the ‘Refugee Crisis’: A Cross-European Perspective. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

27.

Gitelman

(ed.) (2013) Raw Data Is an Oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

28.

Gregory

(2013) Dis/ordering the Orient: Scopic Regimes and Modern War: Orientalism and War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.151–176.

29.

Haggerty

Ericson

(2000) The surveillant assemblage. The British Journal of Sociology 51(4): 605–622.

30.

Haraway

(1988) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–599.

31.

Hayes

Vermeulen

(2012) Borderline: The EU’s New Border Surveillance Initiatives: Assessing the Costs and Fundamental Rights Implications of Eurosur and the ‘Smart Borders’ Proposals: A Study by the Heinrich Böll Foundation. Berlin: Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung.

32.

Hayes

Jones

Töpfer

(2014) Eurodrones. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute.

33.

Hayes

Rowlands

Buxton

(2009) Neoconopticon: The EU Security-Industrial Complex. Amsterdam: Transnational institute.

34.

Herscher

(2014) Surveillant witnessing: Satellite imagery and the visual politics of human rights. Public Culture 26(3(74)): 469–500.

35.

Jay

(1988) Scopic regimes of modernity. In: Foster

(ed.) Vision and Visuality. Seattle, WA: Bay Press, pp. 3–28.

36.

Jones

(2017) Market Forces: The Development of the EU Security-Industrial Complex. Amsterdam: Transnational Institute.

37.

Kıvılcım

(2018) EU-Turkey refugee deal and the changing paradigms of refugee law, lecture notes, citizenship lectures, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, delivered 31 May 2018.

38.

Kundnani

Kumar

(2015) Race, surveillance, and empire. International Socialist Review 97. Available at: https://isreview.org/issue/97/race-surveillance-and-empire-commentary (accessed 29 March 2017).

39.

Lemberg-Pedersen

(2017) Effective protection or effective combat? EU border control and North Africa. In: Gaibazzi

Dünnwald

Bellagamba

(eds) EurAfrican Borders and Migration Management: Political Cultures, Contested Spaces, and Ordinary Lives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.29–60.

40.

Leurs

Shepherd

(2017) Datafication & discrimination. In: Schäfer

Van Es

(eds) The Datafied Society: Studying Culture through Data. Amsterdam: University Press, pp.211–234.

41.

Linke

(2013) Off the edge of Europe: Border regimes, visual culture, and the politics of race. In: Dureau

Park

Trnka

(eds) Citizenship and the Senses. New York: Routledge, pp.178–199.

42.

M’charek

Schramm

Skinner

(2014) Topologies of race: Doing territory, population and identity in Europe. Science, Technology, & Human Values 39(4): 468–487.

43.

Marin

(2017) The deployment of drone technology in border surveillance, between techno-securitization and challenges to privacy and data protection. In: Friedewald

Burgess

Cas

, et al (eds) Surveillance, Privacy and Security. New York: Routledge, pp.107–122.

44.

Massumi

(2009) National enterprise emergency: Steps toward an ecology of powers. Theory, Culture & Society 26(6): 153–185.

45.

Mirzoeff

(2011) The Right to Look. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

46.

Mirzoeff

(2016) It’s not the Anthropocene, it’s the white supremacy scene; or, the geological color line. In: Grusin

(ed.) After Extinction. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp.123–149.

47.

Mountz

(2010) Seeking Asylum: Human Smuggling and Bureaucracy at the Border. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

48.

Mulvey

(1989) Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema: In Visual and Other Pleasures. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

49.

Neocleous

(2014) War Power, Police Power. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

50.

Pugliese

(2013a) State Violence and the Execution of Law: Biopolitical Caesurae of Torture, Black Sites, Drones. New York: Routledge.

51.

Pugliese

(2013b) Technologies of extraterritorialisation, statist visuality and irregular migrants and refugees. Griffith Law Review 22(3): 571–597.

52.

Rijpma

Vermeulen

(2015) Eurosur: Saving lives or building borders? European Security 24(3): 454–472.

53.

Saucier

Woods

(2014) Ex aqua: The Mediterranean basin, Africans on the move, and the politics of policing. Theoria 61(141): 55–75.

54.

Scheel

Ustek-Spilda

(2018) Big data, big promises: Revisiting migration statistics in context of the datafication of everything. Available at: https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/research-subject-groups/centre-criminology/centreborder-criminologies/blog/2018/05/big-data-big (accessed 1 October 2018).

55.

Sharma

Nijjar

(2018) The racialized surveillant assemblage: Islam and the fear of terrorism. Popular Communication 16(1): 72–85.

56.

Sigona

(2015) Seeing double? How the EU miscounts migrants arriving at its borders. Available at: https://theconversation.com/seeing-double-how-the-eu-miscounts-migrants-arriving-at-its-borders-49242 (accessed 1 October 2018).

57.

Spijkerboer

(2007) The human costs of border control. European Journal of Migration and Law 9(1): 127–139.

58.

Stupp

(2016) EU maritime agency gets ready to use drones to monitor refugee boats. Available at: https://www.euractiv.com/section/justice-home-affairs/news/eu-maritime-agency-gets-ready-to-use-drones-to-monitor-refugee-boats/ (accessed 1 October 2018).

59.

Tazzioli

(2016) Eurosur, humanitarian visibility and (nearly) real-time mapping in the Mediterranean. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 15(3): 561–579.

60.

Tazzioli

Walters

(2016) The sight of migration: Governmentality, visibility and Europe’s contested borders. Global Society 30: 445–464.

61.

Travis

(2017) EU-UK naval mission on people-smuggling led to more deaths, report says. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/11/eu-naval-tactics-operation-sophia-stop-people-smuggling-cause-more-deaths-report-says (accessed 1 October 2018).

62.

Virilio

(1994) The Vision Machine. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

63.

Wikileaks (2015) EUNAVFOR MED – Operation SOPHIA: Six monthly report: June, 22nd to December, 31st 2015. Available at: https://wikileaks.org/eu-military-refugees/EEAS/EEAS-2016-126.pdf (accessed 31 January 2018).

64.

Wilcox

(2017) Embodying algorithmic war: Gender, race, and the posthuman in drone warfare. Security Dialogue 48(1): 11–28.

‘The view from above’ at Europe’s maritime borders: Racial securitization from visuality to postvisuality

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References