This article explores the relationship between populism, media and popular culture in Turkey by focusing on a phenomenal historical television series, Diriliş: Ertuğrul, and the discursive spaces opened by the show. The author relies on a symptomatic analysis of populism which conceptualizes the term as an anti-status quo discourse that simplifies the political space by symbolically dividing the society between ‘the people’ and its other, more specifically ‘the elites’. Diriliş is promoted by the Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi) elite and pro-government media as ‘the show of the people’, and as a cultural artifact belonging to the people. The show has been embraced as an alternative to morally degenerate cultural products of alienated Westernist/Kemalist cultural elites. The Justice and Development Party elites used every opportunity to incorporate the series into its populist political program. The article focuses on a specific crisis moment, ‘The Golden Butterfly Awards 2016’, and the ensuing debates to show how media discourse can resonate with the populist political discourse of a political party.
AkçaI (2014) Hegemonic projects in post-1980 Turkey and the changing forms of authoritarianism. In: AkçaIBekmenAÖzdenA (eds) Turkey Reframed: Constituting Neoliberal Hegemony. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.13–46.
AkserMBaybars-HawksB (2012) Media and democracy in Turkey: Toward a model of neoliberal media autocracy. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication5(3): 302–321.
4.
ArditiB (2007) Politics on the Edges of Liberalism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
5.
BirdalMS (2014) The Davutoğlu Doctrine: The populist construction of the strategic subject. In: AkçaIBekmenAÖzdenA (eds) Turkey Reframed: Constituting Neoliberal Hegemony. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.92–106.
6.
BlockENegrineR (2017) The populist communication style: Toward a critical framework. International Journal of Communication11(1): 178–197.
7.
BoraT (2017) Cereyanlar: Türkiye’de Siyasi İdeolojiler. İstanbul: İletişim.
8.
BoymS (2001) The Future of Nostalgia. New York: Basic Books.
BuğraASavaşkanO (2014) New Capitalism in Turkey: The Relationship between Politics, Religion and Business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
11.
BulutEYörükE (2017) Digital populism: Trolls and political polarization of Twitter in Turkey. International Journal of Communication11(1): 4093–4117.
12.
CanovanM (1999) Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies47: 2–16.
13.
CanovanM (2002) Taking politics to the people: Populism as the ideology of democracy. In: MenyYSurelY (eds) Democracies and the Populist Challenge. London: Palgrave, pp.25–40.
14.
CarneyJ (2014) Re-creating history and recreating publics: The success and failure of recent Ottoman costume dramas in Turkish media. European Journal of Turkish Studies1(19): 1–25.
15.
CarneyJ (2018) Resur(e)recting a spectacular hero: Diriliş Ertuğrul, necropolitics, and popular culture in Turkey. Review of Middle East Studies52(1): 93–114.
16.
ChakravarttyPRoyS (2015) Mr. Modi goes to Delhi: Mediated populism and the 2014 Indian elections. Television & New Media16(4): 311–322.
DemirciS (2013) Is the early ottoman history ‘a black hole?’ Discussions about the foundation of the Ottoman Empire and Gazi/Gazâ concepts. History Studies5(1): 89–100.
19.
DinçşahinS (2012) A symptomatic analysis of the justice and development party’s populism in Turkey, 2007–2010. Government and Opposition47(4): 618–640.
GürcanECPekerE (2015) Challenging Neoliberalism at Turkey’s Gezi Park: From Private Discontent to Collective Class Action. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
HobsbawmEJLaversJRangerT (1985) The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
HoyngREsM (2017) Conspiratorial webs: Media ecology and parallel realities in Turkey. International Journal of Communication11(1): 4219–4238.
25.
HuyssenA (2003) Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
İnalcıkH (1994) An Economic and Social History of the Ottoman Empire: 1300–1600, vol. I (ed. QuataertD). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
IrvineJTGalS (2000) Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In: KroskrityPV (ed.) Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, pp.35–84.
29.
KafadarC (1996) Between Two Worlds: The Construction of the Ottoman State. Stanford, CA: University of California Press.
KoçerS (2018) From the worst menace to societies to the Robot Lobby: A semantic view of Turkish political rhetoric on social media. In: Baybars-HawksB (ed.) New Media Politics: Rethinking Activism and National Security in Cyberspace. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press, pp.229–241.
34.
KoyuncuB (2014) Benim Milletim: AK Parti İktidarı, Din Ve Ulusal Kimlik. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
35.
LaclauE (2005) On Populist Reason. London and New York: Verso.
36.
LaclauEZacL (1994) Minding the gap: The subject of politics. In: LaclauE (ed.) The Making of Political Identities. London: Verso, pp.11–38.
37.
ManucciL (2017) Populism and the media. In: KaltwasserCRTaggartPEspejoPO, et al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.468–489.
38.
MazzoleniG (2003) The media and growth of neo-populism in contemporary democracies. In: MazzoleniGStewartJHorsfieldB (eds) The Media and Neo-populism: A Contemporary Comparative Analysis. Westport, CT: Praeger, pp.1–20.
39.
MazzoleniG (2008) Populism and the media. In: AlbertazziDMcDonnellD (eds) Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.49–64.
40.
MazzoleniG (2014) Mediatization and political populism. In: EsserFStrömbackJ (eds) Mediatization of Politics: Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.42–56.
41.
Media Ownership Monitor Turkey (2017) Shutdown media. Media Ownership Monitor Turkey. Available at: https://turkey.mom-rsf.org/
42.
MenyYSurelY (2002) The constitutive ambiguity of populism. In: MenyYSurelY (eds) Democracies and the Populist Challenge. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.1–21.
43.
MoffittB (2015) How to perform crisis: A model for understanding the key role of crisis in contemporary populism. Government and Opposition50(2): 189–217.
44.
MoffittB (2016) The Global Rise of Populism Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
45.
MuddeC (2004) The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition39(4): 541–563.
46.
MuddeCKaltwasserCR (2013) Populism. In: FreedenMStearsM (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.494–513.
ÖzbudunE (2006) From political Islam to conservative democracy: The case of the justice and development party in Turkey. South European Society and Politics11(3–4): 543–557.
52.
ÖzçetinBBaybars-HawksB (2018) Framing the Russian aircraft crisis: News discourse in Turkey’s polarized media environment. Uluslararası İlişkiler15(57): 33–47.
53.
ÖzpekBBYaşarNT (2018) Populism and foreign policy in Turkey under the AKP rule. Turkish Studies18(2): 198–216.
54.
PanayırcıUCİşeriEŞekercioğluE (2016) Political agency of news outlets in a polarized media system: Framing the corruption probe in Turkey. European Journal of Communication31(5): 551–567.
55.
PanizzaF (2005) Introduction: Populism and the mirror of democracy. In: PanizzaF (ed.) Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London: Verso, pp.1–30.
TaggartP (2002) Populism and the pathology of representative politics. In: MényYSurelY (eds) Democracies and the Populist Challenge. London: Palgrave, pp.62–80.
60.
TaşkınY (2008) AKP’s move to ‘conquer’ the center-right: Its prospects and possible impacts on the democratization process. Turkish Studies9(1): 53–72.
