In this article, we draw on the growing Euro-American literature on cultural recognition, legitimacy, and film criticism and focus on the classificatory struggles taking place in the Turkish film field. We content-analyze the criteria that critics deploy as they review films as recognized by different institutions and actors. Multiple correspondence analysis demonstrates that the distinction between artistic and commercial films is still very prominent. Moreover, the existence of political content in a film elevates its symbolic status, regardless of its production mode. To account for this peculiar finding, we explore a fraction of the reviews qualitatively. Our research contributes to the cultural legitimacy literature by crosschecking the effectiveness of recently posited trends and questioning the role of politics in the process of critical recognition in a specific national context located on the margins of Europe.
Abluka [Frenzy] (2015) [Film] Emin Alper (dir). Paprika Films et al.
2.
AksoyAŞeydenBY (2015) Storm over the state cultural institutions: New cultural policy direction in Turkey. International Journal of Cultural Policy21(2): 183–199.
3.
AllenMPLincolnAE (2004) Critical discourse and the cultural consecration of American films. Social Forces82(3): 871–894.
4.
AndrewsD (2013) Theorizing Art Cinemas: Foreign, Cult, Avant-Garde, and beyond. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
5.
AydemirŞ (2015) Beyazcam’dan ‘Yeşilcam’ Çıkar mı? In: İnalKSancarNGezginUB (eds)Marka Takva Tuğra: AKP Döneminde Kültür ve Politika. İstanbul, Turkey: Evrensel, pp.404–408.
6.
BarnettLAllenMP (2000) Social class, cultural repertoires, and popular culture: The case of film. Sociological Forum15(1): 145–163.
7.
BaumannS (2001) Intellectualization and art world development: Film in the United States. American Sociological Review66(3): 404–426.
8.
BaumannS (2007) A general theory of artistic legitimation: How art worlds are like social movements. Poetics35(1): 47–65.
9.
BeckerH (1982) Art Worlds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
10.
BehlilM (2010) Close encounters? Contemporary Turkish television and cinema. Wide Screen2(2): 1–14.
11.
BennettTSavageMSilvaE, et al. (2009) Culture, Class, Distinction. London: Routledge.
12.
BirdalS (2015) AKP İktidarında İdeoloji ve Hegemonya. In: İnalKSancarNGezginUB (eds) Marka Takva Tuğra: AKP Döneminde Kültür ve Politika. İstanbul, Turkey: Evrensel, pp.48–57.
13.
BordwellD (1979) The art cinema as a mode of film practice. Film Criticism4(1): 56–64.
14.
BourdieuP (1999) Une révolution conservatrice dans l’édition. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales126–127: 3–28.
15.
BourdieuP(1993) The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
CzachL (2004) Film festivals, programming, and the building of a national cinema. The Moving Image4(1): 76–88.
18.
DiMaggioPMukhtarT (2004) Arts participation as cultural capital in the United States, 1982–2002: Signs of decline?Poetics32(2): 169–194.
19.
DrakeP (2008) Distribution and marketing in contemporary Hollywood. In: McDonaldPWaskoJ (eds) The Contemporary Hollywood Film Industry. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, pp.63–82.
20.
EllisJ (1978) Art, culture and quality: Terms for a cinema in the forties and seventies. Screen19(3): 9–50.
21.
GreenacreMBlasiusJ (eds) (2006) Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
22.
HeikkiläRLauronenTPurhonenS (2017) The crisis of cultural journalism revisited: The space and place of culture in quality European newspapers from 1960 to 2010. European Journal of Cultural Studies. Epub ahead of print 4 January. DOI: 10.1177/1367549416682970.
23.
HeiseTTudorA (2007) Constructing (film) art: Bourdieu’s field model in a comparative context. Cultural Sociology1(2): 165–187.
24.
JanssenSVerboordMKuipersGMM (2011) Comparing cultural classification. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie63(51): 139–168.
25.
KerstenABielbyDD (2012) Film discourse on the praised and acclaimed: Reviewing criteria in the United States and United Kingdom. Popular Communication10(3): 183–200.
26.
KerstenAJanssenS (2016) Trends in cultural journalism: The development of film coverage in cross-national perspective, 1955–2005. Journalism Practice11: 840–856.
27.
KerstenAVerboordM (2014) Dimensions of conventionality and innovation in film: The cultural classification of blockbusters, award winners, and critics’ favourites. Cultural Sociology8(1): 3–24.
28.
Kurtlar Vadisi: Irak [Valley of the Wolves: Iraq] (2006) [Film] Serdar Akar (dir). Pana Film.
29.
LavieN (2015) Israeli drama: Constructing the Israeli ‘quality’television series as an art form. Media, Culture & Society37(1): 19–34.
30.
LavieNDhoestA (2015) Quality television’ in the making: The cases of Flanders and Israel. Poetics52: 64–74.
31.
Le RouxBRouanetH (2004) Geometric Data Analysis: From Correspondence Analysis to Structured Data Analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
32.
Le RouxBRouanetH (2010) Multiple Correspondence Analysis (Series Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences). London: Sage.
33.
Mucize [Miracle] (2015) [Film] Mahsun Kırmızıgül (dir). Boyut Film.
34.
Mustang (2015) [Film] Deniz Gamze Ergüven (dir). CG Cinéma et al.
35.
NealeS (1981) ‘Art cinema as institution’. Screen22(1): 11–40.
36.
Nefesim Kesilene Kadar [Until I Lose My Breath] (2015) [Film] Emine Emel Balcı (dir). Prolog Film.
PetersonRA (1992) Understanding audience segmentation: From elite and mass to omnivore and univore. Poetics21(4): 243–282.
39.
PetersonRA (1997) The rise and fall of highbrow snobbery as a status marker. Poetics25(2–3): 75–92.
40.
PetersonRA (2005) Problems in comparative research: The example of omnivorousness. Poetics33(5–6): 257–282.
41.
PetersonRAKernR (1996) Changing highbrow taste: From snob to omnivore. American Sociological Review61(5): 900–907.
42.
PrieurASavageM (2011) Updating cultural capital theory: A discussion based on studies in Denmark and in Britain. Poetics39(6): 566–580.
43.
PriorN (2005) A question of perception: Bourdieu, art and the postmodern. British Journal of Sociology56(1): 123–139.
44.
PurhonenSHeikkiläRKarademir-HazirI (2017) The grand opening? The transformation of the content of culture sections in European newspapers, 1960–2010. Poetics62: 29–42.
45.
RobinsKAksoyA (2000) Deep nation: The national question and Turkish cinema culture. In: HjortMMackenzieS (eds) Cinema and Nation. London; New York: Routledge, pp.191–208.
46.
RooseHVan EijckKLievensJ (2012) Culture of distinction or culture of openness? Using a social space approach to analyze the social structuring of lifestyles. Poetics40(6): 491–513.
47.
Sarmaşık [Ivy] (2015) [Film] Tolga Karaçelik (dir). Cine Chromatix et al.
48.
SunerA (2011) Between magnificence and monstrosity: Turkishness in Recent Popular Cinema. New Perspectives on Turkey45: 123–154.
49.
TudorA (2005) The rise and fall of the art (house) movie. In: InglisDHughsonJ (eds) The Sociology of Art: Ways of Seeing. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.125–138.
50.
Van EijckKKnulstW (2005) No more need for snobbism: Highbrow cultural participation in a taste democracy. European Sociological Review21(5): 513–528.
51.
VarrialeS (2016) Globalization, Music and Cultures of Distinction: The Rise of Pop Music Criticism in Italy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
52.
VerboordM (2014) The impact of peer-produced criticism on cultural evaluation: A multilevel analysis of discourse employment in online and offline film reviews. New Media & Society16: 921–940.
