This article discusses lesbian relationships dissolutions and the stories about them. Applying a narrative approach, the critical reading of breakup stories which are conceptualized as dramas by their participants seeks to problematize the distinction between private and public, respectable and scandalous, normative and deviant, and constructive and destructive in order to discuss queer publics and some longings that are attached to them. While the contingency between the institution of family and the politics of belonging in lesbian and gay lives has been intensively scrutinized and criticized by scholars and activists alike, questions regarding the forms of publics and belonging that emerge as a result of kinship failure are yet to be explored. Building on in-depth interviews and inspired by critical intervention into questions of counterpublics, I ask how intimate stories of relational dramas are narrated in an era of compulsory happiness.
AhmedS (2010) The Promise of Happiness. Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press.
2.
BaraitserL (2009) Mothers who make things public. Feminist Review93: 8–26.
3.
BealsKPImpettEAPeplauLA (2002) Lesbians in love: Why some relationships endure and others end. Journal of Lesbian Studies6(1): 53–63.
4.
BerkovitchNManorS (2015) ‘We must help them as much as we can’: Grandparents care work in a neo liberal era. In: Inequality in the 21st Century, LSE, London, 4July2015. Israel Studies Bulletin Board (online). (Accessed 20 July 2015).
5.
BerlantL (1998) Intimacy: A special issue. Critical Inquiry24(2): 281–288.
6.
BerlantL (2008) The Female Complaint: The Unfinished Business of Sentimentality in American Culture. Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press.
7.
BerlantLWarnerM (1998) Sex in public. Critical Inquiry24(2): 547–566.
8.
BrunnerJWeisserS (1991) The invention of self: Autobiography and its forms. In: OlsonDRTorranceN (eds) Literacy and Orality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.129–148.
ButlerJ (2001) Giving an account of oneself. Diacritics32(4): 22–40.
11.
ButlerJ (2002) Is kinship always already heterosexual. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies13(1): 14–44.
12.
CvetkovichA (2003) An Archive of Feelings: Trauma, Sexuality and Lesbian Public Cultures. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
13.
DugganL (2002) The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. In: CastronovoRNelsonDD (eds) Materializing Democracy: Toward a Revitalized Cultural Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp.175–194
14.
EngDL (2010) The Feeling of Kinship: Queer Liberalism and the Racialization of Intimacy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
15.
EngelA (2011) Tender tensions – Antagonistic struggles – Becoming bird: Queer political interventions into neoliberal hegemony. In: do Mar Castro VarelaMDhawanNEngelA (eds) Hegemony and Heteronormativity Revisiting ‘the Political’ in Queer Politics. Surrey, BC, Canada; Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing, pp.63–90.
16.
Fogiel-BijaouiS (2002) Familism, postmodernity and the state: The case of Israel. Journal of Israeli History: Politics, Society, Culture21 (1–2) 38–62.
17.
Fogiel-BijaouiSRutlinger-ReinerR (2013) Introduction: Rethinking the family in Israel. Israel Studies Review28(2): vii–xii.
18.
GergenKJGergenMM (1997) Narratives of the self. In: HinchmanLPHinchmanSK (eds) Memory, Identity, Community: The Idea of Narrative in the Human Sciences. New York: SUNY Press, pp.161–184.
19.
GledhillC (1992) Speculations on the relationship between soap opera and melodrama. Quarterly Review of Film and Video14(1–2): 107–128.
20.
GrossA (2015) The politics of LGBT rights in Israel and beyond: Nationality, normativity and queer politics. Columbia Human Rights Review46(2): 81–152.
21.
HadarI (2001) Parenthood, in the First Annual Report on the Rights of Homosexuals, Lesbians and Transgenders in Israel 2000-2001. The Political Council for Gays Rights in Israel. Available at: http://www.geocities.com/pcgri/report.doc (Accessed 23 June 2008) (in Hebrew).
HalberstamJ (2005) In a Queer Time and Place: Transgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives. New York: New York University Press.
24.
HalberstamJ (2011) The Queer Art of Failure. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
25.
KadishR (2005) Israeli lesbians, national identity, and motherhood. In: Frankfort-NachmiasCShadmiE (eds) Sappho in the Holy Land: Lesbian Existence and Dilemmas in Contemporary Israel. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. pp.223–250.
26.
KitzingerCWilkinsonS (2004) The re-branding of marriage: Why we got married instead of registering a civil partnership. Feminism & Psychology14(1): 127–150.
27.
KooijmanJ (2005) Family portrait: Queering the nuclear family in François Ozon’s sitcom. In: PistersPStaatW (eds) Shooting the Family: Transnational Media and Intercultural Values. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp.73–87.
28.
KuntsmanA (2009) Figurations of Violence and Belonging: Queerness, Migranthood and Nationalism in Cyberspace and Beyond. Bern: Peter Lang Publishing Group.
29.
KupperYKaplanD (2010) When the private meets the public: The politics of recognition in an LGBT organization for educational and social change. Israeli Sociology12(1): 159–180 (in Hebrew).
30.
KurdekLA (2005) What do we know about gay and lesbian couples?Current Directions in Psychological Science14(5): 251–254.
31.
LahadK (2012) Singlehood, waiting, and the sociology of time. Sociological Forum27(1): 163–186.
32.
LaveeYKatzR (2003) The family in Israel: Between tradition and modernity. Marriage and Family Review35(1–2): 193–217.
33.
LindeC (1993) Life Stories: The Creation of Coherence. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
LopezAM (1995) Our welcomed guests: Telenovelas in Latin America. In: AllenRC (ed.) To Be Continued: Soap Operas around the World. London; New York: Routledge, pp.256–275.
35.
LoveH (2007a) Compulsory happiness and queer existence. New Formations63(1): 52–64.
36.
LoveH (2007b) Feeling Backward: Loss and the Politics of Queer History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
MarcusS (2002) Fighting bodies, fighting words: A theory and politics of rape prevention. In: MuiCLMurphyJS (eds) Gender Struggles: Practical Approaches to Contemporary Feminism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp.166–185.
38.
OzonF (1988) Photo de Famille/Family Portrait. Paris: Film Office France.
39.
PlummerK (1995) Telling Sexual Stories: Power, Change, and Social Worlds. London: Routledge.
40.
PreserR (2011) Coherent deviants: Transformation and transition in life-stories of once-married women who chose to live as lesbians. Women’s Studies International Forum34(2): 140–150.
41.
PreserR (2016) Methodology of damage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology19(1): 17–30.
42.
PuarJ (2007) Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
43.
RandallWMcKimEA (2004) Toward a poetics of aging: The links between literature and life. Narrative Inquiry14(2): 235–260.
44.
RiggleEDBRostoskySSPratherRA (2006) Advance planning by same-sex couples. Journal of Family Issues27(6): 758–776.
45.
RomMBenjaminO (2011) Feminism, Family, and Identity in Israel. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
46.
SchneiderDM (1984) A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
47.
WarnerM (2000) The Trouble with Normal. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
WarnerM (2002) Public and Counterpublics. Public Culture14(1): 49–90.
WestonK (1995) Forever is a long time: Romancing the real in gay kinship ideologies. In: YanagisakoSDelaneyC (eds) Naturalizing Power: Essays in Feminist Cultural Analysis. New York: Routledge, pp.87–112.
