This article examines the idea of ‘middle-class monarchy’ emerging in Europe from the internationally publicised marriages of Kate Middleton to Prince William in the United Kingdom and Charlene Wittstock to Prince Albert in Monaco. Through a careful analysis of sexuality, class and race in three major British newspapers, we demonstrate how media discourses surrounding the marriages deploy European monarchies as sites of neoliberal governmentality. Deployed as transmitters of instrumental happiness and conceptualised as an individual choice and project achievable through the control of the body and realisation of one’s desires, Kate embodies the white postfeminist vision of a highly educated, post-liberation woman able to combine the roles of consumer, homemaker and dutiful wife. This contrasts to the foreign Charlene, whose apparent domestication in an old-fashioned marriage of convenience was pitied widely. Finally, the article examines the Closer topless photo scandal as an incident that both challenged and re-sedimented the sexed, raced and classed neoliberal obligations of individual happiness and self-control.
AhmedS (2004) The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
2.
AhmedS (2010) The Promise of Happiness. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
3.
AllenS (2010) A French exchange: Education as the cultural interface in British comedies. Journal of British Cinema and Television7(3): 439–458.
4.
AttwoodF (1999) Same old story? The tale of Diana, Princess of Wales. Journal of Gender Studies8(3): 313–322.
5.
BennettJ (2011) Celebrity forum introduction: The royal wedding. Celebrity Studies2(3): 353–354.
6.
BenoitWLBrinsonSL (1999) Queen Elizabeth’s image repair discourse: Insensitive royal or compassionate queen?Public Relations Review25(2): 145–156.
7.
BlackmanL (1999) An extraordinary life: The legacy of an ambivalence. New Formations36: 111–124.
8.
BlainNO’DonnellH (2003) Media, Monarchy and Power. Bristol: Intellect.
9.
BoisseauTJ (2004) White Queen. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
10.
BrownW (2005) Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
ButlerJ (1999) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.
12.
CampbellB (1998) Diana, Princess of Wales: How Sexual Politics Shook the Monarchy. London: The Women’s Press Ltd.
13.
ChantlerKGangoliGHesterM (2009) Forced marriage in the UK: Religious, cultural, economic or state violence?Critical Social Policy29(4): 587–612.
14.
ChatterjeeP (1989) Colonialism, nationalism, and colonized women: The contest in India. American Ethnologist16(4): 622–633.
15.
ChenE (2013) Neoliberalism and popular women’s culture: Rethinking choice, freedom, and agency. European Journal of Cultural Studies16(4): 440–452.
16.
Church GibsonP (2011) New patterns of emulation: Kate, Pippa and Cheryl. Celebrity Studies2(3): 358–360.
17.
DavisAM (2006) Good Girls and Wicked Witches: Women in Disney’s Feature Animation. Eastleigh: John Liberty Publishing.
18.
EhrenreichB (2010) Bright-Sided: How Positive Thinking is Undermining America. New York: Metropolitan Books.
19.
EnglandDEDescartesLCollier-MeekM (2011) Gender role portrayal and the Disney princesses. Sex Roles64(7–8): 555–567.
20.
FoucaultM (1980) Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In: BouchardDF (ed.) Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews by Michel Foucault. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp.139–164.
21.
FoucaultM (1990) The History of Sexuality: The Will to Knowledge, vol. 1. London and New York: Penguin.
22.
FoucaultM (2002) The Order of Things. London: Routledge.
23.
FoucaultM (2010) Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collége de France. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
24.
FriedanB (2010) The Feminine Mystique. London: Penguin.
25.
HallS (1997) Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage (association with the Open University).
26.
HarveyD (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
HolliAM (2003) Discourse and Politics for Gender Equality in Late Twentieth Century Finland, Acta Politica 23. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
28.
JonesO (2011) Chavs: The Demonization of the Working Class. London: Verso.
29.
KittlerFA (1990) Discourse Networks 1800/1999. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
30.
LewisG (2005) Welcome to the Margins: Diversity, tolerance, and policies of exclusion. Ethnic and Racial Studies28(3): 536–558.
31.
McGuiganJ (2000) British identity and the people’s princess. The Sociological Review48(1): 1–18.
32.
McRobbieA (2009) The Aftermath of Feminism. London: Sage.
33.
NairnT (2011) The Enchanted Glass: Britain and Its Monarchy. London and New York: Verso.
34.
NegraD (2009) What a Girl Wants? Fantasizing the Reclamation of Self in Postfeminism. London: Routledge.
35.
NegraDTaskerY (2014) Gender and recessionary culture. In: NegraDTaskerY (eds) Gendering the Recession. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp.1–30.
36.
ParrottGWHarréR (2001) Princess Diana and the emotionology of contemporary Britain. International Journal of Group Tension30(1): 29–38.
37.
PhillipsL (1999) Media discourse and the Danish monarchy: Reconciling egalitarianism and royalism. Media, Culture & Society21(2): 221–245.
38.
PickettyT (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
39.
RepoJYrjöläR (2011) The gender politics of celebrity humanitarianism in Africa. International Feminist Journal of Politics13(1): 44–62.
40.
RoseN (1998) Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
RoseN (1999) Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London and New York: Free Association Books.
42.
SaukkoP (2006) Rereading media and eating disorders: Karen carpenter, princess Diana, and healthy female self. Critical Studies in Media Communication23(2): 152–169.
43.
SchiebingerL (2008) Nature’s Body: Gender and the Making of Modern Science. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
44.
SeidlerV (2013) Remembering Diana: Cultural Memory and the Reinvention of Authority. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave.
45.
ShomeR (2001) White femininity and the discourse of the nation: Re/membering princess Diana. Feminist Media Studies1(3): 323–342.
46.
SkeggsB (1997) Formations of Class & Gender. London: Sage.
StoverC (2013) Damsels and heroines: The conundrum of the postfeminist Disney princess. LUX2(1): Article 29.
49.
TaskerYNegraD (2007) Interrogating Postfeminism: Gender and the Politics of Popular Culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
50.
TaylorJA (2000) Diana, Self-interest, and British National Identity. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
51.
TylerI (2013) Revolting Subjects: Social Abjection and Resistance in Neoliberal Britain. London: Zed Books.
52.
Van DijkT (1991) Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.
53.
WhelehanI (2010) Remaking feminism: Or why is postfeminism so boring?Nordic Journal of English Studies9(3): 155–172.
54.
WorthingtonM (2009) The motherless ‘Disney Princess’: Marketing mothers out of the picture. In: HallACBishopMJ (eds) Mommy Angst: Motherhood in American Popular Culture. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, pp.29–46.
