From the inception in the early 1980s of the Foucauldian-influenced corpus of work known as ‘governmentality studies’, theorists sought to encourage the empirical study of rationalities and technologies of government as elements that are mutually dependent but not related in a one-to-one fashion. Yet in the years since then, rationalities have received attention from analysts to the relative neglect of technologies. This article undertakes an analysis of the business improvement district and church sanctuary: two disparate, mundane and mutant devices which suggest that technologies cannot be permanently assigned to one kind of power; can shift back and forth between civil society and the state; and can resemble heretofore disassociated technologies. Reinvigorating the quest to understand technologies of government such as these necessitates a greater openness to their possible links to a plurality of powers and recognition of their historical character and capacity for mutations.
Adelman, H. ( 1980) The Indochinese Refugee Movement: The Canadian Experience . Toronto: Operation Lifeline.
2.
Bau, I. ( 1985) This Ground is Holy: Church Sanctuary and Central American Refugees. New York: Paulist Press .
3.
Bellamy, J. ( 1973) Crime and Public Order in England in the Later Middle Ages. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
4.
Briffault, R. ( 1999) ‘A Government for Our Time? Business Improvement Districts and Urban Governance’, Columbia Law Review99(2): 365-477.
5.
Castels, R. ( 1994) ‘"Problematization" as a Mode of Reading History’ , in J. Goldstein (ed.) Foucault and the Writing of History, pp. 237-43. Oxford: Blackwell.
6.
City of Toronto (2001) ‘Business Improvement Areas’Toronto Municipal Code- Section19.
7.
Coleman, R. ( 2003) ‘Images from a Neoliberal city: The State, Surveillance and Social Control’, Critical Criminology12(1): 21-42.
8.
Coutin, S. (in press, 2010) ‘Legacies and Origins of the 1980s U.S.-Central American Sanctuary Movement’, Refuge27(3).
9.
Crawford, A. ( 2003) ‘"Contractual governance" of Deviant Behaviour’ , Journal of Law and Society30(4): 479-505.
10.
Curtis, B. ( 1995) ‘Taking the State Back Out: Rose and Miller on Political Power’, British Journal of Sociology46(4): 575-89.
11.
Dean, M. ( 1991) The Constitution of Poverty: Towards a Genealogy of Liberal Governance. New York: Routledge .
12.
Dean, M. ( 1994) Critical and Effective Histories: Foucault’s Methods and Historical Sociology. London: Routledge.
13.
Dean, M. ( 1995) ‘Governing the Unemployed Self in an Active Society’ , Economy and Society25(3): 357-72.
14.
Dean, M. ( 1996) ‘Putting the Technological into Government’ , History of the Human Sciences9(3): 47-68.
15.
Dean, M. ( 2007) Governing Societies. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
16.
Defert, D. ( 1991) ‘"Popular Life" and Insurance Technology’ , in G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, pp. 211-33. London : Harvester Wheatsheaf.
17.
Donzelot, J. ( 1979) ‘The Poverty of Political Culture’, Ideology and Consciousness5(spring): 73-86.
18.
Dreyfus, H. and P. Rabinow ( 1983) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Ewald, F. ( 1991) ‘Insurance and Risk’, in G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds) Studies in Governmentality , pp. 197-210. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
20.
Foucault, M. ( 1988) ‘Politics and Reason’, in L. Kritzman (ed.) Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings, 1977-1984, pp. 57-85. New York: Routledge.
21.
Foucault, M. ( 2007) Security, Territory, Population. Lectures at the College de France 1977-78. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
Frankel, B. ( 1997) ‘Confronting Neo-liberal Regimes: The Post-Marxist Embrace of Populism and Realpolitik’, New Left Review226(6): 57-92.
23.
Hacking, I. ( 1991) ‘How Should We Do the History of Statistics’ , in G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds) Studies in Governmentality, pp. 181-96. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
24.
Houstoun, L. ( 2003) Business Improvement Districts (2nd edn). Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
25.
Hoyt, L. ( 2003) The Business Improvement District: An Internationally Diffused Approach to Revitalization. Washington, DC: International Downtown Association.
26.
Humphreys, C. ( 2001) ‘"Waiting for the Last Summons": The Establishment of the First Hospices in England 1878-1914’, Mortality6(2): 146-66.
27.
Kempa, M., P. Stenning and J. Wood ( 2003) ‘Policing Communal Spaces: A Reconfiguration of the "Mass Private Property" Hypothesis’, British Journal of Criminology44(4): 562-81.
28.
Lippert, R. ( 1998a) ‘Canadian Refugee Determination and Advanced Liberal Government’, Canadian Journal of Law and Society13(2): 177-207.
29.
Lippert, R. ( 1998b) ‘Rationalities and Refugee Resettlement’ , Economy and Society27(4): 380-406.
30.
Lippert, R. ( 1999) ‘Governing Refugees: The Relevance of Governmentality to Understanding the International Refugee Regime’, Alternatives24(3): 295-328.
31.
Lippert, R. ( 2004) ‘Sanctuary Practices, Rationalities, Sovereignties’, Alternatives29(4): 335-55.
32.
Lippert, R. ( 2006) Sanctuary, Sovereignty, Sacrifice: Canadian Sanctuary Incidents, Power and Law. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
33.
Lippert, R. ( 2007a) ‘Urban Revitalization, Security and Knowledge Transfer: The Case of Broken Windows and Kiddie Bars’, Canadian Journal of Law and Society22(2): 29-53.
34.
Lippert, R. ( 2007b) ‘Open-street CCTV: Canadian Style’, Criminal Justice Matters64(summer): 31-2.
35.
Lippert, R. ( 2009a) ‘Signs of the Surveillant Assemblage: Privacy Regulation, Urban CCTV and Governmentality’, Social and Legal Studies18(4): 505-22.
36.
Lippert, R. ( 2009b) ‘"Clean and Safe" Passage: Business Improvement Districts, Security Modes and Specialized Knowledge’, paper presented at the 4th biannual Private Urban Governance conference , Santiago, Chile, April.
37.
Lippert, R. and Stenson, K. ( 2007) ‘Introduction: Special Issue on Urban Governance and Legality from Below’, Canadian Journal of Law and Society22(2): 1-4.
38.
Macrides, R. ( 1988) ‘Killing, Asylum and the Law and Byzantium’ , Speculum63(3): 509-38.
39.
Miller, P. ( 1987) Domination and Power. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
40.
Miller, P. and Rose, N. ( 1990) ‘Governing Economic Life’, Economy and Society19(1): 1-31.
41.
Nelson, R. ( 2005) Private Neighborhoods and the Transformation of Local Government. Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
42.
O’Malley, P. ( 1996) ‘Risk and Responsibility’, in A. Barry, T. Osborne and N. Rose (eds) Foucault and Political Reason, pp. 189-209. London: UCL Press.
43.
O’Malley, P. ( 2004) Risk, Uncertainty and Government. London: Glasshouse Press.
44.
O’Malley, P., L. Weir and C. Shearing ( 1997) ‘Governmentality, Criticism, Politics’, Economy and Society26(4): 510-23.
45.
O’Malley, P., N. Rose and M. Valverde ( 2006) ‘Governmentality’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science2: 83-104.
46.
Olson, M. ( 1965) The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
Ong, A. ( 2006) Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
48.
Power, M. ( 1997) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Clarendon.
49.
Pyykkönen, M. (in press, 2010) ‘Deportation versus Sanctuary: The Rationalities, Technologies, and Subjects of Finnish Sanctuary Practices’ , Refuge27(3).
50.
Rose, N. ( 1987) ‘Beyond the Public/Private Division: Law, Power and the Family’, Journal of Law and Society14(1): 61-76.
51.
Rose, N. ( 1993) ‘Government, Authority and Expertise in Advanced Liberalism’, Economy and Society22(3): 263-300.
52.
Rose, N. ( 1996) ‘The Death of the Social? Re-figuring the Territory of Government’, Economy and Society25(3): 327-56.
53.
Rose, N. ( 1999) Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Rose, N. and P. Miller ( 1992) ‘Political Power Beyond the State’, British Journal of Sociology43(2): 172-205.
55.
Shoemaker, K. ( 2008) ‘The Abolition of Sanctuary for Crimes and the Birth of Modern Criminal Law’, paper presented at the Law and Society Association meetings, Montreal, June.
56.
Silverstein, A. ( 1992) ‘First Fluffy, Now Old Mickey, Are Booted Out’ , Toronto Star (10 Oct.): E1.
57.
Stenson, K. ( 1998) ‘Beyond Histories of the Present’, Economy and Society27(4): 333-52.
58.
Thompson, E. ( 2004) ‘Churches Refuse to play "Immigration Department": Deal Would Have Given Religious Groups Right to Select Failed Refugee Claimants for Reconsideration by Minister’, Ottawa Citizen (3 Nov.): C3.
59.
Toronto Association of Business Improvement Areas ( 2007) ‘Changes in the city of Toronto Act, 2006 and the Municipal Statute Law Amendment Act, 2006 for Business Improvement Areas’ . [Accessed 26 November 2009: http://www.toronto-bia.com/resources/presentations/toronto_act.ppt]
60.
United Church of Canada (1997) Sanctuary for Refugees? A Guide for Congregations. Etobicoke : Division of Mission in Canada, United Church of Canada .
61.
Valverde, M. ( 1996) ‘"Despotism" and the Ethical Liberal Governance’ , Economy and Society25(3): 357-72.
62.
Ward, K. ( 2004) ‘Entrepreneurial Urbanism and the Management of the Contemporary City: The Example of Business Improvement Districts’ , paper presented at the American Association of Geographers Conference, Philadelphia, PA, March.
63.
Wilson, J. and G. Kelling ( 1982) ‘Broken Windows’, Atlantic Monthly (March): 29-38.
