Editorial

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beall

(2015) Criteria for determining predatory open-access publishers. Scholarly Open Access. Available at: http://crescent.education/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Criteria.pdf (accessed 9 February 2019).

Beall

(2016) Dangerous predatory publishers threaten medical research. Journal of Korean Medical Science 31(10): 1511–1513.

Beall

(2017) What I learned from predatory publishers. Biochemia Medica 27(2): 273–278.

Bohannon

(2015) Predatory publishers earned $75 million last year, study finds. Available at: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/09/predatory-publishers-earned-75-million-last-year-study-finds (accessed 9 February 2019). DOI: 10.1126/science.aad4652.

Chandrakumar

t’Jong

Klassen

(2018) The role of mainstream publishers in eliminating the threat of predatory publishing. Canadian Journal of Diabetes 42(5): 457–458.

Danevska

Spiroski

Donev

. (2016) How to recognize and avoid potential, possible, or probable predatory open-access publishers, standalone, and hijacked journals. Prilozi / Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite, Oddelenie za bioloski i medicinski nauki = Contributions / Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Section of Biological and Medical Sciences 37(2-3): 5–13.

Darbyshire

(2018) Fake news. Fake journals. Fake conferences. What we can do. Journal of Clinical Nursing 27(9-10).

Darbyshire

McKenna

Lee

. (2016) Taking a stand against predatory publishers. Journal of Advanced Nursing 73(7): 1535–1537.

Hansoti

Langdorf

Murphy

(2016) Discriminating between legitimate and predatory open access journals: report from the International Federation for Emergency Medicine Research Committee. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine 17(5): 497–507.

10.

Moher

(2016) Stop predatory publishers now: act collaboratively. Annals of Internal Medicine 164(9): 616–617.

11.

Shamseer

Moher

Maduekwe

. (2017) Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: Can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Medicine 15(1): 28.

12.

Shen

Björk

B-C

(2015) ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Medicine 13(1): 230.

13.

Watson

(2018) Predatory journals and the pollution of academic publishing. Journal of Nursing Management. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jonm.12739 (accessed 9 February 2019). DOI: 10.1111/jonm.12739.