Peer review: A good but flawed system?

Fisher D Parisis N (2015) Social influence and peer review. EMBO reports 16(12): 1588–1591.

Kampourakis K Nehm R Wong ASL . (2015) Peer review and Darwinian selection. Science and Education 24(9): 1055–1057.

Lee CJ Sugimoto CR Zhang G . (2013) Bias in peer review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64(1): 2–17.

Rajpert-De Meyts E Losito S Carrell DT (2016) Rewarding peer-review work: The Publons initiative. Andrology 4(6): 985–986.

Rennie D (2016) Make peer review scientific. Nature 535(7610): 31.

Smith R (2006) Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 99(4): 178–182.

Souder L (2011) The ethics of scholarly peer review: a review of the literature. Learned Publishing 24(1): 55–72.

Wang W Kong X Zhang J . (2016) Editorial behaviors in peer review. SpringerPlus 5 (1): 1–11.

Weicher M (2008) Peer review and secrecy in the “Information Age.” Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 45(1): 1–12.