A preliminary evaluation of the Visual CARE Measure for use by Allied Health Professionals with children and their parents

Abstract

The Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure (Mercer et al., 2004) is a patient-rated experience measure of practitioner empathy, developed and validated within adult health services. This study reports the feasibility, acceptability, reliability and validity of three adapted versions of the original CARE measure for the paediatric setting, namely the Visual CARE Measure 5Q, 10Q and 10Q Parent (also known as the Paediatric CARE Measure). Three hundred and sixty-nine participants (N = 149 children (40%) and N = 220 parents (60%)) completed the measure following consultation with an Allied Health Professional (AHP). AHPs felt it was feasible to use the measure in routine practice and the majority of children and parents found the measure easy to understand (98%) and complete (98%). Internal reliability (Cronbach’s α) was .746 for the 5Q, .926 for the 10Q and .963 for the 10Q parent. Few participants used the ‘not applicable’ response (N = 28 (8%)), suggesting high content validity. AHPs found the measures relevant (95%) and useful (90%) and reported that they were likely to use them again (96%). The Visual CARE Measure shows promise as a useful tool to enable children and their parents to give their views. Further research on the tool’s reliability and validity is required.

Keywords

Children’s participation evidence-based practice professional development quality of care therapeutic relationships

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bell

(2007) Designing and testing questionnaires for children. Journal of Research in Nursing 12(5): 461–469.

Borgers

de Leeuw

Hox

(2000) Children as respondents in survey research: cognitive development and response quality. Bulletin De Methodologie Sociologique 66(1): 60–75.

Cortina

(1993) What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology 78(1): 98–104.

Duncan

EAS

Brown

Murray

. (In preparation) The Validity of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure: A Rasch Measurement Model analysis.

George

Mallery

(2003) SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Hutchfield

Coren

(2011) The child’s voice in service evaluation: ethical and methodological issues. Child Abuse Review 20(3): 173–186.

Macnaughton

(2009) The dangerous practice of empathy. The Lancet 373(9679): 1940–1941.

Mercer

Reynolds

(2002) Empathy and quality of care. British Journal of General Practice 52(Suppl): 9–12.

Mercer

Maxwell

Heaney

(2004) The Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. Family Practice 21(6): 699–705.

10.

Mercer

McConnachie

Maxwell

(2005) Relevance and practical use of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure in general practice. Family Practice 22: 328–334.

11.

Mercer

Murphy

(2008) Validity and reliability of the CARE Measure in secondary care. Clinical Governance: An International Journal 13(4): 269–283.

12.

Mercer

Hatch

Murray

(2008) Capturing patients’ views on communication with anaesthetists: the CARE measure. Clinical Governance: An International Journal 13(2): 128–137.

13.

Mercer

Jani

Maxwell

(2012) Patient enablement requires physician empathy: a cross-sectional study of general practice consultations in areas of high and low socioeconomic deprivation in Scotland. BMC Family Practice 13: 6.

14.

Neumann

Bensing

Mercer

(2009) Analyzing the ‘‘nature’’ and ‘‘specific effectiveness’’ of clinical empathy: A theoretical overview and contribution towards a theory-based research agenda. Patient Education and Counseling 74: 339–346.

15.

Owen

Hayett

Roulstone

(2004) Children’s views of speech and language therapy in school: consulting children with communication difficulties. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 20(1): 55–73.

16.

Place

Murphy

Reid

(2012) Examining the usability and acceptability of the paediatric care measure within AHP services. Journal of the Association of Paediatric Chartered Physiotherapists 3(2): 32–38.

17.

Price

Mercer

MacPherson

(2006) Practitioner empathy, patient enablement and health outcomes: a prospective study of acupuncture patients. Patient Education and Counseling 63(1–2): 239–245.

18.

Robinson

(2010) Children and young people's views of health professionals in England. Journal of Child Health Care 14(4): 310–326.

19.

Scott

(2000) Children as respondents: the challenge for quantitative methods. In: Christensen

James

(eds), Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices. London: Falmer Press, pp. 98–119.

20.

Taylor

Haase-Casanovas

Weaver

(2010) Child involvement in the paediatric consultation: a qualitative study of children and carer’s views. Child: Care, Health and Development 36(5): 678–685.

21.

The Scottish Government (2010) The Healthcare Quality Strategy for NHSScotland. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government.

22.

The Scottish Government (2012) AHPs as Agents of Change in Health and Social Care: The National Delivery Plan for the Allied Health Professions in Scotland, 2012–2015. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government.

23.

UK Government (2012) Health and Social Care Act. Norwich: The Stationery Office.

24.

Verheul

Sanders

Bensing

(2010) The effects of physicians’ affect-oriented communication style and raising expectations on analogue patients’ anxiety, affect and expectancies. Patient Education & Counseling 80(3): 300–306.