This article aims to share critical debate on undertaking interviews with children in the home setting and draws on the authors’ extensive research fieldwork. The article focuses on three key processes: planning entry to the child’s home, conducting the interviews and exiting the field. In planning entry, we include children’s engagement and issues of researcher gender. In conducting the interviews, we consider issues such as the balance of power, the importance of building a rapport, the voluntary nature of consent and the need for a flexible interview structure. Finally, we address exiting from the child’s home with sensitivity at the end of the interview and/or research study. Undertaking research in the child’s home provides a known and familiar territory for the child, but it means that the researcher faces a number of challenges that require solutions whilst they are a guest in a child’s home.
AldersonP (2007) Competent children? Minors’ consent to health care treatment and research. Social Science and Medicine65: 2272–2283.
2.
BellN (2008) Ethics in child research: Rights, reason and responsibilities. Children’s Geographies6: 7–20.
3.
BraddingAHorstmanM (1999) Using the write and draw technique with children. European Journal of Oncology Nursing3: 170–175.
4.
BrayL (2007) Developing an activity to aid informed assent when interviewing children and young people. Journal of Research in Nursing12: 447–457.
5.
BrodyJLAnnettRDSchererDG, et al. (2005) Comparisons of adolescent and parent willingness to participate in minimal and above-minimal risk pediatric asthma research protocols. Journal of Adolescent Health37: 229–235.
6.
BurkeWDiekemaDS (2006) Ethical issues arising from the participation of children in genetic research. The Journal of Pediatrics149: S34–S38.
7.
CalleryPMilnesLVerduynC, et al. (2003) Qualitative study of young people’s and parents’ beliefs about childhood asthma. British Journal of General Practice53: 185–190.
8.
CarterB (2005) “They’ve got to be as good as mum and dad”: Children with complex health care needs and their siblings’ perceptions of a Diana community nursing service. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing9: 49–61.
9.
CarterB (2006) ‘One expertise among many’ – working appreciatively to make miracles instead of finding problems: Using appreciative inquiry as a way of reframing research. Journal of Research in Nursing11: 48–63.
10.
CarterB (2009) Tick box for child? The ethical positioning of children as vulnerable, researchers as Barbarians and reviewers as overly cautious. International Journal of Nursing Studies46: 858–864.
11.
CarterBFordK (2013) Researching children’s health experiences: The place for participatory, child-centered, arts-based approaches. Research in Nursing and Health36(1): 95–107.
12.
ChangBHHendricksAMSlawskyMT, et al. (2004) Patient recruitment to a randomized clinical trial of behavioral therapy for chronic heart failure. BMC Medical Research Methodology4: 8.
13.
ChristensenPH (2004) Children’s participation in ethnographic research: Issues of power and representation. Children and Society18: 165–176.
14.
ChristensenPJamesA (2008) Researching children and childhood cultures of communication. In: ChristensenPJamesA (eds) Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices. 2nd ed. Abingdon, VA: Routledge, pp. 1–9.
15.
ClaudioLStingoneJA (2008) Improving sampling and response rates in children’s health research through participatory methods. Journal of School Health78: 445–451.
16.
CoadJ (2007) Using art-based techniques in engaging children and young people in health care consultations and/or research. Journal of Research in Nursing12: 487–497.
17.
CoadJCoadN (2008) Children and young people’s preference of thematic design and colour for their hospital environment. Journal of Child Health Care12: 33–48.
18.
CondellSL (2008) Writing fieldnotes in an ethnographic study of peers collaborative experiences from the field. Journal of Research in Nursing13: 325–335.
19.
ConnollyP (2008) Race, gender and critical reflexivity in research with young children. In: ChristensenPMJamesA (eds) Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices, 2nd ed. Abingdon, VA: Routledge, pp. 173–188.
20.
ConroyHHarcourtD (2009) Informed agreement to participate: Beginning the partnership with children in research. Early Child Development and Care179: 157–165.
21.
CutcliffeJRRamcharanP (2002) Leveling the playing field? Exploring the merits of the ethics-as-process approach for judging qualitative research proposals. Qualitative Health Research12: 1000–1010.
22.
DuncanREDrewSEHodgsonJ, et al. (2009) Is my mum going to hear this? Methodological and ethical challenges in qualitative health research with young people. Social Science and Medicine69(11): 1691–1699.
23.
ElwoodSMartinD (2000) “Placing” interviews: Location and scales of power in qualitative research. Professional Geographer52: 649–657.
24.
EvansJA (2002) Cautious caregivers: Gender stereotypes and the sexualization of men nurses’ touch. Journal of Advanced Nursing40: 441–448.
25.
FoxRC (2004) Observations and reflections of a perpetual fieldworker. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science595: 309–326.
26.
GardnerHRandallD (2012) The effects of the presence or absence of parents on interviews with children. Nurse Researcher19(2): 6–10.
27.
GibsonFRichardsonAHeyS, et al. (2005) Listening to children and young people with cancer. Final report submitted to Macmillan Cancer Support, July, London, UK: Macmillan Cancer Support.
28.
GrayPSWilliamsonJBKarpDA, et al. (2007) Observational field research. In: The Research Imagination: An Introduction to Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 179–210.
29.
GuilleminMGillamL (2004) Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry10: 261–280.
30.
GuilleminMMcDougallRGillamL (2009) Developing ‘ethical mindfulness’ in continuing professional development in healthcare: Use of a personal narrative approach. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics18: 197–208.
31.
HammersleyMAtkinsonP (1995) Field relations. In: HammersleyMAtkinsonP (eds) Ethnography: Principles in Practice. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 80–123.
32.
HorstmanMAldissSRichardsonA, et al. (2008) Methodological issues when using the draw and write technique with children aged 6 to 12 years. Qualitative Health Research18: 1001–1011.
33.
IrvineHGaffikinM (2006) Getting in, getting on and getting out: Reflections on a qualitative research project. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal19: 115–145.
34.
KellettM (2010) Small shoes, big steps! Empowering children as active researchers. American Journal Of Community Psychology46: 195–203.
35.
KewST (2010) Text messaging: An innovative method of data collection in medical research. BMC Research Notes3: 342.
36.
KirkS (2007) Methodological and ethical issues in conducting qualitative research with children and young people: A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies44: 1250–1260.
37.
KortesluomaRLHentinenMNikkonenM (2003) Conducting a qualitative child interview: Methodological considerations. Journal Of Advanced Nursing42: 434–441.
38.
LambertVGlackenM (2011) Engaging with children in research. Nursing Ethics18: 781–801.
39.
LiamputtongP (2007) The sensitive and vulnerable researcher. In: Researching the Vulnerable: A Guide to Sensitive Research Methods. London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd, pp. 71–94.
40.
LundyLMcEvoyL (2012) Children’s rights and research processes: Assisting children to (in)formed views. Childhood19: 129–144.
41.
LundyLMcEvoyLByrneB (2011) Working with young children as co-researchers: An approach informed by the United Nations convention on the rights of the child. Early Education and Development22: 714–736.
42.
LyteGMilnesLKeatingP, et al. (2007) Review management for children with asthma in primary care: A qualitative case study. Journal of Nursing and Healthcare of Chronic Illnesses16: 123–132.
43.
MacDonaldKGreggansA (2008) Dealing with chaos and complexity: The reality of interviewing children and families in their own homes. Journal of Clinical Nursing17: 3123–3130.
44.
MarshallMCarterBRoseK, et al. (2009) Living with type 1 diabetes: Perceptions of children and their parents. Journal of Clinical Nursing18: 1703–1710.
45.
MassonJ (2000) Researching children’s perspectives: Legal issues. In: LewisALindsayG (eds) Researching Children’s Perspectives. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, pp. 34–45.
46.
MastyJFisherC (2008) A goodness-of-fit approach to informed consent for pediatric intervention research. Ethics and Behavior18: 139–160.
47.
MayallB (2002) Towards a Sociology of Childhood: Thinking from Children’s Lives. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
48.
MayallB (2008) Conversations with children: Working with generational issues. In: ChristensenPJamesAChristensenPJamesA (eds) Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group, pp. 109–124.
49.
MilnesLJMcGowanLCampbellM, et al. (2013a) Developing an intervention to promote young people’s participation in asthma review consultations with practice nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing69(1): 91–101.
50.
MilnesLJMcGowanLCampbellM, et al. (2013b) A qualitative evaluation of a pre-consultation guide intended to promote the participation of young people in asthma review consultations. Patient Education and Counselling91(1): 91–96.
51.
MorabiaACostanzaMC (2010) Engaging parents and children in designing child health research. Preventive Medicine51: 101–102.
52.
MoulesT (2012) Participation in perspective: Reflections from research projects. Nurse Researcher19: 17–22.
53.
OrtizSM (2004) Leaving the private world of wives of professional athletes: A male sociologist’s reflections. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography33: 466–487.
54.
RandallD (2012) Revisiting Mandell’s ‘least adult’ role and engaging with children’s voices in research. Nurse Researcher19(3): 39–43.
55.
ReevesCL (2010) A difficult negotiation: Fieldwork relations with gatekeepers. Qualitative Research10: 315–331.
56.
ScottJ (2008) Children as respondents: The challenge for quantitative methods. In: ChristensenPJamesA (eds) Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices. 2nd ed. Abingdon, VA: Routledge, pp. 87–108.
57.
ScourfieldJCoffeyA (2006) Access, ethics and the (re)construction of gender: The case of researcher as suspected ‘paedophile’. International Journal of Social Research Methodology9: 29–40.
58.
SinCH (2003) Interviewing in ‘place’: the socio-spatial construction of interview data. Area35: 305–312. doi: 10.1111/1475-4762.00179
59.
TaitARVoepel-LewisTMalviyaS (2004) Factors that influence parents’ assessments of the risks and benefits of research involving their children. Pediatrics113: 727–732.
60.
WatermanABladesMSpencerC (2001) Is a jumper angrier than a tree?The Psychologist14: 474–477.
61.
WattsJH (2008) Emotion, empathy and exit: Reflections on doing ethnographic qualitative research on sensitive topics. Medical Sociology Online3: 3–14.
62.
WhallAL (1993) The family as the unit of care in nursing: A historical review. In: WegnerGDAlexanderRJ (eds) Readings in Family Nursing. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, pp. 3–12.
63.
WolthersOD (2006) A questionnaire on factors influencing children’s assent and dissent to non-therapeutic research. Journal of Medical Ethics32: 292–297.
64.
WulffH (2000) Access to a closed world: Methods for a multilocale study on ballet as a career. In: AmitV (ed) Constructing the Field: Ethnographic Fieldwork in the Contemporary World. London, UK: Routledge, pp. 147–161.
65.
YeeWCAndrewsJ (2006) Professional researcher or a ‘good guest’? Ethical dilemmas involved in researching children and families in the home setting. Educational Review58: 397–413.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
