Language Input,Phonological Properties,Lexical-Semantic Knowledge,and English Past Tense Production in Dual Language Learners

Abstract

Purpose:

This preliminary study explored patterns of English past tense production, in 10 Spanish-L1-English-L2 dual language learners (DLLs), predicted by Bybee’s usage-based Network Model (NM).

Methodology:

DLLs completed the Test of Early Grammatical Impairment and the semantic and morphosyntax subtests from the Bilingual English-Spanish Assessment (BESA). The Paradis corpus was employed, as a representative corpus, to index English language input among DLLs. Using these data, we examined the relationship between language input (i.e., word and lemma frequencies for verbs) and phonological properties (i.e., stem-final endings corresponding to regular past tense allomorphs) found to relate to past tense production during English second language (L2) acquisition. Connections between English lexical and semantic knowledge and the use of the past tense were also investigated, as research has linked lexical, semantic, and broad grammatical skills during children’s L2 language acquisition.

Data and analysis:

A Friedman test and Kendall’s tau-b correlations were conducted to compare production accuracy between the allomorphs and to determine relationships between language input, phonological properties, lexical-semantic knowledge and English past tense production.

Conclusions:

DLLs produced past tense allomorphs with comparable rates of accuracy. In addition, DLLs’ use of allomorph /d/ positively correlated with their semantic knowledge in English. Relationships between past tense production accuracy, language input, and lexical knowledge were not observed.

Originality:

This study uniquely contributes to our understanding of the potential link between language input, phonological properties, lexical-semantic knowledge and English pasttense marking in dual language learners.

Significance:

These findings extend our understanding of English past tense production during childhood L2 acquisition.

Keywords

dual language learners English past tense second language acquisition word frequency lemma frequency regular past allomorphs

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berg

(2014). On the relationship between type and token frequency. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 21(3), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2014.911505

Blom

Paradis

(2013). Past tense production by English second language learners with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0112)

Blom

Paradis

Sorenson Duncan

(2012). Effects of input properties, vocabulary size, and L1 on the development of third person singular –es in child L2 English. Language Learning, 62(3), 965–994. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00715.x

Bybee

(2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge University Press.

Bybee

(2007). Frequency of use and organization of language. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001

Bybee

(2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In Robinson

Ellis

(Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216–236). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203938560

Carstairs-McCarthy

(2002). An introduction to English morphology: Words and their structure. Edinburgh University Press.

Cicchetti

D. V.

(1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284

Fenson

Dale

P. S.

Reznick

J. S.

Thal

Bates

Hartung

Pethick

Reilly

(1993). The MacArthur-Bates communicative developmental inventory. Singular Publishing Group.

10.

Gutiérrez-Clellen

V. F.

Kreiter

(2003). Understanding child bilingual acquisition and using parent and teacher reports. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(2), 267–288.

11.

Jacobson

P. F.

Y. H.

(2018). Changes in English past tense use by bilingual school-age children with and without developmental language disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61, 2532–2546. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0044

12.

Jenkins

K. C.

Anderson

R. T.

(2021). A preliminary study of the relationship between working memory, language experience, and grammatical skill in dual language learners. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25(6), 1718–1734. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069211034922

13.

Kaufman

A. S.

Kaufman

N. L.

(2004). Kaufman brief intelligence test (2nd ed.). Pearson.

14.

Kohnert

Kan

P. F.

Conboy

B. T.

(2010). Lexical and grammatical associations in sequential bilingual preschoolers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(3), 684–698. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0126)

15.

MacWhinney

(2008). Enriching CHILDES for morphosyntactic analysis. In Behrens

(Ed.), Trends in corpus research: Finding structure in data (pp. 165–197). Benjamins.

16.

Mayer

(1974). Frog goes to dinner. Penguin Books.

17.

Miller

Iglesias

(2017). Systematic analysis of language transcripts (SALT) (Research version 20) [Computer software]. SALT Software, LLC. https://www.saltsoftware.com/products/software

18.

Miller

J. F.

Andriacchi

Nockerts

(2015). Assessing language production using SALT software: A clinician’s guide to language sample analysis (2nd ed.). SALT Software, LLC. https://www.saltsoftware.com/products/referencebook

19.

Moyle

M. J.

Weismer

S. E.

Evans

J. L.

Linstrom

M. J.

(2007). Longitudinal relationships between lexical and grammatical development in typical and late-talking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(2), 508–528. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/035)

20.

Paradis

(2005). Grammatical morphology in children learning English as a second language: Implications of similarities with Specific Language Impairment. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in the Schools, 36, 172–187. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2005/019)

21.

Paradis

(2016). The development of English as a second language with and without specific language impairment: Clinical implications. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59, 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-15-0008

22.

Peña

E. D.

Gutiérrez-Clellen

V. F.

Iglesias

Goldstein

Bedore

L. M.

(2014). Bilingual English–Spanish assessment manual. AR-Clinical Publications.

23.

Rice

M. L.

Wexler

(2001). Test of early grammatical impairment. The Psychological Corporation.

24.

Simon-Cereijido

Méndez

(2018). Using language-specific and bilingual measures to explore lexical-grammatical links in young Latino dual-language learners. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(3), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_LSHSS-17-0058