Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Aims and objectives:

This study examines how cognate status and elicitation tasks affect Voice Onset Time (VOT) production in advanced Japanese-English bilinguals. It investigates whether bilinguals exhibit phonetic cross-linguistic influence in both their first (L1) and second (L2) languages and compares their L2 productions to a native English baseline to assess phonetic attainment.

Design/methodology/approach:

VOT data for word-initial /k/ were collected from 28 advanced Japanese-English bilinguals and a control group of 6 native English speakers. Participants produced cognate and non-cognate words in both Japanese (bilinguals only) and English using two tasks: picture naming and sentence reading.

Data and analysis:

A total of 2016 tokens from the bilinguals and 216 from the native speakers were acoustically analyzed. Mean VOT values were submitted to a mixed-design ANOVA to compare the groups’ English productions and a repeated-measures ANOVA to analyze the bilinguals’ productions across both languages.

Findings/conclusions:

A significant three-way interaction between Language, Word Status, and Task Type was found for the bilinguals, indicating that the phonetic cognate effect is modulated by both the language context and task demands. Critically, bilinguals exhibited a significant cognate effect in their English productions (shorter VOTs for cognates), a pattern not found to be statistically significant in the native speaker group. Bilinguals’ English VOTs were also significantly shorter overall than those of the native speakers.

Originality:

This study is the first to investigate phonetic cognate effects in a language pair with differing orthographies (Japanese-English) while also comparing different production tasks and including a native-speaker baseline.

Significance/implications:

The results provide robust evidence for the continuous co-activation of a bilingual’s two languages during speech production. The findings are discussed within an exemplar-based model of bilingual phonology, highlighting the intricate interplay of lexical and phonetic factors in shaping bilingual speech.

Keywords

Bilingualism phonetic interaction cognate effects VOT exemplar theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amengual

(2012). Interlingual influence in bilingual speech: Cognate status effect in a continuum of bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 517–530.

Boersma

Weenink

(2021). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program] (6.1.26) [Computer software]. http://www.praat.org/

Caramazza

(1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14(1), 177–208.

Costa

Santesteban

Caño

(2005). On the facilitatory effects of cognate words in bilingual speech production. Brain and Language, 94(1), 94–103.

Davies

(2008). The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/

De Groot

A. M.

(1995). Determinants of bilingual lexicosemantic organisation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8(2–3), 151–180.

Flege

J. E.

Frieda

E. M.

Walley

A. C.

Randazza

L. A.

(1998). Lexical factors and segmental accuracy in second language speech production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 155–187.

Goldrick

Blumstein

S. E.

(2006). Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: Evidence from tongue twisters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(6), 649–683.

Green

D. W.

(1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 67–81.

10.

Grosjean

(1989). Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain and Language, 36(1), 3–15.

11.

Grosjean

(1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 131–149.

12.

Harada

(2007). The production of voice onset time (VOT) by English-speaking children in a Japanese immersion program. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45(4), 353–378.

13.

Homma

(1981). Durational relationship between Japanese stops and vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 9(3), 273–281.

14.

Hoshino

Kroll

J. F.

(2008). Cognate effects in picture naming: Does cross-language activation survive a change of script? Cognition, 106(1), 501–511.

15.

JASP Team. (2021). JASP (Version 0.16) [Computer software]. https://jasp-stats.org/

16.

Kageyama

Saito

(2016). Vocabulary strata and word formation processes. In Handbook of Japanese lexicon and word formation (pp. 11–50). De Gruyter Mouton.

17.

Keating

P. A.

(1984). Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language, 60(2), 286–319.

18.

Levelt

W. J.

Roelofs

Meyer

A. S.

(1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38.

19.

Lisker

Abramson

A. S.

(1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20(3), 384–422.

20.

MEXT. (2018). Kakushikaku kenteishiken to CEFR tono taishouhyou [Comparison of the CEFR with other qualifications and examinations]. https://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/houdou/30/03/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2019/01/15/1402610_1.pdf

21.

Mousikou

Rastle

(2015). Lexical frequency effects on articulation: A comparison of picture naming and reading aloud. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1571.

22.

Nakayama

Sears

C. R.

Hino

Lupker

S. J.

(2012). Cross-script phonological priming for Japanese-English bilinguals: Evidence for integrated phonological representations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(10), 1563–1583.

23.

Nation

I. S. P.

(2012). The BNC/COCA word family lists [Unpublished paper]. http://www.victoria.ac.nz/lals/about/staff/publications/paul-nation/Information-on-the-BNC_COCA-word-family-lists.pdf

24.

National Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics. (2013). BCCWJ word list. http://pj.ninjal.ac.jp/corpus_center/bccwj/freq-list.html

25.

Pierrehumbert

J. B.

(2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition, and contrast. In Bybee

Hopper

(Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 137–157). John Benjamins.

26.

Simonet

(2016). The phonetics and phonology of bilingualism. In Oxford handbooks online: Scholarly research reviews (pp. 1–25). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935345.013.72

27.

Younes

S. A.

Mueller Gathercole

V. C.

(2020). Phonological interaction in Spanish-English bilinguals: Effects of cognate usage on voice onset time of voiced stops. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25, 709–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1715914

Interlingual phonetic interactions of Japanese-English bilinguals: Do cognate status and task type affect the production of voice onset time?