The study examines the variety of Russian spoken in Kyrgyzstan. It aims to discover what non-standard features have developed, how they relate to the contact situation, and what factors influence their emergence.
Design/methodology/approach:
The study employs several methods: participant observation, elicitation and review of secondary sources (concerning the structure of Kyrgyz), and corpus analysis.
Data and analysis:
We have utilised notes taken during participant observation in Kyrgyzstan in 2023–2024 and data from open-source oral texts (with a total length of approximately 78 minutes).
Findings/conclusions:
Our research revealed that three main factors impact the evolution of this particular form of Russian: the proportion of Russian speakers in a specific region of Kyrgyzstan, the influence of the Kyrgyz language on Russian, and internal linguistic variations within the Russian language itself.
Originality:
The article provides new language data against the background of works mainly focusing on the social aspects of bilingualism in Kyrgyzstan. The discussion of the factors influencing a non-standard variety of Russian can be used in other studies in this framework, many of which focus on either social or structural aspects (but not both) and neglect relevant features unrelated to language contact.
Significance/Implications:
A comparison of our data with published descriptions of other non-standard varieties of Russian shows that contact-induced phenomena attested in different areas have much in common, but at the same time, they are subject to typological variation.
BukrinskayaI.KarmakovaO. (2020). Regional’nye raznovidnosti russkoi rechi [Regional varieties of the Russian speech]. Russkaya Rech, 4, 7–18.
3.
BuschfeldS.KatuzschA. (Eds.). (2020). Modelling World Englishes. A joint approach to postcolonial and non-postcolonial varieties. Edinburgh University Press.
4.
DanielM.DobrushinaN. (2009). Novye russkie [New Russians]. In RemnevaM.KnyazevS.PtentsovaA. (Eds.), Voprosy russkogo yazykoznaniya. Vyp. XIII: Fonetika i grammatika: nastoyashchee, proshedshee, budushchee [Issues in Russian linguistics. Vol. 13: Phonetics and grammar: Present, past, future] (pp. 141–158). Moscow State University Press.
5.
DanielM.DobrushinaN.KnyazevS. (2010). Highlanders’ Russian: Case study in bilingualism and language interference in Central Daghestan. In MustajokiA.ProtassovaE.VakhtinN. (Eds.), Slavica Helsingiensia 40. Instrumentarium of linguistics. Sociolinguistic approaches to non-standard Russian (pp. 65–93). University of Helsinki.
DerbishevaZ. (2022). Osobennosti bilingvizma v Kyrgyzstane [Language contacts in the field of bilingualism in Kyrgyzstan]. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 1, 144–155.
Fal’kovskiyI. (2020). Russkii yazyk v Kitae [Russian language in China]. In NormanB.KusseK. (Eds.), Russkii yazyk za predelami Rossii [Russian language outside Russia] (pp. 381–413). Kabinetnyi uchenyi.
10.
FedorovaL. (2010). Osobennosti russkoi rechi tadzhkikskikh immigrantov [Some peculiarities of the Russian speech of Tajik immigrants]. In MustajokiA.ProtassovaE.VakhtinN. (Eds.), Slavica Helsingiensia 40. Instrumentarium of linguistics. Sociolinguistic approaches to non-standard Russian (pp. 266–286). University of Helsinki.
11.
HaspelmathM. (2009). Lexical borrowing: Concept and issues. In HaspelmathM.TadmorU. (Eds.), Loanwords in the world’s languages. A comparative handbook (pp. 35–54). De Gruyter Mouton.
12.
KantarovichJ.GrenobleL.VinokurovaA.NesterovaE. (2021). Complexity and simplification in language shift. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 638118. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.638118
13.
KashkinE. (2020). Osobennosti russkoi rechi nositelei mokshanskogo yazyka [Some peculiarities of the Russian speech of Moksha speakers]. Proceedings of the V. V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute, 26(4), 110–130.
14.
KashkinE. (2022). O nestandartnom (zametki o russkoi rechi gornykh mariitsev) [On non-standard features of Russian in the grammar and lexicon of Hill Mari speakers]. Rodnoy Yazyk, 2, 35–51.
15.
KhomchenkovaI. (2020). Contact-induced features in the Russian speech of Nganasans. ESUKA – JEFUL, 11(2), 13–37.
16.
KhomchenkovaI.PleshakP.StoynovaN. (2019). Nonstandard use of the ‘reflexive’ affix -sja in Russian speech of bilingual speakers of Northern Siberia and the Russian Far East. Languages, 39(4), 1–9.
17.
MakeevaA. (1995). Interferentnye yavleniya v russkoi rechi kyrgyzov – bilingvov (morfologo-sintaksicheskii aspekt) [Interference phenomena in Russian speech of Kyrgyz bilinguals (morphological and syntactic aspect)]. Extended abstract of the candidate dissertation in philology. Institute of Language and Literature, Kyrgyz Academy of Sciences.
18.
MatrasY. (2009). Language contact. Cambridge University Press.
19.
MatrasY.SakelJ. (2007). Investigating the mechanisms of pattern replication in language convergence. Studies in Language, 31(4), 829–865.
OstapenkoL.StarchenkoR.SubbotinaI. (2018). Russkaya molodezh’ Kyrgyzskoi Respubliki v XXI veke. Strategii adaptatsii [Russian youth of the Kyrgyz Republic in the 21st century. Adaptation strategies]. IEA RAS.
22.
SchneiderE. (2007). Postcolonial English. Varieties around the world. Cambridge University Press.
23.
ShagalK. (2016). Contact-induced grammatical phenomena in the Russian of Erzya speakers. In ShagalK.ArjavaH. (Eds.), Mordvin languages in the field (pp. 363–377). University of Helsinki.
24.
TagaevM. (2015). Dialog yazykov i kul’tur (na materiale funktsionirovaniya i vzaimodeistviya kul’turno-yazykovykh prostranstv kirgizskogo i russkogo yazykov) [Dialogue of languages and cultures (based on the functioning and interaction of the cultural and linguistic spaces of the Kyrgyz and Russian languages)]. KRSU.
25.
TagaevM.ProtassovaE. (2020). Russian in Kyrgyzstan. Status, functioning, and collisions between languages. In MustajokiA.ProtassovaE.YelenevskayaM. (Eds.), The soft power of the Russian language. Pluricentricity, politics and policies (pp. 134–149). Routledge.
26.
TatevosovS. (2002). The parameter of actionality. Linguistic Typology, 6, 317–401.
27.
ThomasonS. (2001). Language contact. Edinburgh University Press.
28.
WadeT.GillespieD.GuralS.KorneevaM. (2020). A comprehensive Russian grammar. Wiley Blackwell.
29.
ZakharovaO. (Ed.). (1987). Grammatika kirgizskogo literaturnogo yazyka. Ch. 1. Fonetika i morfologiya [Grammar of standard Kyrgyz. Part 1. Phonetics and morphology]. Ilim.
30.
ZhdanovaV. (2012). Yazyk russkoi diaspory: k probleme tipologii morfologicheskikh i sintaksicheskikh kharakteristik [Language of the Russian diaspora: Towards the typology of morphological and syntactic characteristics]. In ApresjanJu., et al (Eds.), Meanings, texts, and other exciting things. A Festschrift to commemorate the 80th anniversary of professor Igor Alexandrovič’ Mel’čuk (pp. 682–695). Languages of Slavic Culture.
31.
ZhuravlevaE. A. (2020). Russkii yazyk v Kazakhstane [Russian language in Kazakhstan]. In NormanB.KusseK. (Eds.), Russkii yazyk za predelami Rossii [Russian language outside Russia] (pp. 135–195). Kabinetnyi uchenyi.
