Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-12
Does the frequency of cultural switching modulate bilinguals’ performance on Executive Functions tasks? A study of highly proficient bicultural-bilinguals
This study investigates how bicultural switching could influence cognitive performance on Executive Functions tasks among bicultural-bilinguals.
Methodology:
Study 1 (n = 233) integrates self-report questionnaire data on cultural and language behaviour with a priming experiment, providing empirical evidence of young adult bilinguals’ ability to shift between multiple cultures.
Study 2 (n = 48) explores the effect of cultural switching frequency on young adult bicultural bilinguals’ performance on tests for interference and inhibition control, set-shifting ability, and attention.
Data and Analysis:
Study 1: A repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to determine the effect of different primes on participant’s ratings. We ran a two-way mixed ANOVA to ascertain the effect of interlocutors (Grandparents/relatives, Parents, Siblings, Peers/co-workers, Social media) on behaviour (Cultural, Language). Study 2: A one-way ANOVA was conducted on Simon, Flanker, and Wisconsin Card Sort tasks (WCST). Each of the three attention network components was analysed using a 2 (trial-type, within-subjects) × 2 (Switching Group, between-groups) mixed-ANOVA for the Attention Network task.
Findings:
Study 1: Participants who alternate frequently between cultural frames made a clearer distinction between Western primes than those who switched between cultural frames less, suggesting that the frequency of cultural switching could impact cognition. Study 2: Bicultural bilinguals who switched between cultural frames frequently resolved stimulus-response conflict significantly faster in the Flanker task, made fewer mistakes within each sorting block in the WCST, and had a smaller conflict effect compared to infrequent switchers in the Attention Network Task.
Significance:
This study examines the effects of bicultural switching on Executive Functions of highly proficient bicultural bilinguals, highlighting it as a potential confound in bilingual research. Bicultural switching effects on interference and inhibition-control persist even in participants at the developmental peak of their cognitive processing capabilities after controlling for a plethora of socio-linguistic variables. Our research highlights how this understudied aspect of multiculturalism may have broad implications for bilingual research in Executive Functions.
AntonE.DunabeitiaJ.EstevezA.HernandezJ.CastilloA.FuentesL.DavidsonD. J.CarreirasM. (2014). Is there a bilingual advantage in the ANT task? Evidence from children. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 398. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00398
2.
BaracR.MorenoS.BialystokE. (2016). Behavioral and electrophysiological differences in executive control between monolingual and bilingual children. Child Development, 87(4), 1277–1290. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12538
3.
BarbuC.OrbanS.GilletS.PonceletM. (2018). The impact of language switching frequency on attentional and executive functioning in proficient bilingual adults. Psychologica Belgica, 58, 115–127. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.392
4.
BarcelóF.KnightR. T. (2002). Both random and perseverative errors underlie WCST deficits in prefrontal patients. Neuropsychologia, 40(3), 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00110-5
5.
Benet-MartinezV.HaritatosJ. (2005). Bicultural Identity Integration (BII): Components and Psychosocial Antecedents. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 1015–1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00337.x
BialystokE.CraikF. I. M.LukG. (2012). Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(4), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001
8.
BlomE.BoermaT.BosmaE.CornipsL.EveraertE. (2017). Cognitive advantages of bilingual children in different sociolinguistic contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00552
9.
CarlsonS. M. (2005). Developmentally sensitive measures of Executive Function in preschool children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28(2), 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2802_3
10.
CarlsonS. M. (2009). Social origins of executive function development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 123, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.237
11.
de BruinA. (2019). Not all bilinguals are the same: A call for more detailed assessments and descriptions of bilingual experiences. Behavioral Sciences, 9(3), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs9030033
12.
de BruinA.TreccaniB.Della SalaS. (2015). Cognitive advantage in bilingualism: An Example of Publication Bias?Psychological Science, 26(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614557866
13.
DewaeleJ. (2016). Why do so many bi- and multilinguals feel different when switching languages?International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(1), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2015.1040406
DickA. S.GarciaN. L.PrudenS. M.ThompsonW. K.HawesS. W.SutherlandM. T.RiedelM. C.LairdA. R.GonzalezR. (2019). No evidence for a bilingual executive function advantage in the ABCD study. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(7), 692–701. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0609-3
16.
DuñabeitiaJ.HernándezJ.AntónE.MacizoP.EstévezA.FuentesL.CarreirasM. (2014). The inhibitory advantage in bilingual children revisited. Experimental Psychology, 61(3), 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000243
17.
EllefsonM. R.NgF. F.-Y.WangQ.HughesC. (2017). Efficiency of Executive Function: A two-generation cross-cultural comparison of samples from Hong Kong and the United Kingdom. Psychological Science, 28(5), 555–566.
18.
EriksenB.EriksenC. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03203267
19.
FanJ.McCandlissB. D.SommerT.RazA.PosnerM. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(3), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892902317361886
20.
FergusonG.BornsteinM. (2012). Remote acculturation: The ‘Americanization’ of Jamaican islanders. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 36(3), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025412437066
21.
FergusonG.BornsteinM. (2015). Remote acculturation of early adolescents in Jamaica towards European American culture: A replication and extension. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 45, 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.12.007
22.
FoxC.MuellerS.GrayH.RaberJ.PiperB. (2013). Evaluation of a short-form of the Berg Card Sorting Test. PLOS ONE, 8(5), Article e63885. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063885
23.
FriedmanR.LiuW.ChiS.HongY.SungL. (2012). Cross-cultural management and bicultural identity integration: When does experience abroad lead to appropriate cultural switching?International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36(1), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.002
24.
GrantD.BergE. (1948). A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38(4), 404–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0059831
25.
GreenD. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728998000133
26.
GreenD.AbutalebiJ. (2013). Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.796377
GrosjeanF. (2024). On bilinguals and bilingualism. Cambridge University Press.
29.
GrundyJ. G. (2020). The effects of bilingualism on executive functions: An updated quantitative analysis. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 4, 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-020-00062-5
30.
HartantoA.YangH. (2016). Disparate bilingual experiences modulate task-switching advantages: A diffusion-model analysis of the effects of interactional context on switch costs. Cognition, 150, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.016
31.
HartantoA.YangH. (2020). The role of bilingual interactional contexts in predicting interindividual variability in executive functions: A latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 149(4), 609–633. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000672
32.
HernándezM.MartinC.BarcelóF.CostaA. (2013). Where is the bilingual advantage in task-switching?Journal of Memory and Language, 69(3), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.06.004
33.
HilcheyM. D.KleinR. M. (2011). Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(4), 625–658. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0116-7
34.
HofweberJ.MarinisT.Treffers-DallerJ. (2020). How different code-switching types modulate bilinguals’ executive functions: A dual control mode perspective. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(4), 909–925. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000804
35.
HongY.-Y.Benet-MartínezV.ChiuC.-Y.MorrisM. W. (2003). Boundaries of cultural influence: Construct activation as a mechanism for cultural differences in social perception. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 453–464.
36.
HongY.-Y.MorrisM. W.ChiuC.-Y.Benet-MartínezV. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 55(7), 709–720. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.7.709
37.
HongY.-Y.ZhanS.MorrisM. W.Benet-MartínezV. (2016). Multicultural identity processes. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 49–53.
38.
HübnerR.TöbelL. (2019). Conflict resolution in the Eriksen flanker task: Similarities and differences to the Simon task. PLOS ONE, 14(3), Article e0214203. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214203
39.
HuynhQ.-L.NguyenA.-M. D.Benet-MartínezV. (2011). Bicultural Identity Integration and adjustment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(6), 819–834.
40.
KousaieS.PhillipsN. (2012). Conflict monitoring and resolution: Are two languages better than one? Evidence from reaction time and event-related brain potentials. Brain Research, 1446, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.052
LaiG.O’BrienB. A. (2020). Examining language switching and cognitive control through the adaptive control hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 1171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01171
43.
LaketaA.StudenicaA.ChrysochoouE.BlakeyE.VivasA. B. (2021). Biculturalism, linguistic distance, and bilingual profile effects on the bilingual influence on cognition: A comprehensive multipopulation approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(11), 2273–2292.
44.
LehtonenM.SoveriA.LaineA.JärvenpääJ.de BruinA.AntfolkJ. (2018). Is bilingualism associated with enhanced executive functioning in adults? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 144(4), 394–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000142
LukG.BialystokE. (2013). Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between language proficiency and usage. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 605–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.795574
47.
MansfieldK.van der MolenM.FalkensteinM.van BoxtelG. (2013). Temporal dynamics of interference in Simon and Eriksen tasks considered within the context of a dual-process model. Brain and Cognition, 82(3), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2013.06.001
48.
MarianV.BlumenfeldH.KaushanskayaM. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 940–967.
49.
MarianV.SpiveyM. (2003). Bilingual and monolingual processing of competing lexical items. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(2), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716403000092
MasudaT.NisbettR. (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 922–934. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.922
52.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429458
53.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN.EmersonM.WitzkiA.HowerterA.WagerT. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex ‘frontal lobe’ tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
54.
MontgomeryD. E.AndersonM.UhlE. (2008). Interference control in preschoolers: Factors influencing performance on the day-night task. Infant and Child Development, 17(5), 457–470.
55.
MorrisM. W.NisbettR. E.PengK. (1995). Causal attribution across domains and cultures. In SperberD.PremackD.PremackA. J. (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 577–614). Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
MückschelM.StockA. K.DippelG.ChmielewskiW.BesteC. (2016). Interacting sources of interference during sensorimotor integration processes. NeuroImage, 125, 342–349.
58.
MuellerS. T.PiperB. J. (2014). The psychology experiment building language (PEBL) and PEBL test battery. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 222, 250–259.
59.
NaeemK.FilippiR.Periche-TomasE.PapageorgiouA.BrightP. (2018). The importance of socioeconomic status as a modulator of the bilingual advantage in cognitive ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1818. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01818
60.
OysermanD.LeeS. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 311–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.311
61.
PaapK. R. (2019). The bilingual advantage debate: Quantity and quality of the evidence. In SchwieterJ. W. (Ed.), The handbook of neuroscience of multilingualism (pp. 701–735). Wiley-Blackwell.
62.
PaapK. R.Anders-JeffersonR.MasonL.AlvaradoK.ZimigaB. (2018). Bilingual advantages in inhibition or selective attention: More challenges. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1409. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01409
63.
PaapK. R.GreenbergZ. (2013). There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology, 66(2), 232–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.12.002
64.
PaapK. R.JohnsonH.SawiO. (2015). Bilingual advantages in executive functioning either do not exist or are restricted to very specific and undetermined circumstances. Cortex, 69, 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.014
65.
PaapK. R.MyuzH.AndersR.BockelmanM.MikulinskyR.SawiO. (2017). No compelling evidence for a bilingual advantage in switching or that frequent language switching reduces switch cost. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29(2), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2016.1248436
66.
PosnerM.FanJ. (2004). Human attentional networks. Psychiatrische Praxis, 31, 210–214. DOI 10.1055/s-2004-828484
PriorA.MacWhinneyB. (2010). A bilingual advantage in task switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(2), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728909990526
69.
SamuelS.Roehr-BrackinK.PakH.KimH. (2018). Cultural effects rather than a bilingual advantage in cognition: A review and an empirical study. Cognitive Science, 42(7), 2313–2341. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12672
70.
SchwartzS. J.BirmanD.Benet-MartínezV.UngerJ. B. (2017). Biculturalism: Negotiating multiple cultural streams. In SchwartzS. J.UngerJ. B. (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of acculturation and health (pp. 29–47). Oxford University Press.
71.
SimonJ. R.WolfJ. D. (1963). Choice reaction times as a function of angular stimulus-response correspondence and age. Ergonomics, 6, 99–105.
SteinmetzJ.HoussemandC. (2011). What about inhibition in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test?The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25(4), 652–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2011.568525
74.
StudenicaA.LaketaA.ChrysochoouE.BlakeyE.VivasA. B. (2022). The influence of bilingualism on adolescent cognition: The roles of biculturalism, the bilingual profile, and linguistic similarity. Cognitive Development, 63, 101203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2022.101203
75.
TadmorC. T.TetlockP. E. (2006). Biculturalism: A model of the effects of second-culture exposure on acculturation and integrative complexity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(2), 173–190.
76.
TadmorC. T.TetlockP. E.PengK. (2009). Acculturation strategies and integrative complexity. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 40(1), 105–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022108326279
77.
ThierryG.WuY. (2007). Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign-language comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(30), 12530–12535. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609927104
78.
TranC.ArredondoM.YoshidaH. (2015). Differential effects of bilingualism and culture on early attention: A longitudinal study in the U.S., Argentina, and Vietnam. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00795
79.
TranC.ArredondoM.YoshidaH. (2019). Early Executive Function: The influence of culture and bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(04), 714–732. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728918000160
80.
Treffers-DallerJ.OngunZ.HofweberJ.KorenarM. (2020). Explaining individual differences in executive functions performance in multilinguals: The impact of code-switching and alternating between multicultural identity styles. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 561088. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561088
81.
VerkuytenM.YildizA. (2007). National (dis)identification and ethnic and religious identity: A study among Turkish-Dutch Muslims. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(10), 1448–1462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207304276
82.
von BastianC.SouzaA.GadeM. (2016). No evidence for bilingual cognitive advantages: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(2), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000120
83.
WardC.SzaboA. (2019). Multicultural identity styles in plural societies: Implications for intergroup relations. European Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 63–99.
84.
WestR.HuijserH.HeathD. (2017). Cultural context and its influence on sensitivity to context. Journal of Cultural Studies, 12(3), 243–259.
85.
XieW.AltarribaJ.NgB. C. (2022). Bilingualism, culture, and Executive Functions: Is there a relationship?Languages, 7(4), Article 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7040247
86.
YangH.HartantoA.YangS. (2016). The complex nature of bilinguals’ language usage modulates task-switching outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 560. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00560
87.
YangS.YangH.LustB. (2011). Early childhood bilingualism leads to advances in executive attention: Dissociating culture and language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(3), 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728910000611
88.
YeY.MoL.WuQ. (2017). Mixed cultural context brings out bilingual advantage on executive function. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(4), 844–852.
89.
YudesC.MacizoP.BajoT. (2011). The influence of expertise in simultaneous interpreting on non-verbal executive processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 309. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.0030
