The aim of this research is to critically examine the concept of linguistic discreteness in multilingual practices, responding to contemporary debates that question the existence of languages as separate entities. We present a range of empirical data to demonstrate the theoretical necessity of maintaining the concept of language as discrete system in understanding multilingual practices. The research questions focus on how linguistic discreteness manifests in multilingual repertoires and the role it plays in the production and comprehension of the complexes of nuances of social-indexical meanings.
Data, Methodology, Approach:
This paper is a small-scale meta-analysis. The database comprises a diverse collection of empirical examples of code-switching drawn from documented studies, inter-personal interactions, media content, and linguistic landscapes. The research adopts a qualitative methodological approach to show creative, social-indexical uses of languages in multilingual contexts.
Data and Analysis:
Drawing from a range of empirical sources, this paper provides evidence to claim that multilingual repertoires do indeed exhibit discrete linguistic-epistemic inventories that are recruited routinely in complex ways in the production and comprehension of referential and social- indexical meanings.
Findings/Conclusions:
The key finding is that mobility of linguistic resources do not erase discreteness; in fact, it is precisely in the movement of various mobile resources where the discreteness of codes, or language “archives,” become significantly relevant in meaning-making.
Originality:
The paper reinforces the significance of linguistic discreteness through the synthesis of diverse examples to argue for the necessity of discrete linguistic systems in multilingualism studies.
Significance/Implications:
This paper underscores the persistent relevance of discrete linguistic systems in multilingual practices that facilitates complex meaning-making processes, enabling speakers to navigate and articulate social and referential meanings effectively. Methodologically, the research advocates for a nuanced analysis that recognizes the complexity and specificity of linguistic resources.
Limitations:
One limitation is the analytic focus, which does not capture the emic perspective of the speakers in multilingual practices.
AchebeC. (1965). English and the African writer. Transition, 75/76, 342–349.
3.
AghaA. (2009). What do bilinguals do? A commentary. In ReyesA.LoA. (Eds.), Beyond yellow English: Toward a Linguistic Anthropology of Asian Pacific America (pp. 253–260). Oxford Scholarship Online.
4.
AngermeyerP. (2015). Speak English or what? Codeswitching and interpreter Use in New York City courts. Oxford University Press.
5.
AuerP. (1998). Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction, and identity. Routledge.
6.
AuerP. (1999). From codeswitching via language mixing to fused lects: Toward a dynamic typology of bilingual speech. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 3(4), 309–332.
7.
AuerP. (2003). “Crossing” the language border into Turkish? Uses of Turkish by non-Turks in Germany. In MondadaL.DoehlerS. P. (Eds.), Plurilinguisme—Mehrsprachigkeit—Plurilingualism: Festschrift for Georges Lüdi (pp. 73–97). Francke.
8.
AuerP. (2022). Translanguaging or doing languages? Multilingual practices and the notion of Codes. In MacSwanJ. (Ed.), Multilingual perspectives on translanguaging (pp. 126–153). Multilingual Matters.
9.
BakhtinM. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. University of Texas Press.
10.
BakkerP. (1994). Michif, the Cree-French mixed language of the Metis Buffalo hunters in Canada. In BakkerP.MousM. (Eds.), Mixed languages: 15 Case studies in language intertwining (pp. 13–33). IFOTT.
11.
BakkerP. (1997). A language of our own: The genesis of Michif, the mixed Cree-French language of the Canadian Métis. Oxford University Press.
12.
BaughJ. (2018). Linguistics in pursuit of justice. Cambridge University Press.
13.
BaumanR.BriggsC. L. (2003). Voices of modernity: Language ideologies and the politics of inequality. Cambridge University Press.
14.
BautistaM. L.GonzalesA. B. (2009). Southeast Asian Englishes. In KachruB.KachruY.NelsonC. (Eds.), Handbook of world Englishes (pp. 130–144). Wiley.
15.
BellA. (1999). Styling the other to define self: A study of New Zealand identity making. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 3, 523–541.
16.
BhabhaH. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.
17.
BhattR. M. (1997). Code-switching, constraints, and optimal grammars. Lingua, 102(4), 223–251.
18.
BhattR. M. (2008). In other words: Language mixing, identity representations, and third space. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12, 177–200.
19.
BhattR. M. (2019). The poetics and politics of Englishes in late-modernity. World Englishes, 38(1-2), 41–52.
20.
BhattR. M.BolonyaiA. (2011). Code-switching and the optimal grammar of bilingual use. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 522–546.
BhattR. M.BolonyaiA. (2022). Codeswitching and its terminological other—translanguaging. In MacSwanJ. (Ed.), Multilingual perspectives on translanguaging (pp. 154–180). Multilingual Matters.
23.
BlackledgeA.CreeseA. (2017). Translanguaging and the body. International Journal of Bilingualism, 14(3), 250–268.
24.
BlommaertJ. (1992). Codeswitching and the exclusivity of social identities: Some data from Campus Kiswahili. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 13, 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.1992.9994483
25.
BlommaertJ. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge University Press.
26.
BlommaertJ. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge University Press.
27.
BlommaertJ. (2013). Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783090419
28.
BlommaertJ. (2015). Commentary: Superdiversity old and new. Language and Communication, 44, 82–88.
29.
BlommaertJ. (2019). From groups to actions and back in online-offline sociolinguistics. Multilingua, 38, 485–493.
30.
BlommaertJ.BackusA. (2013). Repertoires revisited: “Knowing language” in superdiversity (Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies; Vol. 67). King’s College.
31.
BlommaertJ.RamptonB. (2011). Language and superdiversity. Diversities, 13, 3–21.
32.
BlommaertJ.RamptonB. (2016). Language and superdiversity. In ArnautK.BlommaertJ.RamptonB.SpottiM. (Eds.), Language and superdiversity (pp. 21–48). Routledge.
33.
BolonyaiA. (2015, March 22). “Radical” code-mixing in the context of emerging superdiversity [Paper presentation]. Annual meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics (AAAL), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
34.
BonninJ. E.UnamunoV. (2021). Debating translanguaging: A contribution from the perspective of minority language speakers. Language, Culture and Society, 3(2), 231–254.
35.
BrittE. (2008, January5). Doing “being objective” in AAVE [Paper presentation]. Linguistic Society of America (LSA) 2008 Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, United States.
36.
CanagarajahS. (2009). The plurilingual tradition and the English language in South Asia. AILA Review, 22(1), 5–22.
37.
CanagarajahS. (2012). Teacher development in a global profession: An autoethnography. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2), 258–279.
38.
CatedralL. (2018). Discursive scaling: Moral stability and neoliberal dominance in the narratives of transnational migrant women. Discourse and Society, 29, 23–42.
39.
ClyneM. (1991). Community languages: The Australian experience. Cambridge University Press.
40.
ClyneM. (1994). What can we learn from Sprachinseln? Some observations on Australian German. In MattheierK.BerendN. (Eds.), Sprachinseln (pp. 105–122). Peter Lang.
41.
CookV. (2022). Multi-competence and translanguaging. In MacSwanJ. (Ed.), Multilingual perspectives on translanguaging (pp. 45–65). Multilingual Matters.
42.
DaviesE. (2008). Crossing les barricades: The use of French in some English newspaper articles. Language & Communication, 28, 225–241.
43.
DaviesE.BentahilaA. (2006). Code-switching and the globalisation of popular music: The case of North African rai and rap. Multilingua, 25(4), 367–392.
44.
DoranM. (2004). Negotiating between Bourge and Racaille: “Verlan” as youth identity practice in suburban Paris. In PavlenkoA.BlackledgeA. (Eds.), Negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts (pp. 93–124). Multilingual Matters.
45.
EckertP. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. Teachers College Press.
46.
FoucaultM. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. Pantheon.
47.
GalS.IrvineJ. T. (2019). Signs of difference: Language and ideology in social life. Cambridge University Press.
48.
GarcíaO. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Wiley-Blackwell.
49.
GarcíaO.WeiL. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism, and education. Palgrave Macmillan.
50.
Gardner-ChlorosP. (1995). Code-Switching in community, regional, and national repertoires: The myth of the discreteness of linguistic systems. In MilroyL.MuyskenP. (Eds.), One speaker, two languages (pp. 114–135). Cambridge University Press.
51.
GilesH.CouplandJ.CouplandN. (1991). Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press.
52.
GrenobleL. A.WhaleyL. J. (2006). Saving languages: An introduction to language revitalization. Cambridge University Press.
53.
GumperzJ. (1958). Dialect differences and social stratification in a North Indian village. American Anthropologist, 60, 668–681.
54.
HallS. (1980). Cultural studies: Two paradigms. Media, Culture and Society, 2, 57–72.
55.
HawkerN. (2018). The mirage of “Arabrew”: Ideologies for understanding Arabic-Hebrew contact. Language in Society, 47(2), 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404518000015
56.
HellerM. (Ed.) (2007). Bilingualism: A social approach. Palgrave MacMillan.
57.
HigginsC. (2007). Shifting tactics of intersubjectivity to align indexicalities: A case of joking around in Swahinglish. Language in Society, 36, 1–24.
JørgensenJ. N. (2008). Polylingual languaging around and among children and adolescents. International Journal of Multilingualism, 5, 161–176.
60.
JørgensenJ. N.KarrebækM. S.MadsenL. M.MøllerJ. S. (2011). Polylanguaging in superdiversity. Diversities, 13, 23–37.
61.
KachruB. B. (1965). The Indianness in Indian English. Word, 21, 391–410.
62.
KachruB. B. (1986). The Alchemy of English: The spread, functions, and models of non-native Englishes. University of Illinois Press.
63.
KarimzadF. (2020). Metapragmatics of normalcy: Mobility, context, and language choice. Language & Communication, 70, 107–118.
64.
KarimzadF.CatedralL. (2018). “No, we don’t mix languages”: Ideological power and the chronotopic organization of ethnolinguistic identities. Language in Society, 47(1), 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000781
65.
KasperG. (1997). Linguistic etiquette. In CoulmasF. (Ed.), Handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 374–385). Blackwell.
66.
KhubchandaniL. M. (1983). Plural language, plural cultures: Communication, identity, socio-political change in contemporary India. University of Hawai’i Press.
67.
KothariR.SnellR. (2011). Chutnefying English: The phenomenon of Hinglish. Penguin Books.
68.
LabovW. (1988). The Judicial testing of linguistic theory. In TannenD. (Ed.), Language in context: Connecting observation and understanding (pp. 159–182). Ablex.
69.
LeeJ. (2004). Linguistic hybridization in K-Pop: Self-assertion and resistance. World Englishes, 23, 429–450.
70.
Le PageR.Tabouret-KellerA. (1985). Acts of identity: Creole-based approaches to language and ethnicity. Cambridge University Press.
71.
LiW. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39, 9–30.
72.
LiW.GarciaO. (2022). Not a first language but one repertoire: Translanguaging as a decolonizing project. RELC Journal, 53, 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221092841
73.
LimL.PakirA.WeeL. (2010). English in Singapore: Modernity and management. Hong Kong University Press.
74.
Lippi-GreenR. (2012). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States (2nd ed.). Routledge.
75.
LüpkeF. (2021). Patterns and perspectives shape perceptions: Epistemological and methodological reflections on the study of small-scale multilingualism. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25(4), 878–900.
76.
MacSwanJ. (1999). A minimalist approach to intrasentential code-switching. Garland.
77.
MacSwanJ. (2022). Codeswitching, translanguaging and bilingual grammar. In MacSwanJ. (Ed.), Multilingual perspectives on translanguaging (pp. 83–125). Multilingual Matters.
78.
MakoniS.PennycookA. (2007). Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Multilingual Matters.
79.
MayS. (2012). Language and minority rights: Ethnicity, nationalism and the politics of language. Routledge.
80.
MayS. (2014). The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL, and bilingual education. Routledge.
81.
McCartyT. L.NicholasS.WigglesworthG. (2019). A world of Indigenous languages: Politics, pedagogies and prospects for language reclamation. Multilingual Matters.
82.
MeeuwisM.BlommaertJ. (1998). A monolectal view of code-switching: Layered code-switching among Zairians in Belgium. In AuerP. (Ed.), Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction and identity (pp. 76–98). Routledge.
83.
MøllerJ. S. (2019). Recognizing languages, practicing languaging. In JaspersJ.MadsenL. M. (Eds.), Critical perspectives on linguistic fixity and fluidity (pp. 29–52). Routledge.
84.
MoodyA. (2006). English in Japanese popular culture and J-Pop music. World Englishes, 25, 209–222.
85.
MuyskenP. (1997). Media lengua. In ThomasonS. (Ed.), Contact languages: A wider perspective (pp. 365–426). Benjamins.
86.
Myers-ScottonC. (1993a). Duelling languages: Grammatical structure in codeswitching. Oxford University Press.
87.
Myers-ScottonC. (1993b). Elite closure as a powerful language strategy: The African case. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 103, 149–163.
88.
Myers-ScottonC. (1993c). Social motivations for codeswitching: Evidence from Africa. Oxford University Press.
OtsujiE.PennycookA. (2010). Metrolingualism: Fixity, fluidity and language in flux. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7, 240–254.
91.
PennycookA. (2006). Postmodernism in language policy. In RicentoT. (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 60–76). Blackwell.
92.
PennycookA. (2017). Translanguaging and semiotic assemblages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14, 269–282.
93.
PoplackS. (1981). Syntactic structure and social function of code-switching. In DuránR. (Ed.), Latino language and communicative behavior (pp. 169–184). Ablex.
94.
RamptonB. (1995). Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents. Longman.
95.
RamptonB. (2006). Language in late modernity: Interaction in an Urban School. Cambridge University Press.
96.
RamptonB. (2011). From “multiethnic adolescent heteroglossia” to “contemporary urban vernaculars.”Language & Communication, 31(4), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2011.01.001
ReaganT. (2004). Objectification, positivism and language studies: A reconsideration. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 1(1), 41–60.
99.
ReyesA.LoA. (2009). Beyond yellow English: Towards a linguistic anthropology of Asian Pacific America. Oxford University Press.
100.
RickfordJ. R. (1986). The need for new approaches to social class analysis in sociolinguistics. Language & Communication, 6(3), 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(86)90024-8
101.
SarkarM. (2009). “Still reppin’ por mi gente”: The transformative power of language mixing in Quebec Hip-Hop. In AlimH. S.IbrahimA.PennycookA. (Eds.), Global linguistic flows: Hip Hop cultures, youth identities, and the politics of language (pp. 139–157). Routledge.
102.
SchendlH. (1996). Text types and code switching in Medieval and Early Modern English. Vienna English Working Papers, 5, 50–62.
103.
SchendlH. (1997). “To London fro Kent/Sunt predia depopulantes”: Code switching and medieval English macaronic poems. Vienna English Working Papers, 6, 52–66.
104.
SiegelJ. (2008). The emergence of Pidgin and creole languages. Oxford University Press.
105.
SmithermanG. (2000). Talkin that talk: Language, culture, and education in African America. Routledge.
106.
SridharS. N. (2020). Indian English. In BoltonK.BothaW.KirkpatrickA. (Eds.), The handbook of Asian Englishes (pp. 243–277). John Wiley.
107.
SrivastavaR. N. (1977). Indian bilingualism: Myth and reality. In SharmaP. G.KumarS. (Eds.), Indian bilingualism (pp. 51–87). Kendriya Hindi Sansthan.
108.
SternS. M. (1948). Les vers finaux en espagnol dans les muwassahs hispano-hébraiques: Une contribution à l’histoire et à l’étude du vieux dialecte espagnol mozarabe. Al-Andalus, 13, 299–346.
109.
StillwellK. (2014). Tensions, transgressions, and (contested) coexistence: Linguistic landscapes of Barcelona [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. University of Illinois.
110.
Tabouret-KellerA. (1998). Language and identity. In CoulmasF. (Ed.), The handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 315–326). Blackwell.
111.
WiddowsonH. G. (2012). ELF and the inconvenience of established concepts. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 1(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2012-0002
112.
WongA. (2021). Found in Transliteration: Translanguaging and the Polyvocality of Xiqu Centre. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 25, 26–43.
113.
WoolardK. (1999). Simultaneity and bivalency as strategies in bilingualism. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 8(1), 3–29.
