The effect of asymmetric grammatical gender systems on second language processing: Evidence from ERPs

Abstract

Aims and objectives: This study examined the effect of the first language (L1) grammatical gender (GG) system on the second language (L2) gender agreement processing, particularly when L1 and L2 are asymmetric in their number of gender values such as in Spanish and German languages. Methodology: Behavioral and brain responses (ERPs) were registered while German native-speakers (16) and Spanish-German bilinguals (24) read sentences for comprehension. We manipulated gender agreement between the determiner and the noun: Der/*die Ring, “the_masc/*the_fem ring_masc.” The nouns were either of similar or opposite gender across languages or unique in L2 (neuter gender). Data and analysis: Behavioral responses measured participants’ ability to discriminate grammatical from ungrammatical sentences. For ERPs, N400 and P600 components were analyzed by means of a linear mixed-effect model. Findings/conclusion: Behavioral data showed that German native-speakers discriminated gender agreement violations better than Spanish-German bilinguals, irrespective of lexical gender overlap across languages. Native speakers showed a P600 effect to gender agreement violations, whereas bilinguals showed an N400-like effect to gender mismatches that involved same-gender nouns across languages and neuter gender nouns. Interestingly, opposite gender nouns between L1 and L2 that agreed in gender with the determiner were processed as incorrect for the bilinguals. These results suggest transfer effects from L2 learners’ L1 GG system that facilitate L2 gender agreement processing for similar and neuter gender nouns or hinder it for opposite gender nouns across languages. Originality: This study used ERPs to demonstrate how asymmetries in terms of the number of lexical gender categories between L1 and L2 GG systems can affect L2 learners’ ability to process L2 gender agreement in a native-like manner. Significance/implications: These findings elucidate the challenges L2 learners face when learning a three-gender value system in L2, including a great number of gender incongruences between L1 and L2 nouns and a new neuter gender category.

Keywords

Asymmetric gender systems grammatical gender event-related potentials second language processing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alemán Bañón

Fiorentino

Gabriele

(2012). The processing of number and gender agreement in Spanish: An event-related potential investigation of the effects of structural distance. Brain Research, 1456, 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.03.057

Alemán Bañón

Fiorentino

Gabriele

(2018). Using event-related potentials to track morphosyntactic development in second language learners: The processing of number and gender agreement in Spanish. PLOS ONE, 13(7), Article e0200791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200791

Baayen

R. H.

(2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge University Press. http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/0521709180/ref=sr_1_2_twi_pap_1_olp?ie=UTF8&qid=1456519562&sr=8-2&keywords=statistics+for+linguistics+with+r

Barber

Carreiras

(2005). Grammatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: An ERP comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(1), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929052880101

Barr

D. J.

Levy

Scheepers

Tily

H. J.

(2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001

Bates

Mächler

Bolker

Walker

(2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Boudewyn

M. A.

Luck

S. J.

Farrens

J. L.

Kappenman

E. S.

(2018). How many trials does it take to get a significant ERP effect? It depends. Psychophysiology, 55(6), e13049. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13049

Bruhn De Garavito

White

(2002). The second language acquisition of Spanish DPS: The status of grammatical features. In Pérez-Leroux

A. T.

Liceras

J. M.

(Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax (pp. 153–178). Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-010-0291-2_6

Carrasco-Ortiz

Amengual

Gries

S. T.

(2021). Cross-language effects of phonological and orthographic similarity in cognate word recognition: The role of language dominance. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(3), 389–417. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.18095.car

10.

Carrasco-Ortíz

Velázquez Herrera

Jackson-Maldonado

Avecilla Ramírez

G. N.

Silva Pereyra

Wicha

N. Y. Y.

(2017). The role of language similarity in processing second language morphosyntax: Evidence from ERPs. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 117, 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.04.008

11.

Corbett

G. G.

(1991). Gender. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166119

12.

Delorme

Makeig

(2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009

13.

Dewaele

J.-M.

Véronique

(2001). Gender assignment and gender agreement in advanced French interlanguage: A cross-sectional study. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(3), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672890100044X

14.

Duyck

Desmet

Verbeke

L. P. C.

Brysbaert

(2004). WordGen: A tool for word selection and nonword generation in Dutch, English, German, and French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(3), 488–499. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195595

15.

Foucart

Frenck-Mestre

(2011). Grammatical gender processing in L2: Electrophysiological evidence of the effect of L1–L2 syntactic similarity. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000137

16.

Foucart

Frenck-Mestre

(2012). Can late L2 learners acquire new grammatical features? Evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(1), 226–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.07.007

17.

Friederici

A. D.

(2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(2), 78–84.

18.

Friederici

A. D.

(2011). The brain basis of language processing: From structure to function. Physiological Reviews, 91(4), 1357–1392. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00006.2011

19.

Gelman

Carlin

(2014). Beyond power calculations: Assessing type S (Sign) and type M (Magnitude) errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642

20.

Gillon-Dowens

Guo

Barber

Carreiras

(2011). Gender and number processing in Chinese learners of Spanish—Evidence from Event Related Potentials. Neuropsychologia, 49(7), 1651–1659. https://doi.org/16/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.034

21.

Gillon-Dowens

Vergara

Barber

H. A.

Carreiras

(2010). Morphosyntactic processing in late second-language learners. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(8), 1870–1887. https://doi.org/i:10.1162/jocn.2009.21304

22.

Gries

S. T.

(2013). Statistics for linguistics with R: A practical introduction (2nd revised ed.). De Gruyter Mouton.

23.

Grosjean

(2013). Bilingualism: A short introduction. In Grosjean

(Eds.), The psycholinguistics of bilingualism (pp. 5–25). John Wiley.

24.

Guajardo

L. F.

Wicha

N. Y. Y.

(2014). Morphosyntax can modulate the N400 component: Event related potentials to gender-marked post-nominal adjectives. NeuroImage, 91, 262–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.077

25.

Hagoort

Brown

C. M.

(1999). Gender electrified: ERP evidence on the syntactic nature of gender processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(6), 715–728.

26.

Hagoort

Brown

C. M.

Groothusen

(1993). The Syntactic Positive Shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(4), 439–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969308407585

27.

Hawkins

Franceschina

(2004). Explaining the acquisition and non-acquisition of determiner-noun gender concord in French and Spanish. In Prévost

Paradis

(Eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts (pp. 175–205). John Benjamins.

28.

Hopp

(2013). Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability. Second Language Research, 29(1), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312461803

29.

Jasper

H. H.

(1958). The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10(2), 371–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(58)90053-1

30.

Klassen

(2016). The representation of asymmetric grammatical gender systems in the bilingual mental lexicon. Probus, 28(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2016-0002

31.

Kutas

Hillyard

S. A.

(1980). Reading between the lines: Event-related brain potentials during natural sentence processing. Brain and Language, 11(2), 354–373.

32.

Kutas

Hillyard

S. A.

(1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307(5947), 161–163.

33.

Kuznetsova

Brockhoff

P. B.

Christensen

R. H. B.

(2017). LmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13

34.

Lenth

(2018). emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means (R Package Version 1.1.3). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans

35.

Lenth

Buerkner

Herve

Love

Riebl

Singmann

(2019). Package “emmeans”: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means (Version 1.3.4) [Computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/emmeans.pdf

36.

Likert

(1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 1–55.

37.

Lopez-Calderon

Luck

S. J.

(2014). ERPLAB: An open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, Article 213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00213

38.

Macmillan

N. A.

Creelman

C. D.

(2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide. Routledge.

39.

MacWhinney

Bates

(1989). The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge University Press.

40.

McLaughlin

Tanner

Pitkänen

Frenck-Mestre

Inoue

Valentine

Osterhout

(2010). Brain potentials reveal discrete stages of l2 grammatical learning. Language Learning, 60, 123–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00604.x

41.

Molinaro

Barber

H. A.

Carreiras

(2011). Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions. Cortex, 47(8), 908–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.02.019

42.

Moreno

E. M.

Kutas

(2005). Processing semantic anomalies in two languages: An electrophysiological exploration in both languages of Spanish–English bilinguals. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(2), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.08.010

43.

Morgan-Short

Sanz

Steinhauer

Ullman

M. T.

(2010). Second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: An event-related potential study. Language Learning, 60(1), 154–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00554.x

44.

Nickels

Steinhauer

(2018). Prosody–syntax integration in a second language: Contrasting event-related potentials from German and Chinese learners of English using linear mixed effect models. Second Language Research, 34(1), 9–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316649998

45.

Nieuwland

M. S.

Politzer-Ahles

Heyselaar

Segaert

Darley

Kazanina

Von Grebmer

Wolfsthurn

Bartolozzi

Kogan

Ito

Mézière

Barr

D. J.

Rousselet

G. A.

Ferguson

H. J.

Busch-Moreno

Tuomainen

Kulakova

Husband

E. M.

Huettig

(2018). Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension. eLife, 7, e33468. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33468

46.

Osterhout

Clifton

Frazier

(1994). Event-related brain potentials as tools for comprehending language comprehension. In Clifton

Frazier

Rayner

(Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 15–44). Lawrence Erlbaum.

47.

Osterhout

Holcomb

P. J.

(1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(6), 785–806. https://doi.org/16/0749-596X(92)90039-Z

48.

Osterhout

McLaughlin

Pitkänen

Frenck-Mestre

Molinaro

(2006). Novice learners, longitudinal designs, and event-related potentials: A means for exploring the neurocognition of second language processing. Language Learning, 56, 199–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00361.x

49.

Osterhout

Mobley

L. A.

(1995). Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(6), 739–773. https://doi.org/06/jmla.1995.1033

50.

Osterhout

Poliakov

Inoue

McLaughlin

Valentine

Pitkanen

Frenck-Mestre

Hirschensohn

(2008). Second-language learning and changes in the brain. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21(6), 509–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.01.001

51.

R Development Core Team (2016) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.

52.

Román

Gómez-Gómez

(2022). Changes in native sentence processing related to bilingualism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 757023. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.757023

53.

Sabourin

Stowe

L. A.

(2008). Second language processing: When are first and second languages processed similarly? Second Language Research, 24(3), 397–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658308090186

54.

Sabourin

Stowe

L. A.

de Haan

G. J.

(2006). Transfer effects in learning a second language grammatical gender system. Second Language Research, 22(1), 1–29.

55.

Steinhauer

White

E. J.

Drury

J. E.

(2009). Temporal dynamics of late second language acquisition: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Second Language Research, 25(1), 13–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658308098995

56.

Tanner

Inoue

Osterhout

(2014). Brain-based individual differences in online L2 grammatical comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000370

57.

Tokowicz

MacWhinney

(2005). Implicit and explicit measures of sensitivity to violations in second language grammar: An event related potential investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 173–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050102

58.

Ullman

M. T.

(2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92(1–2), 231–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008

59.

Ullman

M. T.

(2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In Sanz

(Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice (pp. 141–178). Georgetown University Press.

60.

von Grebmer Zu Wolfsthurn

Pablos Robles

Schiller

N. O.

(2021). Cross-linguistic interference in late language learners: An ERP study. Brain and Language, 221, 104993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2021.104993

61.

White

Valenzuela

Kozlowska–Macgregor

Leung

Y.-K. I.

(2004). Gender and number agreement in nonnative Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(1), 105–133. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001067

62.

Wicha

N. Y. Y.

Moreno

E. M.

Kutas

(2004). Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(7), 1272–1288. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929041920487