This study explores Spanish heritage speakers’ (HSs) knowledge of clitic climbing and the (extra-)linguistic factors that modulate it.
Design:
Heritage speakers of Spanish completed three screening tasks (a background language questionnaire, a productive vocabulary task, and proficiency task) and two experimental tasks (an elicited production task, and a forced choice task) examining their knowledge of clitic climbing in different contexts.
Data and Analysis:
Thirty-nine participants completed two experimental tasks. Each task included 32 critical items distributed in four conditions. The data were analyzed using generalized linear mixed models.
Findings:
Patterns of language exposure and use are a strong predictor for clitic climbing knowledge while the effects of age of onset of bilingualism found contradict our hypothesis.
Originality:
This study examines production and interpretation data of clitic climbing knowledge in combination with extralinguistic factors that may facilitate heritage language acquisition and maintenance. Sequential bilinguals show a stronger enclisis bias than simultaneous bilinguals.
Significance:
The results show that, in cases of optionality, self-reported heritage language exposure and use may be a stronger predictor than age of onset of bilingualism of the dominant language.
Limitations:
This study does not have acceptability data on either grammatical or ungrammatical instances of proclisis or enclisis. In addition, because the test items feature different verbs, no lexical analysis can be conducted. Finally, using an adapted version of the BLP instead of its original normed version restricts opportunities for comparability and reproducibility.
BayramF.RothmanJ.Di PisaG.SlabakovaR. (2020). Current trends and emerging methodologies in charting heritage language bilingual grammars. In MontrulS.PolinskyM. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
2.
BayramF.RothmanJ.IversonM.KupischT.MillerD.Puig-MayencoE.WestergaardM. (2019). Differences in use without deficiencies in competence: Passives in the Turkish and German of Turkish heritage speakers in Germany. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(8), 919–939.
3.
BedoreL. M.PeñaE. D.SummersC. L.BoergerK. M.ResendizM. D.GreeneK.GillamR. B. (2012). The measure matters: Language dominance profiles across measures in Spanish-English Bilingual Children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 616–629.
4.
BirdsongD.GertkenL. M.AmengualM. (2012). Bilingual language profile: An easy-to-use instrument to assess bilingualism. COERLL, University of Texas at Austin.
5.
BonetE. (1995). Feature structure of romance clitics. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 13(4), 607–647.
BreimanL.FriedmanJ. H.OlshenR. A.StoneC. J. (1984). Classification and regression trees. Chapman & Hall.
8.
BridgesK.HoffE. (2014). Older sibling influences on the language environment and language development of toddlers in bilingual homes. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(2), 225–241.
9.
CamachoJ.KirovaA. (2018). Adverb placement among heritage speakers of Spanish. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), Article 53. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.430
10.
CardinalettiA.StarkeM. (1999). Responses and demonstratives. In van RiemsdijkH. (Ed.), Clitics in the Languages of Europe (pp. 273–290). Mouton de Gruyter.
11.
CochranM.LarnerM.RileyD.GunnarssonL.HendersonC. R. (1990). Extending families: The social networks of parents and their children. Cambridge University Press.
12.
ColombiM. C. (2000). En vías del desarrollo del lenguaje académico en español en hablantes nativos de español en los Estados Unidos. In RocaA. (Ed.), Research on Spanish in the United States (pp. 296–309). Cascadilla Press.
13.
ColombiM. C.RocaA. (2003). Insights from research and practice in Spanish as a heritage language. In RocaA.ColombiM. C. (Eds.), Mi lengua: Spanish as a heritage language in the United States (pp. 1–21). Georgetown University Press.
14.
CuarteroM.RossiE.NavarroE.PascualyCaboD. (2023). Mind the net! Unpacking the contributions of social network science for heritage and Bilingualism research. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(1), Article 100041.
15.
CuzaA.Pérez-LerouxA. T.SánchezL. (2013). The role of semantic transfer in clitic-drop among simultaneous and sequential Chinese-Spanish bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 93–125.
16.
CuzaA.Pérez-TattamR. (2015). Grammatical gender selection and phrasal word order in child heritage Spanish: A feature re-assembly approach. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(1), 50–68.
17.
DaviesM. (1995). Analyzing syntactic variation with computer-based corpora: The case of modern Spanish clitic climbing. Hispania, 78(2), 370–380.
18.
DomínguezL. (2003). Interpreting reference in the early acquisition of Spanish clitics. In MontrulS.OrdóñezF. (Eds.), Linguistic theory and language development in Hispanic languages (pp. 212–228). Cascadilla Press.
19.
DuffieldN.WhiteL. (1999). Assessing L2 knowledge of Spanish clitic placement: Converging methodologies. Second Language Research, 15(2), 133–160.
20.
EisenchlasS. (2003). Clitics in child Spanish. First Language, 23(2), 193–211.
21.
FujinoH.SanoT. (2002). Aspects of the null object phenomenon in child Spanish. In Pérez-LerouxA. T.LicerasJ. (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax. The L1/L2 connection (pp. 67–88). Kluwer.
22.
GharibiK.BoersF. (2017). Influential factors in incomplete acquisition and attrition of young heritage speakers’ vocabulary knowledge. Language Acquisition, 24(1), 52–69.
23.
GiancasproD. (2017). Heritage speakers’ production and comprehension of lexically-and contextually-selected subjunctive mood morphology [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Rutgers The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick.
24.
GiancasproD. (2020). Not in the mood: Frequency effects in heritage speakers’ subjunctive knowledge. In BrehmerB.Treffers-DallerJ. (Eds.), Lost in Transmission: The Role of Attrition and Input in Heritage Language Development (pp. 72–97). John Benjamins Publishing.
25.
GoldinM. (2020). An exploratory study of the effect of Spanish immersion education on the acquisition of pronominal subjects in child heritage speakers. Languages, 5(2), Article 18.
26.
GoldinM.OteroJ. C. L.HurE. (2023). How frequent are these verbs?: An exploration of lexical frequency in bilingual children’s acquisition of subject-verb agreement morphology. Isogloss. Open Journal of Romance Linguistics, 9(2), 1–25.
27.
GollanT. H.WeissbergerG. H.RunnqvistE.MontoyaR. I.CeraC. M. (2012). Self-ratings of spoken language dominance: A Multilingual Naming Test (MINT) and preliminary norms for young and aging Spanish-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 594–615.
28.
GrinsteadJ. (2004). Subjects and interface delay in child Spanish and Catalan. Language, 80, 40–72.
29.
GrüterT.CragoM. (2012). Object clitics and their omission in child L2 French: The contributions of processing limitations and L1 transfer. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 15(3), 531–549.
30.
GuardadoM. (2018). Discourses of heritage language development I: A preliminary typology. In GuardadoM. (Ed.), Discourse, ideology and heritage language socialization (pp. 81–100). De Gruyter Mouton.
31.
GutiérrezM. J. (2014). La subida de clíticos en tiempo real y aparente en el español de Houston. In Enrique-AriasA.GutiérrezM. J.LandaA.OcampoF. (Eds.), Perspectives in the study of Spanish language variation: Papers in honor of Carmen Silva-Corvalán (pp. 301–320). Universidade de Santiago de Compostela: Servizo de Publicacións e Intercambio Científico.
32.
GutiérrezM. J.Silva-CorvalánC. (1993). Clíticos en una situación de contacto. Revista Española de Lingüística, 23(2), 207–220.
33.
HurE. (2022). The effects of lexical properties of nouns and verbs on L2 and heritage differential object marking [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Rutgers The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick.
34.
HurE.López OteroJ. C.LeeE. (2021). Attitudes and expectations towards heritage language instruction: Evidence from Korean and Spanish in the US. Languages, 6(1), Article 14.
35.
HurE.López OteroJ. C.SánchezL. (2020). Gender agreement and assignment in Spanish heritage speakers: Does frequency matter?Languages, 5(4), Article 48.
36.
KayneR. S. (1975). French syntax: The transformational cycle. MIT Press.
37.
KayneR. S. (1989). Null subjects and clitic climbing. In JaeggliO.SafirK. (Eds.), The null subject parameter (pp. 239–261). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
38.
KayneR. S. (1991). Romance clitics, verb movement, and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 647–686.
39.
KayneR. S. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. MIT Press.
40.
KayneR. S. (2000). Parameters and universals. Oxford University Press.
41.
KinsellaB. (2020). Multilingualism and the role of sibling order: Second-generation Latino children in the US. Brill.
42.
LardiereD. (2008). Feature-assembly in second language acquisition. In LicerasJ.ZoblH.GoodluckH. (Eds.), The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp. 106–140). Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
LardiereD. (2009). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25, 173–227.
44.
LevyB. J.McveighN. D.MarfulA.AndersonM. C. (2007). Inhibiting your native language: The role of retrieval-induced forgetting during second-language acquisition. Psychological Science, 18(1), 29–34.
45.
LinckJ. A.KrollJ. F.SundermanG. (2009). Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language: Evidence for the role of inhibition in second-language learning. Psychological Science, 20(12), 1507–1515.
46.
Lloyd-SmithA.BayramF.IversonM. (2020). The effects of heritage language experience on lexical and morphosyntactic outcomes. In BayramF. (Ed.), Studies in Turkish as a heritage language, 60 (pp. 63–84). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
47.
López OrnatS. (1994). La adquisición de la lengua española. Siglo XXI.
48.
López OteroJ. C. (2020). The acquisition of the syntactic and morphological properties of Spanish imperatives in heritage and second language speakers [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Rutgers The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick.
49.
López OteroJ. C. (2022). Lexical frequency effects on the acquisition of syntactic properties in heritage Spanish: A study on unaccusative and unergative predicates. Heritage Language Journal, 19(1), 1–37.
50.
López OteroJ. C.CuzaA.JiaoJ. (2021). Object clitic use and intuition in the Spanish of heritage speakers from Brazil. Second Language Research, 39(1), 161–183.
51.
LujánM. (1980). Clitic promotion and mood in Spanish verbal complements. Linguistics, 18(5–6), 381–484.
52.
Martín GómezA. (2020). Age and input effects in the acquisition of clitic climbing constructions in heritage and second language (L2) Spanish [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Purdue University.
53.
Martín GómezA. (2022). The effects of age and experience with input in the acquisition of clitic climbing in heritage and L2 Spanish. International Journal of Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069221093937
54.
MateuV. E. (2015). Object clitic omission in child Spanish: Evaluating representational and processing accounts. Language Acquisition, 22(3), 240–284.
55.
MitrofanovaN.RodinaY.UrekO.WestergaardM. (2018). Bilinguals’ sensitivity to grammatical gender cues in Russian: The role of cumulative input, proficiency, and dominance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1894. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01894
56.
MontrulS. (2002). Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 5(1), 39–68.
57.
MontrulS. (2004). Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morphosyntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 7(2), 125–142.
58.
MontrulS. (2010a). Dominant language transfer in adult second language learners and heritage speakers. Second Language Research, 26(3), 293–327.
59.
MontrulS. (2010b). How similar are adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers? Spanish clitics and word order. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(1), 167–207.
60.
MontrulS. (2015). The acquisition of heritage languages. Cambridge University Press.
61.
MontrulS.FooteR.PerpiñánS. (2008). Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning, 58(3), 503–553.
62.
MontrulS.BowlesM. (2009). Back to basics: Incomplete knowledge of Differential Object Marking in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(3), 363–383.
63.
MontrulS.Sánchez-WalkerN. (2013). Differential object marking in child and adult Spanish heritage speakers. Language Acquisition, 20(2), 109–132.
64.
MontrulS.SlabakovaR. (2003). Competence similarities between native and near-native speakers: An investigation of the preterite-imperfect contrast in Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(3), 351–398.
65.
OrtegaL. (2020). The study of heritage language development from a bilingualism and social justice perspective. Language Learning, 70, 15–53.
66.
ParodiC. (2008). Stigmatized Spanish inside the classroom and out: A model of language teaching to heritage speakers. In BrintonD. M.KaganO.BauckusS. (Eds.), Heritage language education: A new field emerging (pp. 199–214). Routledge.
67.
PengC. Y. (2020). The effects of media exposure and language attitudes on grammaticality judgments. Global Chinese, 6(1), 69–95.
68.
Perez-CortesS. (2016). Acquiring obligatory and variable mood selection: Spanish heritage speakers and L2 learners’ performance in desideratives and reported speech contexts [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Rutgers The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick.
69.
Perez-CortesS.GiancasproD. (2022). (In) frequently asked questions: On types of frequency and their role (s) in heritage language variability. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1002978.
70.
Pérez-LerouxA. T.CuzaA.ThomasD. (2011). Clitic placement in Spanish–English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(2), 221–232.
71.
PutnamM. T.Perez-CortesS.SánchezL. (2019). Language attrition and the feature reassembly hypothesis. In SchmidM.KöpkeB. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language attrition (pp. 18–24). Oxford University Press.
72.
PutnamM. T.SánchezL. (2013). What’s so incomplete about incomplete acquisition?: A prolegomenon to modeling heritage language grammars. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3(4), 478–508.
73.
PutnamM. T.SchwarzL. (2014). How interrogative pronouns can become relative pronouns: The case of was in Misionero German. STUF-Sprachtypologie Und Universalienforschung, 67(4), 613–625.
74.
RequenaP. (2015). Direct object clitic placement preferences in Argentine child Spanish [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Pennsylvania State University.
75.
RizziL. (1982). Issues in Italian syntax. Foris.
76.
Rodríguez-MondoñedoM.SnyderW.SugisakiK. (2005). The parameter of clitic-climbing: The view from child Spanish. In DeemK. U.NomuraJ.SchulzB.SchwartzB. D. (Eds.), The proceedings of the inaugural conference on generative approaches to language acquisition North America, Honolulu. (Vol. 2, pp. 241–248). MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
77.
RothmanJ. (2007). Heritage speaker competence differences, language change, and input type: Inflected infinitives in Heritage Brazilian Portuguese. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11(4), 359–389.
78.
SchmidM. S.KarayaylaT. (2020). The roles of age, attitude, and use in first language development and attrition of Turkish–English bilinguals. Language Learning, 70, 54–84.
79.
SetonB.SchmidM. (2016). Multi-competence and first language attrition. In CookV.WeiL. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic multi-competence (pp. 338–354). Cambridge University Press.
80.
ShengL.LuY.GollanT. H. (2014). Assessing language dominance in Mandarin-English bilinguals: Convergence and divergence between subjective and objective measures. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 364–383.
81.
Silva-CorvalánC.GutiérrezM. J. (1995). On transfer and simplification: Verbal clitics in Mexican-American Spanish. In HashemipourP.Maldonado SotoR.Van NaerssenM.TerrellT. D. (Eds.), Studies in language learning and Spanish linguistics in honor of Tracy D. Terrell (pp. 302–312). McGraw-Hill.
82.
SporticheD. (1996). Clitic constructions. In RooryckJ.ZaringL (Eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp. 213–276). Springer.
83.
StoesselS. (1998). The investigation of social networks as a factor in language maintenance and shift [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Boston University.
84.
StroblC.BoulesteixA.KneibT.AugustinT.ZeileisA. (2008). Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, Article 307. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9307
85.
StroblC.TutzG.MalleyJ. (2009). An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods, 14, 323–348. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016973
86.
StrozerJ. R. (1976). Clitics in Spanish [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of California, Los Angeles.
87.
ThomasD. (2012). Grammatical optionality and variability in bilingualism: How Spanish-English bilinguals limit clitic-climbing [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Toronto.
88.
TorrensV.WexlerK. (1996). Clitic-doubling in early Spanish. In Proceedings of the 20th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 780–791). Cascadilla Press.
89.
TorresJ. (2016). Flipping the classroom: A pedagogical model for promoting heritage language writing skills. In Pascual y CaboD. (Ed.), Advances in Spanish as a heritage language: Studies in bilingualism (pp. 299–324). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
90.
Treffers-DallerJ.KorybskiT. (2015). Using lexical diversity measures to operationalise language dominance in bilinguals. In Silva-CorvalanC.Treffers-DallerJ. (Eds.), Language dominance in bilinguals: Issues of measurement and operationalization (pp. 106–123). Cambridge University Press.
91.
TsinivitsD.UnsworthS. (2021). The impact of older siblings on the language environment and language development of bilingual toddlers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 42(2), 325–344.
92.
UnsworthS. (2013). Assessing the role of current and cumulative exposure in simultaneous bilingual acquisition: The case of Dutch gender. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(1), 86–110.
93.
UnsworthS. (2016). Early child L2 acquisition: Age or input effects? Neither, or both?Journal of Child Language, 43(3), 608–634.
94.
WeiL. (1994). Three generations, two languages, one family: Language choice and language shift in a Chinese community in Britain. Multilingual Matters LTD.
95.
YagerL. (2016). Morphosyntactic variation and change in Wisconsin Heritage German [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
96.
YagerL.HellmoldN.JooH.-A.PutnamM. T.RossiE.StaffordC.SalmonsJ. (2015). New structural patterns in Moribund Grammar: Case marking in heritage German. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1716.
97.
ZwickyA. M. (1994). What is a clitic? In NevisJ. A.JosephB. D.WannerD.ZwickyA. M. (Eds.), Clitics: A comprehensive bibliography 1892–1991 (pp. xii–xx). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
