Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Aims and Objectives:

Bilingual speakers that speak a null subject (Spanish) and a non-null subject language (English) may show some indeterminacy in referential choice in their nondominant language in comparison to monolingual speakers. The present study tests the production of referring expressions in the two languages of bilingual speakers (Spanish and English) to assess attainment at the discourse level and explore the role of language dominance on referential choice.

Methodology:

A group of 49 Spanish–English bilinguals participated in a picture description task in English and Spanish measuring referential choice in contexts of reference maintenance and topic-shift.

Data and Analysis:

The results of our study show that at a group level, bilingual speakers produced more underspecified references in maintenance contexts than English monolingual speakers and produced more overspecified references in topic-maintenance and topic-shift contexts than Spanish monolingual speakers. The results further show that language dominance in the target language is associated with more monolingual-like referential choice.

Conclusions:

We discuss the role of language dominance in the development of bilingual referential choice patterns.

Keywords

Referential choice Spanish English language dominance adult bilinguals

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ariel

(1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. Routledge.

Arnold

J. E.

(1998). Reference form and discourse patterns [Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University].

Arnold

J. E.

(2010). How speakers refer: The role of accessibility. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4, 187–203.

Arnold

J. E.

Griffin

Z. M.

(2007). The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(4), 521–536.

Arnold

J. E.

Strangmann

I. M.

Hwang

Zerkle

Nappa

(2018). Linguistic experience affects pronoun interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language, 102, 41–54.

Azar

Ozyurek

Backus

(2020). Turkish-Dutch bilinguals maintain language-specific reference tracking strategies in elicited narratives. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24(2), 376–409.

Bates

Sarkar

(2007). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (R package version 0.99875- 6). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html

Chamorro

(2018). Offline interpretation of subject pronouns by native speakers of Spanish. Glossa, 3(1), Article 27.

Contemori

(2021). Changing comprehenders’ pronoun interpretations: Immediate and cumulative priming at the discourse level in L2 and native speakers of English. Second Language Research, 37(4), 573–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319886644

10.

Contemori

Di Domenico

(2021). Microvariation in the division of labor between null- and overt-subject pronouns: The case of Italian and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 42(4), 997–1028. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716421000199

11.

Contemori

Dussias

P. E.

(2016). Referential choice in a second language: Evidence for a listener-oriented approach. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(10), 1257–1272.

12.

Contemori

Ivanova

(2020). Bilinguals’ referential choice in cognitively demanding situations. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24(1), 83–85.

13.

Contemori

Mossman

Ramos

(2021). Acquiring L2 pronoun interpretation biases: Implicit learning at the discourse-level in L2 English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(1), 210–227. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000152

14.

Di Domenico

Baroncini

Capotorti

. (2020). Null and overt subject pronouns in topic continuity and topic shift. Glossa, 5(1), Article 117.

15.

Givon

(1983). Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In Givon

(Ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study (pp. 1–42). John Benjamins Publishing.

16.

Grosjean

(1989). Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain and Language, 36(1), 3–15.

17.

Hendriks

Koster

Hoeks

J. C. J.

(2014). Referential choice across the lifespan: Why children and elderly adults produce ambiguous pronouns. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(4), 391–407.

18.

Jaeger

T. F.

(2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446.

19.

Jahn

D. R.

Mauer

C. B.

Menon

C. V.

Edwards

M. L.

Dressel

J. A.

O’Bryant

S. E.

(2013). A brief Spanish-English equivalent version of the Boston Naming Test: A Project FRONTIER Study. Journal of Clinical Experimental Neuropsychology, 35(8), 835–845.

20.

Keating

G. D.

Jegerski

VanPatten

(2016). Online processing of subject pronouns in monolingual and heritage bilingual speakers of Mexican Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(1), 36–49.

21.

Kohnert

K. J.

Hernandez

Bates

(1998). Bilingual performance on the Boston Naming Test: Preliminary norms in Spanish and English. Brain & Language, 65(3), 422–440.

22.

Montrul

(2004). Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers. A case of morpho-syntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 125–142.

23.

Montrul

(2006). Incomplete acquisition as a feature of bilingual and L2 grammars. In Slabakova

Montrul

S. A.

Prévost

(Eds.), Inquiries in linguistic development: In honor of Lydia White (pp. 335–359). John Benjamins Publishing.

24.

Montrul

(2018). Heritage language development: Connecting the dots. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22(5), 530–546.

25.

Montrul

Rodríguez Louro

(2006). Beyond the syntax of the null subject parameter: A look at the discourse-pragmatic distribution of null and overt subjects by L2 learners of Spanish. In Torrens

Escobar

(Eds.), The acquisition of syntax in romance languages (pp. 401–418). John Benjamins Publishing.

26.

Quesada

Lozano

(2020). Which factors determine the choice of referential expressions in L2 English discourse? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(5), 959–986.

27.

Serratrice

De Cat

(2020). Individual differences in the production of referential expressions: The effect of language proficiency, language exposure and executive function in bilingual and monolingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(2), 371–386.

28.

Silva-Corvalan

Treffers-Daller

(2016). Language dominance in bilinguals: Issues of measurement and operationalization. Cambridge University Press.

29.

Sorace

(2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 1–33.

30.

Torregrossa

Andreou

Bongartz

Tsimpli

(2021). Bilingual acquisition of reference: The role of language experience, executive functions and cross-linguistic effects. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24(4), 694–706.

31.

Torregrossa

Bongartz

(2018). Teasing apart the effects of dominance, transfer, and processing in reference production by German–Italian bilingual adolescents. Languages, 3, Article 36.

32.

Torregrossa

Bongartz

Tsimpli

I. M.

(2019). Bilingual reference production: A cognitive-computational account. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9, 569–599.

33.

Treffers-Daller

(2015). The construct of language dominance, its operationalization and measurement. In Silva Corvalán

Treffers-Daller

(Eds.), Language dominance in bilinguals: Issues of measurement and operationalization (pp. 235–265). Cambridge University Press.

34.

Tsimpli

Sorace

Heycock

Filiaci

(2004). First language attrition and syntactic subjects: A study of Greek and Italian near-native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8, 257–277.

35.

van Dijk

van Wonderen

Koutamanis

Kootstra

G. J.

Dijkstra

Unsworth

. (2021). Cross-linguistic influence in simultaneous and early sequential bilingual children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Child Language, 49(5), 897–929.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.09 MB

Referential choice in two languages: The role of language dominance

Abstract

Aims and Objectives:

Methodology:

Data and Analysis:

Conclusions:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material