The aim of this study is to examine the language processing mechanisms involved when young children bring structural innovations into their community way of speaking, as part of conventionalising code-switching practices to become a mixed language.
Approach:
The study takes a qualitative approach to the analysis of child language acquisition and adult speech data in two contexts.
Data and Analysis:
The study analyses naturalistic and spontaneous speech data of children and adults speaking the mixed language, Light Warlpiri, and adults older than that age group who do not speak the new mixed language. It compares an innovative auxiliary form in Light Warlpiri to child non-target speech in English with data taken from the Child Language Data Exchange System corpus.
Findings:
The findings are that the Light Warlpiri-speaking children used processes of re-analysis that are commonly found in child first language acquisition in other contexts to re-analyse elements of the verbal input, but because of the sociolinguistic context they created an innovative structure.
Originality:
The study is the first to directly compare processes of innovation in language contact with those of non-target structures in monolingual child language acquisition, identifying the same processes in each. It is also the first to show that a dramatic structural change from a linguistic perspective may be a small, incremental change from a child learner’s perspective.
Significance/Implications:
The significance of the study is that until now processes of innovation in language contact situations have been thought by many to differ in quality from those in monolingual child language acquisition contexts. This study shows that the child language acquisition processes are the same in each situation, but different sociolinguistic contexts lead to different outcomes for the communities’ ways of speaking. It also shows that children do not bring in new structure that is not motivated by their input; rather, they make small changes to the input they receive.
AbohE. O. (2009). Competition and selection. That’s all! In AbohE.SmithN. (Eds.), Complex processes in new languages (pp. 317–344). John Benjamins.
2.
AbohE. O. (2015). The Emergence of hybrid grammars: Language contact and change. Cambridge University Press.
3.
AbohE. O.AnsaldoU. (2006). The role of typology in language creation. In AnsaldoU.MatthewsS.LimL. (Eds.), Deconstructing creole (pp. 39–66). John Benjamins.
4.
AndersenE. (1990). Speaking with style: The sociolinguistics skills of children. Routledge.
5.
AuerP. (1999). From code-switching via language mixing to fused lects: Toward a dynamic typology of bilingual speech. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 3(4), 309–332.
6.
AuerP. (2014). Language mixing and language fusion: When bilingual talk becomes monolingual. In Besters-DilgerJ.DermarkarC.PfänderS.RabusA. (Eds.), Congruence in contact-induced language change: Language families, typological resemblance and perceived similarity (pp. 294–335). Berlin: De Gruyter.
7.
BakkerPeter. (1994). Michif, the Cree-French mixed language of the Metis buffalo hunters in BakkerCanada. In P.MousM. (Eds.), Mixed languages: 15 Case Studies in Language Intertwining (pp. 13–33). IFOTT.
8.
BakkerP. (1997). A language of our own: The genesis of Michif, the mixed Cree-French language of the Canadian Metis (Vol. 10). Oxford University Press.
9.
BavinE. L.ShopenT. (1991). Warlpiri in the 80s: An overview of research into language variation and child language. In RomaineS. (Ed.), Language in Australia (pp.104–117). Cambridge University Press.
10.
BickertonD. (1984). The language bioprogram hypothesis. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 173–221.
11.
BickertonD. (2001). How to acquire language without positive evidence: What acquisitionists can learn from creoles. In DeGraffM. (Ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony and development (pp. 49–74). MIT Press.
12.
BrugmanH.RusselA. (2004). Annotating Multimedia/ Multi-modal resources with ELANProceedings of LREC 2004, Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
13.
BruynA.MuyskenP.VerripsM. (2001). Double-object constructions in the Creole languages: Development and acquisition. In DeGraffM. (Ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony and development (pp. 329–374). MIT Press.
14.
ButcherA. (2008). Linguistic aspects of Australian Aboriginal English. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 22(8), 625–642.
15.
ChaudensonR. (2001). Creolization of language and culture. Routledge.
16.
CheshireJ.KerswillP.FoxS.TorgersenE. (2011). Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(2), 151–196.
17.
ComeauL.GeneseeF.LapaquetteL. (2003). The modelling hypothesis and child bilingual codemixing. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7(2), 113–126.
18.
de HouwerA. (1983). Some aspects of the simultaneous acquisition of Dutch and English by a three year old child. Nottingham Linguistic Circular, 12(2), 106–129.
19.
de HouwerA. (1990). The acquisition of two languages from birth: A case study. Cambridge University Press.
20.
de HouwerA. (2005). Early bilingual acquisition: Focus on morphosyntax and the separate development hypothesis. In KrollJ. F.de GrootA. B. M. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistics approaches (pp. 30–48). Oxford University Press.
21.
DeGraffM. (1996). UG and acquisition in pidginization and creolization. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 723–724.
22.
DeGraffM. (2001). Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony, and development. MIT Press.
23.
DeGraffM. (2009). Language acquisition in creolization and, thus, language change: Some Cartesian-Uniformitarian boundary bonditions. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(4), 888–971.
24.
DemuthK.McCulloughE. (2009). The prosodic (re)Organization of children’s early English articles. Journal of Child Language, 36, 173–200.
25.
DeucharM.QuayS. (1999). Language choice in the earliest utterances: A case study with methodological implications. Journal of Child Language, 26, 461–475.
26.
DöpkeS. (2000a). Cross-linguistic structures in simultaneous bilingualism. John Benjamins.
27.
DöpkeS. (2000b). Generation of and retraction from cross-linguistically motivated structures in bilingual first language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(3), 209–226.
28.
EganA. (1986). Pintaru-kurlu “The Quail”. Bilingual Resources Development Unit, NT Department of Education.
GeneseeF. (1989). Early bilingual development: One language or two?Journal of Child Language, 16, 161–179.
31.
GeneseeF.NicoladisE.ParadisJ. (1995). Language differentiation in early bilingual development. Journal of Child Language, 22, 611–631.
32.
GilesH.BourhisR.TaylorD. (1977). Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In GilesH. (Ed.), Language, ethnicity and intergroup relations (pp. 307–348). Academic Press.
33.
GilesH.CouplandN.CouplandJ. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context and consequence. In GilesH.CouplandJ.CouplandN. (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 1–68). Cambridge University Press.
34.
GolovkoE. V. (1994). Mednij Aleut or Copper Island Aleut: An Aleut-Russian mixed language. In BakkerP.MousM. (Eds.), Mixed languages: 15 case studies in language intertwining (pp. 113–121). IFOTT.
35.
GranitesR. J.LaughrenM. (2001). Semantic contrasts in Warlpiri verbal morphology: A Warlpiri’s verbal view. In SimpsonJ.NashD.LaughrenM.AustinP.AlpherB. (Eds.), Forty years on: Ken Hale and Australian languages (pp. 151–159). Pacific Linguistics.
36.
HaleK. (1971). A note on a Walbiri tradition of antonymy. In SteinbergD. D.JakobovitsL. A. (Eds.), Semantics - an interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics (pp. 472–482). Cambridge University Press.
37.
HaleK. (1982). Some essential features of Warlpiri verbal clauses. In SwartzS. (Ed.), Papers in Warlpiri grammar: In memory of Lother Jagst (pp. 217–314). Summer Institute of Linguistics-Australian Aborigines Branch.
38.
HaleK.LaughrenM.SimpsonJ. (1995). Warlpiri. In JacobsJ.von StechowA.SternefeldW.VennemannT. (Eds.), An international handbook of contemporary research (Vol. 2, pp. 1430–1449). Walter de Gruyter.
39.
HarkinsJ. (1994). Bridging two worlds: Aboriginal English and crosscultural understanding. University of Queensland Press.
40.
HartsuikerR. J.BeertsS.LonckeM.DesmetT.BernoletS. (2016). Cross-linguistic structural priming in multilinguals: Further evidence for shared syntax. Journal of Memory and Language, 90, 14–30.
41.
HartsuikerR. J.PickeringM. J.VeltkampE. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish-English bilinguals. Psychological Science, 15(6), 409–414.
42.
HudsonJ. (1983). Grammatical and semantic aspects of Fitzroy Valley Kriol(Vol. Series A, Volume 8). Summer Institute of Linguistics, Australian Aborigines and Islanders Branch.
43.
JourdanC. (1989). Nativization and anglicization in Solomon Islands Pijin. World Englishes, 8(1), 25–35.
44.
JourdanC. (2009). Complexification or regularization of paradigms: The case of prepositional verbs in Solomon Islands Pijin. In AbohE.SmithN. (Eds.), Complex processes in new languages (pp. 159–170). John Benjamins.
45.
KerswillP.WilliamsA. (2000). Creating a new town koine: Children and language change in Milton Keynes. Language in Society, 29, 65–115.
46.
KochH. (2000). The role of Australian Aboriginal languages in the formation of Australian Pidgin grammar: Transitive verbs and adjectives. In SiegelJ. (Ed.), Processes of language contact: Studies from Australia and the South Pacific (pp. 13–46.). Les Editions Fides.
47.
LanzaE. (1992). Can bilingual two-year-olds code-switch?Journal of Child Language, 19, 633–658.
48.
LanzaE. (1997). Language contact in bilingual two-year-olds and code-switching: Language encounters of a different kind?International Journal of Bilingualism, 2(1), 135–162.
49.
LaughrenM. (1984). Warlpiri baby talk. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 4, 73–88.
50.
LaughrenM. (2002). Syntactic constraints in a ‘free word order’ language. In AmberberM.CollinsP. (Eds.), Language Universals and Variation (pp. 83–130). Praeger Publishers.
51.
LaughrenM. (2013). A revised analysis of Warlpiri verb inflections plus auxiliary combinations: their makeover in ‘Light’ Warlpiri. In HendersonJ.RitzM.-E.Rodríguez LouroC. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society (pp. 1–14). Australian Linguistic Society.
52.
LaughrenM.HoogenraadR.HaleK.GranitesR. J. (1996). A learner’s guide to Warlpiri. Institute for Aboriginal Development Press.
53.
LefebvreC. (1998). Creole genesis and the acquisition of grammar: The case of Haitian creole. Cambridge University Press.
54.
LefebvreC. (2002). Relabelling: A major process in language contact. Journal of Language Contact, Thema2, 91–111.
55.
MacWhinneyB. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56.
MalcolmI.KaldorS. (1991). Aboriginal English: An overview. In RomaineS. (Ed.), Language in Australia (pp. 67–83). Cambridge University Press.
57.
MatrasY. (2003). Mixed languages: Re-examining the structural prototype. In MatrasY.BakkerP. (Eds.), The mixed language debate: Theoretical and empirical advances (pp. 151–176). Mouton de Gruyter.
58.
MatrasY.BakkerP. (2003). The study of mixed languages. In MatrasY.BakkerP. (Eds.), The mixed language debate (pp. 1–20). Mouton de Gruyter.
59.
McConvellP. (2008). Mixed languages as outcomes of code-switching: Recent examples from Australia and their implications. Journal of Language Contact, 2, 187–212.
60.
McConvellP.MeakinsF. (2005). Gurindji Kriol: A mixed language emerges from code-switching. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 25(1), 9–30.
61.
MeakinsF. (2007). Case-marking in contact: The development and function of case morphology in Gurindji Kriol, an Australian mixed language. PhD thesis (PhD), University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
62.
MeakinsF. (2011). Case-marking in contact: The development and function of case morphology in Gurindji Kriol (Vol. 39): John Benjamins Publishing.
63.
MeggittM. J. (1962). Desert people. Angus and Roberston.
64.
MufweneS. (2001). The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge University Press.
65.
MufweneS. (2008). What do creoles and pidgins tell us about the evolution of language? In LaksB.CleuziouS.DemouleJ.-P.EncrevéP. (Eds.), Origin and evolution of languages: Approaches, models, paradigms (pp. 272–297). Equinox Publishing.
66.
MüllerN.HulkA. (2001). Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(1), 1–21.
67.
MushinI.AngeloD.MunroJ. (2016). Same but different: Understanding language contact in Queensland Indigenous settlements. In VerstraeteJ.-C.HafnerD. (Eds.), Land and language in Cape York Peninsula and the Gulf Country (pp. 383–407). John Benjamins.
68.
MuyskenP. (1997). Media Lengua. In ThomasonS. G. (Ed.), Contact languages: A wider perspective (pp. 365–426). John Benjamins.
69.
Myers-ScottonC. (2000). Four types of morpheme: Evidence from aphasia, code switching, and second-language acquisition. Linguistics, 38(6), 1053–1100.
70.
Myers-ScottonC. (2003). What lies beneath: Split (mixed) languages as contact phenomena. In BakkerP.MatrasY. (Eds.), The mixed language debate (pp. 73–106). Mouton de Gruyter.
71.
NashD. (1982). Warlpiri verb roots and preverbs. Work papers of SIL-AAB, 6, 165–216.
72.
NashD. (1986). Topics in Warlpiri Grammar. Garland Publishing Inc.
73.
NashD.SimpsonJ. (1981). No-name in central Australia. Papers from the parasession on language and behavior, Chicago Linguistic Society May 1-2, 1981. Chicago Linguistic Society.
74.
O’ShannessyC. (2004). The monster stories: A set of picture books to elicit overt transitive subjects in oral texts. Unpublished series. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
O’ShannessyC. (2006). Language contact and children’s bilingual acquisition: Learning a mixed language and Warlpiri in northern Australia. PhD thesis, Linguistics Department, (PhD). University of Sydney dissertation.
77.
O’ShannessyC. (2012). The role of code-switched input to children in the origin of a new mixed language. Linguistics, 50(2), 328–353.
78.
O’ShannessyC. (2013). The role of multiple sources in the formation of an innovative auxiliary category in Light Warlpiri, a new Australian mixed language. Language, 89(2), 328–353.
79.
O’ShannessyC. (2016). Distributions of case allomorphy by multilingual children. Linguistic Variation, 16(1), 68–102.
80.
O’ShannessyC. (2016). Entrenchment of Light Warlpiri morphology. Loss and Renewal: Australian Languages Since Colonisation, 13, 217.
81.
OtheguyR.GarcíaO.ReidW. (2015). Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages: A perspective from linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review, 6(3), 281–307.
PfaffC. W. (1982). Constraints on language mixing: Intrasentential code switching and borrowing in Spanish/English. In AmastaeJ.Elias-OlivaresL. (Eds.), Spanish in the United States: Sociolinguistic aspects (pp. 264–297). Cambridge University Press.
84.
PickeringM.GarrodS. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–226.
85.
PlagI. (2008). Creoles as interlanguages: Syntactic structures. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 23(2): 307–328.
86.
QueenR. (1996). Intonation in contact: A study of Turkish-German bilingual intonation patterns. University of Texas at Austin.
87.
QueenR. (2001). Bilingual intonation patterns: Evidence of language change from Turkish-German bilingual children. Language in Society, 30(1), 55–80.
88.
RobertsJ. (1997). Acquisition of variable rules: A study of (-t,d) deletion in preschool children. Journal of Child Language, 24, 351–372.
89.
RobertsJ.LabovW. (1995). Learning to talk Philadelphian. Language Variation and Change, 7, 101–122.
90.
SandefurJ. (1979). An Australian creole in the Northern Territory: A description of Ngukurr-Bamyili dialects (Part 1) (Vol. Series B, Volume 3). Summer Institute of Linguistics, Australian Aborigines and Islanders Branch.
91.
SandefurJ. (1991). A sketch of the structure of Kriol. In RomaineS. (Ed.), Language in Australia (pp. 204–212). Cambridge University Press.
92.
SankoffG. (1991). Using the future to explain the past. In ByrneF.HuebnerT. (Eds), Development and structures of Creole languages: Essays in honor of Derek Bickerton (Vol. 9, p. 61). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
93.
Schultze-BerndtE.MeakinsF.AngeloD. (2013). Kriol. In MichaelisS.MaurerP.HaspelmathM.HuberM. (Eds.), English-Based and Dutch-Based Languages (pp. 241–251). Oxford University Press.
94.
ShnukalA.MarcheseL. (1983). Creolization of Nigerian Pidgin English: A progress report. English World-Wide, 4, 17–26.
95.
SiegelJ. (2008). The emergence of pidgin and creole languages: Oxford University Press.
SwartzS. (1991). Constraints on zero anaphora and word order in Warlpiri narrative text. Summer Institute of Linguistics.
98.
ThomasonS. G. (1997). A typology of contact languages. In SpearsA.WinfordD. (Eds.), The structure and status of pidgins and creoles (pp. 71–88). John Benjamins.
99.
ThomasonS. G. (2003). Social factors and linguistics processes in the emergence of stable mixed languages. In MatrasY.BakkerP. (Eds.), The mixed language debate (pp. 21–40). Mouton de Gruyter.
100.
ThomasonS. G. (2007). Language contact and deliberate change. Journal of Language Contact, 1(1): 42–62.
101.
TravisC. ECacoullosR. T.KiddE. (2017). Cross-language priming: A view from bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(2), 283–298.
102.
VakhtinN. (1998). Copper Island Aleut: A case of language “resurrection”. In GrenobleL. A.WhaleyL. J. (Eds.), Endangered languages (pp. 317–327). Cambridge University Press.
103.
WeberK.IndefreyP. (2009). Syntactic priming in German–English bilinguals during sentence comprehension. NeuroImage, 46(4), 1164–1172.
104.
WeiL. (2017). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(2).
