An incremental model of second language speech production mechanisms: Developmental evidence from object ellipsis in second language Chinese speech production
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2020
An incremental model of second language speech production mechanisms: Developmental evidence from object ellipsis in second language Chinese speech production
This study investigates object ellipsis in English and Korean speakers’ second language (L2) Chinese speech production and the effects of first language (L1) influence in L2 Chinese speech production.
Design:
59 English speakers and 64 Korean speakers at various Chinese proficiency levels, as well as 16 native speakers of Chinese, participated in the study. In addition to an acceptability judgement test, an utterance-recall task was employed in the study to prime participants for relevant structures.
Findings:
There are early stages where derivations, such as move, deletion, etc., are not implemented in L2 speech production, although at later stages L2 speech production mechanisms can converge with that of native speakers. No evidence of L1 influence is found, and L2 learners are found to behave differently in the utterance-recall task and the sentence acceptability judgement task.
Originality:
The study includes data from L2 Chinese learners from beginner to advanced levels and provides a comprehensive picture of structural priming effects on the development of L2 speech production.
Implications:
There is a discontinuity in the development of L2 speech production mechanisms, and the development of the mechanisms is incremental in nature. Mechanisms for L2 language comprehension are different from those for L2 speech production, at least as far as L2 at the early stages is concerned.
AdgerD. (2003). Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
BernoletS.HartsuikerR. J.PickeringM. J. (2007). Shared syntactic representations in bilinguals: Evidence for the role of word-order repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 33, 931–49.
3.
BernoletS.HartsuikerR. J.PickeringM. J. (2013). From language-specific to shared syntactic representations: The influence of second language proficiency on syntactic sharing in bilinguals. Cognition, 127, 287–306.
4.
BockJ. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387.
5.
BockJ. K.LeveltW. J. M. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In GernsbacherM. A. (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 945–984). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6.
BockJ. K.WarrenR. K. (1985). Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation. Cognition, 21, 47–67.
7.
ChomskyN. (1993). A Minimalist program for linguistic theory. In HaleK.KeyserS. J. (Eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberge (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
ChrabaszczA.JiangN. (2014). The role of the native language in the use of the English nongeneric definite article by L2 learners: A cross-linguistic comparison. Second Language Research, 30, 351–379.
9.
DellG. S.FerreiraV. S. (2016). Thirty years of structural priming: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Memory and Language, 91, 1–4.
10.
ErlamR. (2006). Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge: An empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics, 27, 464–491.
11.
ErlamR. (2009). The elicited oral imitation test as a measure of implicit knowledge. In EllisR.LoewenS.ElderC.ErlamR.PhilpJ.ReindersH. (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 65–93). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
12.
FerreiraF.EngelhardtP. E. (2006). Syntax and production. In TraxlerM. J.GernsbacherM. A. (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 61–91). London: Academic Press.
13.
GathercoleS. E.AllowayT. P. (2007). Understanding working memory: A classroom guide. Lontoo: Harcourt Assessment.
14.
HartsuikerR. J.PickeringM. J.VeltkampE. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish–English bilinguals. Psychological Science, 15, 409–414.
15.
HawkinsR.AlthobaitiM.MaY. (2012). Eliminating grammatical function assignment from hierarchical models of speech production: Evidence from the conceptual accessibility of referents. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 677–707.
16.
HuangC.-T. J. (1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 531–574.
17.
IndefreyP. (2018). The relationship between syntactic production and comprehension. In RueschemeyerS.-A.GaskellM. G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 547–564). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
JinH.-G. (1994). Topic-prominence and subject-prominence in L2 acquisition: Evidence of English-to-Chinese typological transfer. Language Learning, 44, 101–122.
19.
JohnsonK. (2001). What VP ellipsis can do, and what it can’t, but not why. In BaltinM.CollinsC. (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory (pp. 439–479). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
20.
KimY.McDonoughK. (2008). Learners’ production of passives during syntactic priming activities. Applied Linguistics, 29, 149–154.
21.
Larsen-FreemanD.LongM. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.
22.
LiC. N.ThompsonS. A. (1976). Subject and topic: A new typology. In LiC. N. (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 457–489). New York: Academic Press.
23.
LiY.-H. A. (2005). Shenglue yu queshi [Ellipsis and missing objects]. Yuyan Kexue [Linguistic Sciences], 15, 3–19.
24.
LiY.-H. A. (2014). Born empty. Lingua, 151, 43–68.
25.
LiY.-H. A.WeiT.-C. (2014). Ellipsis. In HuangC-T. J.LiY.-H. A.SimpsonA. (Eds.), The handbook of Chinese linguistics (pp. 275–310). New Jersey: Wiley Blackwell.
26.
LiuC.-M. L. (2014). A modular theory of radical pro-drop (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Harvard University.
27.
LobeckA. (1995). Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing and identification. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
LobeckA. (1999). VP ellipsis and the minimalist program: Some speculations and proposals. In LappinS.BenmamounE. (Eds.), Fragments-studies in ellipsis and gapping (pp. 98–123). New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
MaiZ. (2012). Properties of the (shi). . .de focus construction in adult L2 acquisition and heritage language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
30.
MartinsA. M. (1994). Enclisis, VP-deletion and the nature of Sigma. Probus, 6, 173–205.
31.
MerchantJ. (2001). The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
MerchantJ. (2004). Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, 661–738.
33.
OtaniK.WhitmanJ. (1991). V-Raising and VP-Ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 345–358.
34.
ParadisM. (1994). Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: Implications for bilingualism and SLA. In EllisN. (Ed.), Implicit and explicit language learning (pp. 393–419). London: Academic Press.
35.
ParadisM. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
36.
ParadisM. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
37.
RomanoF. (2018). The basic continuity hypothesis of L1 to L2 production. Second Language Research, 34, 275–308.
38.
SaitoM. (2007). Notes on East Asian argument ellipsis. Language Research, 43, 203–227.
39.
SchwartzB. D.SprouseR. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72.
40.
ShiD. (1989). Topic chain as a syntactic category in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 17, 223–259.
41.
SimpsonA. (2014). Verbal answers to yes/no question, focus and ellipsis. In LiA.SimpsonA.TsaiD. (Eds.), Chinese syntax in a cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 299–333). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
SohH. L. (2007). Ellipsis, last resort, and the dummy auxiliary shi ‘be’ in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistic Inquiry, 38, 178–188.
43.
TsaoF.-F. (1977). A Functional Study of Topic in Chinese: The first step towards discourse analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South California, Los Angeles.
44.
UllmanM. T. (2001). The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 37–69.
