Cantonese tone production in pre-school Urdu–Cantonese bilingual minority children

Abstract

Aim:

In this study, we examine the production of Cantonese tones by preschool Urdu–Cantonese children living in Hong Kong.

Methodology:

21 first language Urdu second language Cantonese children (ages 4–6) and 20 age-matched first language Cantonese children participated in a picture-naming experiment with 86 words (109 syllables in total).

Data and Analysis:

Acoustic analysis was carried out for perceptually correct and incorrect tone productions of each tone. Comparisons were also made across speaker groups regarding accuracy rates and error patterns.

Findings:

Overall, first-language Urdu participants had lower accuracy and greater tone confusion than first language Cantonese participants. The pattern is attributable to influence from Urdu prosody, ongoing Cantonese tone mergers, and general sensitivity to phonetic information.

Originality:

This is the first empirical study on the acquisition of Cantonese tones by children who are heritage speakers of a non-tone language.

Significance:

This study extends the literature of early bilingual phonology by furthering our understanding of an under-studied bilingual population, that is, heritage children of a non-tone language acquiring a tone language as the majority language. The findings of this study also produce implications for the practice of language educators and speech therapy professionals working with bilingual children.

Keywords

Hong Kong Cantonese lexical tone Urdu prosody early bilingual acquisition South Asian heritage speakers in Hong Kong

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

T. K.

Knightly

L. M.

Jun

J. S.

(2002). Overhearing a language during childhood. Psychological Science, 13(3), 238–243.

Bates

Maechler

Bolker

Walker

(2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.

Best

C. T.

(1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange

(Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 167–200). Baltimore: York Press

Best

C. T

Tyler

M. D.

(2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn

O. S.

Munro

(Eds.), Second-language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production. A Festschrift in Honour of James E. Flege (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Boersma

Weenink

(2017). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/

Census and Statistics Department of HKSAR. (2011). Thematic Report: Ethnic Minorities. Hong Kong.

Chang

C. B.

Yao

(2016). Toward an understanding of heritage prosody: Acoustic and perceptual properties of tone produced by heritage, native, and second language speakers of Mandarin. Heritage Language Journal, 13(2), 134–160.

Chang

C. B.

Yao

(2019). Production of neutral tone in Mandarin by heritage, native and second language speakers. In Calhoun

Escudero

Tabain

Warren

(Eds.) Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019 (pp. 2291–2295). Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.

Chang

C. B.

Yao

Haynes

E. F.

Rhodes

(2011). Production of phonetic and phonological contrast by heritage speakers of Mandarin. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(6), 3964–3980.

10.

Chang

Y. S.

Yao

Huang

B. H.

(2017). Effects of linguistic experience on the perception of high-variability non-native tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(2), EL120–EL126.

11.

Cheung

P. S. P.

Lee

K. Y. S.

Lee

L. W. T.

(1997). The development of the ‘Cantonese Receptive Vocabulary Test’ for children aged 2–6 in Hong Kong. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 32(1), 127–138.

12.

Dunn

L. M.

Dunn

D. M.

(2007). PPVT-4: Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Boulder, CO: Pearson Assessments.

13.

Flege

J. E.

(1996). English vowel production by Dutch talkers: More evidence for the “similar” vs “new” distinction. In James

A. R.

Leather

(Eds.), Second-language speech: Structure and process (pp. 11–52). Berlin: de Gruyter.

14.

Francis

A. L.

Ciocca

Fenn

(2008). Perceptual learning of Cantonese lexical tones by tone and non-tone language speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 36(2), 268–294.

15.

Hallé

P. A.

Chang

Best

C. T.

(2004). Identification and discrimination of Mandarin Chinese tones by Mandarin Chinese vs . French listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 32(3), 395–421.

16.

Hao

Y.-C.

(2012). Second language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese tones by tonal and non-tonal language speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 40(2), 269–279.

17.

Holm

Dodd

(1999). A longitudinal study of the phonological development of two Cantonese–English bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20(3), 349–376.

18.

Holm

Dodd

(2006). Phonological development and disorder of bilingual children acquiring Cantonese and English. In Zhu

Dodd

(Eds.), Phonological development and disorders in children: A multilingual perspective (pp. 286–325). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

19.

Hong Kong Unison. (2012). Report: Survey on Kindergarten Education for Ethnic Minority Students in Hong Kong. April 2012. Retrieved from http://www.unison.org.hk/DocumentDownload/Researches/R201204%20Kindergarten%20Survey%20Report.pdf

20.

Hussain

(1997). Phonetic correlates of lexical stress in Urdu. PhD thesis, Illinois, Northwestern University.

21.

Jabeen

(2010). An acoustic study of the influence of Urdu on the intonation patterns of English in Pakistan. Government College University Faisalabad.

22.

Kan

R. T. Y.

Schmid

M. S.

(2019). Development of tonal discrimination in young heritage speakers of Cantonese. Journal of Phonetics, 73, 40–54.

23.

Khouw

Ciocca

(2007). Perceptual correlates of Cantonese tones. Journal of Phonetics, 35(1), 104–117.

24.

Law

N. C. W.

L. K. H.

(2006). The relationship of phonological development and language dominance in bilingual Cantonese–Putonghua children. International Journal of Bilingualism, 10(4), 405–427.

25.

Lee

K. Y. S.

Chan

K. T. Y.

Lam

J. H. S.

Van Hasselt

C. A.

Tong

M. C. F.

(2015). Lexical tone perception in native speakers of Cantonese. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(1), 53–62.

26.

D. C. S.

Chuk

J. Y. P.

(2015). South Asian students’ needs for Cantonese and written Chinese in Hong Kong: A linguistic study. International Journal of Multilingualism, 12(2), 210–224.

27.

Lloyd-Smith

Einfeldt

Kupisch

(2019). Italian-German bilinguals: The effects of heritage language use on accent in early-acquired languages. International Journal of Bilingualism. Epub ahead of print 10 February 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1367006919826867.

28.

Mok

P. P. K.

Lee

(2018). The acquisition of lexical tones by Cantonese–English bilingual children. Journal of Child Language, 45(6), 1357–1376.

29.

Mok

P. P. K.

Fung

H. S. H.

V. G.

(2019). Assessing the link between perception and production in Cantonese tone acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 62(5), 1243–1257.

30.

Mok

P. P. K.

Zuo

Wong

P. W. Y.

(2013). Production and perception of a sound change in progress: Tone merging in Hong Kong Cantonese. Language Variation and Change, 25(3), 341–370.

31.

J. S.

T. K.

Jun

S. A.

(2010). Early childhood language memory in the speech perception of international adoptees. Journal of Child Language, 37(5), 1123–1132.

32.

Ohala

(1986). A search for the phonetic correlates of Hindi stress. In Krishnamurti

(Ed.), South Asian Languages: Structure, convergence, and diglossia (pp. 81–92). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

33.

Polinsky

(2018). Heritage languages and their speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

34.

Polinsky

Kagan

(2007). Heritage languages : In the ‘wild’ and in the classroom. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(5), 368–395.

35.

Puri

(2013). Intonation in Indian English and Hindi late and simultaneous bilinguals. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

36.

R Core

. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/

37.

Rao

(2015). Manifestations of /bdg/ in Heritage Speakers of Spanish. Heritage Language Journal, 12(1), 48–74.

38.

Shi

(1986). Tianjin fangyan shuangzizu shengdiao fenxi [An analysis of the bisyllabic tones in Tianjin dialect]. Yuyan Yanjiu, 10, 77–90.

39.

Shum

M. S. K.

Gao

Tsung

W.-W.

(2011). South asian students’ Chinese language learning in Hong Kong: Motivations and strategies. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 32(3), 285–297.

40.

C. K.

Best

C. T.

(2010). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech, 53(2), 273–293.

41.

C. K.

Best

C. T.

(2011). Categorizing mandarin tones into listeners’ native prosodic categories: The role of phonetic properties. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 47(1), 133–145.

42.

C. K.

Best

C. T.

(2014). Phonetic influences on english and french listeners’ assimilation of mandarin tones to native prosodic categories. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(2), 195–221.

43.

L. K. H.

Dodd

B. J.

(1995). The acquisition of phonology by Cantonese-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 22(3), 473–495.

44.

C. K. S.

Cheung

P. S. P.

Mcleod

(2013). A population study of children’s acquisition of Hong Kong Cantonese consonants, vowels, and tones. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 56(1), 103–122.

45.

Wang

Jongman

Sereno

J. A.

(2003). Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(2), 1033–1043.

46.

Wayland

R. P.

Guion

S. G.

(2004). Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: A preliminary report. Language Learning, 54(4), 681–712.

47.

Wong

(2013). Perceptual evidence for protracted development in monosyllabic Mandarin lexical tone production in preschool children in Taiwan. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(1), 434–443.

48.

Wong

Leung

C. T.-T.

(2018). Suprasegmental features are not acquired early: Perception and production of monosyllabic Cantonese lexical tones in 4- to 6-year-old preschool children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 61(5), 1070–1085.

49.

(2013). ProsodyPro – A tool for large-scale systematic prosody analysis. Proceedings of Tools and Resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody (TRASP 2013), 7–10. Aix-en-Provence, France. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4534/80b67a15cac4ec47b52c3a2eea241c18db64.pdf

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.49 MB