We investigate the robustness of cross-language phonetic correspondences in two bilingual communities over time, focusing on whether corresponding sounds (e.g. Mandarin /s/ and Korean /s’/) remain coupled in the face of language change, or whether the categories diverge over time in younger, more proficient bilinguals.
Design/Methodology/Approach:
We quantify the extent of assimilation versus independence of categories across languages by comparing bilinguals’ production of place of articulation and laryngeal contrasts in Mandarin and Korean sibilants. Distinct language-internal changes were expected on each dimension.
Data and analysis:
107 speakers varying in age (aged 19–83), gender, and dialect participated in the study. Acoustic measurements (center of gravity of frication, voice onset time) and statistical analyses were performed on a total of ~11,000 tokens.
Findings/Conclusions:
The extent of cross-language independence differed on the two dimensions. Corresponding segments across the two languages remained tightly coupled in terms of place of articulation, even in the face of change; on the other hand, a language-internal change in the Korean laryngeal contrast left corresponding Mandarin segments unaffected, resulting in divergence of originally corresponding categories. We also found unpredicted changes on each dimension, and these changes progressed concurrently in the two languages.
Originality:
The study of correspondences in the context of independent sound change provides a unique perspective from which to evaluate the robustness of cross-language interaction, and the parallel analysis of two separate dimensions in two communities adds to the generalizability of results.
Significance/Implications:
Most changes occurred concurrently in the two languages, suggesting that similar phonetic categories across languages can remain tightly coupled, even in highly proficient bilinguals where phonetic independence is expected. However, one of the primary expected changes (voice onset time merger in Korean) did not affect corresponding segments in Mandarin, indicating that the extent of cross-language independence in phonetic correspondences may differ even within the same population. We discuss potential reasons for the different results.
AntoniouM.BestC.TylerM.KroosC. (2011). Inter-language interference in VOT production by L2-dominant bilinguals: Asymmetries in phonetic code-switching. Journal of Phonetics, 39(4), 558–570.
2.
BaikW. (1998). On tensity of Korean fricatives (electropalatographic study). Speech Sciences, 11, 135–145.
3.
BalukasC.KoopsC. (2015). Spanish-English bilingual voice onset time in spontaneous code-switching. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(4), 423–443.
BeckmanM. E.LiF.KongE.EdwardsJ. (2014). Aligning the timelines of phonological acquisition and change. Laboratory Phonology, 5(1), 151–194.
6.
BullockB. E.GerfenC. (2004). Phonological convergence in a contracting language variety. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 95–104.
7.
CaramazzaA.Yeni-KomshianG. H. (1974). Voice onset time in two French dialects. Journal of Phonetics, 2, 239–245.
8.
ChangC. B. (2013). The production and perception of coronal fricatives in Seoul Korean: The case for a fourth laryngeal category. Korean Linguistics, 15(1), 7–49.
9.
ChangC. B.YaoY.HaynesE. F.RhodesR. (2011). Production of phonetic and phonological contrast by heritage speakers of Mandarin. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(6), 3964–3980.
10.
China Data Center. (2006). China Data Online. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Retrieved12March2016 from http://chinadataonline.org
11.
ChoT.JunS.-A.LadefogedP. (2002). Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives. Journal of Phonetics, 30(2), 193–228.
12.
CuīJ. Y. (2011). Investigations and studies on the use of language of Korean nationality discourse community in Dandong area (Master’s thesis). Bohai University.
13.
de JongK.ChoM.-H. (2012). Loanword phonology and perceptual mapping: Comparing two corpora of Korean contact with English. Language, 88(2), 341–368.
DinkinA.DodsworthR. (2016). Gradience, allophony, and chain shifts. Language Variation and Change, 29(1), 101–127.
16.
DuanmuS. (2007). Phonology of standard Chinese (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
FaytakM.LinS. (2015). Articulatory variability and fricative noise in apical vowels. Proceedings of the ICPhS, 18.
18.
FlegeJ. E. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 47–65.
19.
FlegeJ. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In StrangeW. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.
20.
FlegeJ. E.EeftingW. (1987a). Cross-language switching in stop consonant perception and production by Dutch speakers of English. Speech Communication, 6, 185–202.
21.
FlegeJ. E.EeftingW. (1987b). Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 67–83.
ForrestK.WeismerG.MilencovicP.DougallR. (1988). Statistical analysis of word-initial voiceless obstruents: Preliminary data. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84(1), 115–123.
24.
FowlerC.SramkoV.OstryD.RowlandS.HalléP. (2008). Cross language phonetic influences on the speech of French–English bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 36(4), 649–663.
FuchsS.TodaM. (2010). Do differences in male versus female /s/ reflect biological or sociophonetic factors? In FuchsS.TodaM.ZygisM. (Eds.), Turbulent sounds: An interdisciplinary guide (pp. 281–302). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
27.
GuionS. (2003). The vowel systems of Quichua-Spanish bilinguals. Phonetica, 60, 98–128.
28.
HanS. (2006). 평안북도 의주방언의 음운론 [The phonology of Northern Phyengan Uyju dialect]. Welin: Seoul.
29.
HanS. (2011). The language identity of Korean-Chinese society in Qingdao, China. Dialectology, 14, 114–136.
30.
HanS. (2014). The language change of Korean-Chinese society in China. Korean Studies, 32, 411–438.
31.
HaugenE. (1950). The analysis of linguistic borrowing. Language, 26(2), 210–231.
32.
HollidayJ. J. (2014). The perceptual assimilation of Korean obstruents by native Mandarin listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135(3), 1585–1595.
33.
HollidayJ. J. (2016). Second language experience can hinder the discrimination of nonnative phonological contrasts. Phonetica, 73(1), 33–51.
34.
HollidayJ. J.KongE. (2011). Dialectal variation in the acoustic correlates of Korean stops. Proceedings of ICPhS, 17, 878–881.
35.
HwangH. (2004). Spectral characteristics of frication noise in Korean sibilants. Speech Sciences, 49, 31–50.
36.
ItoC.KenstowiczM. (2008). Mandarin loanwords in Yanbian Korean I: Laryngeal features. Phonological Studies, 12, 61–72.
37.
JangH. (2012). Acoustic properties and perceptual cues of Korean word-initial obstruents (PhD thesis). Korea University.
38.
JinW. (2008). Sounds of Chinese Korean: A variationist approach (PhD thesis). University of Texas at Arlington.
39.
KallayJ.HollidayJ. J. (2012). Using spectral measures to differentiate Mandarin and Korean sibilant fricatives. Proceedings of Interspeech, 13, 118–121.
40.
KangK. -H.GuionS. (2006). Phonological systems in bilinguals: Age of learning effects on the stop consonant systems of Korean-English bilinguals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(3), 1672–1683.
41.
KangY. (2010). The emergence of phonological adaptation from phonetic adaptation: English loanwords in Korean. Phonology, 27, 225–253.
42.
KangY. (2014). Voice onset time merger and development of tonal contrast in Seoul Korean stops: A corpus study. Journal of Phonetics, 45, 76–90.
43.
KangY.HanS. (2012). 파열음의 방언 간 변이 [Dialectal variation in Korean stops]. Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Meeting of the Society for Korean Linguistics and the Society of Korean Dialectology, E1–10.
44.
KangY.GeorgeS.SooR. (2016). Cross-language influence of stop voicing contrast in Heritage Tagalog. Heritage Language Journal, 13(2), 184–218.
45.
KangY.NagyN. (2016). VOT merger in Heritage Korean in Toronto. Language Variation and Change, 28, 1–24.
46.
KeshetJ.SondereggerM.KnowlesT. (2014). AutoVOT: A tool for automatic measurement of voice onset time using discriminative structured prediction, version 0.91. Retrieved August 2015 from https://github.com/mlml/autovot/.
47.
KimH. (2001). The place of articulation of the Korean plain affricate in intervocalic position: An articulatory and acoustic study. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 31(2), 229–257.
48.
KimH. (2011). What features underline the /s/ vs. /s’/ contrast in Korean? In ClementsG. N.RidouaneR. (Eds.), Where do phonological features come from? (pp. 99–130). John Benjamins.
49.
KimM. (2004). Correlation between VOT and F0 in the perception of Korean stops and affricates. Interspeech 8.
50.
KwakC. (1997). 연변 지역의 함북 길주ㆍ명천 지역 방언에 대한 조사 연구 [A study of the Northern Hamkyeng Korean varieties spoken in Yanbian: Kilju and Myengchen dialects]. 애산학보 [Aesan Journal], 20(1), 179–274.
51.
KwakC. (2000). 재외동포의 언어 연구 [The language of Korean diasporas]. 어문학 [The Korean Language and Literature], 69, 1–41.
52.
KwakC. (2001) “구개음화 규칙의 발생과 그 확산” [A study on appearance and spread of palatalization rule]. 진단학보 [Cintan Journal], 92, 237–268.
53.
KwakC. (2002) “육진방언의 음운변화—20세기초로부터 1세기 동안의 변화” [“The phonological change of Yukcin dialect—change during 1 century from beginning of the 20th century”] 진단학보 [Cintan Journal], 100, 183–220.
54.
LadefogedP.WuZ. (1984). Places of articulation: An investigation of Pekingese fricatives and affricates. Journal of Phonetics, 12(3), 267–278.
55.
LeeH.JongmanA. (2012). Effects of tone on the three-way laryngeal distinction in Korean: An acoustic and aerodynamic comparison of the Seoul and South Kyungsang dialects. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 42(2), 145–169.
56.
LeeK. -M.RamseyS. R. (2011). A history of the Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Lee-KimS. -I. (2014). Revisiting Mandarin ‘apical vowels’: An articulatory and acoustic study. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 44(3), 261–282.
58.
LiB.ShaoJ.OhS. (2012). Reciprocal perception of Chinese and Korean affricates and fricatives. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 15, 1–7.
59.
LiF.EdwardsJ.BeckmanM. E. (2007). Spectral measures for sibilant fricatives of English, Japanese, and Mandarin Chinese. Proceedings of ICPhS, 16, 917–920.
60.
LinY. -H. (2007). The Sounds of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
LuY. -A. (2014). Mandarin fricatives redux: The psychological reality of phonological representations. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 23(1), 43–69.
62.
LubbersM.TorreiraF. (2016). Praatalign: An interactive Praat plugin for performing phonetic forced alignment. Retrieved from https://github.com/dopefishh/praatalign.
63.
LukG.BialystokE. (2013). Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between language proficiency and usage. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 605–621.
64.
NagyN. (2015). A sociolinguistic view of null subjects and VOT in Toronto heritage languages. Lingua, 164, 309–327.
65.
NagyN.KochetovA. (2013). VOT across the generations: A cross-linguistic study of contact-induced change. In SiemundP.GogolinI.SchulzM.DavydovaJ. (Eds.), Multilingualism and language contact in urban areas: Acquisition - Development - Teaching - Communication (pp. 19–38). John Benjamins.
66.
NorrisD.McQueenJ.CutlerA. (2003). Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 47(2), 204–238.
67.
OhM.YangH. (2013). The production of stops by Seoul and Yanbian Korean speakers. Journal of the Korean Society of Speech Sciences, 5(4), 185–193.
68.
PengS. -H. (1993). Cross-language influence on the production of Mandarin /f/ and /x/ and Taiwanese /h/ by native speakers of Taiwanese Amoy. Phonetica, 50(4), 245–260.
69.
ReinischE.WeberA.MittererH. (2013). Listeners retune phoneme categories across languages. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39(1), 75–86.
70.
SancierM. L.FowlerC. A. (1997). Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 421–436.
71.
SilvaD. (2006). Acoustic evidence for the emergence of tonal contrast in contemporary Korean. Phonology, 23(2), 287–308.
72.
StormeB. (2016). The adaptation of French liquids in Haitian: A test of the perceptual hypothesis. Proceedings of ConSOLE XVI (pp. 453–468).
TaiP. (2004). Language policy and standardization of Korean in China. In ZhouM.SunH. (Eds.), Language policy in the People’s Republic of China: Theory and practice since 1949 (pp. 303–315). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
75.
WanI. -P. (2010). Phonological experiments in the study of palatals in Mandarin. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 38, 157–174.
76.
YoonK. (2002). A production and perception experiment of Korean alveolar fricatives. Speech Sciences, 9(3), 169–184.
77.
ZampiniM.GreenK. (2001). The voicing contrast in English and Spanish: The relationship between perception and production. In NicolJ. (Ed.), One mind, two languages. Blackwell.
