Discourse particles in Chinese–Japanese code switching: Constrained by the Matrix Language Frame?

Abstract

Aims and objectives/purpose/research questions:

The purpose of this paper is to clarify the grammatical constraints on discourse particles in Chinese–Japanese intra-sentential code switching in light of the general framework of the Matrix Language Frame (MLF) model augmented by the 4-M model.

Design/methodology/approach:

This study retrieves data collected for three years from three Chinese–Japanese bilingual children aged between 2;1 and 5;0.

Data and analysis:

The database consists of nearly 300 hours of spontaneous conversations that are audio-recorded from the families of the three bilingual children, as well as diary entries. It shows that a large number of code switching utterances involve discourse particles.

Findings/conclusions:

Qualitative analyses of the data indicate that discourse particles are generally constrained by the MLF, yet they do not fit into any category of the 4-M model. Morphologically bound, discourse particles represent the information structure of a sentence (as in the Japanese topic marker -wa) or encode constraints on the inferential processes (as in the Japanese complementizer -kara) rather than truth-conditional information. They manifest some idiosyncrasy at the interface of syntax and pragmatics, and set up the MLF at a discourse level. Thus, the MLF model is extended from a merely syntactic level to the syntax–discourse interface.

Originality:

The present work has contributed empirical evidence from a hitherto undocumented language pair of Chinese and Japanese, and made theoretical explorations on the linguistic constraints of discourse particles.

Significance/implications:

On one hand, it is work that provides support for the robust nature of universality of the MLF constraints on code switching. On the other hand, discourse particles exhibit typological features that need further theoretical exploration in order to make a more comprehensive account for the grammatical constraints on Chinese–Japanese code switching.

Keywords

Chinese–Japanese code switching discourse particles grammatical constraints Matrix Language Frame model syntax–discourse interface

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Backus

(2003). Units in code switching: Evidence for multimorphemic elements in the lexicon. Linguistics, 41, 83–132.

Blakemore

(2002). Relevance and linguistic meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Brody

(1987). Particles borrowed from Spanish as discourse markers in Mayan languages. Anthropological Linguistics, 29, 507–521.

Chan

(2008). Code-switching, word order and the lexical/functional category distinction. Lingua, 118, 777–809.

de Houwer

. (1990 [2006]). The acquisition of two languages from birth: A case study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Erteschik-Shir

(2007). Information structure: the syntax-discourse interface. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Goss

E. L.

Salmons

J. C.

(2000). The evolution of a bilingual discourse marking system: Modal particles and English markers in German-American dialects. International Journal of Bilingualism, 4, 469–484.

Grice

(1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole

Morgan

(Eds.), Syntax and semantics vol.3, Speech acts (pp.41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Grosjean

(2001). The bilingual mode. In Nicol

J. L.

(Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 1–22). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

10.

Hlavac

(2006). Bilingual discourse markers: Evidence from Croatian-English code-switching. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 1870–1900.

11.

Iwasaki

(2013). Japanese (Revised edition). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.

12.

Lantto

(2015). Conventionalized code-switching: Entrenched semantic-pragmatic pattern of a bilingual Basque-Spanish speech style. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19, 753–768.

13.

Lanza

(1992). Can bilingual two-year-olds code-switch? Journal of Child Language, 19, 633–658.

14.

Lanza

(1997). Language mixing in infant bilingualism: A sociolinguistic perspective. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

15.

Levinson

(2000). Presumptive meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

16.

MacWhinney

(2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. The 3^rd Edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

17.

Maschler

(1994). Metalanguaging and discourse markers in bilingual conversation. Language in Society, 23, 325–366.

18.

Maschler

(2000). What can bilingual conversation tell us about discourse markers? Introduction. International Journal of Bilingualism, 4, 437–445.

19.

Matras

(2000). Fusion and the cognitive basis for bilingual discourse markers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 4, 505–528.

20.

Matras

(2011). Universals of structural borrowing. In Siemund

(Ed.), Linguistic universals and language variation (pp. 204–233). Berlin, Germany: Mouton.

21.

Meng

H.-R.

Miyamoto

(2009). Code switching in a Japanese-Chinese bilingual infant: A study on language dominance. Proceedings of the 138th Conference of the Linguistic Society of Japan (pp. 258–263). Tokyo.

22.

Muysken

(1995). Code-switching and grammatical theory. In Milroy

Muysken

(Eds.), One speaker, two languages: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on code-switching (pp. 177–198). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

23.

Muysken

(2000). Bilingual speech: A typology of code-mixing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

24.

Myers-Scotton

(1993). Duelling languages: Grammatical structure in codeswitching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

25.

Myers-Scotton

(2002). Contact linguistics: Bilingual encounters and grammatical outcomes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

26.

Myers-Scotton

Jake

J. L.

(2000). Four types of morpheme: Evidence from aphasia, code switching and second-language acquisition. Linguistics, 38, 1053–1100.

27.

Myers-Scotton

Jake

J. L.

(2001). Explaining aspects of code-switching and their implications. In Nicol

J. L.

(Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 84–116). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

28.

Myers-Scotton

Jake

J. L.

(2009). A universal model of code-switching and bilingual language processing and production. In Bullock

B. E.

Toribio

A. J.

(Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic code-switching (pp. 336–357). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

29.

Namba

(2009). A continuum-based model for insertional code-switching: Japanese nominal insertions in English Matrix Language Frames. Japan Journal of Multilingualism and Multiculturalism, 15, 18–40.

30.

Onodera

(2004). Japanese discourse markers: Synchronic and diachronic discourse analysis. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.

31.

Romaine

(1989). Bilingualism. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

32.

Schiffrin

(2001). Discourse markers: Language, meaning, and context. In Schiffrin

Tannen

Hamilton

H. E.

(Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 54–75). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

33.

Schourup

(1999). Discourse markers. Lingua, 107, 227–265.

34.

Taeschner

(1983). The sun is feminine: A study on language acquisition in bilingual children. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

35.

Takagi

(2008). Japanese morpheme classification using the 4-M model. Journal of Inquiry and Research, 88, 1–19.

36.

Torres

(2002). Bilingual discourse markers in Puerto Rican Spanish. Language in Society, 31, 65–83.

37.

Wilson

Sperber

(2012). Meaning and relevance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.