Previous research on Arabic heritage speakers points to notable variability in the language proficiencies of Arabic heritage speakers, both as individuals and as groups (Albirini & Benmamoun, 2012; Albirini, Benmamoun, & Saadah, 2011). This study examines the language proficiencies of Egyptian and Palestinian heritage speakers, assesses the relationship between their L1 proficiency levels and other linguistic, socio-affective, socio-contextual, and demographic factors, and explores the relative significance of these factors in determining proficiency in heritage Arabic. A total of 20 Egyptian and 20 Palestinian heritage speakers completed an oral narrative that was used for assessing three dimensions of their language proficiencies, namely fluency, grammatical accuracy, and syntactic complexity. In addition, the participants filled in a 182-item questionnaire about the factors potentially influencing their heritage language skills, including language input, language use, language attitudes, ethnic identity, family role, community support, school, and demographics. The study also involved follow-up interviews with a sample of five Palestinian and five Egyptian participants.
The results showed that the Palestinian speakers outperformed their Egyptian counterparts in terms of language fluency, accuracy, complexity, and overall proficiency. Pearson and Spearman correlations indicated that language use, language input, family role, community support, and parents’ language correlate positively with language proficiency. Multiple regression analyses showed that language use (in terms of frequency, range, and contexts) is the only significant predictor of the variability in heritage language proficiency. Lastly, the interviews revealed that the Palestinian heritage speakers’ linguistic advantage over their Egyptian counterparts might be attributed to their commitment to Arabic as a main marker of their heritage and identity, the encouragement of their families to maintain their heritage language, and the wider social networks to which they had access. The implications of the study are discussed.
AlbiriniA.BenmamounE. (2012). Aspects of second language transfer in the oral production of Egyptian and Palestinian heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism. Epub ahead of print 18May2012. doi: 10.1177/1367006912441729.
2.
AlbiriniA.BenmamounE.SaadahE. (2011). Grammatical features of Egyptian and Palestinian Arabic heritage speakers’ oral production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 273–303.
3.
AlmubayeiD. (2007). Language and the shaping of the Arab-American identity. UTA Working Papers in Linguistics, 2, 91–119.
4.
AndersonR. (1999). Loss of gender agreement in L1 attrition: Preliminary results. Bilingual Research Journal, 23, 319–338.
5.
AndersonR. (2001). Lexical morphology and verb use in child first language loss. A preliminary case study investigation. International Journal of Bilingualism, 5, 377–401.
6.
BaleJ. (2010). Arabic as a heritage language in the United States. International Multilingual Research Journal, 4(2), 125–151.
7.
Bar-ShalomE.ZaretskyE. (2008). Selective attrition in Russian-English bilingual children: Preservation of grammatical aspect. International Journal of Bilingualism, 12, 281–302.
BhatiaT. K.RitchieW. C. (1999). The bilingual child: Some issues and perspective. In RitchieW. C.BhatiaT. K. (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition (pp. 569–643). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10.
BoumansL. (2006). The attributive possessive in Moroccan Arabic spoken by young bilinguals in the Netherlands and their peers in Morocco. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 213–231.
11.
BrizićK. (2006). The secret life of languages: Origin-specific differences in L1/L2 acquisition by immigrant children. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 339–362.
12.
CarreiraM.KaganO. (2011). The results of the heritage language survey: Implications for teaching, curriculum design, and professional development. Foreign Language Annals, 44(1), 40–64.
13.
CarreiaM.RodriguezR. (2011). Filling the void: Community Spanish language programs in Los Angeles serving to preserve the language. Heritage Language Journal, 8(2), 1–16.
14.
ChinenK.TuckerG. R. (2005). Heritage language development: Understanding the roles of ethnic identity and Saturday school participation. Heritage Language Journal, 3(1), 27–59.
15.
CookV. (2003). Effects of the second language on the first. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
16.
CorbettG. (2000). Number. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
de BotK.ClyneM. (1994). A 16-year longitudinal study of language attrition in Dutch immigrants in Australia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 15(1), 17–18.
18.
de BotK. (2001). Language use as an interface between sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic processes in language attrition and language shift. In FolmerJ.van AvermaetP. (Eds.), Theories on maintenance and loss of minority languages. Towards a more integrated explanatory framework (pp. 65–81). Münster/New York: Waxmann.
19.
de BotK. (2004). The multilingual lexicon: Modeling selection and control. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1, 17–32.
20.
De HouwerA. (1990). The acquisition of two languages from birth: A case study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
El AissatiA. (1996). Language loss among native speakers of Moroccan Arabic in the Netherlands. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
22.
FaseW. (1994). Ethnic divisions in Western European education. Münster, Germany: Waxmann.
23.
FloresC. (2010). The effect of age on language attrition: Evidence from bilingual returnees. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13(4), 533–546.
24.
FosterP.TonkynA.WigglesworthG. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21, 354–375.
25.
GayL. R.AirasianP. (2000). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (6th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
26.
GoralM. (2004). First-language decline in healthy aging: Implications for attrition in bilingualism. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17(1), 31–52.
27.
GreenD. W. (2003). The neural basis of the lexicon and the grammar in L2 acquisition: The convergence hypothesis. In van HoutR.HulkA.HuikenF.TowellR. (Eds.), The interface between syntax and the lexicon in second language acquisition (pp. 197–218). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
28.
HansenL. (1999). Not a total loss: The attrition of Japanese negation over three decades. In HansenL. (Ed.), Second language attrition in Japanese contexts (pp. 142–153). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
29.
HansenL. (2000) Language attrition in contexts of Japanese bilingualism. In NoguchiM.FotosS. (Eds.), Studies in Japanese bilingualism. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
30.
HousenA.KuikenF. (2009). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473.
31.
HulsenM. (2000). Language loss and language processing: Three generations of Dutch migrants in New Zealand. Doctoral dissertation. University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
32.
HulsenM.de BotK.WeltensB. (2002). Between two worlds. Social networks, language shift and language processing in three generations of Dutch migrants in New Zealand. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 153, 27–52.
33.
HulstijnJ. H. (2010). Measuring second language proficiency. In BlomE.UnsworthS. (Eds.), Experimental methods in language acquisition research (pp. 185–199). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins.
34.
HuntK. (1970). Syntactic maturity in school children and adults. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 35, 1–67.
35.
IbrahimZ.AllamJ. (2006). Arabic learners heritage students redefined: Present & future. In WahbaK.TahaZ.EnglandL. (Eds.), Handbook for Arabic language teaching professionals in the 21st Century (pp. 437–446). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
36.
IsurinL. (2007). Teachers’ language: L1 attrition in Russian–English bilinguals. The Modern Language Journal, 91(3), 357–371.
37.
IwashitaN. (2006). Syntactic complexity measures and their relation to oral proficiency in Japanese as a foreign language, Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(2), 151–169.
38.
JarvisS. (2003). Probing the effects of the L2 on the L1: A case study. In CookV. (Ed.), Effects of the second language on the first (pp. 81–102). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
39.
Jiménez JiménezA. F. (2004). A sociocultural approach to language attrition. In SchmidM. S.KöpkeB.KeijzerM.WeilemarL. (Eds.), First language attrition: Interdisciplinary perspectives on methodological issues (pp. 61–80). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
40.
KeijzerM. (2010). The regression hypothesis as a framework for first language attrition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 9–18.
41.
KöpkeB. (2004). Neurolinguistic aspects of attrition. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17(1), 3–30.
42.
KöpkeB. (2007). Language attrition at the crossroads of brain, mind, and society. In KöpkeB.SchmidM.KeijzerM.DostertS. (Eds.), Language attrition: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 9–38). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
43.
KöpkeB.SchmidM. (2004). First language attrition: The next phase. In SchmidM.KöpkeB.KeijzerM.WeilemarL. (Eds.), First language attrition: Interdisciplinary perspectives on methodological issues (pp. 1–43). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
44.
Larsen-FreemanD. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590–619.
45.
LennonP. (1991). Errors: Some problems of definition, identification, and distinction. Applied Linguistics, 12, 180–196.
46.
MaguireM. H.BeerA.AttarianH.Curdt-ChristiansenX. L.YoshidaR. (2005). The chameleon character of multilingual literacy portraits: Re-searching in “Heritage” language places and space. In AndersonJ.KendrickM.RogersT.SymtheS. (Eds.), Portraits of literacy across families, communities and schools: Intersections and tensions (pp. 141–70). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
MajorR. C. (1992). Losing English as a first language. Modern Language Journal, 76, 190–208.
48.
MartinN. (2009). Arab American parents’ attitudes toward their children’s heritage language maintenance and language practices. Unpublished Masters thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, US.
49.
Myers-ScottonC. (1993). Duelling languages grammatical structure in code mixing. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
50.
MontrulS. (2004). Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morpho-syntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 125–142.
51.
MontrulS. (2005). Second language acquisition and first language loss in adult early bilinguals: Exploring some differences and similarities. Second Language Research, 21(3), 199–249.
52.
MontrulS. (2008). Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism. Re-examining the age factor [Series on studies in bilingualism]. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
53.
MontrulS.FooteR.PerpiñánS. (2008). Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning, 58(3), 503–553.
54.
NeisserU. (1984). Interpreting Harry Bahrick’s discovery: What confers immunity against forgetting?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(1), 32–35.
55.
OmarM. (1973). The acquisition of Egyptian Arabic as a native language. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
56.
OriyamaK. (2010) Heritage language maintenance and Japanese identity formation: What role can schooling and ethnic community contact play?Heritage Language Journal, 7(2), 76–111.
57.
ParadisM. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
58.
ParadisM. (2007). L1 attrition features predicted by a neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. In KöpkeB.SchmidM.KeijzerM.DostertS. (Eds.), Language attrition: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 121–134). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
59.
PolinskyM. (2008a). Gender under incomplete acquisition: Heritage speakers” knowledge of noun categorization. Heritage Language Journal, 6(1), 40–71.
60.
PolinskyM. (2008b). Heritage language narratives. In BrintonD.KaganO.BauckusS. (Eds.), Heritage language education. A new field emerging (pp. 149–164). New York, NY: Routledge.
61.
PolinskyM. (2011). Reanalysis in adult heritage language: A case for attrition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(2), 1–45.
62.
RavidD.FarahR. (1999). Learning about noun plurals in early Palestinian Arabic. First Language, 19, 187–206.
63.
RieschildV.TentJ. (2008). Bilinguality, gender, and religion as influences on Arabic-Heritage Australian youths’ attitudes to their ambient languages and cultures. 17th sociolinguistics symposium, 3–4 April, Amsterdam.
64.
RouchdyA. (1992). The Arabic language in America. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
65.
RouchdyA. (2002). Language conflict and identity: Arabic in the American diaspora. In RouchdyA., Language contact and language conflict in Arabic: Variations on a sociolinguistic theme (pp. 133–148). New York, NY: Routledge Curzon.
66.
SaidE. (2000). Out of place: A memoir. London: Granta Books.
67.
ScheragA.DemuthL.RöslerF.NevilleH.RöderB. (2004). The effects of late acquisition of L2 and the consequences of immigration on L1 for semantic and morpho-syntactic language aspects. Cognition, 93, B97–B108.
68.
SchmidM. (2007). The role of L1 use for L1 attrition. In KöpkeB.SchmidM.KeijzerM.DostertS. (Eds.), Language attrition: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 135–154). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
69.
SchmidM. (2011). Language attrition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
70.
SchmidM.KöpkeB. (2007). Bilingualism and attrition. In KöpkeB.SchmidM.KeijzerM.DostertS. (Eds.), Language attrition: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–8). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
71.
SchwandtT. (2000). Three epistemological stances from qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructivism. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed.) (pp. 189–213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72.
SehlaouiA. (2011). Language learning, heritage, and literacy in the USA: The case of Arabic. Language, Culture, and Curriculum, 21(3), 280–291.
73.
SeligerH. W.VagoR. M. (1991). The study of first language attrition: An overview. In SeligerH. W.VagoR. M. (Eds.), First language attrition (pp. 3–15). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
74.
Sharwood SmithM. A.van BurenP. (1991). First language attrition and the parameter-setting model. In SeligerH.VagoR. (Eds.), Language attrition: Structural and theoretical perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
75.
ShiriS. (2010). Arabic in the United States. In PotowskiK. (Ed.), Language diversity in the U.S. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
76.
Silva-CorvalánC. (1994). Language contact and change. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
77.
Silva-CorvalánC. (2003). Linguistic consequences of reduced input in bilingual first language acquisition. In MontrulS.OrdóñezF. (Eds.), Linguistic theory and language development in Hispanic languages (pp. 375–397). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
78.
SkaadenH. (2005). First language attrition and linguistic creativity. International Journal of Bilingualism, 9(3-4), 435–445.
79.
SoraceA. (2000). Differential effects of attrition in the L1 syntax of near-native L2 speakers. Proceedings of the 24th Boston University conference on language development (pp. 719–725). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
80.
SuleimanY. (2011). Arabic, self and identity: A study in conflict and displacement. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
81.
TomiyamaM. (2009). Age and proficiency in L2 attrition: Data from two siblings. Applied Linguistics, 30(2), 253–275.
82.
TseL. (2001). Resisting and reversing language shift: Heritage-language resilience among US native biliterates. Harvard Educational Review, 71, 676–708.
83.
WongK.XiaoY. (2010). Diversity and difference: Identity issues of Chinese heritage language learners from dialect backgrounds, Heritage Language Journal, 7(2), 153–187.
84.
YoungR. (1995). Conversational styles in language proficiency interviews. Language Learning, 45(1), 3–42.
85.
ZentellaA. C. (1997). Growing up bilingual: Puerto Rican children in New York. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
86.
ZhangD.Slaughter-DefoeD. (2009). Language attitudes and heritage language maintenance among Chinese immigrant families in the USA. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 22(2), 77–93.
87.
ZhangJ. (2010). Parental attitudes toward Mandarin maintenance in Arizona: An examination of immigrants from the People’s Republic of China. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 7(4), 237–269.
