In bilingual contact environments, personal pronoun systems are relatively impervious to replacement or borrowing. Several Creole languages contain hybrid personal pronoun paradigms, but the language contact environments that resulted in creolization and mixed pronominal systems are no longer in effect, and the mechanisms of pronominal replacement remain unknown. The present analysis is based on data from Zamboangueño Chabacano, a variety of Philippine Creole Spanish that has already undergone at least one set of pronominal replacements in its history, substituting Spanish-derived plural pronouns with pronouns taken from Philippine languages. Due to recent migration, Zamboangueño Chabacano is now in contact with Tagalog, and younger speakers are incorporating the Tagalog second-person singular respect-neutral pronoun ikaw into the Chabacano system. The insertion of ikaw restores the respectful–respect-neutral pronominal distinction originally present in Spanish and found in Philippine languages but lacking in Chabacano. The ease with which a Tagalog pronoun is entering Chabacano is attributed to long-standing popular views that Zamboangueño Chabacano is already a mixed-up language—often regarded as “broken Spanish”—devoid of its own grammar and therefore readily susceptible to any and all intrusions. The use of ikaw as an in-group marker among Zamboangueño youth further aids the addition of the Tagalog pronoun to the Chabacano paradigm.
Álvarez GuerraJ. (1872). Un viaje por Oriente: De Manila á Marianas [A trip to the Orient: from Manila to the Marianas]. Madrid, Spain: Imp. de C. Molino y Cía.
2.
ApostolF. (1962–1967). The Chabacano dialect. Series of articles appearing in the Southern Tribune, Zamboanga City (from December 5, 1962, to February 15, 1967).
3.
BakerP.HuberM. (2000). Constructing new pronominal systems from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Linguistics, 38, 833–866.
4.
BalmoriJ. (1917). Na maldito arena. Philippine Review, 2, 71–73.
5.
BanquéP. S. J. (1884). Carta del Hermano Pablo Banqué al P. Hermenegildo Jacas, fechada en Zamboanga en 10 de abril de 1884. In Cartas de los PP. de la Compañía de Jesús de la Misión de Filipinas [Letter from Brother Pablo Banqué to Father Hermenegildo Jacas, dated ZamboangaApril10, 1884. In Letters to the Fathers of the Company of Jesus, Philippine Mission] (Cuaderno 6, pp. 25–35). Manila, Philippines: Establecimiento Tipo-Litográfico de M. Pérez hijo, 1887.
6.
BaraneraF. (1880). Compendio de geografía de las Islas Filipinas, Marianas y Joló [Geographical compendium of the Philippine Islands, the Marianas and Jolo]. Manila, Philippines: Establecimiento Tipográfico de Ramírez y Giraudier.
7.
BarrantesV. (1869). La instrucción primaria en Filipinas de 1596 hasta 1868 [Primary education in the Philippines from 1596 to 1868]. Madrid, Spain: Imprenta de la Iberia y Manila: Imprenta y Libraría de Ramírez y Giraudier.
8.
BarriosA. (2006, January). Austronesian elements in Philippine Creole Spanish. Paper presented at Tenth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Puerto Princesa City, Palawan, Philippines. Retrieved from http://www.sil.org/asia/philippines/ical/papers.html
9.
Barrios-FabianM. L. (2004). Case study of Zamboanga City (forced migration area) (Discussion Paper Series No. 2004-50). Makati City, Manila: Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
10.
BarrowsD. (1914). A history of the Philippines. Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World Book Company.
11.
BastianA. (1870). Sprachvergleichende Studien mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Indochinesischen Sprachen [General linguistic studies with special emphasis on Indo-Chinese languages]. Leipzig, Germany: F.A. Brockhaus.
12.
BatalhaG. N. (1960). Coincidências com o dialecto de Macau em dialectos espanhóis das Ilhas Filipinas [Coincidences between the dialect of Macao and the Spanish dialects of the Philippines]. Boletim de Filologia [General linguistic studies with special emphasis on Indo-Chinese languages], 19, 295–303.
13.
BickertonD. (1981). Roots of language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.
14.
BlakeF. (1905). The Bisayan dialects. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 26, 120–136.
15.
BlumentrittF. (1885). Vocabular einzelner Ausdrücke und Redensarten, welche dem Spanischen der philippinischen Inseln eigenthümlich sind, II. In Jahres-Bericht der Communal-Ober-Realschule in Leitmeritz (Vol. XIX, pp. 1–64). Leitmeritz, Germany: Verlag der Communal-Ober-Realschule.
16.
BroadH. P. (1929). Chabacano. Philippine Magazine, 26, 142, 160.
17.
CaminsB. (1999). Chabacano de Zamboanga handbook and dictionary. Zamboanga City, Philippines: Office of the Mayor.
18.
CañamaqueF. (1880). Las Islas Filipinas (de todo un poco) [The Philippine Islands: a little bit of everything]. Madrid, Spain: Librería de Fernando Fé, Librería de Simón y Osler.
19.
CaroyMoraJ. (1897). La situación del país [The situation of the country]. Manila, Philippines: Impr. de “Amigos del País.”
20.
CavadayMéndezdeVigoA. (1876). Historia geográfica, geológica y estadística de Filipinas [Geographical, geological, and statistical history of the Philippines]. Manila, Philippines: Ramírez y Giraudier.
21.
City of Zamboanga. (2008, December). Adelante Zamboanga: Official publication, City of Zamboanga, Asia’s Latin City. No. 1, Maiden issue.
22.
Commissioner of Education. (1907). Report of the commissioner of education for the year ending June 30, 1905 (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
23.
CysouwM. (2002). “We” rules: The impact of an inclusive/exclusive opposition on the paradigmatic structure of person marking. In SimonH.WieseH. (Eds.), Pronouns—Grammar and representation (pp. 41–62). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
24.
CysouwM. (2003). The paradigmatic structure of person marking. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
DalrympleM.KaplanR. (2000). Feature indeterminacy and feature resolution. Language, 76, 759–798.
26.
De la Corte y RuanoF. (1877). La isla de Mindanao, su suelo y sus habitantes [The island of Mindanao, its land and its inhabitants]. Madrid, Spain: Imprenta del Memorial de Ingenieros.
27.
De los Reyes y FlorentinoI. (1888). Artículos varios sobre etnografía, historia y costumbres de Filipinas [Assorted articles on the ethnography, history, and customs of the Philippines]. Manila, Philippines: J.A. Ramos-Editor.
28.
De OcampoE. (2007). The Ternateños: Their history, languages, customs and traditions. Manila, Philippines: National Historical Institute.
29.
DonohueM.SmithJ. C. (1998). What’s happened to us? Some developments in the Malay pronoun system. Oceanic Linguistics, 37, 65–84.
30.
DoyleJ. S. J. (1888). Carta del P. Juan Doyle al Rector de Ateneo de Manila, fechada en Cotabato el 27 de mayo de 1888. In Cartas de los PP. de la Compañía de Jesús de la Misión de Filipinas (Cuaderno 8, pp. 124–129). Manila, Philippines: Establecimiento Tipo-Litografía de Chofré y Compª, 1889.
31.
EddingN. R. (2003). Language maintenance and shift among native and non-native speakers of Zamboanga Chabacano (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Western Mindanao State University, Philippines.
32.
Élisée Reclus. (1892). The earth and its inhabitants: Oceania (Vol. 14, KeaneA. H., Ed.). New York, NY: D. Appleton and Company.
33.
EntralaF.deP. (1881). Sin título, novela de costumbres [No title, a novel of customs]. Manila, Philippines: Establecimiento Tipográfico de Ramírez y Giraudier.
EscosuraP.delaCañamaqueF. (1882). Memoria sobre Filipinas y Joló [A memoir on the Philippines and Jolo] (2nd ed.). Madrid, Spain: Librería de los señores Simón y Osler.
36.
FecedP. [Quioquiap] (1888). Filipinas, esbozos y pinceladas [The Philippines: sketches and drawings]. Manila, Philippines: Estab. Tipog. de Ramírez y Compañía.
37.
FergusonC. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 15, 325–340.
38.
FernándezM. (2006). Las lenguas de Zamboanga según los padres jesuitas y otros observadores occidentales [The languages of Zamboanga according to the Jesuit fathers and other observers]. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana, 7, 9–26.
39.
ForemanJ. (1906). The Philippine islands. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
FormanM. (2001). Confidence in Chabacano: Counterbalance to a western ideology of language. Estudios de Sociolingüística [Studies in Sociolinguistics], 2, 95–117.
42.
ForrestT. (1780). Voyage aux Moluques et à la Nouvelle Guinée [A trip to the Moluccas and New Guinea]. Paris, France: Hôtel de Thou.
43.
FrakeC. (1971). Lexical origins and semantic structure in Philippine Creole Spanish. In HymesD. (Ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages (pp. 223–242). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
FrakeC. (1988). Abu Sayyaf: Displays of violence and the proliferation of contested identities among Philippine Muslims. American Anthropologist, 100, 41–54.
45.
FranciayPoncedeLeónB.González ParradoJ. (1898). Las Islas Filipinas: Mindanao, tomo I. Havana, Cuba: Imp. de la Subinspección de Infantería.
46.
Germán A. (1932). The Spanish dialect of Cavite (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of the Philippines, Philippines .
47.
Gómez RiveraG. (2002). El idioma criollo de Filipinas [The creole language of the Philippines]. Papia, 12, 125–137.
48.
González FernándezR.Moreno JerezF. (1877). Anuario filipino para 1877 [Philippine yearbook for 1877]. Manila, Philippines: Establecimiento Tipográfico de Plana y Ca.
49.
Gonzalez SerranoV. (1880). Ecos de Manila. Manila, Philippines: Imprenta y Librería de El Oriente.
50.
GrantA. (2002). El chabacano zamboangueño: Una lengua mezclada [Zamboangueño Chabacano: a mixed language]. Papia, 12, 7–40.
51.
GrantA. (2009). Contact, complexification and change in Mindanao Chabacano structure. In AbohE.SmithN. (Eds.), Complex processes in new languages (pp. 223–241). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
52.
GuerreroR. (1896). Crónica de la guerra de Cuba y de la rebelión de Filipinas, tomo cuarto [Chronicle of the Cuban war and the Philippine rebellion]. Barcelona, Spain: Casa Editorial Maucci.
53.
GuillemardF. H. H. (1908). Australasia, volume II: Malaysia and the Pacific Archipelagoes (2nd ed., Revised by A. H. Keane). London, UK: Edward Stanford.
54.
HarleyH.RitterE. (2002). Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language, 78, 482–526.
55.
HeadB. (1978). Respect degrees in pronominal reference. In GreenbergJ. (Ed.), Universals of human language: Word structure (Vol. 3, pp. 151–211). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
56.
HerasJ. S. J. (1878). Carta del Padre Juan Heras al Provincial, fechada en Manila en 10 de diciembre de 1878. In Cartas de los PP. de la Compañía de Jesús de la Misión de Filipinas (Cuaderno, pp. 2–45). Manila, Philippines: Establecimiento Tipo-Litográfico de Ramírez y Giraudier, 1879.
57.
HortonA. B. (Compiler) (1903). Committee on insular affairs, house of representatives, fifty-seventh Congress, first and second sessions, 1901-1903. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
58.
JagorF. (1875). Travels in the Philippines. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.
59.
JakeJ. (1994). Intrasentential code-switching and pronouns: On the categorical status of functional elements. Linguistics, 32, 271–298.
60.
KeppelH. (1853). A visit to the Indian archipelago (Vol. I). London, UK: Richard Bentley.
61.
LannoyM. J. (1849). Iles Philippines, de leur situation ancienne et actuelle [The Philippine Islands : their former and current situation]. Brussels, Belgium: Imprimérie de Delevigne et Callewaert.
62.
LayG. T. (1839). The claims of Japan and Malaysia upon Christendom exhibited in notes of voyages made in 1837. New York, NY: E. French.
63.
LipskiJ. (1986). Modern Spanish once—Removed in Philippine Creole Spanish: The case of Zamboanga. Language in Society, 16, 91–108.
64.
LipskiJ. (1988). Philippine Creole Spanish: Reassessing the Portuguese element. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 104, 25–45.
65.
LipskiJ. (1992). New thoughts on the origins of Zamboangueño (Philippine Creole Spanish). Language Sciences, 14, 197–231.
66.
LipskiJ. (2000). El español criollo de Filipinas: El caso de Zamboanga [Philippine creole Spanish: the case of Zamboanga]. In LastraY. (Ed.), Estudios de sociolingüística (pp. 339–366). México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas.
67.
LipskiJ. (2001). The place of Chabacano in the Philippine linguistic identity. Estudios de Sociolingüística, 2, 119–163.
68.
LipskiJ. (2010). Chabacano y español: Resolviendo las ambigüedades [Chabacano and Spanish: resolving the ambiguities]. Lengua y Migración/Language and Migration, 2, 5–41.
69.
LópezV. (1893). El filibustero [The Philibusterer]. Madrid, Spain: Imprenta de la Viuda de M. Minuesa de los Ríos.
70.
MacKinlayW. (1901). Memorandum on the languages of the Philippines. The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 31, 214–218.
71.
MalcampoH. (2007). Historia de Zamboanga (en Chabacano) antes y durante el período español 1400-1900 [History of Zamboanga (in Chabacano) before and during the Spanish period 1400-1900]. Zamboanga, Philippines: Western Mindanao State University Press.
72.
MalcampoH. (2009, July). A position paper on the present status of Chabacano in the city of Zamboanga. Presented to the Zamboanga City Council, Zamboanga City, Philippines.
MañoT. (1961). Zamboangueño Chabacano. Far Eastern University Faculty Journal, 6, 52–57.
75.
Martínez de ZúñigaJ. (1973). Status of the Philippines in 1800 (del CarmenVicente, Trans.). Manila, Philippines: Filipiniana Book Guild.
76.
MarryatF. (1848). Borneo and the Indian archipelago. London, UK: Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans.
77.
McKaughanH. (1954). Notes on Chabacano grammar. University of Manila Journal of East Asiatic Studies, 3, 205–226.
78.
McWhorterJ. (1995). The scarcity of Spanish-based creoles explained. Language in Society, 24, 213–244.
79.
McWhorterJ. (2000). The missing Spanish creoles: Recovering the birth of plantation contact languages. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
80.
MirandaG. (1956). El dialecto chabacano de Cavite [The Chabacano dialect of Cavite]. Dumaguete City, Philippines: n. p.
81.
MolonyC. (1973). Sound changes in Chabacano. In GonzalezA. (Ed.), Parangal kay López (pp. 38–50). Quezon City, Philippines: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
82.
MolonyC. (1977a). Semantic changes in Chabacano. In MeiselJ. (Ed.), Langues en contact-pidgins-creoles-languages in contact (pp. 153–166). Tübingen, Germany: Gunter Narr.
83.
MolonyC. (1977b). Recent relexification processes in Philippine Creole Spanish. In BlountB.SanchesM. (Eds.), Sociocultural dimensions of language change (pp. 131–160). New York, NY: Academic Press.
84.
MontanoJ. (1886). Voyage aux Philippines et en Malaisie [A trip to the Philippines and Malaysia]. Paris, France: Librairie Hachette et Cie.
85.
MonteroyVidalJ. (1876). Cuentos filipinos [Philippine tales]. Madrid, Spain: Imprenta, Estereotipia y Galvanoplastia de Aribau y Compañía.
86.
MoorJ. H. (1837). Notices of the Indian archipelago and adjacent countries. Singapore: n. p.
87.
Moya y de JiménezF. J. (1883). Las Islas Filipinas en 1882 [The Philippine Islands in 1882]. Madrid, Spain: Est. Tipográfico de El Correo.
88.
MuglerF. (1983). A comparative study of the pronominal system of Romance-based creoles (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
89.
MühlhäuslerP.HarréR. (1990). Pronouns and people: The linguistic construction of social and personal identity. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
90.
Nieva A. (1984). Chabacano: Bien facil lang gayot [Chabacano: it’s really easy]. In OrendainA.II (Ed.), Zamboanga hermosa: Memories of the Old Town (pp. 213–217). Makati, Manila: Filipinas Foundation.
91.
NigozaE. (2007). Bahra: The history, legends, customs and traditions of Ternate, Cavite. Cavite City, Philippines: Cavite Historical Society.
92.
PeetS. D. (1904). Native tribes of the Philippines. The American Antiquarian and Oriental Journal, 26, 46–48.
93.
Philippine Information Society. (1901). Facts about the Filipinos (Vol. 1, part no. 1). Boston, MA: Philippine Information Society.
94.
PiP. S. J. (1894). Carta del P. Pío Pi al Hermano Francisco de A. Alós, fechada en Zamboanga a 8 de agosto de 1894. In Cartas de los PP. de la Compañía de Jesús de la Misión de Filipinas (Cuaderno 10, pp. 57–67). Manila, Philippines: Establecimiento Tipo-Litográfico de M. Pérez, hijo, 1895.
95.
QuilisA.Casado-FresnilloC. (2008). La lengua española en FIlipinas [The Spanish language in the Philippines]. Madrid, Spain: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
96.
Riego de DiosM. I. (1976). The Cotabato Chabacano verb. Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 7, 48–59.
97.
Riego de DiosM. I. (1978). A pilot study on the dialects of Philippine Creole Spanish. Studies in Philippine Linguistics, 2, 77–81.
98.
RincónM. (1897). Cháchara: Páginas de la vida manileña [Idle chatter: pages from Manila life]. Manila, Philippines: Tipo-Litografía de Chofré y Comp.
99.
RizalJ. (1891). El filibusterismo [Philibusterism]. Ghent, Belgium: Boekdrukkerij F. Meyer-Van Loo.
100.
RubinoC. (2008). Zamboangueño Chavacano and the potentive mode. In MichaelisS. (Ed.), Roots of creole structures: Weighing the contribution of substrates and superstrates (pp. 279–299). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
101.
RuízS. (1907). Cuestiones filipinas: La instrucción española y la Americana [Philippine issues: Spanish and American education]. Nuestro tiempo, Año 7, 93, 181–193.
102.
RussellF. K. (1907). A woman’s journey through the Philippines. Boston, MA: Page & Co.
103.
St. JohnH. (1853). The Indian archipelago: Its history and present state. London, UK: Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans.
104.
SaleebyN. (1908). The history of Sulu (Reprinted in 1963 by the Filipiniana Book Guild). Manila, Philippines: Bureau of Printing.
105.
SanchoJ. S. J. (1888). Carta del P. Joaquín Sancho al Superior de la Misión, fechada en Zamboanga el 30 de octubre de 1888. In Cartas de los PP. de la Compañía de Jesús de la Misión de Filipinas (Cuaderno 8, pp. 99–104). Manila, Philippines: Establecimiento Tipo-Litografía de Chofré y Compª.
106.
SantayanaA. (1862). La isla de Mindanao: Su historia y su estado presente, con algunas reflexiones sobre su porvenir [The island of Mindanao, its history and current situation, with some reflections on its future]. Madrid, Spain: Imprenta de Alhambra y Comp.
107.
SchweglerA. (2002). On the (African) origins of Palenquero subject pronouns. Diachronica, 19, 273–332.
108.
SippolaE. (2011). Una gramática descriptiva del chabacano de Ternate (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Helsinki, Finland.
109.
SonneratM. (1776). Voyage a la Nouvelle Guinée [A trip to New Guinea]. Paris, France: Chez Ruault.
110.
SteinkrügerP. (2006, January). The puzzling case of Chabacano: Creolization, substrate, mixing and secondary contact. Presented at tenth international conference on Austronesian linguistics, Puerto Princesa City, Palawan, Philippines. Retrieved from http://www.sil.org/asia/philippines/ical/papers.html
111.
ThomasonS. (1999). Speakers’ choices in language change. Studies in the Language Sciences, 29, 19–43.
112.
ThomasonS.EverettD. (2005). Pronoun borrowing. In ChangC.HouserM.KimY.MortensenD.Park-DoobM.ToosarvandaniM. (Eds.), Berkeley Linguistics Society (Vol. 27, pp. 301–315). Berkeley, CA: UC Linguistics Dept.
113.
TignoJ. (2006). Migration and violent conflict in Mindanao. Population Review, 45, 23–47.
114.
TironaT. (1923). An account of the Ternate dialect of Cavite (Tagalog Paper 487 of the Beyer Collection). Manila, Philippines: Philippine National Library.
115.
TownsendH. (1902). Notes on Philippine geography. The School Journal, 65, 484–486.
116.
United States Bureau of the Census. (1905). Census of the Philippine Islands taken under the direction of the Philippine Commission in the year 1903, Volume 1. Washington: United States Bureau of the Census.
117.
United States Philippine Commission. (1900). The report of the Philippine Commission to the President (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
118.
United States Philippine Commission. (1901). Report of the United States Philippine commission: To the secretary of war for the period from December 1, 1900 to October 15, 1901, part 2. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
119.
United States Philippine Commission. (1909). Report of the United States Philippine commission to the secretary of war 1908, part 2. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
120.
Valles-AkilL. (2002). Mantenemiento de lengua criolla en un contexto multilingüe: El caso del chabacano en la ciudad de Zamboanga [Maintenance of a creole language in a multi-lingual context: the case of Chabacano in Zamboanga City]. Papia, 12, 41–66.
WallaceS. (1983). Pronouns in contact. In AgardF.KelleyG.MakkaiA.MakkaiV. B. (Eds.), Essays in honor of Charles F. Hockett (pp. 573–589). Leiden, South Holland: E.J. Brill.
123.
WhinnomK. (1956). Spanish contact vernaculars in the Philippines. Hong Kong, China: Hong Kong University.
124.
WhitmarshP. (1901). Around Mindanao. The Outlook, 67, 637–643.
125.
WorcesterD. (1898). The Philippine islands and their people. New York, NY: Macmillan.
126.
YvanM. (1855). Six months among the Malays and a year in China (p. 230). London.
