This study examines the potential effects of crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of subject–verb inversion in Spanish matrix and embedded wh-questions among Spanish heritage language learners living in the United States. The results from an acceptability judgment task and a written production task administered to 17 US-born heritage speakers indicate crosslinguistic influence effects. The effects are more evident with embedded interrogatives than with matrix questions. A follow-up study with the heritage speakers also shows less inversion behavior with embedded questions in oral production but higher performance levels than in written production. The findings are discussed in relation to interface vulnerability approaches and current debates on the selective nature of crosslinguistic influence in L2 and bilingual development.
AdgerD. (2001). Core syntax: A minimalist approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
AndersenR. W. (1982). Determining the linguistic attributes of language attrition. In LambertR. D.FreedB. F. (Eds.), The loss of language skills (pp. 83–118). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
3.
ArgyriE.SoraceA. (2007). Crosslinguistic influence and language dominance in older bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 79–99.
4.
AyounD. (2005). Verb movement phenomena in Spanish: “Mixed languages” and bilingualism. In CohenJ.McAlisterK. T.RolstadK.MacSwanJ. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th international bilingualism symposium (pp. 143–162). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
5.
BaauwS. (1998). Subject-verb inversion in Spanish wh-questions: Movement as symmetry breaker. In Van BezooijenR.KagerR. (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands (pp. 1–12). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
6.
BarbosaP. (2001). On inversion in wh-questions in Romance. In HulkA.PollockJ. Y. (Eds.), Subject inversion in Romance and the theory of universal grammar (pp. 20–59). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
BohnackerU. (2007). On the “vulnerability” of syntactic domains in Swedish and German. Language Acquisition, 14, 31–73.
8.
Bruhn De GaravitoJ. (2001). Verb raising in Spanish: A comparison of early and late bilinguals. In SkarabelaB.FishS.DoA. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 84–94). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
9.
BylundE. (2009). Maturational constraints and first language attrition. Language Learning, 59, 687–715.
10.
CuzaA. (2001). La atrición de la competencia morfosintáctica del español lengua materna en situación de contacto con el inglés [The morphosyntactic attrition of Spanish L1 in a contact situation with English L2] (Unpublished MA thesis). University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
11.
CuzaA.FrankJ. (2011). Transfer effects at the syntax-semantics interface: The case of double-que questions in heritage Spanish. The Heritage Language Journal, 8, 66–89.
12.
ChomskyN. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
CoppietersR. (1987). Competence differences between native and near native speakers. Language, 64, 544–573.
14.
CrainS.ThorntonR. (1998). Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments in the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
GassS.SelinkerL. (1992). Language transfer in language learning. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
16.
GoodallG. (2004). On the syntax and processing of Spanish wh-questions. In SchmeiserB.ChandV.KelleherA.RodriguezA. (Eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL (Vol. 23, pp. 101–114). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
17.
GrinsteadJ.ElizondoE. (2001). The emergence of CP in child Spanish. Paper presented at the 4th conference on the acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as first and second languages, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
18.
Guijarro-FuentesP. (2007). Movimiento del verbo y flexión verbal en español [L2 Verb Movement and verbal inflexion in Spanish L2]. BISAL, 2, 64–88.
19.
HåkanssonG. (1995). Syntax and morphology in language attrition: A study of five bilingual expatriate Swedes. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5, 153–171.
20.
IoninT.MontrulS. (2010). The role of L1-transfer in the interpretation of articles with definite plurals in L2-English. Language Learning, 60, 877–925.
21.
IvanovI. (2009). Topicality and clitic doubling in L2 Bulgarian: A test case for the interface hypothesis. In BowlesM.IoninT.MontrulS.TremblayA. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA) (pp. 17–24). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
22.
JakubowiczC.StrikN. (2008). Scope-marking strategies in the acquisition of long distance wh-questions in French and Dutch. Language and Speech, 51, 101–132.
23.
JarvisS.PavlenkoA. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. London, UK: Routledge.
24.
KimJ.-H.MontrulS.YoonJ. (2010). Binding interpretation of anaphors in Korean heritage speakers. Language Acquisition, 16, 3–35.
25.
KöpkeB. (2004). Neurolinguistic aspects of attrition. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 3–30.
26.
KöpkeB.SchmidM. (2004). First language attrition: The next phase. In SchmidM.KöpkeB.KeijzerM.WeilemarL. (Eds.), First language attrition: Interdisciplinary perspectives on methodological issues (pp. 1–45). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
27.
LambertR. D.FreedB. F. (1982). The loss of language skills. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
28.
LicerasJ. (1989). On some properties of the “pro-drop” parameter: Looking for missing subjects in non-native Spanish. In GassS. M.SchachterJ. (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 109–133). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
LicerasJ. (1997). The syntactic nature of first language attrition: Universal principles, parametric options and language specific features (Research Project). Ontario, University of Ottawa.
30.
LicerasJ.DíazL. (1998). On the nature of the relationship between morphology and syntax: Inflectional typologies, f-features and null/overt pronouns in Spanish interlanguage. In BeckM. L. (Ed.), Morphology and its interfaces in second-language knowledge (pp. 308–338). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
31.
MandellP. (1998). The V-movement parameter: Syntactic properties and adult L2 learners of Spanish. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 169–197.
32.
MandellP. (1999). On the reliability of grammaticality judgment tests in second language acquisition research. Second Language Research, 15, 73–99.
33.
MontrulS. (2002). Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 39–68.
34.
MontrulS. (2004). Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morphosyntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 125–142.
35.
MontrulS. (2008). Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
36.
MontrulS. (2009). Incomplete acquisition of tense-aspect and mood in Spanish heritage speakers. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 13, 239–269.
37.
MontrulS.BowlesM. (2009). Is grammar instruction beneficial for heritage language learners? Dative case marking in Spanish. Heritage Language Journal, 7, 47–73.
38.
MontrulS.IoninT. (2010). Transfer effects in the interpretation of definite articles by Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 449–473.
39.
MontrulS.SlabakovaR. (2003). Competence similarities between native and near-native speakers: An investigation of the preterite/imperfect contrast in Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 351–398.
40.
MüllerN.HulkA. (2001). Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 1–21.
41.
OrdóñezF.OlarreaA. (2006). Microvariation in Caribbean/non-Caribbean Spanish interrogatives. Probus, 18, 59–96.
42.
PavlenkoA. (2000). L2 influence on L1 in late bilingualism. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 11, 175–205.
43.
Pérez-LerouxA. T. (1993). Empty categories and the acquisition of wh-movement (Doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
44.
Pérez-LerouxA. T.CuzaA.ThomasD. (2011). Clitic placement in Spanish/English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 221–232.
45.
Pérez-LerouxA. T.DaliousJ. (1998). The acquisition of Spanish interrogative inversion. Hispanic Linguistics, 10, 84–114.
46.
PesetskyD.TorregoE. (2001). T-to-C movement: Causes and consequences. In KenstowiczM. (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 355–418). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47.
PlatzackC. (2001). The vulnerable C-domain. Brain and Language, 77, 364–377.
48.
PollockJ. Y. (1989). Verb movement, UG and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 365–424.
49.
PotowskiK.JegerskiJ.Morgan-ShortK. (2009). The effects of instruction on linguistic development in Spanish heritage language speakers. Language Learning, 59, 537–579.
50.
RadfordA. (1997). Syntax: A minimalist introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51.
RizziL. (1996). Residual verb second and the wh-criterion. In BellettiA.RizziL. (Eds.), Parameters and functional heads (pp. 63–90). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
52.
RizziL. (1999). On the position “Int(errogative)” in the left position of the clause, Ms. (unpublished manuscript), Università di Siena.
53.
RothmanJ. (2009a). Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences: L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax-pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 951–973.
54.
RothmanJ. (2009b). Understanding the nature and outcomes of early bilingualism: Romance languages as heritage languages. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 13, 155–163.
55.
SànchezL. (2003). Quechua-Spanish bilingualism: Interference and convergence in functional categories. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
56.
SchmidM. (2002). First language attrition, use and maintenance: The case of German Jews in Anglophone countries. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
57.
SchmidM. (2010). Languages at play. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 1–7.
58.
SchwartzB.SprouseR. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72.
59.
SerratriceL.SoraceA.PaoliS. (2004). Subjects and objects in Italian-English bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 183–206.
60.
Silva-CorvalánC. (1994). Language contact and change. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
61.
SlabakovaR.IvanovI. (2011). A more careful look at the syntax-discourse interface. Lingua, 121, 637–65.
62.
SoraceA. (2000). Differential effects of attrition in the L1 syntax of near-native L2 speakers. In HowellC.FishS.Keith-LucasT. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Boston University conference on language development (pp. 719–725). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
63.
SoraceA. (2004). Native language attrition and developmental instability at the syntax-discourse interface: Data, interpretations and methods. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 143–145.
64.
SoraceA. (2005). Selective optionality in language development. In CornipsL.CorriganK. (Eds.), Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social (pp. 46–111). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
65.
SoraceA.FiliaciF. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22, 339–368.
66.
ThorntonR. (1990). Adventures in long-distance moving: The acquisition of complex wh-questions (Doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
67.
TorregoE. (1984). On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 103–129.
68.
TsimpliI. M.SoraceA. (2006). Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena. In BammanD.MagnitskaiaT.ZallerC. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Boston University conference on language development (pp. 653–664). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
69.
TsimpliI. M.SoraceA.HeycockC.FiliaciF. (2004). First language attrition and syntactic subjects: A study of Greek and Italian near-native speakers of English. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 8, 257–277.
70.
WeinreichU. (1953). Language in contact. New York, NY: Linguistic Circle.
71.
WhiteL.GeneseeF. (1996). How native is near native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 12, 233–265.
72.
WilsonF.SoraceA.KellerF. (2008). Antecedent preferences for anaphoric demonstratives in L2 German. In ChandleeJ.FranchiniJ. M.LordS. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Boston University conference on language development (pp. 634–645). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
73.
YipV.MatthewsS. (2009). Conditions on cross-linguistic influence in bilingual acquisition: The case of wh-interrogatives. Paper presented at the 7th International Symposium on Bilingualism, July, Utrecht, Netherlands.
74.
YuanB. (1997). Asymmetry of null subjects and null objects in Chinese speakers L2 English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 467–497.
75.
ZagonaK. (2002). The syntax of Spanish. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
76.
ZubizarretaM. L. (1998). Prosody, focus and word order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
