This study investigates the effect of L2 (Spanish) use on Catalan–Spanish bilinguals’ ability to accurately perceive and produce two contrastive native Catalan vowel categories, /e/ and /ε/. Participants were L1 Catalan highly proficient Catalan–Spanish bilinguals differing in amount of daily exposure/use of Catalan (low: 40%–70% vs. high: 80%–100%). Perceptual accuracy was assessed through speeded categorization and AXB discrimination tasks based on a 10-step vowel continuum (/e/–/ε/). Production accuracy was assessed by eliciting /ε/ tokens in Catalan cognate and noncognate words. The results indicated that participants using Spanish more frequently discriminated Catalan vowels /e/ and /ε/ less accurately and significantly more slowly and had a more Spanish-like acoustic target in the production of Catalan /ε/, particularly in cognate words. These results are consistent with the view that, in a language contact context, extensive L2 experience affects L1 sound categories.
Badia MargaritA. M. (1969). Algunes mostres de les igualacions ε=e i ɔ=o en el català parlat de Barcelona [Some examples of the equalizations of ε=e and ɔ=o in spoken Barcelona Catalan]. In Badia MargaritA. M. (Ed.), Sons i fonemes de la llengua catalana [Sounds and phonemes of the Catalan language] (pp. 97–103). Barcelona, Spain: Publicacions de la Universitat de Barcelona.
2.
Badia MargaritA. M. (1970). Les vocals tòniques e i o en el català de Barcelona [The stressed vowels e and o in Barcelona Catalan]. In Badia MargaritA. M. (Ed.), Sons i fonemes de la llengua catalana [Sounds and phonemes of the Catalan language] (pp. 141–190). Barcelona, Spain: Publicacions de la Universitat de Barcelona.
3.
BakerW.TrofimovichP. (2005). Interaction of native- and second-language vowel system(s) in early and late bilinguals. Language and Speech, 48, 1–27.
4.
BohnO.-S.FlegeJ. E. (1990). Interlingual identification and the role of foreign language experience in L2 vowel perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 303–328.
5.
BoschL.CostaA.Sebastián-GallésN. (2000). First and second language vowel perception in early bilinguals. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 189–221.
6.
BradlowA. R.Akahane-YamadaR.PisoniD. B.TohkuraY. (1999). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 977–985.
7.
CarbonellJ. F.LlisterriJ. (1992). Illustrations of the IPA: Catalan. Journal of the International Phonetic Association22, 1–2: 53–56.
8.
ColoméA.MiozzoM. (2010). Which words are activated during bilingual word production?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 69–109.
9.
CostaA.SantestebanM.CañoA. (2005). On the facilitatory effects of cognate words in bilingual speech production. Brain and Language, 94, 94–103.
10.
de BotK. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt’s “speaking” model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1–24.
11.
FlegeJ. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In StrangeW. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience (pp. 233–277). Baltimore, MD: York Press.
12.
FlegeJ. E. (2003). Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In MeyerA.SchillerN. (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (pp. 219–355). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
13.
FlegeJ. E. (2007). Language contact in bilingualism: Phonetic system interactions. In ColeJ.HualdeJ. (Eds.), Laboratory phonology9 (pp. 353–382). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
14.
FlegeJ. E.FriedaE. M.NozawaT. (1997). Amount of native language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 169–186.
15.
ForsterK. I.ForsterJ. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 35, 116–124.
16.
GuionS. G.FlegeJ. E.LoftinJ. D. (2000). The effect of L1 use on pronunciation in Quichua–Spanish bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 28, 27–42.
17.
Institut d’Estudis Catalans. (2011). Coneixements i usos del català a Catalunya el 2010: Dades del baròmetre de la comunicació i la cultura. [Knowledge and use of Catalan in Catalonia in 2010: Data from the Communication and Culture Barometer]. Barcelona, Spain: Institut d’Estudis Catalans.
18.
IversonP.HazanV.BannisterK. (2005). Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: A comparison of methods for teaching English /r/–/l/ to Japanese adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 3267–3278.
19.
KormosJ. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
KuhlP. K.ConboyB. TCoffey-CorinaS.PaddenD.Rivera-GaxiolaM.NelsonT. (2008). Phonetic learning as a pathway to language: New data and native language magnet theory expanded (NLM-e). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 979–1000.
21.
KuhlP. K.IversonP. (1995). Linguistic experience and the “perceptual magnet effect.” In StrangeW. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience (pp. 121–154). Baltimore, MD: York Press.
22.
KuhlP. K.StevensE.HayashiA.DeguchiT.KiritaniS.IversonP. (2006). Infants show a facilitation effect for native language phonetic perception between 6 and 12 months. Developmental Science, 9, F13–F21.
23.
LarssonJ. P.Vera-ConstánF.Sebastián-GallésN.DécoG. (2008). Lexical plasticity in early bilinguals does not alter phoneme categories: I. Neurodynamical modeling. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 76–94.
24.
Martínez-CeldránE.Fernández-PlanasA. M.Carrera-SabatéJ. (2003). Castilian Spanish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 33, 255–259.
25.
MoraJ. C.KeidelJ. L.FlegeJ. E. (2011). Why are the Catalan contrasts between /e/–/ε/ and /o/–/ɔ/ so difficult for even early Spanish–Catalan bilinguals to perceive? In WrembelM.KulM.Dziubalska-KołaczykK. (Eds.), Achievements and perspectives in the acquisition of second language speech: New sounds 2010 (Vol. II, pp. 183–193). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
26.
MorrisonG. S. (2005). An appropriate metric for cue weighting in L2 speech perception: Response to Escudero & Boersma (2004). Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 597–606.
27.
PallierC.BoschL.Sebastián-GallésN. (1997). A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception. Cognition, 64, B9–B17.
RecasensD. (1991). Fonètica descriptiva del català [Descriptive phonetics of Catalan]. Barcelona, Spain: Institut d’Estudis Catalans.
30.
RecasensD. (1993). Fonètica i fonologia [Phonetics and phonology]. Barcelona, Spain: Enciclopèdia Catalana.
31.
RecasensD.EspinosaA. (2006). Dispersion and variability of Catalan vowels. Speech Communication, 48, 645–666.
32.
RecasensD.EspinosaA. (2009). Dispersion and variability in Catalan five and six peripheral vowel systems. Speech Communication, 51, 240–258.
33.
Sebastián-GallésN.BoschL. (2005). Phonology and bilingualism. In KrollJ. F.de GrootA. M. B. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 68–87). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
34.
Sebastián-GallésN.EcheverríaS.BoschL. (2005). The influence of initial exposure on lexical representation: Comparing early and simultaneous bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 240–255.
35.
Sebastián-GallésN.Rodríguez-FornellsA.Diego-BalaguerR.DíazB. (2006). First- and second-language phonological representations in the mental lexicon. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1277–1291.
36.
Sebastián-GallésN.Soto-FaracoS. (1999). Online processing of native and non-native phonemic contrasts in early bilinguals. Cognition, 72, 111–123.
37.
Sebastián-GallésN.Vera-ConstánF.LarssonJ. P.CostaA.DécoG. (2008). Lexical plasticity in early bilinguals does not alter phoneme categories: II. Experimental evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 2343–2357.
38.
SimonetM. (2010). Dark and clear laterals in Catalan and Spanish: Interaction of phonetic categories in early bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 663–678.
39.
SyrdalA. K.GopalH. S. (1986). A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 79, 1086–1100.
40.
WerkerJ. F.TeesR. C. (1984). Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75, 1866–1878.
41.
YlinenS.UtherM.LatvalaA.VepsalainenS.IversonP.Akahane-YamadaR.NaatanenR. (2010). Training the brain to weight speech cues differently: A study of Finnish second-language users of English. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1319–1332.
