The aim of this study is to test whether balanced English–Spanish bilingual speakers behave like monolinguals in each of their languages when describing and remembering complex motion events. The semantic domain in question is motion, because some components (namely the manner of motion) are more difficult to lexicalize in Spanish than in English because of typological constraints (see Filipović, 2007; Slobin, 1996, 1997; Talmy, 1985). As a result, performance on a recognition task involving motion verbs could be expected to vary depending on the language used in the experiment. English and Spanish monolinguals and bilinguals performed the recognition task. Results from the monolinguals indicate that there is a language effect based on this typological difference. Specifically, English monolingual speakers performed significantly better than their Spanish peers in the recognition task in both of our conditions, i.e., with verbalization and without verbalization. The bilingual results on the other hand strongly suggest that these speakers tend to adhere to a single lexicalization pattern that is acceptable in both languages, which is the Spanish one in this case. We discuss further implications of these results for language processing and for memory of motion events in general.
AbutalebiJ.CappaS. F.PeraniD. (2009). What can functional neuroimaging tell us about the bilingual brain? In KrollJ. F.de GrootA. M. B. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism (pp. 497–515). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
AltarribaJ.MathisK. M. (1997). Conceptual and lexical development in second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 550–568.
3.
AskeJ. (1989). Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1–14.
4.
BloomP.PetersonM. A.NadelL.GarrettM. F. (Eds.) (1999). Language and Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
BowermanM.ChoiS. (2003). Space under construction: Language-specific categorization in first language acquisition. In GentnerD.Goldin-MeadowS. (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 387–427). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
BrownP. (2001). Learning to talk about motion UP and DOWN in Tzeltal: Is there a language-specific bias in verb naming? In BowermanM.LevinsonS. C. (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 512–543). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
ChenH.NgM. (1989). Semantic facilitation and translation priming effect in Chinese–English bilinguals. Memory and Cognition, 18, 279–288.
8.
DavidoffJ.DaviesI.RobersonD. (1999). Colour categories in a stone-age tribe. Nature, 398, 203–204.
9.
de GrootA. M. B. (1992). Bilingual lexical representation: A closer look at conceptual representations. In FrostR.KatzL. (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 389–412). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
10.
de GrootA. M. B. (1993). Word-type effects in bilingual processing task: Support for a mixed representational system. In SchreuderR.WeltensB. (Eds.), The bilingual lexicon (pp. 27–51). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
11.
DussiasP. (1998). The use of the late closure strategy in fluent Spanish–English bilinguals. Paper presented at the Linguistic Colloquium on bilingualism, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
12.
DussiasP. (2001). Sentence parsing in fluent Spanish–English bilinguals. In NicolJ. (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 159–176). Oxford: Blackwell.
13.
FilipovićL. (2007). Talking about motion: Crosslinguistic investigation of lexicalization patterns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14.
FilipovićL. (2008) Typology in action: Applying insights from typological contrasts. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 42–61.
15.
FilipovićL. (2010) Typology meets witness narratives and memory: Theory and practice entwined in cognitive linguistics. In TabakowskaE.ChoinskiM.WiraszkaL. (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics in action: Theory to application and back (pp. 269–291). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
16.
FilipovićL. (2010) Thinking and speaking about motion: Universal vs. language-specific effects. In MarottaG.LenciA.MeiniL.RovaiF. (Eds.), Space in Language. Proceedings of the International Conference, October 8–10, 2009 (pp. 235–248). Pisa: ETS.
17.
FinkbeinerM.NicolJ.GrethD.NakamuraK. (2002). The role of language in memory for actions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31 (5), 447–457.
18.
FrancisW. (1999). Cognitive integration of language and memory in bilinguals: Semantic representation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 193–222.
19.
GennariS. P.SlomanS. A.MaltB. C.FitchW. T. (2002). Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83, 49–79.
20.
GentnerD.Goldin-MeadowS. (Eds.) (2003). Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
GrosjeanF. (2001). The bilingual’s language modes. In NicolJ. (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp.1–22). Oxford: Blackwell.
22.
GrosjeanF.SoaresC. (1986). Processing mixed languages: Some preliminary findings. In VaidJ. (Ed.), Language processing in bilinguals: Psycholinguistic and neurological perspectives (pp. 145–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23.
GumperzJ.LevinsonS. (Eds.) (1996). Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
HerediaR.McLaughlinB. (1992). Bilingual memory revisited. In HarrisR. J. (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 91–103). North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers.
25.
HamersJ. F.BlancM. H. A. (1989). Bilinguality and bilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
26.
HartsuikerR.PickeringM. (2008). Language integration in bilingual sentence production. Acta Psychologica, 128(3), 479–489.
27.
HohensteinJ.EisenbergA.NaiglesL. (2006). Is he floating across or crossing afloat? Cross-influence of L1 and L2 in Spanish–English bilingual adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 249–261.
28.
JinY.-S. (1990). Effects of concreteness on cross-language priming in lexical decisions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70, 1139–1154.
29.
KayP.KemptonW. (1984). What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis?American Anthropologist, 86, 65–79.
30.
KolersP. A. (1966). Interlingual facilitation of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal learning and Verbal Behaviour, 5, 314–319.
31.
KrollJ. F.ShollS. A. (1992). Lexical and conceptual memory in fluent and nonfluent bilinguals. In HarrisR. J. (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 191–204). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
32.
LaiV. T.NarasimhanB. (2008, October). Verb representation and thinking-for-speaking effects in Spanish–English bilinguals. Poster presented in the conference Verb Concepts: Cognitive Science Perspectives on Verb Representation and Processing. Concordia University, Montreal.
33.
LandauB. (2009). The representation of paths in language and cognition: Universal asymmetries and their cause. Plenary talk given at the Space in Language International Conference, University of Pisa, Italy.
34.
LevinsonS. C. (1999 [1996]). Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: cross-linguistic evidence. In BloomP.PetersonM. A.NadelL.GarrettM. F. (Eds.), Language and Space (pp. 109–169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
LevinsonS. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
LevinsonS.WilkinsG. (Eds.) (2006). Grammars of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
LucyJ. A. (1992). Language diversity and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
LucyJ.GaskinsS. (2003). Interactions of language type and referent type in the development of nonverbal classification preferences. In GentnerD.Goldin-MeadowS. (Eds.), Language in mind (pp. 465–492). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39.
MackM. (1986). A study of semantic and syntactic processing in monolinguals and fluent early bilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 463–488.
40.
MaigisteE. (1982). Automaticity and interference in bilinguals. Psychological Research, 44, 29–43.
41.
MaigisteE. (1985). Development of intra- and interlingual interference in bilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 14, 137–154.
42.
MaltB. C.SlomanS. A.GennariS. P. (2003). Speaking versus thinking about objects and actions. In GentnerD.Goldin-MeadowS. (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 81–111). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43.
McCormackP. D. (1977). Bilingual linguistic memory: The independence/interdependence issue revisited. In HornbyP. A. (Ed.), Bilingualism: Psychological, social and educational implications (pp. 57–66). New York: Academic Press.
44.
Myers-ScottonC. (2003). Multiple voices: An introduction to bilingualism. Oxford: Blackwell.
45.
NicolJ.TellerM.GrethD. (2001). Production of verb agreement in monolingual, bilingual and second-language speakers. In NicolJ. (Ed.), One mind, two languages: bilingual language processing (pp. 117–158). Oxford: Blackwell.
46.
PapafragouA.MasseyC.GleitmanL. (2002). Shake, rattle ‘n’ roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition, 84, 189–219.
47.
PavioA.ClarkJ. M.LambertW. E. (1988). Bilingual dual coding theory and semantic repetition effect on recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 163–172.
48.
PrestonM. S.LambertW. E. (1969). Interlingual interference in a bilingual version of the Stroop color-word task. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 295–301.
49.
RegierT.KayP. (2009). Language, thought, and colour: Whorf was half right. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 439–446.
50.
RobersonD.DavidoffJ.DaviesI. R.ShapiroL. R. (2005). Colour categories: Evidence for cultural relativity hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 50, 378–411.
51.
SchankR. (1982). Dynamic memory: A theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
SchankR.AbelsonR. (1995). Knowledge and memory. The real story. In WyerR. S.Jr. (Ed.), Advances in social cognition, Volume 8 (pp. 1–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53.
SchraufR. W.PavlenkoA.DewaeleJ.-M. (2003). Bilingual episodic memory: An introduction. International Journal of Bilingualism, 7, 221–233.
54.
ShollA.SankaranarayananA.KrollJ. F. (1995). Transfer between picture naming and translation: A test of asymmetries in bilingual memory. Psychological Science, 6, 45–49.
55.
SlobinD. I. (1996). Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In ShibataniM.ThompsonS. A. (Eds.) Grammatical constructions – their form and meaning (pp. 195–219). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
56.
SlobinD. I. (1997). Mind, code, and text. In BybeeJ.HaimanJ.ThompsonS. (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type (pp. 437–467). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
57.
SlobinD. I. (2000). Verbalised events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In NiemeierS.DirvenR. (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (pp. 107–138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
58.
SlobinD. I. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In GentnerD.Goldin-MeadowS. (Eds.), Language in mind (pp. 157–191). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59.
SlobinD. I. (2006). What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse and cognition. In HickmanM.RobertS. (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 59–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
60.
SoaresC.GrosjeanF. (1984). Bilinguals in a monolingual and bilingual speech mode: The effect on lexical access. Memory and Cognition, 12, 380–386.
61.
TalmyL. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In ShopenT. (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (pp.57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62.
TalmyL. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflations. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society17, 480–519.
63.
TalmyL. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64.
TaylorI.TaylorM. M. (1990). Psycholinguistics – learning and using language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
65.
TulvingE. (2002). Episodic memory and common sense: How far apart? In BaddeleyA.ConwayM. A.AggletonJ. (Eds.), Episodic memory: New directions in research (pp. 269–287). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66.
ViglioccoG.ButterworthB.GarrettM. F. (1996). Subject–verb agreement in Spanish and English: Differences in the role of conceptual constraints. Cognition, 61, 261–298.
