This paper investigates whether bilinguals' and monolinguals' concepts of entities differ when the bilinguals' two languages provide two different representations of the same entity. Previous research shows that speakers of languages that have a grammatical gender system think of objects as being masculine or feminine in line with the grammatical gender of the objects' nouns. The present study investigates the effects of grammatical gender on concepts of objects in bilingual speakers of two languages that assign opposite gender to the same object. Italian-German bilingual children and Italian monolingual controls performed an on-line voice attribution task. All children were native speakers of Italian and living in Italy. Results show that Italian monolingual children attribute more female voices to objects whose noun is grammatically feminine in Italian. Monolinguals also show a preference for attributing voices consistently with Italian grammatical gender assignment. Italian-German bilingual children are not affected by Italian grammatical gender. It is argued that when the two languages of a bilingual represent a specific aspect of reality differently, the bilingual may develop different concepts from a monolingual. This is due to the knowledge of two specific languages rather than to bilingualism per se, and to linguistic rather than cultural factors.
Andonova, E., D'Amico, S., Devescovi, A., & Bates, E. (2004). Gender and lexical access in Bulgarian. Perception and Psychophysics, 66(3), 496-507.
2.
Andonova, E., Gosheva, A., Schaffai, J.S., & Janyan, A. (2007). Second language gender system affects first language gender classification. In I. Kecskes & L. Albertazzi (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of bilingualism (pp. 271-300). London: Springer.
3.
Athanasopoulos, P. (2006). Effects of the grammatical representation of number on cognition in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , 9, 89-96.
4.
Beit-Hallami, B., Catford, J.C., Cooley, R.E., Yull, C.Y., Guiora, A.Z. & Paluszny, M. (1974). Grammatical gender and gender identity development: Cross-cultural and cross-lingual implications. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 44, 424-431.
5.
Bialystok, E. (2005). Consequences of bilingualism for cognitive development . In B. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistics perspectives (pp. 417-432). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
Bialystok, E., Craick, F.I.M., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19(2), 290 - 303.
7.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2005). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.3.14) [Computer program]. Retrieved May 26, 2005, from <http://www.praat.org/>.
8.
Boroditsky, L., & Schmidt, L.A. (2000). Sex, syntax, and semantics. In L. R. Gleitman & A. K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.42-47). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
Bowerman, M., & Levinson, S. C. (Eds.). (2001). Language acquisition and conceptual development. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Calvino, I. (1993). Fiabe italiane [Italian fairytales]. Milano, Mondadori. 1st edition 1956.
11.
Clarke, M.A., Losoff, A., Dickenson, M., & McCracken, J.S. (1981). Gender perception in Arabic and English. Language Learning, 31, 159-169.
12.
Cohen, J.D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25(2), 257-271.
13.
Cook, V.J. (1997). The consequences of bilingualism for cognitive processing. In A. M. B. de Groot & J. F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Cook, V.J. (2002). Background to the L2 user. In V. J. Cook (Ed.), Portraits of the L2 user (pp.21-28). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
15.
Cook, V.J., Bassetti, B., Kasai, C., Sasaki, M., & Takahashi, J.A. (2006). Do bilinguals have different concepts? The case of shape and material in Japanese L2 users of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 10(2), 137-152.
16.
Corbett, G.G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
D'Angiulli, A., Siegel, L.S., & Serra, E. (2001). The development of reading in English and Italian bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22(4), 479-507.
18.
Davidoff, J., Davies, I., & Roberson, D. (1999). Color categories of a stone-age tribe. Nature, 398, 203-204.
19.
Ervin, S.M. (1961). Semantic shift in bilingualism. American Journal of Psychology, 74, 233 - 241.
20.
Ervin, S.M. (1962). The connotations of gender. Word , 18, 249-261.
21.
Flaherty, M. (1999). The influence of a language gender system on perception . Tohoku Psychologica Folia, 58, 1-10.
22.
Flaherty, M. (2001). How a language gender system creeps into perception . Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(1), 18-31.
23.
Fodor, I. (1959). The origin of grammatical gender. Lingua, 8(1).
24.
Foundalis, H. (2002). Evolution of gender in Indo-European languages . In W. D. Gray & C. D. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.304-309). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25.
Gentner, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (Eds.). (2003). Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
26.
Green, D.W. (1998). Bilingualism and thought. Psychologica Belgica, 38, 253-278.
27.
Guiora, A. (1983). Language and concept formation: A cross-lingual analysis. Behavior Science Research, 18(3), 228-256.
28.
Guiora, A., & Sagi, A. (1978). A cross-cultural study of symbolic meaning: Developmental aspects. Language Learning, 28(2), 381-386.
29.
Hoffman, C., Lau, I.Y.-M., & Johnson, D.R. (1986). The linguistic relativity of person cognition: An English-Chinese comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1097-1107.
30.
Imai, M., & Gentner, D. (1997). A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning: Universal ontology and linguistic influence. Cognition, 62, 169-200.
31.
Jakobson, R. (1966). On linguistic aspects of translation. In R. A. Brower (Ed.), On translation (pp. 232-239). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
Jones, M.A. (1996). Foundations of French syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Kenyeres, A. (1938). Comment une petite Hongroise de sept ans apprend le Français. Archives de Psychologie, 26(104), 321-366.
34.
Konishi, T. (1993). The semantics of grammatical gender: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 519-534.
35.
Leinbach, M.D., Hort, B.E., & Fagot, B. (1997). Bears are for boys: Metaphorical associations in young children's gender stereotypes. Cognitive Development , 12, 107-130.
36.
Martinez, I., & Shatz, M. (1996). Linguistic influences on categorization in preschool children: A crosslinguistic study. Journal of Child Language , 23, 529-545.
37.
Mullen, M.K. (1990). Children's classification of nature and artifact pictures into female and male categories. Sex Roles, 23, 577-587.
38.
Odlin, T. (2003). Cross-linguistic influence. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp.436-486). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
39.
O'Mahony, M., & Ishii, R. (1986). A comparison of English and Japanese taste languages . British Journal of Psychology, 77, 161-174.
40.
Pavlenko, A. (2003). Eyewitness memory in late bilinguals: Evidence for discursive relativity. International Journal of Bilingualism , 7(3), 257-281.
41.
Pavlenko, A. (2005). Bilingualism and thought. In A. M. B. de Groot & J. F. Kroll (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistics perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
Phillips, W., & Boroditsky, L. (2003). Can quirks of grammar affect the way you think? Grammatical gender and object concepts. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20-fifth annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Boston: Cognitive Science Society.
43.
Sera, M.D., Berge, C.A.H., &Del Castillo Pintado, J. (1994). Grammatical and conceptual forces in the attribution of gender by English and Spanish speakers. Cognitive Development , 9(3), 261-292.
44.
Sera, M., Elieff, C., Forbes, J., Burch, M.C., Rodríguez, W., & Dubois, D.P. (2002). When language affects cognition and when it does not: An analysis of grammatical gender and classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(3), 377-397.
45.
Slobin, D.I. (2000). Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (pp. 107-137). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
46.
Taeschner, T. (1983). The sun is feminine. A study of language acquisition in bilingual children. Berlin: Springer.
47.
Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D., Paganelli, F., & Dworzynski, K. (2005). Grammatical effects of gender on cognition: Implications for language learning and language use. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 134(4), 501-520.
48.
Yorkston, E., & DE Mello, G.E. (2005). Linguistic gender marking and categorization. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 224-234.
49.
Zubin, D.A., & Kopcke, K.M. (1984). Affect classification in the German gender system . Lingua, 63, 41-96.
