In this paper we analyze mixed compounds, such as legume+winkel `vegetable shop, greengrocery' and winter+paletot `winter coat' which contain a French and a Dutch element, and French nominal groups, such as carte d'identité `identity card', and journal parlé `radio news', which bilingual speakers from Brussels frequently insert into Brussels Dutch utterances. Using Muysken's (2000) typology of bilingual speech, we claim that the mixed compounds and the nominal groups display the characteristics of insertional codemixing. In addition, some evidence for the existence of a continuum between borrowing and codeswitching can be obtained from these examples. As the multimorphemic units that are inserted into Dutch are neither single words, nor full constituents, their status in the lexicon raises interesting issues for researchers interested in the interface between syntax and the lexicon (see also Backus, 2003). We try to argue that nominal groups such as carte d'identité and journal parlé are probably best seen as lexical templates or constructional idioms (Booij, 2002b). The insertion of French constructional idioms in Brussels Dutch represents an innovation in the lexical patterns that are available to speakers of this language, which is highly relevant for theories of language change.
Alegre, M.A., & Gordon, P. (1996). Red rats eater exposes recursion in children's word formation. Cognition, 60, 65-82.
2.
Backus, A. (2003). Units in codeswitching: Evidence for multimorphemic elements in the lexicon. Linguistics, 41(1), 83-132.
3.
Baetens,Beardsmore, H. (1971). Le Français Régional de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Institut de Phonétique, conférences et travaux 3. Bruxelles: Presses Universitaires de Bruxelles.
4.
Beard, R. (1996). Head operations and head-modifier ordering in nominal compounds. Paper at the 70th meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Diego. (Unpublished manuscript, Bucknell University, Lewisburg PA).
5.
Bierbach, M. (1981). Die Verbindung von Verbal- und Nominalelement im Französischen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
6.
Bisetto, A., & Scalise, S. (1999). Compounding: Morphology and/or syntax? In L. Mereu (Ed.), Boundaries of morphology and syntax (pp. 31-48). Series IV-Current issues in linguistic theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
7.
Blanche-Benveniste, C. (1997). Approches de la langue parlée en français. Collection L'essentiel français. Gap: Ophrys .
8.
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Henry Holt.
9.
Booij, G. (1999). The phonology of Dutch. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
10.
Booij, G. (2002a). The morphology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
Booij, G. (2002b). Constructional idioms, morphology, and the Dutch lexicon. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 14(4), 301-329.
12.
Booij, G., & van Santen, A. (1998). Morfologie: De woordstructuur van het Nederlands [Morphology: Dutch word structure]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
13.
Botha, R. (1984). Morphological mechanisms. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
14.
Clyne, M. (1967). Transference and triggering: Observations on the language assimilation of postwar German-speaking migrants in Australia. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
15.
Darmesteter, A. (1967). [reprint of corrected 1894 ed., first ed. 1874] Traîté de la formation des mots composés dans la langue française comparée aux autres langues romanes et au latin. Paris: Honoré Champion
16.
De Clerck, W. (1981). Nijhoffs Zuid Nederlands Woordenboek. `sGravenhage/ Antwerpen: Martinus Nijhoff.
17.
De Vriendt, S. (2001). De meervoudsvorming in het Brussels. De Vlaamse woorden [Plural formation in Brussels Dutch. The Flemish words]. Brussels Dialect41, August-September-October 2001, 6-10.
18.
De Vriendt, S., & Goyvaerts, D. (1989). Assimilation and sandhi in het Brussels. Leuvense Bijdragen, 78(1), 1-93.
19.
Disciullio, A.-M., & Williams, E. (1987). On the definition of word. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
20.
Fleischer, W. (2000). Die Klassifikation von Wortbildungsprozessen. In G. Booij, Chr. Lehmann & J. Mugdan (Eds.), Morphologie. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung. Volume 1 (pp. 886-897). Berlin: de Gruyter,
21.
Geerts, G., & Heestermans, H. (1984). Van Dale. Groot Woordenboek der Nederlandse Taal. Eleventh Edition. Utrecht/ Antwerpen: Van Dale Lexicografie.
22.
Geerts, G., Haeseryn, W., de Rooij, J., & van den Toorn, M.C. (1984, first edition) Algemene Nederlands Spraakkunst (ANS). Electronic version: E-ANS. URL: <http://oase.uci.kun.nl/~ans/>. [Accessed 07/01/03].
23.
Gordon, P. (1985). Level ordering in lexical development. Cognition, 21, 73-93.
24.
Grevisse, M. (1993). Le bon usage. Grammaire française, refondue par André Goosse. Treizième édition revue. Paris: Duculot.
25.
Gross, G. (1996). Les expressions figées en français: Noms composés et autres locutions. Collection l'Essentiel français. Paris: Ophrys.
26.
Kiparsky, P. (1982). From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. In H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations (Part 1). Dordrecht: Foris.
27.
Lardière, D. (1998). Parameter-resetting in morphology: Evidence from compounding. In M.-L. Beck (Ed.), Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge (pp. 283-305). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
28.
Macwhinney, B. (2000) The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Mathieu-Colas, M. (1996). Essai de typologie des noms composés français . Cahiers Lexicologiques, 69(2), 71-125.
30.
M'Barek, N., & Sankoff, D. (1988). Le discours mixte arabe/français: Emprunts ou alternances de langue?Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 33, 143-154.
31.
Muysken, P. (1992). Indic mixed verbal compounds. ESF network on codeswitching and language contact. Codeswitching summer school (pp. 195-208). Pavia (Italy), 9-12 September, 1992.
32.
Muysken, P. (2000). Bilingual speech. A typology of codemixing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Myers-Scotton, C. (1993). Duelling languages: Grammatical structure in codeswitching . Oxford: Clarendon Press.
34.
Noailly, M. (1990). Le substantif épithète. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France.
35.
Picone, M. (1994). Code-intermediate phenomena in Louisiana French . In K. Beals et al. (Eds.), CLS 30. Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Volume 1: The main session (pp. 320-334). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
36.
Picone, M. (1996). Anglicisms, neologisms and dynamic French. Linguisticæ Investigationes: Supplementa, 18. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
37.
Poplack, S. (1980). Sometimes I `ll start a sentence in Spanish y termino en Español: Toward a typology of Codeswitching. Linguistics , 18, 581-618.
38.
Poplack, S. (1990). Variation theory and language contact: Concepts, methods and data. Network on codeswitching and language contact. Papers for the Workshop on Concepts, Methodology and Data (pp. 33-65). Basel, 12-13 January, 1990.
39.
Poplack, S., & Meechan, M. (1995). Patterns of language mixture: Nominal structure in Wolof-French and Fongbe-French bilingual discourse. In L. Milroy & P. Muysken (Eds.), One speaker, two languages. Cross-disciplinary perspectives on codeswitching (pp. 199-232). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Posner, R. (1997). Linguistic change in French. Oxford: Clarendon.
41.
Rohrer, Chr. (1977). Die Wortzusammensetzung im Modernen Französisch . Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik, 78. Tübingen: TBL Verlag Narr.
42.
Romaine, S. (1989). Bilingualism. Oxford: Blackwell.
43.
Sadock, J.M. (1998). On the autonomy of compounding morphology. In S. G. Lapointe, D. K. Brentari & P. M. Farrell (Eds.), Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax (pp. 161-187). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
44.
Sankoff, D., Poplack, S., & Vanniarajan, S. (1990). The case of the nonce loan in Tamil. Language Variation and Change, 2, 71-102.
45.
Rohrer, C. (1977). Wortzusammensetzung im Modernen Französisch. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
46.
Ten Hacken, P.( 2000). Derivation and compounding. In G. Booij, Chr. Lehmann & J. Mugdan (Eds.), Morphologie. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung 1 (pp. 349-360). Berlin: de Gruyter.
47.
Treffers-Daller, J. (1994). Mixing two languages: French-Dutch contact in a comparative perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
48.
Weymare, E. (2002). Gemengde Samenstellingen in het Vlaams [mixed compounds in Flemish (Southern Dutch)]. Unpublished paper, University of Nijmegen.
49.
Winford, D. (2003) An introduction to contact linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell
50.
Wioland, F. (1991) Prononcer les mots du français: Des sons et des rythmes. Paris: Hachette.
51.
Zwanenburg, W. (1992a). Compounding in French. Rivista di Linguistica, 4(1), 221-240.
52.
Zwanenburg, W. (1992b). La composition dans les langues romanes et germaniques: Essuieglace/windshield-wiper. Working Papers of the research Institute for Language and Speech OTS, University of Utrecht, no 13.
