This paper presents an extended formulation of the Competition Model. The extended model, called the Unified Competition Model, is designed to account for a larger range of phenomena in first and second language acquisition, including bilingualism. As in the classic version of the Competition Model, competition is at the core of a set of non-modular interacting forces. However, the various inputs to competition are now described in terms of six additional subcomponents: arenas, mappings, chunking, storage, codes, and support. Learning is viewed as a resonant process that relies on storage, chunking, and support to acquire new mappings.
Asher, J. (1977). Children learning another language: A developmental hypothesis. Child Development, 48, 1040-1048.
2.
Atkinson, R. (1975). Mnemotechnics in second-language learning. American Psychologist, 30, 821 - 828.
3.
Bailey, D., Chang, N., Feldman, J., & Narayanan, S. (1998). Extending embodied lexical development. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 64 - 69.
4.
Bates, E., & Macwhinney, B. (1981). Second language acquisition from a functionalist perspective: Pragmatic, semantic and perceptual strategies . In H. Winitz (Ed.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Conference on Native and Foreign Language Acquisition (pp. 190-214). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
5.
Bates, E., & Macwhinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In E. Wanner & L. Gleitman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp.173-218). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Bley-Vroman, R., Felix, S., & Ioup, G. (1988). The accessibility of universal grammar in adult language learning. Second Language Research, 4, 1-32.
7.
Booth, J.R., Macwhinney, B., Thulborn, K.R., Sacco, K., Voyvodic, J.T., & Feldman, H.M. (2001). Developmental and lesion effects during brain activation for sentence comprehension and mental rotation. Developmental Neuropsychology, 18, 139 - 169.
8.
Booth, J.R., Perfetti, C.A., & Macwhinney, B. (1999). Quick, automatic, and general activation of orthographic and phonological representations in young readers . Developmental Psychology, 35, 3-19.
9.
Clahsen, H., & Muysken, P. (1986). The availability of UG to adult and child learners: A study of the acquisition of German word order. Second Language Research, 2, 93-119.
10.
De Bot, K., & van Montfort, R. (1988). "Cue-validity" in het Nederlands als eerste en tweede taal. Interdisciplinair Tijdschrift voor Taal en Tekstwetenschap, 8, 111-120.
11.
Dell, G., Juliano, C., & Govindjee, A. (1993). Structure and content in language production: A theory of frame constraints in phonological speech errors. Cognitive Science, 17, 149 - 195.
12.
Devescovi, A., D'Amico, S., Smith, S., Mimica, I., & Bates, E. (1998). The development of sentence comprehension in Italian and Serbo-Croatian: Local versus distributed cues. In D. Hillert (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 31. Sentence processing: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 345-377). San Diego: Academic Press.
13.
Döpke, S. (in press). Generation of and retraction from cross-linguistically motivated structure in bilingual first language acquisition. In F. Genesee (Ed.), Bilingualism, language, and cognition: Aspects of bilingual acquisition. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
14.
Ellis, N.C., & Beaton, A. (1995). Psycholinguistic determinants of foreign language vocabulary learning. In B. Harley (Ed.), Lexical issues in language learning. Philadelphia : John Benjamins.
15.
Elman, J.L., & Mcclelland, J.L. (1988). Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: Compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 143-165.
16.
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1969). Sociolinguistics. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology . New York: Academic Press.
17.
Flege, J., & Davidian, R. (1984). Transfer and developmental processes in adult foreign language speech production. Applied Psycholinguistics , 5, 323-347.
18.
Flege, J., Takagi, J., & Mann, V. (1995). Japanese adults can learn to produce English `r' and `l' accurately. Language Learning, 39, 23-32.
19.
Gass, S. (1987). The resolution of conflicts among competing systems: A bidirectional perspective. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 329-350.
20.
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52, 45-56.
21.
Gibson, E., Pearlmutter, N., Canseco-Gonzalez, E., & Hickok, G. (1996). Recency preference in the human sentence processing mechanism. Cognition, 59, 23-59.
22.
Goldberg, A.E. (1999). The emergence of the semantics of argument structure constructions. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp.197-213). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23.
Gupta, P., & Macwhinney, B. (1997). Vocabulary acquisition and verbal short-term memory: Computational and neural bases. Brain and Language, 59, 267-333.
24.
Halliday, M. (1966). Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 1. Journal of Linguistics, 2,37-71.
25.
Hancin-Bhatt, B. (1994). Segment transfer: a consequence of a dynamic system . Second Language Research, 10, 241-269.
26.
Harrington, M. (1987). Processing transfer: language-specific strategies as a source of inter-language variation. Applied Psycholinguistics , 8, 351-378.
27.
Hausser, R. (1999). Foundations of computational linguistics: Man-machine communication in natural language. Berlin: Springer.
28.
Hofstädter, D. (1997). Fluid concepts and creative analogies: Computer models of the fundamental mechanisms of thought. London : Allen Lane.
29.
Kilborn, K. (1989). Sentence processing in a second language: The timing of transfer. Language and Speech, 32, 1-23.
30.
Kilborn, K., & Cooreman, A. (1987). Sentence interpretation strategies in adult Dutch-English bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 415-431.
31.
Kilborn, K., & Ito, T. (1989). Sentence processing in Japanese-English and Dutch-English bilinguals. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp.257-291). New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Krashen, S. (1994). The Input Hypothesis and its rivals. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp.45-78). San Diego: Academic.
33.
Kroll, J., & Sholl, A. (1992). Lexical and conceptual memory in fluent and nonfluent bilinguals. In R. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp.191-206). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
34.
Langacker, R. (1989). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 2: Applications . Stanford: Stanford University Press.
35.
Li, P., Farkas, I., & Macwhinney, B. (under review). The origin of categorical representations of language in the brain. Cognitive Science .
36.
Liu, H., Bates, E., & Li, P. (1992). Sentence interpretation in bilingual speakers of English and Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 451-484.
37.
Locke, J.L. (1995). Development of the capacity for spoken language . In P. Fletcher & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), The handbook of child language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell .
38.
Macdonald, M., & Macwhinney, B. (1990). Measuring inhibition and facilitation from pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language , 29, 469-492.
39.
Macdonald, M.C., Pearlmutter, N.J., & Seidenberg, M.S. (1994). Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101(4), 676-703.
40.
Macwhinney, B. (1975a). Pragmatic patterns in child syntax. Stanford Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 10, 153-165.
41.
Macwhinney, B. (1975b). Rules, rote, and analogy in morphological formations by Hungarian children. Journal of Child Language, 2, 65-77.
42.
Macwhinney, B. (1977). Starting points. Language, 53, 152-168.
43.
Macwhinney, B. (1978). The acquisition of morphophonology. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 43, 1-123.
44.
Macwhinney, B. (1982). Basic syntactic processes. In S. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language acquisition: Vol. 1. Syntax and semantics (pp.73-136). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
Macwhinney, B. (1987a). The Competition Model. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp.249-308). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
Macwhinney, B. (1987b). Toward a psycholinguistically plausible parser . In S. Thomason (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University.
47.
Macwhinney, B. (1989). Competition and lexical categorization. In R. Corrigan, F. Eckman & M. Noonan (Eds.), Linguistic categorization (pp.195-242). Philadelphia : Benjamins.
48.
Macwhinney, B. (1999). The emergence of language from embodiment. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp.213-256). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49.
Macwhinney, B., & Valdes-Perez, R. (2000). Online measures of basic language skills in children with early focal brain lesions. Brain and Language, 71, 400-431.
50.
Macwhinney, B., & Pléh, C. (1988). The processing of restrictive relative clauses in Hungarian. Cognition, 29, 95-141.
51.
Mcclelland, J.L., Mcnaughton, B.L., & O'Reilly, R.C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102,419-457.
52.
Mcdonald, J.L. (1987a). Assigning linguistic roles: The influence of conflicting cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 100-117.
53.
Mcdonald, J.L. (1987b). Sentence interpretation in bilingual speakers of English and Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 379-414.
54.
Mcdonald, J.L., & Heilenman, K. (1991). Determinants of cue strength in adult first and second language speakers of French. Applied Psycholinguistics , 12, 313-348.
55.
Mcdonald, J.L., & Macwhinney, B. (1989). Maximum likelihood models for sentence processing research. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 397-421). New York: Cambridge University Press.
56.
Mcdonald, J.L., & Macwhinney, B.J. (1995). The time course of anaphor resolution: Effects of implicit verb causality and gender. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 543 - 566.
57.
Newell, A. (1990). A unified theory of cognition. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
58.
Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234.
59.
Paget, R. (1930). Human speech. New York: Harcourt Brace.
60.
Ramachandran, V.S., & Hubbard, E.M. (2001). Synesthesia: A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 3-34.
61.
Snow, C. (1995). Issues in the study of input: Finetuning, universality, individual and developmental differences, and necessary causes. In P. Fletcher & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), The handbook of child language (pp.180-193). Oxford: Blackwells.
62.
Snow, C.E. (1999). Social perspectives on the emergence of language . In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp.257-276). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
63.
Sokolov, J.L. (1988). Cue validity in Hebrew sentence comprehension . Journal of Child Language, 15,129-156.
64.
Sokolov, J.L. (1989). The development of role assignment in Hebrew. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp.158-184). New York: Cambridge.
65.
Stager, C.L., & Werker, J.F. (1997). Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word learning tasks. Nature, 388, 381-382.
66.
Stemberger, J., & Macwhinney, B. (1986). Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms. Memory and Cognition , 14, 17-26.
67.
Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68.
Tomasello, M. (2000). The item-based nature of children's early syntactic development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 156-163.
