Learning new segments and reducing domains in German L2 phonology: The role of the Prosodic Hierarchy

Abstract

This paper investigates interactions between the prosodic structures of L1 and L2 in second language acquisition. We focus here on a case in which the L1 and L2 are quite different with regard to the role played by the prosodic structures: the acquisition of German by speakers of Spanish. “Demarcating languages” such as German tend to phonologically mark the beginnings and/ or ends of relatively small prosodic constituents, while “Grouping languages” such as Spanish tend to favor the application of phonological phenomena throughout relatively long constituents. The subset-superset relationship inherent in current views of L2 acquisition, in particular the Asymmetry Hypothesis, predicts that reducing the domain of application of a process should be impossible to learn. In this light, we examine data (spontaneous and read speech of 11 Spanish speakers learning German) involving phonological processes which differ both in their segmental content and in their domains of application in the two languages. Our results are different from those predicted, that is, the pattern of acquisition cuts across the categories that would be established in such framework. Our findings thus demonstrate that the Asymmetry Hypothesis cannot be maintained as a model of L2 phonological acquisition, at least in its present form.

Keywords

L1 Spanish L2 German second language phonology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alber, B. (1998). Stress preservation in German loan words. In W. Kehrein & R. Wiese (Eds.), Phonology and morphology of the Germanic language (pp. 113-141). Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Anttila, A. (1997). Deriving variation from grammar. In F. Hinskens , R. V. Hout & L. Wetzels (Eds.), Variation, change and phonological theory (pp. 35 - 68). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Carroll, S.E. (2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Chen, M.Y. (1990). What must phonology know about syntax? In S. Inkelas & D. Zec (Eds.), The phonology-syntax connection (pp. 19-46). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Hall, T. (1992). Syllable structure and syllable-related processes in German. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

Harris, J.W. (1969). Spanish phonology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Harris, J.W. (1984). La espirantización en castellano y la representación fonológica autosegmental. In Estudis Gramaticals 1. Working Papers in Linguistics (pp. 149-167). Bellaterra: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

Harris, J.W. (1989). The stress erasure convention and cliticization in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 339-363.

Hualde, J.-I. (1992). On Spanish syllabification. In H. Campos & F. Martínez-Gil (Eds.), Current studies in Spanish linguistics (pp. 475-493). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press .

10.

Lleó, C. (2001). The interface of phonology and syntax: The emergence of the article in the early acquisition of Spanish and German. In J. Weissenborn & B. Höhle (Eds.), Approaches to Bootstrapping: Phonological, lexical, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition , Vol.2 (pp.23-44). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

11.

Lleó, C. (2003). Child prosody and filler syllables: Looking into Spanish through the optimal window of acquisition. In S. Montrul & F. Ordóñez (Eds.), Selected papers of the 4th International Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese (pp. 229 - 253). Somerville : Cascadilla Press.

12.

Malmberg, B. (1949). La structure syllabique de l'espagnol. BF 9, 99-120.

13.

Morris, R.E. (1998). Stylistic variation in Spanish phonology. Dissertation, Ohio State University, ROA-292.

14.

Nespor, M. , & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht : Foris.

15.

Trujillo, C. (2001). Die Rolle der Sonorität im phonologizchen Fremdspracherwerb . Peter Lang.

16.

Vogel, I. (1999). Subminimal constituents in prosodic phonology . In S. J. Hannahs & M. Davenport (Eds.), Phonological structure (pp. 249-267). Dordrecht: Foris.

17.

Werenitsch, N.I. (1999). Zur Frage der Variation der Lautsegmente unter dem Einfluß der Sprechgeschwindigkeit. In E.-M. Krech & E. Stock (Eds.), Sprechwissenschaft-Zu Geschichte und Gegenwart (pp. 373-380). Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Bern, New York, Paris, Wien: Peter Lang.

18.

White, L. (1992/94). Universal grammar: Is it just a new name for old problems? In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp.217-232). Amsterdam /Philadelphia : John Benjamins.

19.

Wiese, R. (1996). The phonology of German. Oxford : Clarendon Press.

20.

Young-Scholten, M. (1994). On positive evidence and ultimate attainment in L2 phonology. Second Language Research, 10, 193-214.

21.

Zampini, M.L. (1997). L2 Spanish spirantization, prosodic domains and interlanguage rules. In S. J. Hannahs & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Focus on phonological acquisition (pp. 209-234). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.