This study is concerned with two phenomena of language alternation in biographic narrations in Yiddish and Low German, based on spoken language data recorded between 1988 and 1995. In both phenomena language alternation serves as an additional communicative tool which can be applied by bilingual speakers to enlarge their set of interactional devices in order to ensure a smoother or more pointed processing of communicative aims. The first phenomenon is a narrative strategy that I call Token
Codeswitching: In a bilingual narrative culminating in a line of reported speech, a single element of L2 indicates the original language of the reconstructed dialogue—a token for a quote. The second phenomenon has to do with directing procedures, carried out by the speaker and aimed at guiding the hearer's attention, which are frequently carried out in L2, supporting the hearer's attention at crucial points in the interaction. Both phenomena are analyzed following a model of narrative discourse as proposed in the framework of Functional Pragmatics. The model allows the adoption of an integral approach to previous findings in codeswitching research.
Auer, P. (1984). Bilingual conversations. Amsterdam : Benjamins.
2.
Auer, P. (1988). A conversation analytic approach to codeswitching and transfer. In M. Heller (Ed.), Codeswitching. Anthropological and sociolinguistic perspectives (pp.187-213). Berlin, New York, Amsterdam : Mouton de Gruyter.
3.
Auer, P. (1995). The pragmatics of code-switching: A sequential approach. In L. Milroy & P. Muysken (Eds.), One speaker, two languages. Cross disciplinary perspectives on codeswitching (pp. 115-135). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Blom, J.P., & Gumperz, J.J. (1972). Social meaning in linguistic structures. In J.J. Gumperz & Hymes, D. (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp.407- 434). New York: Holt, Rinehardt and Winston.
5.
Brünner, G., & Grae N, G. (1994). Texte und Diskurse. Methoden und Forschungsergebnisse der Funktionalen Pragmatik. Ppladen : Westdeutscher Verlag.
6.
Bühler, K. (1982/1934). Sprachtheorie. Stuttgart/New York: Fischer .
7.
Clyne, M. (1987). Constraints on codeswitching: How universal are they? Linguistics, 25, 739-764.
8.
Dorian, N.C. (1997). Telling the Monolinguals from the Bilinguals: Unrealistic code choices in direct quotations within Scottish Gaelic narratives . International Journal of Bilingualism, 1(1), 41-54.
9.
Ehlich, K. (1979). Verwendungender Deixis beim sprachlichen Handeln. Linguistisch-philologische Untersuchungen zum hebräischen deiktischen System . Frankfurt: Lang.
10.
Ehlich, K. (1983). Alltägliches Erzählen. In W. Sanders & K. Wegenast (Eds.), Erzählen für Kinder -Erzählen von Gott (pp.128-150). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
11.
Ehlich, K. (1986a). Interjektionen. Tübingen : Niemeyer .
12.
Ehlich, K. (1986b). Funktional-pragmatische Kommunikationsanalyse-Ziele und Verfahren. In W. Hartung (Ed.), Untersuchungen zur Kommunikation. Ergebnisse und Perspektiven (pp.15- 40) Berlin : Akademieder Wissenschaften.
13.
Ehlich, K., & Rehbein, J. (1986). Muster und Institution. Untersuchungen zur schulischen Kommunikation. Tübingen: Narr.
14.
Fishman, J.A. (1971). Sociolinguistics. Rowley: Newbury.
15.
Freed, A.F. (1994). The form and function of questions in informal dyadic conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 621-644.
16.
Gumperz, J.J. (1982).Discourse strategies. Cambridge , U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Kelly-Holmes, H. (2000). Bier, parfum, kaas: Language fetish inEuropean advertising. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 3(1), 67-82.
18.
Levinson, S.C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Maschler, Y. (1994). Metalanguaging and discourse markers in bilingual conversation. Language in Society, 23, 325-366.
20.
Maschler, Y. (1997). Emergent bilingual grammar: The case of contrast . Journal of Pragmatics, 28,279-313.
21.
Matras, Y. (1996). Prozedurale Fusion: Grammatische Interferenzschichten im Romanes. Sprachtypologie und Universalien forschung, 49(1), 60-78.
22.
Matras, Y. (1998). Utterance modifiers and universals of grammatical borrowing. Linguistics, 36,281-331.
23.
McClure, E., & McClure, M. (1988). Macro-and micro-sociolinguistic dimensions of codeswitching in Vingard. In M. Heller (Ed.), Codeswitching. Anthropological and Sociolinguistic Perspectives (pp.2 -51). Berlin/New York/ Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.
24.
Pfaff, C. (1979). Constraints on language mixing. Language, 55, 291-318.
25.
Poplack, S. (1980). Sometimes I'll start a sentence in Spanish Y TERMINO EN ESPANOL: Towards a typology of codeswitching. Linguistics , 18, 581-618.
26.
Poplack, S. (1988). Contrasting patterns of codeswitching in two communities . In M. Heller (Ed.), Codeswitching. Anthropological and sociolinguistic perspectives (pp.215-244). Berlin, New York, Amsterdam : Mouton de Gruyter.
27.
Redder, A. (1990). Grammatiktheorie und sprachliches Handeln: `denn' und `da'. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
28.
Redder, A. (1999). 'Werden' -funktional-grammatische Bestimmungen . In A. Redder & J. Rehbein (Eds.), Grammatik und mentale Prozesse (pp.295-336). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
29.
Reershemius, G. (1997a). Niederdeutsch in Ostfriesland. Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie, 54, 104-127.
30.
Reershemius, G. (1997b). Biographisches Erzählen auf Jiddisch. Grammatische und diskursanalytische Untersuchungen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
31.
Reershemius, G. (1999). Fragen: Die realen und fiktiven Funktionen des Hörers im narrativen Diskurs. In K. Bührig & Y. Matras (Eds.), Sprachtheorie und prachliches Handeln (pp.203- 212). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
32.
Rehbein, J. (1977). Komplexes Handeln. Elemente zur Handlungstheorieder Sprache. Stuttgart: Metzler.
33.
Rehbein, J. (1979). Sprechhandlungsaugmente. Zur Organisation der Hörersteuerung.In H. Weydt (Ed.), Die Partikeln der deutschen Sprache (pp.58-74). Berlin : De Gruyter.
34.
Rehbein, J. (1982). Biographisches Erzählen. In E. Lämmert (Ed.), Erzählforschung (pp.51-73). Stuttgart: Metzler.
35.
Rehbein, J. (1989). Biographiefragmente. Nicht-erzählende rekonstruktive Diskursformen in der Hochschulkommunikation. In R. Kokemohr & R. Marotzki (Eds.), Studentenbiographien I (pp.163-253). Frankfurt/ Main: Lang.
36.
Rehbein, J. (1992).Zur Wortstellung im Komplexen deutschen Satz. In L. Hoffmann (Ed.), Deutsche Syntax. Ansichten und Aussichten (pp.523-575). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.
37.
Rehbein, J. (1995). Über zusammengesetzte Verweiswörter und ihre Rolle in argumentierender Rede. In H. Wohlrapp (Ed.), Wege der Argumentationsforschung (pp.166-197 ). Stuttgart: Frommann.
38.
Sankoff, G., Thibault, P., Nagy, N., Blondeau, H., Fonolossa, M-O., & Gagnon, L. (1997). Variation in the use of discourse markers in a language contact situation. Language Variation and Change , 9, 19 -217.
39.
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
