This paper investigates how and what properties of abstract lexical entries in the mental lexicon interact with the distribution of surface morphemes in language contact and/or L1 attrition. Data from Hungarian/English bilingual children provide evidence that asymmetries in the production of Hungarian preverbs and case suffixes may be explained by considering how these morphemes are elected in language production. Effects of differential election and status of “early” versus "late” system morphemes interact with effects of cross-linguistic incongruence and result in different patterns of error types in the use of preverbs and case suffixes. The results of the study support the predictions of the 4-M model and the Abstract Level model (Myers-Scotton & Jake, 2000). Working within the framework of the 4-M model and the Abstract Level model provides a principled explanation for interrelations between language production and the morphemic organization of the bilingual mental lexicon.
Ackerman, F. (1984). Verbal modifiers as argument taking predicates: Complex verbs as predicate complexes in Hungarian. Groningen Working Papers in Linguistics (pp.23-71). Groningen: University of Groningen.
2.
Ackerman, F., & Webelhuth, G. (1997). The composition of (dis)continuous predicates: Lexical or syntactic ? Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 44, 317-340.
3.
Babarczy, A. (1997). The order of acquisition of functional categories and movement in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 44, 151-174.
4.
Backus, A. (1996). Two in one. Bilingual speech of Turkish immigrants in the Netherlands. Studies in Multilingualism 1. Tilburg : Tilburg University Press.
5.
Bánréti, Z. (1997). Sentence parsing in aphasia: Grammaticality judgments by Hungarian Broca's aphasics. Acta Linguistica Hungarica , 44, 3-42.
6.
Beöthy, E., & John-Steiner, V. (1995). Magyar-angol kétnyelvű gyermekek hibázási mintázatának elemzése. In Zs. Telegdi, Cs. Pléh, & Gy. Szépe (Eds.), Általános nyelvészeti tanulmányok XVII (pp.5-12). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
7.
Bock, K., & Levelt, W. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp.954-984). New York: Academic Press.
8.
Bolonyai, A. (1998). In-between languages: Language shift/maintenance in childhood bilingualism. The International Journal of Bilingualism , 2, 21-43.
9.
Bolonyai, A. (1999a). The hidden dimensions of language contact: The case of Hungarian-English bilingual children. Ph.D. dissertation, Linguistics Program, University of South Carolina.
10.
Bolonyai, A. (1999b). "The worm in the apple." What can happen to abstract lexical structure in bilingual speech?Paper presented at the second International Symposium on Bilingualism, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.
11.
Brody, M. (1990). Remarks on the order of elements in the Hungarian focus field. In I. Kenesei, (Ed.), Approaches to Hungarian. Structures and argument, 3 (pp.95-122). Szeged : JATE.
12.
Caramazza, A., & Miceli, G. (1991). Selective impairment of thematic role assignment in sentence processing. Brain and Language, 41, 402-36.
13.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
Kiss, É.K. (1987). Configurationality in Hungarian. Dordrecht: Reidel.
15.
Kiss. É.K., (1994). Sentence structure and word order. In F. Kiefer & É.K Kiss (Eds.), The syntactic structure of Hungarian. Syntax and semantics, 27 (pp.1-90). New York: Academic Press.
16.
Farkas, D., & Sadock, D. (1989). Preverb climbing in Hungarian. Language, 65, 318-338.
17.
Fenyvesi, A. (1995). Language contact and language death in an immigrant language: The case of Hungarian. Pitt Working Papers in Linguistics , 3, 1-117.
18.
Fenyvesi, A. (1995/96). The case of American Hungarian case: Morphological change in McKeesport, PA. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 43, 381-404.
19.
Frazier, L., & McNamara, P. (1995). Favor referential representations. Brain and Language, 49, 224 - 240.
20.
Fuller,J. (1996). When cultural maintenance means linguistic convergence: Pennsylvania German evidence for the matrix language turnover hypothesis. Language in Society, 25, 493-514.
21.
Garrett, M.F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In G. Bower (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation, 9 (pp.133-177). New York: Academic Press.
22.
Garrett, M.F. (1990). Sentence processing. In D. Osherson & H. Lasnik (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science: Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
Goethe,J.W. (1963). Elective affinities. Chicago : Henry Regnery Company.
24.
Jackendoff, R. (1987). The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 369 - 411.
25.
Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
Jackendoff, R. (1997). The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
Jake, J.L. (1998). Constructing interlanguage: Building a composite matrix language. Linguistics , 32, 271-298.
28.
Jake, J.L., & Myers-Scotton, C.M. (1997). Codeswitching and compromise strategies: Implications for lexical structure. International Journal of Bilingualism , 1, 25-39.
29.
Jake, J.L., & Myers-Scotton, C.M. (1998). How to build a creole: Splitting and recombining lexical structure. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Pidgin and Creole Linguistics (SCPL), New York, NY.
30.
Kálmán, L. (1985). Word order in non-neutral sentences. In I. Kenesei (Ed.), Approaches to Hungarian, 1 (pp.25-37). Szeged: JATE.
31.
Kiefer, F. (1990-91). Noun incorporation in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 40, 149-177.
32.
Kolk, H. (1995). A time-based approach to grammatic production . Brain and Language, 50, 282 - 303.
33.
Komlósy, A. (1985). Predicate complementation. In I. Kenesei (Ed.), Approaches to Hungarian, 1 (pp.53-78). Szeged: JATE.
34.
Komlósy, A. (1994). Complements and adjuncts. In F. Kiefer & K. É. Kiss (Eds.), The syntactic structure of Hungarian. Syntax and semantics 27, (pp.91-178). New York: Academic Press.
35.
Landau, B., & Jackendoff, R. (1993). "What" and "where" in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 16, 217-265.
36.
Lanza, E. (1997). Language mixing in infant bilingualism: A sociolinguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
Linebarger, M.C. (1990). Neuropsychology of sentence parsing. In Caramazza, A. (Ed.), Cognitive neuropsychology and neurolinguistics (pp.55-122). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
MacWhinney, B. (1976). Hungarian research on the acquisition of morphology and syntax. Journal of Child Language, 3, 397-410.
40.
MacWhinney, B. (1985). Hungarian language acquisition as an exemplification of a general model of grammatical development. In D. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, 2 (pp.1069-1155). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
MacWhinney, B., & Osmán-Sági, J. (1991). Inflectional marking in Hungarian aphasics. Brain and Language, 41, 165-183.
42.
Myers-Scotton, C. (1993[1997]). Duelling languages: Grammatical structure in codeswitching. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1997 paperback edition with new "Afterword".
43.
Myers-Scotton, C. (1998). A way to dusty death: The matrix language turnover hypothesis. In L. Grenoble & L. Whaley (Eds.), Endangered languages (pp.289-316). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press .
44.
Myers-Scotton, C. (1999). Morpheme organization in the mental lexicon: Evidence from language contact phenomena. Plenary speech presented at the second International Symposium on Bilingualism, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.
45.
Myers-Scotton, C., & J.L., Jake ( 1995). Matching lemmas in a bilingual language competence and production model: Evidence from intrasentential codeswitching. Linguistics , 33, 981-1024.
46.
Myers-Scotton, C., & Jake, J.L. (2000). Explaining aspects of codeswitching and their implications. In J. Nicol (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 91-125). Oxford : Blackwell.
47.
Pfaff, C. (1991). Turkish in contact with German: Language maintenance and loss among immigrant children in Berlin (West). International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 90, 97-129.
48.
Pléh CS ( 1992). Verbal prefixes in Hungarian children. In I. Kenesei & Cs. Pléh (Eds.), Approaches to Hungarian: The structure of Hungarian (pp.269-281). Szeged: JATE.
49.
Pléh CS, Ackerman, F., & Komlósy, A. (1989). On the psycholinguistics of preverbal modifiers in Hungarian: Adult intuitions and children's treatment of modifiers. Folia Linguistica, 23,181- 213.
50.
Pléh CS, Vinkler ZS, & Kálmán, L. (1997). Early morphology of spatial expressions in Hungarian children: A Childes study. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 44, 249-260.
51.
Rappaport, M., & Levin, B. (1988). What to do with Θ-roles. In W. Wilkins (Ed.), Syntax and semantics, thematic relations, 21 (pp.7-36). New York: Academic Press.
52.
Rumelhart, D.E., & McClelland, J.L. (1986). On learning the past tense of English verbs. In D. E. Rumelhart and J.L. McLelland & the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, 2 (pp.217-271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53.
Seliger, H.W. (1989). Deterioration and creativity in childhood bilingualism . In K. Hyltenstam & L. K. Obler (Eds.), Bilingualism across the life span: Aspects of maturation, maturity, and loss (pp. 173-184). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
54.
Solovyova, A. (1994). Morphological peculiarities in a corpus of American Hungarian speech. Unpublished Ms, Indiana University Bloomington , IN.
55.
Stemberger, J.P., & MacWhinney, B. (1986). Frequency and lexical storage of regularly inflected forms. Memory and Cognition , 14, 17-26.
56.
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical form. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic descriptions, Vol.3 (pp.57-149). New York: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Wei, L. ( 1996). Variation in the acquisition of morpheme types in the interlanguage of Chinese and Japanese Learners of English as a second language. Ph.D. Dissertation. Linguistics Program. University of South Carolina.
58.
Zurif, E., Swinney, D., & Garrett, M. (1990). Lexical processing and sentence comprehension in aphasia. In A. Caramazza. (Ed.), Cognitive neuropsychology and neurolinguistics (pp. 123-136). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
