Towards a (Bayesian) Convergence?

Achinstein P. (1978) ‘Concepts of evidence’ 87 Mind 22–45.

Aitken C.G.G. (1995) Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists. J. Wiley, Chichester.

Allen R.J. (1986) ‘A reconceptualization of civil trials’ 66 Boston University Law Review 401–37.

Allen R.J. (1992) ‘The evolution of the hearsay rule to a rule of admission’ 76 Minnesota Law Review 797–812.

Allen R.J. (1994) ‘Factual ambiguity and a theory of evidence’ 88 Northwestern Law Review 604–40.

Allen R.J. , Balding D.J. , Donnelly P. , Friedman R. , Kaye D.H. , LaRue L.H. , Park R.C. , Robertson B. and Stein A. (1995) ‘Probability and proof in State v Skipper, an Internet exchange’ 35 Jurimetrics 304–7.

Allen R.J. and Carriquiry A.L. (1997) ‘Factual ambiguity and a theory of evidence reconsidered: a dialogue between a statistician and a law professor'. 31 Israel Law Review in press.

Allen R.J. and Kuhns R. (1989) An Analytical Approach to Evidence. Little, Brown and Co., Boston.

Allen R.J. , Kuhns R. and Swift E. (1997) An Analytical Approach to Evidence (2nd edn). Little, Brown and Co., Boston.

Balding D.J. and Donnelly P. (1994) ‘The prosecutor's fallacy and DNA evidence’ Criminal law Reiview 711–21.

Baron J. (1994) ‘Non-consequentialist decisions’ 17 Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1–42.

Beale S.S. (1996) ‘Law's emperor’ 74 Texas Law Review 1201–4.

Bell R.S. (1987) ‘Decision theory and due process: a critique of the Supreme Court's lawmaking for burdens of proof 78 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 557–85.

Berenstein C. , Kanal L.N. and Lavine D. (1986) ‘Consensus rules’ in Kanal L.N. and Lemmer J.F. (eds) Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. North Holland Press, New York.

Bergman P. and Moore A. (1991) ‘Mistrial by likelihood ratio: Bayesian analysis meets the f-word’ 13 Cardozo Law Review 589.

Bernado J.M. and Smith A.F.M. (1994) Bayesian Theory. J. Wiley, Chichester.

Box G.E.P. (1979) ‘Robustness in the strategy of model building’ in Launer R.L. and Wilkinson G.N. (eds) Robustness in Statistics. Academic Press, New York, pp. 201–36.

Box G.E.P. (1980) ‘Sampling and Bayes’ inference in scientific modelling and robustness (with discussion)’ 143 Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 383–430.

Brilmayer L. and Kornhauser L. (1978) ‘Quantitative methods and legal decisions’ 46 University of Chicago Law Review 116.

Brook J. (1985) ‘The use of statistical evidence in litigation: well-worn hypotheticals, real cases, and controversy’ 29 St LULJ 293.

Byrne M.D. (1995) ‘The convergence of explanatory coherence and the story model: a case study in juror decision’ in Moore J.D. and Lehman J.F. (eds) Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Erlbaum Press, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 539–43.

Callen C.R. (1982) ‘Notes on a grand illusion: some limits on the use of Bayesian theory in evidence law’ 57 Indiana Law Journal 1–44.

Callen C.R. (1986) ‘Second order considerations, weight, sufficiency and schema theory: a comment on Professor Brilmayer's theory’ 66 Boston University Law Review 715.

Callen C.R. (1991) ‘Cognitive science and the sufficiency of “sufficiency of the evidence” tests’ 65 Tulane Law Review 113.

Callen C.R. (1992) ‘A brief word on the statistical evidence debate’ 66 Tulane Law Review 1405.

Callen C.R. (1994) ‘Hearsay and informal reasoning’ 47 Vand Law Review 43.

Cohen L.J. (1977) The Probable and the Provable. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 58–67. Reprinted, 1991. Gregg Rivivals, Aldershot.

Cohen L.J. (1988a) ‘The difficulty about conjunction in forensic proof 37 The Statistician 415.

Cohen L.J. (1988b) An Introduction to the Philosophy of Induction and Probability. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Cooksey R.W. (1996) Judgment Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications.

Cowan C.L. , Thompson W.C. and Ellsworth P.C. (1984) ‘The effects of death qualification on jurors’ predisposition to convict and on the quality of deliberation’ 8 Law and Human Behaviour 53–79.

Dann B.M. and Logan G. III (1996) ‘Jury reform: the Arizona experience’ 79 Judicature 280–6.

Dawid A.P. (1987) ‘The difficulty about conjunction’ 36 The Statistician 91–7.

De Finetti B. (1974–5) Theory of Probability (2 vols). J. Wiley, Chichester.

DeGroot M.H. (1975) Probability and Statistics. Addison Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Mass.

DeGroot M.H. , Fienberg S.E. and Kadane J.B. (eds) (1986) Statistics and the Law.). Wiley, New York.

DeKay M.J. (1996) ‘The difference between Blackstone-like error ratios and probabilistic standards of proof 21 Law and Social Inquiry 95–132.

Earman J. (1992) Bayes or Bust. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Edwards W. (1968) ‘Conservatism in human information processing’ in Kleinmuntz B. (ed.) Formal Representations of Human Judgment. J. Wiley, New York, pp. 17–52.

Edwards W. (1991) ‘Influence diagrams, Bayesian imperialism, and the Collins case: an appeal to reason’ 13 Cardozo Law Review 1025.

Ellsberg D. (1961) Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms’ 75 Quarterly Journal of Economics 643–69.

Evett I.W. (1987) ‘Bayesian inference and forensic science's problems and perspectives’ 36 The Statistician 99–105.

Evett I.W. (1991) ‘Interpretation: a personal Odyssey’ in Aitken C.G.G. and Stoney DA (eds) The Use of Statistics in Forensic Science. Pp. 9–22.

Evett I.W. (1992a) ‘Evaluating DNA profiles in a case where the defense is “it was my brother”’ 32 The Journal of the Forensic Science Society 5–14.

Evett I.W. (1992b) ‘DNA statistics: putting the problems into perspective’ 33 Jurimetrics 139–45.

Evett I.W , Scranage J.K. and Pinchin R. (1992) ‘An efficient statistical procedure for interpreting DNA single locus profiling data in crime cases’ 32 The Journal of the Forensic Science Society 307–26.

Evett I.W. and Werrett D.J. (1990) ‘Bayesian analysis of single locus DNA profiles’ in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Identification. Promega Corporation, Madison, pp. 77–101.

Fienberg S.E. (1986) ‘Gatecrashers, blue buses and the Bayesian representation of legal evidence’ 66 Boston University Law Review 693–700.

Fienberg S.E. (ed.) (1989) The Evolving Role of Statistical Assessments as Evidence in the Courts. Springer-Verlag, New York.

Fienberg S.E. (1990) ‘Legal likelihoods and a priori assessments: what goes where?’ in Geisser S. , Hodges J.S. , Press S.J. and Zellner A. (eds) Bayesian and Likelihood Methods in Statistics and Econometrics. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Fienberg S.E. (1993) ‘The New York city census adjustment trial: witness for the plaintiffs’ 34 Jurimetrics 65–83.

Fienberg S.E. and Finkelstein M.O. (1996) ‘Bayesian statistics and the law’ in Bernardo J.M. , Berger J.O. , Dawid A.P. and Smith A.F.M. (eds) Bayesian Statistics 5. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 129–46.

Fienberg S.E. and Kadane J.B. (1983) ‘The presentation of Bayesian statistical analyses in legal proceedings’ 32 The Statistician 88–98.

Fienberg S.E. and Kaye D.H. (1991) ‘Legal and statistical aspects of some mysterious clusters’ 154 Journal of the Royal Statistical society Series A 61–74.

Fienberg S.E. , Krislov S.H. and Straf M.L. (1995) ‘Understanding and evaluating statistical evidence in litigation’ 36 Jurimetrics 1–32.

Fienberg S.E. and Schervish M.J. (1986) ‘The relevance of Bayesian inference for the presentation and evaluation of statistical evidence and for legal decision making’ 66 Boston University Law Review 771–998.

Fitzgerald R. and Ellsworth P.C. (1984) ‘Due process vs. crime control: death qualification and jury attitudes’ 8 Law and Human Behavior 31–51.

Friedman D.A. (1993) ‘Adjusting the census of 1990’ 34 Jurimetrics 99–106.

Friedman R.D. (1986a) ‘A diagrammatic approach to evidence’ 66 Boston University Law Review 571–622.

Friedman R.D. (1986b) ‘A close look at probative value’ 66 Boston University Law Review 733–70.

Friedman R.D. (1987) ‘Route analysis of credibility and hearsay’ 96 Yale Law Journal 667.

Friedman R.D. (1991) ‘Character impeachment evidence: psycho-Bayesian [!?] analysis and a proposed overhaul’ 38 University of California at Los Angeles Law Reveiw 637–97.

Friedman R.D. (1992) ‘Infinite strands, infinitesimally thin: storytelling, Bayesianian, hearsay and other evidence’ 14 Cardozo Law Review 79.

Friedman R.D. (1996) ‘Assessing evidence’ 94 Michigan Law Review 1810.

Gardenfors P. and Sahlin N.-E. (1982) ‘Unreliable probabilities, risk taking and decision making’ 53 Synthese 361–86.

Gastwirth J.L. Krieger A. and Rosenbaum P. (1994) ‘How a court accepted an impossible explanation’ 49 American Statistician 313–15.

Gigerenzer G. (1996) ‘The psychology of good judgment: frequency formats and simple algorithms’ 16 Medical Decision Making 273–80.

Gigerenzer G. and Goldstein D.G. (1996) ‘Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality’ 103 Psychological Review 650–79.

Good I.J. (1977) ‘Dynamic probability, computer chess, and the measurement of knowledge’ in Elcock E.W. and Mitchell D. (eds) Machine Intelligence, Vol. 8. Halsted Press, New York.

Grey T.C. (1983) ‘Langdell's’ 45 University of Pittsburg Law Review 1–53.

Haney C. (1984) ‘On the selection of capital juries: the biasing effects of the death-qualification process’ 8 Law and Human Behavior 121–32.

Hans V. and Doob A. (1976) ‘Section 12 of the Canada Evidence Act and the deliberations of simulated juries’ 18 The Criminal Law Quarterly 235–53.

Hastie R. (1993) ‘Algebraic models of juror decision processes’ in Hastie R. (ed.) The Psychology of furor Decision Making. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 85–115.

Hodgson D. (1995) ‘Probability: the logic of the law – a response’ 15 Oxford journal of Legal Studies 51.

Jaynes (1998) ‘Probability theory – the logic of science'. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (forthcoming).

Jeffreys H. (1948) Theory of Probability. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Kadane J.B. and Schum D.A. (1996) A Probabilistic Analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti Evidence. J. Wiley, Toronto, New York.

Kahneman D. , Slovic P. and Tversky A. (eds) (1982) Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Kaplan J. (1968) ‘Decision theory and the factfinding process’ 20 Stanford Law Review 1065–92.

Kaye D.H. (1979) ‘The laws of probability and the law of the land’ 47 University of Chicago Law Review 34–56. Reprinted in Imwinkelried E.J. and Weisenberger G. (eds) (1996) An Evidence Anthology. Anderson Publishing Co., Cincinnati, Ohio.

Kaye D.H. (1980) ‘Naked statistical evidence’ 89 Yale Law journal 601.

Kaye D.H. (1982) ‘The limits of the preponderance of the evidence standard: justifiably naked statistical evidence and multiple causation’ American Bar Foundation Research Journal 487–516.

Kaye D.H. (1986) ‘Do we need a calculus of weight to understand proof beyond a reasonable doubt?’ 66 Boston University Law Review 657–72. Reprinted in Tillers P. and Green E. (eds) (1988) Probability and Inference in the Law of Evidence: The Uses and Limits of Bayesianism. Reidel Publishing Co., Boston, Mass.

Kaye D.H. (1991) ‘Credal probability’ 13 Cardozo Law Review 647–56.

Kaye D.H. (1993) ‘DNA evidence: probability, population genetics and the courts’ 7 Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 101–72.

Knight F.H. (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Houghton, Mifflin, Boston.

Koehler J.J. and Shaviro D.N. (1990) ‘Veridical verdicts: increasing verdict accuracy through the use of overtly probabilistic evidence and methods’ 75 Cornell Law Review 247.

Kolodner J.L. (1992) ‘An introduction to case-based reasoning’ 6 Artificial Intelligence Reports 3–34.

Lehrer K. and Wagner C. (1981) Rational Consensus in Science and Society: A Philosophical and Mathematical Study. D, Reidel Publishing Company, Boston.

Lempert R.O. (1977) ‘Modeling relevance’ 75 Michigan Law Review 1021–57.

Lempert R.O. (1986) ‘The new evidence scholarship: analyzing the process of proof 66 Boston University Law Review 439–77.

Lempert R. (1988) ‘The new evidence scholarship: analyzing the process of proof in Tillers P. and Green E.D. (eds) Probability and Inference in the Law of Evidence. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 61–102.

Lempert R. (1991) ‘Some caveats concerning DNA as criminal identification evidence: with thanks to the Reverend Bayes’ 13 Cardozo Law Review 303–41.

Lempert R. (1993) ‘Civil juries and complex cases: taking stock after twelve years’ in Litan R. (ed.) Verdict. The Brookings Institution, Washington DC , ch. 6, pp. 180–247.

Lindley D.V. (1965) Introduction to Probability and Statistics: From a Bayesian Viewpoint: Part 1, Probability; Part 2, Inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Lipton P. (1991) Inference to the Best Explanation. Routledge, New York.

Lombardo D.A. (1996) ‘Do special verdicts improve the structure of jury decision-making’ 36 Jurimetrics Journal 275.

Lubet S. (1993) Modern Trial Advocacy: Analysis and Practice. National Institute for Trial Advocacy, Notre Dame, Indiana.

Luhmann N. (1985a) ‘The autopoiesis of social systems’ a paper presented at the Conference on Autopoiesis in Law and Society, European University Institute, Firenze, 12–15 December.

Luhmann N. (1985b) ‘The self-reproduction of the law and its limits’ in Teubner G. (ed.) Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State. De Gruyter, Berlin.

Luhman N. (1985c) ‘Meaning’ a paper presented at the Conference on Autopoiesis in Law and Society, European University Institute, Firenze, 12–15 December.

Luhman N. (1985d) ‘The sociological observation of the theory and practice of law’ a paper presented at the Conference on Autopoiesis in Law and Society, European University Institute, Firenze, 12–15 December.

McNicol D. (1972) A Primer of Signal Detection Theory. Allen and Unwin, London.

Michon J.A. (1995) ‘Office ergonomics’ 3 (n. 2) NSCR Newsletter 1.

Michon JA , Eijkman E.G.J , and De Klerk L.F.W. (eds) (1979) ‘Prologue’ Handbook of Psychonomics. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

Michon J.A. and Pakes F.J. (1995) ‘Judicial decision-making: a theoretical perspective’ in Bull R. and Carson D. (eds) Handbook of Psychology in Legal Contexts. J. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 509–25.

Moniger W.R. , Bullas J. , de Lorenzis B. , Ellison E. , Flueck J. , McLeod J.C. , Lusk C. , Lampru P.D. , Phillips R.S. , Roberts W.F. , Shaw R. , Stewart T.R. , Weaver J. , Young K.C. and Zubrick S.M. (1991) ‘Shootout-89, a comparative evaluation of knowledge-based systems that forecast severe weather’ 72 Bulletin of the American Meterological Society 1339–54.

Monk R. (1996) Betrand Russell, The Spirit of Solitude 1875–1921. The Free Press, New York.

Munsterberg H. (1908) On the Witness Stand: Essays on Psychology and Crime. The McClure Co., New York.

Nance D.A. (1986) ‘A comment on the supposed paradoxes of a mathematical interpretation of the logic of trials’ 66 Boston University Law Review 947.

Nesson C.R. (1985) ‘The evidence or the event: on judicial proof and the acceptability of verdicts’ 98 Harvard Law Review 1357.

Nickerson R. (1996) ‘Ambiguities and unstated assumptions in ‘probabilistic reasoning’ 120 Psychological Bulletin 410–433.

Orloff N. and Steadinger J. (1983) ‘A framework for evaluating the preponderance of the evidence standard’ 131 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1159–74.

Pennington N. and Hastie R. (1991) ‘A cognitive theory of juror decision making: the story model’ 13 Cardozo Law Review 519–57.

Pennington N. and Hastie R. (1993) ‘The story model for juror decision making’ in Hastie R. (ed.) Inside the Juror: The Psychology of furor Decision Making. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 192–221.

Porat A. and Stein A. (1997) ‘Liability for uncertainty: making evidential damage actionable’ 18 Cardozo Law Review (forthcoming).

Pratt J.W. , Raiffa H. and Schlaifer R. (1964) ‘The foundations of decision under uncertainty: an elementary exposition’ 59 Journal of the American Statistical Association 353–75.

Putnam H. (1963a) ‘Degree of confirmation and inductive logic’ in Schilpp P.A. (ed.) The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. Lasalle.

Putnam H. (1963b) ‘Probability and confirmation’ The Voice of America Forum, Vol. 10. US Information Agency.

Ramsey F.P. (1931) The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays. Harcourt, Brace and Co., New York.

Raskin D.C. and Yuille J.C. (1989) ‘Problems in evaluating interviews of children in sexual abuse cases’ in Ceci S.J. , Ross D.F. and Tolia M.P. (eds) Perspectives on Children's Testimony. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 184–207.

Robertson B. and Vignaux G.A. (1991) ‘Extending the conversation about Bayes’ 13 Cardozo Law Review 629.

Robertson B. and Vignaux G.A. (1993) ‘Probability – the logic of the law’ 13 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 457.

Robertson B. and Vignaux G.A. (1995) Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom. J. Wiley, Chichester.

Robertson B. and Vignaux G.A. (1996) ‘Hypothesis refinement’ in Skilling and Subisiso (eds) Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods 1994. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 183–8.

Rolph J.E. (1993) ‘The census adjustment trial: reflections of a witness for the plaintiffs’ 34 Jurimetrics 85–98.

Saks M.J. and Kidd R.F. (1980–81) ‘Human information processing and adjudication: trial by heuristics’ 15 law and Society Review 123–60.

Savage L.J. (1954) The Foundations of Statistics. J. Wiley. New York.

Schank R.C. (1986) Explanation Patterns: Understanding Mechanically and Creatively. L. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.

Schauer F. (1995) ‘Opinions as rules’ 62 University of Chicago Law Review 1455–75.

Schum D.A. (1994) Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning. J. Wiley, New York.

Schum DA and Martin A.W. (1982) ‘Formal and empirical research on cascaded inference in jurisprudence’ 17 Law and Society Review 105–51.

Searle J. (1984) Minds, Brains and Science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Shafer G. (1986a) ‘Comment’ 66 Boston University Law Review 629–33.

Shafer G. (1986b) ‘The construction of probability arguments’ 66 Boston University Law Review 799–816.

Shavell S. (1987) Economic Analysis of Accident Law. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Shaviro D. (1989) ‘Statistical-probability evidence and the appearance of justice’ 103 Harvard Law Review 530–54.

Simon H.A. (1947) Administrative Behavior. Macmillan, New York.

Simon H.A. (1983) Reason in Human Affairs. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.

Simon P. , Marquis de LaPlace (1819) Essai Philosophique sur les Probabilites (A Philosophical Essay on Probability). Truscott and Emory transl. 1952. Dover Publications, New York.

Simon R.J. and Mahan L. (1971) ‘Quantifying burdens of proof: a view from the bench, the jury, and the classroom’ 5 Law and Society Review 319–30.

Slovic P. , Fischhoff B. and Lichtenstein S. (1977) ‘Behavioral decision theory’ 28 Annual Review of Psychology 1–39.

Smith A.F.M. (1986) ‘Some Bayesian thoughts on modelling and model choice’ 35 The Statistician 97–102.

Stein A. (1996a) ‘Judicial fact-finding and the Bayesian method: the case for deeper scepticism about their combination’ 1 International Journal of Evidence and Proof 25–47

Stein A. (1996b) ‘Allocating the burden of proof in sales litigation: the law, its rationale, a new theory, and its failure’ 50 University of Miami Law Review 335.

Thagard P. (1992) Conceptual Revolutions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Thagard P. (1997) ‘Probabilistic networks and explanatory coherence’ in O'Rorke P. and Luger G. (eds) Computing Explanations: AI Perspectives on Abduction. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA.

Thomson J.J. (1986) ‘Liability and individualized evidence’ 49 Law and Contemporary Problems 199.

Todd S.C. (1993) The Shape of Athenian Law. Oxford University Press, New York.

Tribe L.H. (1971) ‘Trial by mathematics: precision and ritual in the legal process’ 84 Harvard Law Review 1329.

Tversky A. and Kahneman D. (1974) ‘Judgment under uncertainty’ 185 Science 1124.

Twining W.L. and Stein A. (eds) (1992) Evidence and Proof, The International Library of Essays in Law and Legal Theory, vol. XI. Dartmouth Publishing Co., Aldershot.

Wachter K. (1993) ‘The census adjustment trail: an exchange’ 34 Jurimetrics 107–15.

Wagenaar W.A. , Van Koppen P.J. , and Crombag H.F.M. (1993) Anchored Narratives: The Psychology of Criminal Evidence. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.

Weinstein J.B. (1988) ‘Litigation and statistics’ 3 Statistical Science 286–97.

Wellborn O.G. III (1991) ‘Demeanor’ 75 Cornell Law Review 1075–105.

Wells G.L. and Loftus E.F. (eds) (1984) Eyewitness Testimony: Psychological Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, New York.

Wissler R.L. and Saks M.J. (1985) ‘On the inefficacy of limiting instructions: when jurors use prior conviction evidence to decide guilt’ 9 Law and Human Behavior 37–48.

Wright R.W. (1988) ‘Causation, responsibility, risk, probability, naked statistics, and proof: pruning the bramble bush by clarifying the concepts’ 73 Iowa Law Review 1001.

Zuckerman A. (1986) ‘Law, fact or justice’ 66 Boston University Law Review 487–508.