Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper examines the principles governing evidence in Bosnia and Herzegovina's criminal procedure, highlighting its unique blend of civil and common law influences. It explores the acquisition, presentation, and evaluation of evidence, emphasizing transparency, fairness, and human rights protection. By analyzing domestic laws and international standards, the study addresses challenges in balancing criminal justice and individual liberties. Beyond its relevance to Bosnia and Herzegovina, this analysis contributes to broader legal scholarship, offering insights into the evolution of modern criminal procedure.

Keywords

evidence criminal procedure immediacy assessment of evidence in dubio pro reo

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights . (1981).

Ajdarić v. Croatia, no. 20883/09, ECtHR 2011.

American Convention on Human Rights . (1969).

Asch v. Austria, no. 12398/86, ECtHR 1991.

Ashworth

(2006) Four threats to the presumption of innocence. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof 10(4): 241–279.

Bajović

(2010) Načelo utvrđivanja materijalne istine. Pravni život, Časopis za pravnu teoriju i praksu 9(2010): 657–668.

Bajović

(2021) O činjenicama i istini u krivičnom postupku, 2nd ed. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain, no. 10590/83, ECtHR 1988.

Bayer

(1960) Jugoslavensko krivično procesno pravo, Knjiga prva, Uvod u teoriju krivičnog procesnog prava . Zagreb: Školska knjiga.

10.

Bayer

(1972) Jugoslavensko krivično procesno pravo, Knjiga I, Uvod u teoriju krivičnog procesnog prava, 4th ed. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.

11.

Bejatović

(2008) Krivično procesno pravo. Beograd: JP “Službeni glasnik”.

12.

Brkić

(2022) Opšte teorijske postavke o načelu neposrednosti u krivičnom postupku. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu 56(1): 23–51.

13.

Campbell

(2013) Criminal labels, the European convention on human rights and the presumption of innocence. The Modern Law Review 76(4): 681–707.

14.

Case of Aleksandar Tucikešić, AP-1788/22, Const. Court 2022.

15.

Case of Araz Jukić, AP-865/16, Const. Court 2017.

16.

Case of Bekir Mešić, AP-539/17, Const. Court 2019.

17.

Case of M. Š., AP-661/04, Const. Court 2005.

18.

Case of Mlađo Zelenović, AP-4318/16, Const. Court 2018.

19.

Case of Mugdin Herceg, AP-2313/05, Const. Court 2007.

20.

Case of Samir Avdić, AP-1480/13, Const. Court 2016.

21.

Case of Savo Lončar, AP-1604/05, Const. Court 2006.

22.

Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union . (2000).

23.

Cleve v. Germany, no. 48144/09, ECtHR 2015.

24.

Damaška

(2021) Dokaz krivnje, Od rimsko-kanonskog do suvremenog prava. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.

25.

Đurđić

(2006) Načelo pravičnog postupka. Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo 44(3): 67–94.

26.

Đurđić

Trajković

(2013) O istini u krivičnom postupku. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu 65(2013): 111–127.

27.

European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Its Protocols . (1950).

28.

Garé

DHRM

(1994) Het onmiddelijkheidsbeginsel in het Nederlandse strafproces. Arnhem: Gouda Quint.

29.

Garrett

(2011) Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

30.

Glaser

(1833/1885) Handbuch des Strafprozesses. Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker & Humblot.

31.

Grubač

(2004) Krivično procesno pravo, Uvod i opšti deo, 3rd ed. Beograd: JP “Službeni glasnik”.

32.

Grubiša

(1963) Činjenično stanje u krivičnom postupku. Zagreb: Narodne novine.

33.

Hume

(1844) Commentaries on the Law of Scotland, Respecting Crimes. Edinburgh: Bell & Bradfute.

34.

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights . (1966).

35.

Ivanović

Munižaba

(2017) Odnos principa in dubio pro reo i kontinuiteta dokaza prema odredbama aktuelnog Zakonika o krivičnom postupku Republike Srbije. Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine 89(1): 17–36.

36.

Jekić

(2003) Krivično procesno pravo. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Boegradu.

37.

Kassin

Gudjonsson

(2004) The psychology of confessions: a review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 5(2): 33–67.

38.

LaFave

Israel

King

, et al. (2017) Modern Criminal Law: Cases, Comments and Questions, 6th ed. St Paul, MN: West Academic Publishing.

39.

Lazin

(1985) “In dubio pro reo” u krivičnom postupku. Beograd: Naučna knjiga.

40.

Maas

(1907) Der Grundsatz der Unmittelbarkeit in der Reichsstrafprozessordnung. Breslau: Mahlmann Matthias.

41.

Marković

(1930) Udžbenik sudskog krivičnog postupka Kraljevine Jugoslavije. Beograd: Narodna štamparija.

42.

Mirkov

(2014) Načelo in dubio pro reo kao obeležje pravičnog krivičnog postupka. Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine 86(1): 24–34.

43.

Mitrović

Raosavljević

(2020) Challenges in pre-accession harmonization of anti-discrimination laws in Bosnia and Herzegovina. EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges Series (ECLIC) 4(2020): 1119–1134.

44.

Mittermaier

CJA

(1856) Die Gesetzgebung und Rechtsübung über Strafverfahren nach ihrer neuesten Fortbildung dargestellt und geprüft. Erlangen: Verlag von Ferdinand Enke.

45.

Ogorelica

(1899) Kazneno procesulano pravo. Zagreb: Naklada Kraljevske Hrvatsko-Slavonsko-Dalmatinske Zemaljske vlade.

46.

Ogorelica

(1929) Zakonik o sudskom krivičnom postupku. Zagreb: Tisak jugoslovenske štampe.

47.

Pavišić

(2005) Komentar Zakona o kaznenom postupku, 2nd ed. Rijeka: Žagar.

48.

Putzke

Scheinfeld

(2005) Strafprozessrecht. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.

49.

Redlich

Goodman

(2003) Taking responsibility for an act not committed: the influence of age and suggestibility. Law and Human Behavior 27(2): 141–156.

50.

Ritter von Feuerbach

PJA

(1821) Betrachtungen über die Oeffentlichkeit und Mündlichkeit der Gerechtigkeitspleg, Band I. Gießen: Georg Friedrich Heyer.

51.

Ritter von Hye-Glunek

(1854) Die Leitenden Grundsätze der österreichischen Strafprozessordnung vom 19. Juli 1853. Wien: Friedrich Manz.

52.

Schmitt

(1992) Die richterliche Beweiswürdigung im Strafprozess. Lübeck: Schmidt-Römhild.

53.

Sijerčić-Čolić

(2012) Krivično procesno pravo, Knjiga I, Krivičnoprocesne radnje i krivičnoprocesni subjekti. Sarajevo: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Sarajevu.

54.

Sijerčić-Čolić

(2019) Krivično procesno pravo, Knjiga I, Krivičnoprocesne radnje i krivičnoprocesni subjekti, 5th ed. Sarajevo: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Sarajevu.

55.

Sijerčić-Čolić

Hadžiomerović

Jurčević

, et al. (2005) Komentar zakona o krivičnom/kaznenom postupku u Bosni i Hercegovini. Sarajevo: Vijeće Evrope i Evropska komisija.

56.

Simović

(2016) Krivično procesno pravo, Uvod i opšti dio, 4th ed. Bihać: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Bihaću.

57.

Škulić

(2010) Krivično procesno pravo, 2nd ed. Beograd: pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

58.

Škulić

(2011) Krivično procesno pravo, 3rd rd. Beograd: pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

59.

Stanković

(2021) Krivično procesno pravo. Brčko: Evropski univerzitet Brčko Distrikt Bosne i Hercegovine.

60.

Stolwijk

SAM

(1976) Het onderzoek ter terechtzitting in strafzaken. Arnhem: Gouda Qiunt.

61.

Summers

(2007) Fair Trials: The European Criminal Procedural Tradition and the European Court of Human Rights. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

62.

Tsalkitzis v. Greece No. 2, no. 72624/10, ECtHR 2017.

63.

Uzelac

(2003) Teret dokazivanja. Zagreb: Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu.

64.

Vasiljević

(1981) Sistem krivičnog procesnog prava SFRJ, 3rd ed. Beograd: Savremena administracija.

65.

Von Holtzendorff

(1879) Handbuch des Deutschen Strafprozessrechts. Berlin: Habel.

66.

Zachariä

(1861) Handbuch des deutschen Strafprozesses. Göttingen: Verlag der Dieterichschen Buchhandlung.

67.

Zakon o krivičnom postupku Bosne i Hercegovine [Criminal Procedure Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina], “Službenik glasnik Bosne i Hercegovine”, br. 3/2003, 32/2003 – ispravka, 36/2003, 26/2004, 63/2004, 13/2005, 48/2005, 46/2006, 29/2007, 53/2007, 58/2008, 12/2009, 16/2009, 53/2009 – dr. zakon, 93/2009, 72/2013 and 65/2018.

68.

Zakon o krivičnom postupku Brčko Distrikta Bosne i Hercegovine [Criminal Procedure Code of the Brčko Distrikt Bosnia and Herzegovina], “Službenik glasnik Brčko Distrikta Bosne i Hercegovine”, br. 34/2013 – prečišćen tekst, 27/2014, 3/2019 and 16/2020.

69.

Zakon o krivičnom postupku Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine [Criminal Procedure Code of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina], “Službene novine Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine”, br. 35/2003, 56/2003 – ispravka, 78/2004, 28/2005, 55/2006, 27/2007, 53/2007, 9/2009, 12/2010, 8/2013, 59/2014 and 74/2020.

70.

Zakon o krivičnom postupku Republike Srpske [Criminal Procedure Code of Republika Srpska], “Službenik glasnik Republike Srpske”, br. 53/2012, 91/2017, 66/2018 and 15/2021.

In the pursuit of justice: An exploration of criminal procedure principles in relation to evidence in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References