AchinsteinP (2001) The Book of Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
AitkenCConnollyTGammermanAZhangGBaileyDGordonROldfieldR (1996) Statistical modelling in specific case analysis. Science & Justice36(4): 245–255.
3.
AitkenCTaroniFBozzaS (2022) Evidence, probability and relative plausibility. International Journal of Evidence and Proof26(4): 309–324
4.
AitkenCFTaroniFBozzaS (2021) Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists, 3rd Edition. Chichester: Wiley.
5.
AllenRJ (1994) Factual ambiguity and a theory of evidence. Northwestern University Law Review88: 604–640.
6.
AllenRJ (1997) Rationality, algorithms, and juridical proof: A preliminary inquiry. International Journal of Evidence and Proof1(special): 254–275.
7.
AllenRJ (2017) The nature of juridical proof: Probability as a tool in plausible reasoning. International Journal of Evidence and Proof21(1–2): 133–142.
8.
AllenRJ (2020) Legal probabilism—a qualified rejection: A response to Hedden and Colyvan. Journal of Political Philosophy28(1): 117–128.
9.
AllenRJ (2013b) Complexity, the generation of legal knowledge and the future of litigation. UCLA Law Review60(6) 1384–1411.
10.
AllenRJ (2013a) Taming complexity: Rationality, the law of evidence, and the nature of the legal system. Law, Probability & Risk12(2): 99–113.
11.
AllenRJLeiterB (2001) Naturalized epistemology and the law of evidence. Virginia Law Review87(8): 1491–1550.
12.
AllenRJPardoMS (2019b) Clarifying relative plausibility: A rejoinder. International Journal of Evidence and Proof23(1–2): 205–217.
13.
AllenRJPardoMS (2019a) Relative plausibility and its critics. International Journal of Evidence and Proof23(1–2): 5–59.
14.
AllenRJSteinA (2013) Evidence, probability, and the burden of proof. Arizona Law Review55: 557–602.
15.
AllenRJSwiftESchwartzDSPardoMSSteinA (2016) An Analytical Approach to Evidence, 6th edn. New York: Wolters Kluwer.
16.
AmayaA (2009) Inference to the best explanation. In KapteinHPrakkenHVerheijB (eds) Legal Evidence and Proof: Statistics, Stories, Logic. Aldershot: Ashgate, 135–160.
17.
BiedermannACarusoDKlotsoglouKN (2021) Decision theory, relative plausibility and the criminal standard of proof. Criminal Law & Philosophy15(2): 131–157.
18.
BurtisMMGelbachJBKobayashiBM (2017) Error costs, legal standards of proof, and statistical evidence. Supreme Court Economic Review25.
19.
ChengEK (2013) Reconceptualizing the burden of proof. Yale Law Journal122(5) : 1104–1371.
20.
de FinettiB (1937) La prévision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré7(1) : 1–68.
21.
de ZoeteJFentonNNoguchiTLagnadoD (2019) Resolving the so-called “probabilistic paradoxes in legal reasoning” with Bayesian networks. Science & Justice59(4): 367–379.
22.
Di BelloM (2019) Plausibility and probability in juridical proof. International Journal of Evidence and Proof23(1–2): 161–167.
23.
DoakJ (2019) Preface International Journal of Evidence and Proof 23(1–2): 3–4.
24.
EarmanJ (1992) Bayes or Bust? Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25.
EpsteinLKingG (2002) The rules of inference. University of Chicago Law Review69(1): 1–133.
26.
FentonNLagnadoD (2022) Bayesianism: Objections and rebuttals. In DahlmanCSteinATuzetG (eds) Philosophical Foundations of Evidence Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 267–275.
27.
GelbachJB (2020) Estimation evidence. University of Pennsylvania Law Review168(3): 549.
28.
GoldmanAI (2002) Quasi-objective Bayesianism and legal evidence. Jurimetrics42(3): 237–260.
29.
HaackS (2014) Legal probabilism: An epistemological dissent. In Evidence Matters: Science, Proof, and Truth in the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 47–77.
