The contemporary status of rape shield laws in India

Abstract

This article critically analyses the current status of rape shield laws in India. The article begins by assessing the effectiveness of these laws by examining the statutory provisions and judicial precedents in India using a doctrinal methodology. The article would then assess the status of rape shield laws and their jurisprudence in England and Wales, and Canada for a comparative assessment and to draw valuable lessons for the Indian jurisdiction. It would also help address growing concerns about the possible overreach of these laws on the defendant’s right to a fair trial. Finally, the article will conclude with possible solutions for effectively implementing these laws in India while balancing the interests of the accused and the complainants.

Keywords

law of evidence legal realism in India Indian rape shield law prior sexual history right to a fair trial

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chandrachud A (2012) Speech, structure and behavior on the Supreme Court of India. Columbia Journal of Asian Law 25(2).

Baxi

(2014) Public Secrets of Law: Rape Trials in India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bhawnani

(2021) The mother’s character on trial in child sexual abuse cases. Indian Law Review 1: 9-13, 17-20.

Brown

Burman

Jamieson

(1993) Sex Crimes on Trial: The Use of Sexual Evidence in Scottish Courts, 85. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Canadian Centre for Justice and Community Safety Statistics (2021) Criminal Victimisation in Canada, 2019. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/85-002-x/2021001/article/00014-eng.htm (accessed 21 January 2022).

Capurso

(1998) How judges judge: Theories on judicial decision making. University of Baltimore Law Forum 29(1): 5.

Craig

(2018) Putting Trials on Trial: Sexual Assault and the Failure of the Legal Profession, 183. Montreal: McGill Queen’s University Press.

Craig

(2021) Private records, sexual activity evidence, and the charter of rights and freedoms. Alberta Law Review 58(4): 773.

Crown Court Compendium (Judicial College, December 2020). Available at: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Crown-Court-Compendium-Part-I-December-2020-amended-01.02.21.pdf (accessed 30 September 2022).

10.

Dash

(2020) Rape adjudication in India in the aftermath of criminal law amendment act, 2013: Findings from trial courts of Delhi. Indian Law Review 4(2): 244.

11.

Dash

(2021) Feminism and its discontents: Punishing sexual violence in India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies 28(1): 7.

12.

Dhingra

(2017) Laws repealed, but rape victims continue to face humiliating questions. Theprint.in. Available at: https://theprint.in/theprint-analysis/laws-repealed-rape-victims-continue-face-humiliating-questions/8416/ (accessed 4 October 2022).

13.

Diab

Young

(2021) Striking the right balance? Complainant privacy and full answer and defence in the new first-party records regime. Criminal Law Quarterly 69: 191.

14.

Dufraimont

(2019) Myth, inference and evidence in sexual assault trials. Queen’s Law Journal 44(2): 316.

15.

Ellison

Munro

(2013) Better the devil you know? ‘Real rape’ stereotypes and the relevance of a previous relationship in (Mock) juror deliberations. International Journal of Evidence & Proof 17(4): 299.

16.

Finch

Munro

(2007) The demon drink and the demonized woman: Socio-sexual stereotypes and responsibility attribution in rape trials involving intoxicants. Socio-Legal Studies 16(4): 591.

17.

Firth

(2005) The rape trial and sexual history evidence—R v. A and the (Un) worthy complainant. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 57(3): 442.

18.

Frank

(1932) What courts do in fact. Illinois Law Review 26: 645–656.

19.

Frank

(1995) The law and the modern mind. In: Christie

Martin

(eds) Jurisprudence: Text and Reading on The Philosophy of Law. Minnesota: West Publishing Company, 32–47.

20.

Galvin

(1987) Shielding Rape Victims in the State and Federal Courts: A Proposal for the Second Decade. Minnesota Law Review, 775–804.

21.

Garland

(2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

22.

Gautam

(2017) The unfair operation principle and the exclusionary rule: On the admissibility of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials in India. Indiana International & Comparative Law Review 27(2): 147.

23.

Goel

(2014) The Explorative Study of the Realist School of Jurisprudence in Indian Context SSRN Electronic Journal. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2485904 (accessed 29 May 2022).

24.

Gotell

(2008) Rethinking affirmative consent in Canadian sexual assault law: Neoliberal sexual subjects and risky women. Akron Law Review 41(4): 865.

25.

Gurnham

(2018) Ched Evans, rape myths and Medusa’s gaze: A story of mirrors and windows. International Journal of Law in Context 14(3): 454.

26.

Hajela

(2019) Legal realism via constitutional morality in India: A critical analysis. Nirma University Law Journal 9(1): 41–43.

27.

Harman

(2018) New Cross-Party Coalition Launches Challenge to Attorney General and MoJ on Use of Rape Complainant’s Previous Sexual History in Court. Available at: https://www.harrietharman.org/new_cross_party_coalition_launches_challenge_to_attorney_general_moj_on_use_of_rape_complainants_previous_sexual_history_in_court (last accessed 19th November 2022).

28.

Hidayatullah

(1972) A Judge’s Miscellany. NM Tripathi Publishing, 67.

29.

Huchhanavar

(2020) Regulatory mechanisms combating judicial corruption and misconduct in India: critical analysis. Indian Law Review 4(1): 47.

30.

Huchhanavar

(2021) India—disciplining judges for legal errors—the curious case of Justice Ganediwala. Public Law 3: 641.

31.

Huchhanavar

(2022) Judicial conduct regulation: Do in-house mechanisms in India uphold judicial Independence and effectively enforce judicial accountability? 6(3) Indian Law Review 352: 362–375.

32.

Kessler

(1992) Pattern of sexual conduct evidence and present consent: Limiting the admissibility of sexual history evidence in rape prosecutions. Women’s Rights Law Reporter 14(1): 79.

33.

Kotiswaran

(2018) Governance feminism in the postcolony: Reforming India’s rape laws. In: Halley

Kotiswaran

Rebouché

, et al. (eds) Governance Feminism: An Introduction. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 75–148.

34.

Kulshreshtha

(2020) An Assessment of Policing Behaviour with regard to Offences against Women in India. In: Ukey

Balyan

Walavalkar

, et al. (eds) Revisiting Reforms in Criminal Justice System in India. India: Thomson Reuters, 226–228.

35.

Lal

(2015) Child marriage in India: Factors and problems. International Journal of Science and Research 438: 2993.

36.

Law Commission of India (1980) Eighty-Fourth Report on Rape and allied offences some questions of Substantive Law, Procedure and Evidence. Government of India. Available at: https://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/51-100/report84.pdf (accessed 5 October 2022).

37.

Law Commission of India (2000) One Hundred and Seventy-Second Report on Review of Rape Laws. Government of India. Available at: https://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/old_reports/rpt172.pdf (accessed 5 October 2022).

38.

Levanon

(2012) Sexual history evidence in cases of sexual assault: A critical Re-evaluation. University of Toronto Law Journal 64: 609.

39.

Maheshwari

(2014) The language of evidence in rape trials. Socio-Legal Review 10(1): 1.

40.

Malimath

(2003) Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System. New Delhi: Malimath Committee.

41.

McColgan

(1996) Common law and the relevance of sexual history evidence. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 16(2): 275.

42.

McDonald

(2020) Using deductive reasoning to teach the application of a heightened relevance standard to sexual history evidence. In: Daly

Gans

Schwikkard

(eds) Teaching Evidence Law. London: Routledge, 69.

43.

McGlynn

(2017) Rape trials and sexual history evidence: Reforming the law on third-party evidence. The Journal of Criminal Law 81(5): 367.

44.

Mehta

Tewari

(2021) Between sexual violence and autonomy: Rethinking the engagement of the Indian women’s movement with criminal law. German Law Journal 22: 860.

45.

Mitra

Satish

(2014) Testing chastity, evidencing rape impact of medical jurisprudence on rape adjudication in India. Economic & Political Weekly 49(41): 51.

46.

Murthy

(2000) Partners for Law in Development. Available at: http://pldindia.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Comments-by-Laxmi-Murthy-to-Criminal-Law-Amendment-Bill-2000.pdf (accessed 21 March 2022).

47.

Nicolson

(1995) Telling tales: Gender discrimination, gender construction and battered women who kill. Feminist Legal Studies 3: 185.

48.

Partners for Law in Development (2015) Towards Victim Friendly Responses and Procedures for Prosecuting Rape. Available at: https://pldindia.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/handout-2-1.pdf (accessed 5 June 2022).

49.

Planning Commission of India (2011) Child Marriage in India–A Study of Situation, Causes and Enforcement of Child Marriage Prohibition Act. Government of India. Available at: https://niti.gov.in/planningcommission.gov.in/docs/reports/genrep/Report_Child_Marriage_in_India.pdf (accessed 21 March 2022).

50.

Puthucherril

(2021) Belling the cat: Judicial discipline in India. In: Devlin

Wildeman

(eds) Disciplining Judges. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing, 168–175.

51.

Reddy

Sekhar

(2019) Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy. Schooling the Judges. Available at: https://vidhilegalpolicy.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/JudicialAcademies.pdf (accessed 5 June 2022), 12–15.

52.

Redmayne

(2003) Myths, relationships and coincidences: The new problems of sexual history. International Journal of Evidence and Proof 7(2): 75.

53.

Rook

Ward

(2021) Rook & Ward on Sexual Offences: Law and Practice, 6th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

54.

Satish

(2016) Discretion, Discrimination and the Rule of Law: Reforming Rape Sentencing in India. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

55.

Shetty

(2020) Rape shield legislations and the use of evidence in Indian courts. International Journal of Legal Developments and Allied Issues 6(3): 96.

56.

Sweta

(2021) A jurisprudential analysis of legal formalism and legal realism under Indian legal system. International Journal of Law, Management & Humanities 4(3): 1970.

57.

Tanovich

(2017) Regulating inductive reasoning in sexual assault cases. In: Berger

Cunliffe

Stribopolous

(eds) To Ensure That Justice is Done: Essays in Memory of Marc Rosenberg, vol. 73. Canada: Thomson Reuters, 73.

58.

Temkin

Ashworth

(2004) The Sexual Offences Act 2003: (1) Rape, sexual assaults and the problems of consent. Criminal Law Review 328: 336.

59.

Thomason

(2018) Previous sexual history evidence: A gloss on relevance and relationship evidence. International Journal of Evidence & Proof 22(4): 342.

60.

Verma

Seth

Subramanium

(2013) Report of the Committee on Amendments to Criminal Law. New Delhi: Verma Committee.

61.

Vishwanath

(2020) Ethnographic study of rape adjudication in Lucknow trial court. Socio-Legal Review 16: 55.

62.

Wadekar

(2021) Rejecting ideal victimhood. Economic & Political Weekly 56(23): 8.

63.

Young

(1997) Femininity as Marginalia. In: Rush

McVeigh

Young

(eds) Criminal Legal Practises. UK: Routledge, 445.

64.

Young

(2001) The sexual history provisions in the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act, 1999: A violation of the right to fair trial. Medicine, Science and the Law 41(3): 217.

65.

Zuckerman

(1989) The Principles of Criminal Evidence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.