Intermediaries in Chile: Facilitating the right of child victims and witnesses to participate and be heard in criminal trials

Abstract

The intermediary system is a special measure designed to support the participation of vulnerable witnesses in the judicial system. In Chile, this model was initially incorporated in six regions with the application of Law 21.057 in October 2019. The measure establishes that a specially trained professional from the criminal justice system must facilitate communication during a trial between the court and child victims or witnesses of sexual or other serious crimes through the use of a linked room. This study analyses the perceptions of intermediaries and other members of the justice system in relation to the first year of implementation of the intermediary system based on information obtained through the use of focus groups and a survey. The results show an overall positive assessment of the experiences with and functioning of the ‘judicial intermediation’ and portray some of the best practices and facilitating conditions for the correct operation of the scheme as well as the difficulties and challenges for other Chilean regions and countries.

Keywords

child-friendly justice child victims intermediary system sexual crimes

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrews

Lamb

(2016) How do lawyers examine and cross-examine children in Scotland? Applied Cognitive Psychology 30: 953–971.

Antolak-Saper

MacPherson

(2019) Vulnerable witnesses and Victoria's intermediary pilot program. Criminal Law Journal 43(5): 325–338.

Bekink

(2016) The protection of child victims and witnesses in a post-constitutional criminal justice system with specific reference to the role of an intermediary: A comparative study. PhD Thesis, University of South Africa, Pretoria.

Cashmore

Shackel

(2018) Evaluation of the Child Sexual Offence Evidence Pilot: Final Outcome Evaluation Report. Sydney: University of New South Wales.

Collins

Krahenbuhl

(2020) Registered intermediaries’ assessment of children's communication: An exploration of aims and processes. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof 24(4): 374–395.

Cooper

Mattison

(2016) Children's champions. Australian Police Journal 70(4): 200–203.

Cooper

Mattison

(2017) Intermediaries, vulnerable people and the quality of evidence: an international comparison of three versions of the English intermediary model. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof 21(4): 351–370.

Corte Suprema de Chile (2014) Acta No 79-2014 de 03 de junio de 2014, Auto Acordado que regula la implementación y uso de una sala especial para la declaración de niños, niñas y adolescentes víctimas o testigos de un delito.

Coughlan

Jarman

(2002) Can the intermediary system work for child victims of sexual abuse? Families in Society 83(5/6): 541–546.

10.

Council of Europe (2010) Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on child-friendly justice. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/16804b2cf3 (accessed 14 April 2022).

11.

Davies

Hanna

Henderson

et al. (2011) Questioning Child Witnesses: Exploring the Benefits and Risks of Intermediary Models. Auckland: Institute of Public Policy.

12.

Davies

Henderson

Hanna

(2010) Facilitating children to give best evidence: Are there better ways to challenge children's testimony? Criminal Law Journal 34(6): 347–362.

13.

Department of Justice Australia (2021) Jurisdictional Comparison Table – Intermediary Schemes. Available at: https://www.courts.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/679571/jurisdictional-summary-of-intermediary-schemes.pdf (accessed 14 April 2022).

14.

Department of Justice Northern Ireland (2016) Registered Intermediaries Schemes Pilot Project Phase II Review. Belfast: Department of Justice.

15.

Ellison

Munro

(2018) Trauma and victim participation in the criminal process. In: Cooper

Hunting

(eds) Access to Justice for Vulnerable People. London: Wildy, Simmonds & Hill Publishing, 176–184.

16.

Fambasayi

Koraan

(2018) Intermediaries and the international obligation to protect child witnesses in South Africa. PER/PELJ 21: 1–30. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2018/v21i0a2971.

17.

Fundación Amparo y Justicia (2020) Entrevista investigativa videograbada a niños, niñas y adolescentes víctimas de delitos sexuales. Fundamentos y Orientaciones Técnicas Basadas en Evidencia Internacional. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones UC.

18.

Universidad San Sebastián, Fundación Amparo y Justicia y Poder Judicial (2019) Estudio sobre percepción de jueces y juezas respecto de la implementación de la Ley 21.057 de entrevistas grabadas en video y otras medidas de resguardo a menores de edad víctimas de delitos sexuales. Propuesta No 6, Universidad San Sebastián.

19.

Henderson

(2015) A very valuable tool’: judges, advocates and intermediaries discuss the intermediary system in England and Wales. International Journal of Evidence and Proof 19(3): 154–171.

20.

Henderson

Lamb

(2018) Judicial and intermediary interventions during childreńs cross-examinations. 11th Annual Conference – International Investigative Interviewing Research Group (IIIRG), Porto, Portugal, 2–6 July.

21.

Henry

Crane

Millmore

et al. (2021) Intermediaries and cross-examination resilience in children: the development of a novel experimental methodology. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 35(6):1–18. doi: 10.1002/acp.3869.

22.

Howard

McCann

Dudley

(2020a) It's really good, much needed, why hasn’t it happened earlier?’ Professionals’ perspectives on the benefits of communication assistance in the New Zealand youth justice system. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 53(2): 265–284.

23.

Howard

McCann

Dudley

(2020b) I was flying blind a wee bit’: Professionals’ perspectives on challenges facing communication assistance in the New Zealand youth justice system. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof 24(2): 104–120.

24.

Howard

McCann

Dudley

(2020c) What is communication assistance? Describing a new and emerging profession in the New Zealand youth justice system. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 27(2): 300–314.

25.

Hughes

Sheahan

Williams

et al. (2020) Ensuring the rights of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities within child justice systems. Lancet Child and Adolescent Health 4: 163–166.

26.

Jonker

Swanzen

(2007) Intermediary services for child witnesses testifying in South African criminal courts. SUR International Journal of Human Rights 4(6): 94–119.

27.

JUSTICE (2019) Prosecuting Sexual Offence. Available at: https://justice.org.uk/our-work/criminal-justice-system/prosecuting-sexual-offences/ (accessed November 2021).

28.

Lamb

Brown

Hershkowitz

et al. (2018) Tell Me What Happened: Questioning Children About Abuse. Hoboken, USA: Wiley & Sons.

29.

MIDE UC (2009) Percepción de los Procesos de Investigación y Judicialización en los Casos de Agresiones Sexuales Infantiles en la Regiones Metropolitana, de Valparaíso y del Bío-Bío. La Perspectiva de los Niños y Niñas o Adolescentes Afectados. Santiago: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.

30.

Ministerio de Justicia y Derechos Humanos de Chile (2021) Informe final. Evaluación anual Ley 21.057 en su primer año de implementación. Available at: https://www.minjusticia.gob.cl/media/2021/12/InformeFinal_ley21057_2020.pdf (accessed 14 April 2022).

31.

Myers

(1996) A decade of international legal reform regarding child abuse investigation and litigation: steps toward a child witness code. Pacific Law Journal 28: 169–241.

32.

New Zealand Law Commission (1999) Evidence Report 55 – Volume 1: Reform of the Law. Wellington: New Zealand Law Commission.

33.

NSW Department of Justice (2016) Children's Champion (Witness Intermediary) Procedural Guidance Manual (New South Wales). Parramatta: NSW Department of Justice.

34.

Orellana

Arredondo

Carrasco

et al. (2015) Significados asociados a la participación en juicios orales en niños y niñas víctimas de delitos sexuales. Praxis 17(27): 61–81.

35.

Plotnikoff

Woolfson

(2007) The Go-Between: Evaluation of Intermediary Pathfinder Projects. London: NSPCC/The Nuffield Foundation.

36.

Plotnikoff

Woolfson

(2009) Measuring up? Evaluating implementation of Government commitments to young witnesses in criminal proceedings. Available at: https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Measuring20Up20executive20summary.pdf (accessed November 2021).

37.

Plotnikoff

Woolfson

(2015) Intermediaries in the Criminal Justice System: Improving Communication for Vulnerable Witnesses and Defendants. Bristol: Policy Press.

38.

Price

Ahern

Lamb

(2016) Rapport-building in investigative interviews of alleged child sexual abuse victims. Applied Cognitive Psychology 30(5): 743–749.

39.

Saywitz

Larson

Hobbs

et al. (2015) Developing rapport with children in forensic interviews: systematic review of experimental research. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 33(4): 372–389.

40.

Strauss

Corbin

(2002) Bases de la Investigación Cualitativa: Técnicas y Procedimientos Para Desarrollar la Teoría Fundada. 1st edn. Medellín: Editorial Universidad de Antioquia.

41.

Taggart

(2021) ‘I am not beholden to anyone… I consider myself to be an officer of the court’: A comparison of the intermediary role in England and Wales and Northern Ireland. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof 25(2): 141–162.

42.

The Inns of Court College of Advocacy (2019) Raising the Bar. Available at: https://www.icca.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Raising-the-Bar.pdf (accessed 14 April 2022).

43.

United Kingdom Ministry of Justice (2020) Registered Intermediary Procedural Guidance. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/955316/registered-intermediary-procedural-guidance-manual.pdf (accessed 14 April 2022).

44.

Victims Commissioner (2018) A Voice for the Voiceless: The Victims’ Commissioner's Review into the Provision of Registered Intermediaries for Children and Vulnerable Victims and Witnesses. Available at: https://victimscommissioner.org.uk/published-reviews/a-voice-for-the-voiceless-provision-of-registered-intermediaries/ (accessed 14 April 2022).

45.

Wilcock

Crane

Hobson

et al. (2017) Supporting child witnesses during identification lineups: exploring the effectiveness of registered intermediaries. Applied Cognitive Psychology: 1–9. doi: 10.1002/acp.3412.

46.

Wyman

Lavoie

Talwar

(2018) Best practices for interviewing children with intellectual disabilities in maltreatment cases. Exceptionality 27(3): 167–184.