Abstract
The publication of Auld LJ's review of the English criminal courts may herald significant reform of the trial process. It is argued that recommendations to retain the jury whilst subjecting its decision-making to greater judicial control, and restricting proper research into its operation, lack a coherent foundation and may prove problematic in practice. The recommendations may enhance protection for vulnerable witnesses although proposals to increase the chances of convicting in cases of domestic violence may also create risks for victims.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.