Department for Education (1995) Value Added in Education, London: Department for Education.
2.
Goldstein, H. (1993) Assessing Group Differences, Oxford Review of Education, 19, (2): 141-150.
3.
Goldstein, H. (1995) Multilevel Statistical Models (2nd Edition), London: Edward Arnold andNew York: Halsted Press
4.
Goldstein, H. and Healy, M. (1995) The graphical presentation of a collection of means , Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 158, (I): 175-177.
5.
Gray, J.Jesson, D., Goldstein, H., Hedger, K. and Rasbash, J. (1995) A Multilevel Analysis of School Improvement: Changes in Schools' Performance Over Time, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6, (2): 97-114.
6.
Gray, J.Goldstein, H. and Jesson, D. (1996) Changes and Improvements in Schools' Effectiveness: Trends over five years, Research Papers in Education, II, (I): 35-51.
7.
Goldstein, H. and Yang, M. (1997) Multilevel Analysis of KSI Assessment Results, report to Hampshire LEA.
8.
Gray, J.Hopkins, D. and Reynolds, D. (1998) The Improving Schools Research Project, a paper presented at The International Congress of School Effectiveness and Improvement , Manchester, January 1998.
9.
Griffiths, B. (1997) Effective Schools and School Reviews: The Victorian Accountability Framework, IARTV Seminar Series, No 64, April, 1997.
10.
Hill, N. (1996) Value Added and School Performance Recent LEA Initiatives . Slough: NFER
11.
Mortimore, P. (1995) Effective Schools: Current Impact and Future Possibilities, The Director's Inaugural Lecture, 7 February 1995, London: Institute of Education, University of London .
12.
Mortimore, P.Sammons, P. and Thomas, S. (1994) School Effectiveness and Value Added Measures, Assessment In Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, I, (3): 315-332.
13.
Nuttall, D.Goldstein, H., Prosser, R. and Rasbash, J. (1989) Differential school effectiveness, International Journal of Educational Research (special issue) Developments in School Effectiveness Research, 13, (7): 769-776.
14.
Paterson, L. and Goldstein, H. (1991) New statistical methods of analysing social structures: an introduction to multilevel models, British Educational Research Journal, 17, (4). 387-393.
15.
Rowe, K. (1996) Assessment, Performance Indicators, League Tables, Value Added Measures and School Effectiveness: Issues and Implications, IARTV Seminar Series, No 58, October 1996.
16.
Scaa (1997) The National Value Added Project Report to the Secretary of State, London . SCAA.
17.
Sammons, P. and Smees, R. (1997a) Using Baseline Screening Information to Examine Pupil Progress Across Years I and 2, a report prepared for Surrey Education Services.
18.
Sammons, P. and Smees, R. (1997b) Using Baseline Screening Information to Examine Pupil Progress Across Years 4 and 6, a report prepared for Surrey Education Services.
19.
Sammons, P., Thomas, S. and Mortimore, P. (1997) Forging Links. Effective Schools and Effective DepartmentsLondon: Paul Chapman.
20.
The Guardian (1998a) In a league of their own, article by John Carvel, Guardian Education, March 17, 1998.
21.
The Guardian (1998b) Storming the ivory tower, article by Peter Kingston, Guardian Education , March I7, 1998.
22.
Thomas, S. and Mortimore, P. (1996) Comparison of value added models for secondary school effectiveness, Research Papers in Education, II, (I): 5-33.
23.
Thomas, S., Sammons, P. and Street, H. (1997) Value Added Approaches: Fairer Ways of Comparing Schools, School Improvement Network Research Matters, Summer 1997.
24.
Thomas, S., Sammons, P., Mortimore, P. and Smees, R. (1997) Differential Secondary School Effectiveness: Examining the size, extent and consistency of school and departmental effects on GCSE outcomes for different groups of students over three years, British Educational Research Journal, 23, (4): 451-469.
25.
Thomas, S., Smees, R. and Boyd, B. (1998) Using Pupil Attitude Data in Scottish Schools: A policy paper, presented to the Scottish Office Employment and Industry Department, Edinburgh, March 1998 and submitted to Educational Research and Evaluation .
26.
Thomas, S. and Elliot, K. (1998a) DENI Raising School Standards Initiative. A contextualised analysis of the Summer I996 Baseline Assessments Years 3 and 5, a report for the Department of Education Northern Ireland.
27.
Thomas, S. and Elliot, K. (1998b) DENI Raising School Standards Initiative A contextualised analysis of the Summer I996 Baseline Assessments Years 8 and I0, a report for the Department of Education Northern Ireland.
28.
I This paper is based on a poster session presented at the 8th International Congress of School Effectiveness and Improvement, Manchester, 4-8 January 1998. The research reported was partly funded by an ESRC fellowship award to Dr Sally Thomas (H53627504395)
29.
The Lancashire Value Added project was set up in I992 in partnership with the LEA and has now been running for 6 years (see Thomas and Mortimore, I996).
30.
Other recent ISEIC value added projects include:
31.
• Improving School Effectiveness Project, in collaboration with QIE, University of Strathclyde
32.
• The Development of Value Added Measures in Jersey. Newham Teacher's Questionnaire Project Surrey Value Added Project at Key Stage I and 2.
33.
SCAA's report to the Secretary of State on 'The Value Added National Project' also recommends that results are reported in both graphical and tabular form.
34.
Except for age if the baseline assessment is standardised.
35.
ie students' t test.
36.
Using the prior attainment scores, the different bands are created with band I containing those pupils with the top 25% of prior attainment scores, band 2 with the middle 50% and band 3 with the bottom 25%.