This is a conceptual article arising from, and grounded in, research with a government-funded primary school serving high-poverty communities in Queensland, Australia. It is one response to the last 10 years of participatory research work led by the three authors of this article (the school principal and two academics). In this article, we write about three concepts that have emerged out of our joint work: (1) communities-in-formation, (2) emerging equalities, (3) material participation. We discuss how and why we have undertaken this kind of partnership and conceptual research and offer some suggestions for others who are interested in undertaking similar work.
AikenG. T. (2017). The politics of community: Togetherness, transition and post-politics. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(10), 2383–2401.
2.
AndersonT.ShattuckJ. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research?Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25.
3.
BiestaG. J. J. (2004). The community of those who have nothing in common: Education and the language of responsibility. Interchange, 35(3), 307–324.
4.
BiestaG. J. J. (2010). A new logic of emancipation: The methodology of Jacques Rancière. Educational Theory, 60(1), 39–59.
5.
BiestaG. J. J. (2014). The beautiful risk of education. Paradigm Publishers.
6.
BinghamC.BiestaG. (2010). Jacques Rancière: Education, truth, emancipation. Bloomsbury Publishing.
7.
BlencoweC.BrigstockeJ.NooraniT. (2015). Theorising participatory practice and alienation in health research: A materialist approach. Social Theory & Health, 13(3), 397–417.
8.
FryerN. (2015). The ‘third thing’: Rancière, process drama and experimental performance. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 20(3), 331–336.
9.
GlasswellK.SinghP.McNaughtonS. (2016). Partners in design: Co-inquiry for quality teaching in disadvantaged schools. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 39(1), 20–29.
10.
HeimansS.BiestaG. (2020). Rediscovering the beauty and risk of education research and teaching: An interview with Gert Biesta by Stephen Heimans. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48(2), 101–111.
11.
HeimansS.SinghP.GlasswellK. (2017). Doing education policy enactment research in a minor key. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 38(2), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.1074428
KayJ. (2011). Obliquity. Why our goals are best achieved indirectly. The Penguin Press.
14.
NewmanJ. E.ClarkeJ. (2009). Publics, politics and power: Remaking the public in public services. SAGE.
15.
RaffoC.GunterH. (2008). Leading schools to promote social inclusion: Developing a conceptual framework for analysing research, policy and practice. Journal of Education Policy, 23(4), 397–414.
16.
RancièreJ. (1991). The ignorant schoolmaster: Five lessons in intellectual emancipation (RossK., Trans.). Stanford University Press.
17.
RancièreJ. (2009a). Aesthetics and its discontents (CorcoranS., Trans.). Polity.
18.
RancièreJ. (2009b). A few remarks on the method of Jacques Rancière. Parallax, 15(3), 114–123.
19.
RancièreJ. (2010). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics (CorcoranS., Trans.). Continuum.
20.
RotheK. (2019). On the magic of the scene. Martha Muchow’s scenographies. In FriedrichL.HarrasserK.KaiserC. (Eds.), Scenographies of the subject, pp. 59–74. Springer.
21.
SinghP.GlasswellK. (2013). Chasing social change: Matters of concern and the mattering practice of educational research. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 1, 1–15. https://doi.org/www.ijicc.net
22.
SinghP.GlasswellK. (2016). Differences that come to matter. Leading struggles against educational inequality. In JohnsonG.DempsterN. (Eds.), Leadership in diverse learning contexts (pp. 255–275). Springer.
23.
SinghP.HeimansS.GlasswellK. (2014). Policy enactment, context and performativity: Ontological politics and researching Australian National Partnership policies. Journal of Education Policy, 29(6), 826–844. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2014.891763
24.
SinghP.MärtsinM.GlasswellK. (2013). Knowledge work at the boundary: Making a difference to educational disadvantage. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2, 102–110. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2013.02.001
25.
SinghP.MärtsinM.GlasswellK. (2015). Dilemmatic spaces: High-stakes testing and the possibilities of collaborative knowledge work to generate learning innovations. Teachers and Teaching, 21(4), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.976853
26.
SinghP.PiniB.GlasswellK. (2018). Explorations in policy enactment: Feminist thought experiments with Basil Bernstein’s code theory. Gender and Education, 30(4), 417–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1216523
27.
SmythJ.WrigleyT. (2013). Living on the edge: Rethinking poverty, class and schooling. Peter Lang.
28.
WalsA. E. J.PetersM. A. (2018). Flowers of resistance: Citizen science, ecological democracy and the transgressive education paradigm. In KönigA.RavetzJ. (Eds.), Sustainability science: Key issues, pp. 29–52. Routledge.
29.
WilliamsR. (1983). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. Fontana.
