Perceptions of regular and special education teachers of their own and their co-teacher’s instructional responsibilities in inclusive education: A case study
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2020
Perceptions of regular and special education teachers of their own and their co-teacher’s instructional responsibilities in inclusive education: A case study
Co-teaching is fundamental to inclusive education. However, the way co-teaching is implemented, varies considerably, and establishing and allocating instructional responsibilities does not follow a standardized pattern. This study is based on four cases – two located at traditional secondary schools and two at newly created community schools – and includes semi-structured in-depth interviews with four regular teachers and four special education teachers. It aims at providing insight into how co-teaching partners in Germany perceive their own and their partner’s instructional responsibilities. Data are analyzed with a structuring technique of qualitative content analysis. It becomes evident that the partners in each case do not always follow identical instructional intents. Nonetheless, different types of teacher knowledge seem to complement each other effectively in co-teaching relationships. Although, of course provided primarily for pupils with special needs, special education expertise also seems to support pupils without such needs. The results indicate a need to secure and integrate co-teaching relationships structurally into a school’s development process. The article concludes with some options for development in practice.
AndrewsD.AbawiL. (2017). Three-dimensional pedagogy: A new professionalism in educational contexts. Improving Schools, 20(1), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216652025
2.
Autorengruppe Bildungsberichterstattung. (2018). Bildung in Deutschland 2018: Ein indikatorengestützter Bericht mit einer Analyse zu Wirkungen und Erträgen von Bildung [Education in Germany in 2018: An evidence-based report including an analysis of the effects and benefits of education]. wbv Media. https://doi.org/10.3278/6001820fw
3.
BiermannJ.PowellJ. J. W. (2014). Institutionelle Dimensionen inklusiver Schulbildung – Herausforderungen der UN-Behindertenrechtskonvention für Deutschland, Island und Schweden im Vergleich [Institutional dimensions of inclusive schooling - A comparative analysis of the challenges of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for Germany, Iceland and Sweden]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 17, 679–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-014-0588-0
4.
BoothT.AinscowM. (2011). Index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools (3rd ed.). Center for Studies on Inclusive Education.
5.
DavisJ. M. (2013). Supporting creativity, inclusion and collaborative multi-professional learning. Improving Schools, 16(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480213480260
6.
DysonA.HowesA.RobertsB. (2004). What do we really know about inclusive schools? A systematic review of the research evidence. In MitchellD. R. (Ed.), Special educational needs and inclusive education: Major themes in education (pp. 280–294). RoutledgeFalmer.
FennickE.LiddyD. (2001). Responsibilities and preparation for collaborative teaching: Co-teachers’ perspectives. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 24, 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640102400307
9.
FriendM.CookL. (2012). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (7th ed.). Pearson.
10.
FriendM.CookL.Hurley-ChamberlainD.ShambergerC. (2010). Co-teaching: An illustration of the complexity of collaboration in special education. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474410903535380
11.
GavishB. (2017). Four profiles of inclusive supportive teachers: Perceptions of their status and role in implementing inclusion of students with special needs in general classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.004
12.
GerberP. J.PoppP. A. (2000). Making collaborative teaching more effective for academically able students: Recommendations for implementation and training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 229–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511166
13.
GöranssonK.NilholmC. (2014). Conceptual diversities and empirical shortcomings – A critical analysis of research on inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29, 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.933545
14.
HesjedalE.HetlandH.IversenA. C.MangerT. (2015). Interprofessional collaboration as a means of including children at risk: An analysis of Norwegian educational policy documents. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19, 1280–1293. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1057241
15.
HollenwegerJ. (2016). Tätigkeiten synchronisieren statt Aufgaben teilen. Grundlagen und Modelle einer situativen Analyse inklusiver Praktiken [Synchronizing activities instead of splitting up tasks. Fundamental ideas and concepts of a case-oriented analysis of inclusive practice]. In KreisA.WickJ.Kosorok LabhartC. (Eds.), Kooperation im Kontext schulischer Heterogenität [Cooperation within the context of school heterogeneity] (pp. 33–51). Waxmann.
16.
HughesC. E.MurawskiW. M. (2001). Lessons from another field: Applying co-teaching strategies to gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45(3), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620104500304
17.
IlikŞ. Ş.ErR. K. (2019). Evaluating parent participation in individualized education programs by opinions of parents and teachers. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(2), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v7i2.3936
18.
JonesB. A.Peterson-AhmadM. B. (2017). Preparing new special education teachers to facilitate collaboration in the individualized education program process through mini-conferencing. International Journal of Special Education, 32, 697–707.
19.
JurkowskiS.MüllerB. (2018). Co-teaching in inclusive classes: The development of multi-professional cooperation in teaching dyads. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.017
20.
KeefeE. B.MooreV. (2004). The challenge of co-teaching inclusive classrooms at the high school level: What the teachers told us. American Secondary Education, 32(3), 77–88.
21.
KershnerR. (2007). What do teachers need to know about meeting special educational needs? In FlorianL. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of special education (pp. 486–498). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607989.n38
22.
KreisA.WickJ.Kosorok LabhartC. (2016). Aktivitätenrepertoires von Regellehrpersonen an inklusiven Schulen – Eine Typologie [Repertoires of activities of school teachers at an inclusive school - A typology]. In MoserV.Lütje-KloseB. (Eds.), Schulische Inklusion [Inclusion at school] (pp. 140–159). Beltz Juventa.
23.
LamnekS. (2010). Qualitative Sozialforschung [Qualitative social research]. Beltz Verlag.
24.
LittigB.BognerA.MenzW. (2018). Generating qualitative data with experts and elites. In FlickU. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection (pp. 652–667). SAGE.
25.
MayringP. (2015). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative content analysis: Foundations and techniques] (12th ed.). Beltz UTB.
MulhollandM.O’ConnorU. (2016). Collaborative classroom practice for inclusion: Perspectives of classroom teachers and learning support/resource teachers. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20, 1070–1083. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1145266
29.
NaraianS.SchlessingerS. (2018). Becoming an inclusive educator: Agentive maneuverings in collaboratively taught classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.012
30.
NtombelaS. (2011). The progress of inclusive education in South Africa: Teachers’ experiences in a selected district, KwaZulu-Natal. Improving Schools, 14(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480210390082
31.
PancsofarN.PetroffJ. G. (2016). Teachers’ experiences with co-teaching as a model for inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20, 1043–1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1145264
32.
PattonM. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. SAGE.
33.
PicklG.HolzingerA.Kopp-SixtS. (2016). The special education teacher between the priorities of inclusion and specialisation. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20, 828–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1115559
34.
PowellJ. J. W. (2018). Inclusive Education: Entwicklungen im internationalen Vergleich [Inclusive Education: Progress in an international comparison]. In SturmT.Wagner-WilliM. (Eds.), Handbuch schulische Inklusion [Handbook of inclusion at school] (pp. 127–141). Verlag Barbara Budrich.
35.
RobinsonD. (2017). Effective inclusive teacher education for special educational needs and disabilities: Some more thoughts on the way forward. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.09.007
36.
RolffH.-G. (2010). Schulentwicklung als Trias von Organisations-, Unterrichts- und Personalentwicklung [School development as a combination of organisational, instructional and staff development]. In BohlT.HelsperW.HoltappelsH. G.SchelleC. (Eds.), Handbuch Schulentwicklung. Theorie – Forschungsbefunde – Entwicklungsprozesse – Methodenrepertoire [Handbook of school development. Theories – research results – development processes – methods] (pp. 29–36). Klinkhardt.
37.
RytivaaraA.KershnerR. (2012). Co-teaching as a context for teachers’ professional learning and joint knowledge construction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 999–1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.05.006
38.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A.McDuffieK. A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A metasynthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73, 392–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290707300401
39.
SolisM.VaughnS.SwansonE.McCulleyL. (2012). Collaborative models of instruction: The empirical foundations of inclusion and co-teaching. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 498–510. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21606
40.
StefanidisA.StrogilosV. (2015). Union gives strength: Mainstream and special education teachers’ responsibilities in inclusive co-taught classrooms. Educational Studies, 41, 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2015.1018872
41.
SucL.BukovecB.KarpljukD. (2017). The role of inter-professional collaboration in developing inclusive education: Experiences of teachers and occupational therapists in Slovenia. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21, 938–955. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1325073
Van GasseR.VanlommelK.VanhoofJ.Van PetegemT. (2016). Teacher collaboration on the use of pupil learning outcome data: A rich environment for professional learning?Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.004
44.
WaitollerF.ArtilesA. J. (2013). A decade of professional development research for inclusive education: A critical review and notes for a research program. Review of Educational Research, 83, 319–356. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313483905
45.
WeissM. P.LloydJ. W. (2002). Congruence between roles and actions of secondary special educators in co-taught and special education settings. Journal of Special Education, 36(2), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669020360020101
