This article examines a government attempt to impose testing of 4-year-olds as a baseline against which to ‘hold primary schools accountable’ for children’s subsequent progress. It examines the various forms of baseline testing in this experiment and analyses the misleading claims made for the ‘predictive validity’ of baseline scores. The article also takes a broader look at standardised ways of tracking children’s attainment and progress to the end of primary school and tacit assumptions of linear progress underpinning large-scale data-based accountability processes.
ClarkM. M. (2016). Baseline assessments their value and validity in assessing young children on entry to school. In Baseline assessment: What research is telling us. Newman University. Retrieved from http://www.newman.ac.uk/24feb/4560/.
4.
CrillyL. (2016). Understanding the diversity of children’s needs (MA assignment). Leeds: Leeds Beckett University.
MossP. (2013). The relationship between early childhood and compulsory education: A properly political question. In MossP. (Ed.), Early childhood and compulsory education: Reconceptualising the relationship (pp. 2–50). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
20.
MossP. (2014). Transformative change and real utopias in early childhood education: A story of democracy, experimentation and potentiality. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
21.
MuterV.HulmeC.SnowlingM.StevensonJ. (2004). Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 40, 665–681.
RansonS. (2003). Public accountability in the age of neo-liberal governance. Journal of Education Policy, 18, 459–480.
24.
Roberts-HolmesG. (2014). The ‘datafication’ of early years pedagogy: ‘If the teaching is good, the data should be good and if there’s bad teaching, there is bad data’. Journal of Education Policy, 30, 302–315.
25.
Standards and Testing Agency. (2014). Reception baseline: Criteria for potential assessments. London, England: Crown.
