The central and distinguishing thesis of social and cultural perspectives on outcome equity is that public school classrooms are culturally biased environments. Such environments disaffect children who arrive at school from the economic or cultural margin. The ‘formative learning environment’ (FoLE) establishes and sustains legitimate partnerships for the purpose of supporting learning and minimizing the outcome inequities experienced by students from conditions of social adversity. Research consistently finds that when children learn in FoLEs, they begin to participate actively in their own learning progression by consciously monitoring and regulating product-oriented learning. The focus of the article is placed upon the conceptual knowledge required to design FoLEs which shield marginalized and disaffected students from academic failure.
Assessment Action Group /AiFL Programme Management Group (AAG/APMG). (2002–2008). AifL – Assessment is for learning. Retrieved from: http://www.ltscotland.org.uk/assess
2.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
3.
BarronB. J. (2000). Achieving co-ordination in collaborative problem solving groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 403–436. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS0904_2
4.
BenardB. (1991). Fostering resiliency in kids: Protective factors in the family, school, and community. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
5.
BerkmanL. F.KawachiI. (2000). A historical framework for social epidemiology. In BerkmanL. F.KawachiI. (Eds.), Social epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
BlackP.WiliamD. (2006). Assessment for learning in the classroom. In GardnerJ. (Ed.), Assessment and learning. London: SAGE.
7.
BlackP.WiliamD. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
8.
BlatchfordP.KutnickP.BainesE.GaltonP. (2003). Toward a social pedagogy of classroom group work. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 153–72.
9.
BlatchfordP.BainesE.Rubie-DaviesC.BassettP.ChowneA. (2006). The effect of a new approach to group-work on pupil–pupil and teacher–pupil interactions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 750–765. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.750
10.
BourdieuP.PasseronJ.-C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society, culture. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
ChengR. W.LamS.-F.ChanJ. C. (2008). When high achievers and low achievers work in the same group: The roles of group heterogeneity and processes in project based learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 205–221. doi: : 10.1348/000709907X218160
14.
ClarkI. (2010). The development of ‘Project 1’: Formative assessment strategies in UK schools. Current Issues in Education, 13, 1–33.
15.
ClarkI. (2012). Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 205–249. doi: 10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6
16.
CollinsJ. (1993). Determination and contradiction: An appreciation and critique of the work of Pierre Bourdieu on language and education. In CalhounL. E. C. (Ed.), Bourdieu: Critical perspectives. Cambridge: Polity.
17.
CollinsJ. (2009). Social reproduction in classrooms and schools. Annual Review of Anthropology, 38, 33–48. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.0852
18.
CondieR.LivingstoneK.SeagravesL. (2005). Evaluation of the assessment is for learning programme: Final report and appendices. The Quality of Education Centre, University of Strathclyde. Retrieved from: www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2005/12/0210792641/26428
19.
CrosnoeR.ElderG. H. (2004). Family dynamics, supportive relationships, and educational resilience during adolescence. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 571–602. doi: 10.1177/0192513X03258307
20.
DelpitL. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: The New Press.
21.
DornS. (2010). The political dilemmas of formative assessment. Exceptional Children, 76, 325–337.
22.
DweckC. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 4, 1040– 1048. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
23.
DweckC. S. (2002). Beliefs that make smart people dumb. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Why smart people do stupid things. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
FinnJ. D.RockD. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 221–234. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.221
26.
GreeneR. (2002). Human behavior theory: A resilience orientation. In GreeneR. (Ed.), Resiliency: An integrated approach to practice, policy, and research. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
27.
HallamS.KistonA.PeffersJ.RobertsonP.StobartG. (2004). Evaluation of project 1 of the AiFL development programme: Support for professional practice in formative assessment. Institute of Education (IoE), London. Retrieved from: www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2004/10/19947/4298
28.
IrvingS.HarrisL.PetersonE. (2011). ‘One assessment doesn’t serve all the purposes’ or does it? New Zealand teachers describe assessment and feedback. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(3), 413–426.
29.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T.HolubecE. J. (1998). Cooperation in the classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
30.
KennyM. E.GallagherL. A.Alvarez-SalvatR.SilsbyJ. (2002). Sources of support and psychological distress among academically successful inner-city youth. Adolescence, 37, 161–182.
31.
Kramer-DahlA.TeoP.ChiaA. (2007). Supporting knowledge construction and literate talk in secondary social studies. Linguistics and Education, 18, 167–199. doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2007.07.003
LooneyJ.PoskittJ. (2005). New Zealand: Embedding formative assessment in multiple policy initiatives. In CERI/OECD (Ed.), Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Centre for Educational Innovation and Research. Paris: OECD.
34.
LutharS.CicchettiD. (2000). The construct of resilience: Implications for interventions and social policies. Journal of Development and Psychopathology, 12, 857–885.
35.
LwinS.GohC.DoyleP. (2012). ‘I’m going to split you all up’: Examining transitions to group/pair work in two primary English classrooms. Language and Education, 26, 19–33. doi: 10.1080/09500782.2011.609281
36.
MastenA. S. (1994). Resilience in individual development: Successful adaptation despite risk and adversity. In WangM. C.GordonE. W. (Eds.), Educational resilience in inner-city America: Challenges and prospects. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
MastenA. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56, 227–238. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227.
38.
MastenA. S.ReedM. J. (2002). Resilience in development. In SnyderC. R.LopezS. J. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 74–78). London: Oxford University Press.
39.
MercerN. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203464984
40.
NettlesS.MucherahW.JonesD. (2000). Understanding resilience: The role of social resources. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 5(1&2), 47–60.
OECD/CERI. (2011). Against the odds: Disadvantage students who succeed at school. Paris: CERI/OECD.
43.
Prom-JacksonS.JohnsonS. T.WallaceM. B. (1987). Home environment, talented minority youth, and school achievement. Journal of Negro Education, 56, 111–121. doi: 10.2307/2295388
44.
ReyesJ.EliasM. J. (2011). Fostering social-emotional resilience among Latino youth. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 723–737. doi: 10.1002/pits.20580
45.
RogoffB.GutiérrezK. D. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32, 19–25. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032005019
46.
RoweF.StewartD. (2011). Promoting connectedness through who school approaches: Key elements and pathways of influence. Health Education, 111, 49–65.
SlavinR. E. (1996). Research for the future research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Journal of Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43–69.
49.
SlavinR. E. (2006). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
50.
StraussA. L.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
51.
SullivanA. (2012). Cultural capital and educational attainment. European Sociological Review, 28, 607–621.
52.
UngarM. (2005). Introduction: Resilience across cultures and contexts. In UngarM. (Ed.), Handbook for working with children and youth: Pathways to resilience across cultures and contexts. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
53.
United Nations. (2010). The millennium development goals 2010. We can end poverty: 2015 Millennium Development Goals. New York: United Nations. Retrieved from: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/
54.
van BredaA. (2001). Resilience theory: A literature review. South African Military Health Service, Military Psychological Institute, Social Work Research & Development.
55.
Vanderbilt-AdrianceE.ShawS. (2008). Conceptualizing and re-evaluating resilience across levels of risk, time, and domains of competence. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 11, 30–58. doi: 10.1007/s10567-008-0031-2
56.
VillegasA. M.LucasT. (2002). Educating culturally responsive teachers. New York: State University of New York Press.
57.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58.
WaldripB.FisherD.DornanJ. (2009). Identifying exemplary science teachers through students’ perceptions of their learning environments. Learning Environment Research, 12, 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s10984-008-9049-0
59.
WangM. C.HaertelG. D.WalbergH. J. (1994). Educational resilience in inner cities. In WangM. C.GordonE. W. (Eds.), Educational resilience in inner-city America: Challenges and prospects. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
60.
WaxmanH. C.GrayJ.PadrónY. N. (2003). Review of research on resilience. The Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence (CREDE), University of California, Santa Cruz.
WeissbergR. P.HaynesN.EliasM.GreenbergM.ShriverT.ZinsJ.Schwab-StoneM.KesslerR.FreyK. (1997). Promoting social and emotional learning: Guidelines for educators. Washington, DC: ACSD Publishing.
WoltersC. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 236–250. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.236
65.
ZevenbergenR. (2000). ‘Cracking the code’ of mathematics classrooms: School success as a function of linguistic, social and cultural background. In BoalerJ. (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning. Westport, CT: Ablex.
66.
ZimmermanB. J.PonsM. M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614–628. doi:10.3102/00028312023004614.
