CottonK. (2001). New small learning communities: findings from recent literature.Portland Oregon, Northwest Regional Educational Laboratories: 71.
7.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1992). Flow: the psychology of happiness.London, Rider, Random House.
8.
CullmanK. (1999). How small schools increase learning (and what large schools can do about it), National Association of Elementary School Principals. 2003.
9.
Drling-HammondL.AncessJ. (2002). Reinventing high school: Outcomes of the coalition campus schools project. American Educational Research Journal39(3): 639–673.
10.
ElsworthG. (1998). ‘School size and diversity in the senior secondary curriculum: A generalizable relationship?’Australian Journal of Education42(2): 183–203.
FlecknoeM. (2003). An editor visits: Samuel King's School. Improving Schools6(1): 2–4.
17.
GajdaR. (2002). School shooting case studies: lessons in prevention, response and long-term resolution.American Educational Research AssociationNew Orleans.
18.
GandinL. A.AppleM. (2002). Challenging neo-liberalism, building democracy: Creating the Citizen School in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Journal of Educational Policy17(2): 259–279.
19.
GigerenzerG.ToddP. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart.New York, Oxford University Press.
20.
GraingerJ. (2002). Report on Small Schools Week: Promoting the benefits of small schools: House of Commons, Westminster, National Association of Small Schools. 2003.
21.
GriderA.VerstegenD. (2000). Legislation, litigation and rural and small schools: A survey of the states. Journal of Educational Finance26: 103–120.
22.
GriffithJ. (2002). Is quality/effectiveness an empirically demonstrable school attribute? statistical aids for determining appropriate levels of analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement13(1): 91–122.
23.
HampelR. (2002). Historical perspectives on small schools. Phi Delta Kappan83(5): 357–364.
24.
HargreavesL.ComberC. (1996). The National Curriculum: Can small schools deliver? Confidence and competence levels of teachers in small rural primary schools. British Education Research Journal22(1): 89–99.
25.
HofmanR.HofmanA. (2002). School governance, culture and student achievement. International Journal of Leadership in Education5(3): 249–272.
26.
HowieC.StrangeM. (2000). Research about school size and school performance in impoverished communities. ERIC digest ED448968.
27.
JencksC. (1972). Inequality: a reassessment of family and schooling in America.London, Penguin Books.
28.
JohnsonJ. (2002). Will Parents and Teachers Get on the Bandwagon To Reduce School Size?Phi Delta Kappan83(5): 353–357.
29.
KahnemanD. (2002). New challenges to the rationality assumption. Choices, values and frames.TverskyA.. Cambridge, UK., Cambridge University Press: 758–774.
30.
KaufmanS. (1995). At home in the universe: the search for laws of self-organization and complexity.London, Viking.
31.
KlonskyM. (2002). How smaller schools prevent school violence. Educational Leadership59(5): 65–70.
LeeV.SmithJ. (1997). High School Size: Which Works Best and for Whom?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis19(3): 205–228.
34.
LeonardL.LeonardP. (2001). Confronting assumptions about the benefits of small schools. Educational Management and Administration29(1): 79–96.
35.
LevinH.KelleyC. (1997). Can education do it alone? Education, culture, economy, society.HalseyA.LauderH.BrownP.AmyS.. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 240–251.
36.
McCowanT. (2003). Participation and education in the Landless People's Movement of Brazil. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies1(1): Electronic only.
37.
MeierD. (2002). Just let us be: The genesis of a small public school. Educational Leadership59(5): 76–80.
38.
NathanJ. (2002). Small schools: The benefits of sharing. Educational Leadership59(5): 71–76.
39.
NorretrandersT. (1998). The user illusion: Cutting consciousness down to size.New York, Penguin.
40.
NyeB.HedgesL. (2002). Do low-achieving students benefit more from small classes? Evidence from the Tennessee Class Size experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis24(3): 201–217.
41.
ObholzerA. (1994). Unconscious at work.London, Routledge.
42.
OFSTED (2000). Small schools: how well are they doing?London, OFSTED: 7.
43.
PhillipsE. (1997). A critique of the existing research into small primary schools. British Journal of Educational Studies, 45(3): 235–248.
44.
RaywidM. A. (1995). The Subschools/Small Schools Movement—Taking Stock, ED397490. 2003.
45.
RaywidM. A. (1998). Small schools: A reform that works. Educational Leadership55(4): 34–39.
46.
RaywidM. A. (2002). The policy environment of small schools and schools-within-schools. Educational Leadership59(5): 47–52.
47.
ScheerensJ. (2002). School effectiveness in developing countries. School Effectiveness and School Improvement12(4): 353–358.
48.
SchneiderM.BuckleyJ. (2002). What do parents want from schools? Evidence from the Internet. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis24(2): 133–144.
49.
Small-Schools-Group (1998). Report of the Small Schools Group, Vermont State Legislature. ED426830.
50.
StiefelL.BerneR. (2000). High School Size: Effects on Budgets and Performance in New York City. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis22(1): 27–39.
51.
StringfieldS. (1997). Research on High Reliability Organisations; Implications for school Effects Research, Policy and Educational Practice.Baltimore USA, John Hopkins University.
52.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1988). Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases.TverskyA.. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press: 3–20.
53.
Vander-ArkT. (2002). The case for small high schools. Educational Leadership59(5): 55–59.
54.
ViaderoD. (2001). Small is better. Education Week21(13): 28–31.
55.
Wake-Educational-Partnership (2002). Small schools, big changes: school size, student achievement, and parent choice in Wake County. Wake County, North Carolina: 13.
56.
WillmsJ. D.SomersM.-A. (2002). Family, classroom, and school effects on children's educational outcomes in Latin America. School Effectiveness and School Improvement12(4): 409–445.