In many contemporary societies, misinformation, epistemic arrogance, and intergroup conflict pose serious threats to social cohesion and well-being. Wisdom may offer a potential antidote to these problems, with a recently identified Common Wisdom Model (CWM) suggesting that wisdom involves epistemic virtues such as intellectual humility, openness to change, and perspective-taking. However, it is unclear whether these virtues are central for folk concepts of wisdom in non-Western contexts. We explored this question by conducting focus group discussions with 174 participants from the Philippines and Sri Lanka, two countries facing socio-political and economic challenges. We found that epistemic themes were common in both countries, but more so when participants were asked to define wisdom in general terms rather than to describe how it is acquired or expressed in daily lives. Moreover, epistemic themes were more prevalent among Filipino than Sri Lankan participants, especially when the questions posed were abstract rather than concrete. We discuss how these findings relate to the CWM and the socio-cultural contexts of the two countries, and suggest that a question format should be considered in cross-cultural research on wisdom.
BaltesP. B.KunzmannU. (2004). The two faces of wisdom: Wisdom as a general theory of knowledge and judgment about excellence in mind and virtue vs. wisdom as everyday realization in people and products. Human Development, 47(5), 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1159/000079156
BaltesP. B.SmithJ.StaudingerU. M. (1992). Wisdom and successful aging. In SondereggerT. B. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation 1991: Psychology and aging (pp. 123–167). University of Nebraska Press.
5.
BaltesP. B.StaudingerU. M. (2000). Wisdom: A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.122
6.
BradyM. S. (2018). Suffering and virtue. Oxford University Press.
7.
BrienzaJ. P.GrossmannI. (2017). Social class and wise reasoning about interpersonal conflicts across regions, persons and situations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284(1869), 20171870. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1870
8.
ChuR. T. (2013). Reconstituting histories of Filipino families with Chinese ancestry: Methodology, sources and relevance. Kritika Kultura, (21/22), 307–335. https://doi.org/10.13185/KK2013.02106
9.
DorfmanA.MoscovitchD. A.ChopikW. J.GrossmannI. (2022). None the wiser: Year-long longitudinal study on effects of adversity on wisdom. European Journal of Personality, 36(4), 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211014057
10.
FrazierP.ConlonA.GlaserT. (2001). Positive and negative life changes following sexual assault. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(6), 1048–1055. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.69.6.1048
GelmanS. A.HirschfeldL. A. (1999). How biological is essentialism? In MedinD. L.AtranS. (Eds.), Folkbiology (pp. 403–446). The MIT Press.
13.
GlückJ. (2018). Measuring wisdom: Existing approaches, continuing challenges, and new developments. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 73(8), 1393–1403. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx140
14.
GlückJ.BluckS. (2011). Laypeople’s conceptions of wisdom and its development: Cognitive and integrative views. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 66B(3), 321–324. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr011
15.
GlückJ.SternbergR. J.NusbaumH. C. (2019). Not today, and probably not tomorrow either: Obstacles to wisdom and how we may overcome them. In R. J. Sternberg, H. C. Nusbaum, & J. Glück (Eds.), Applying wisdom to contemporary world problems (pp. 445–464). Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20287-3_16
16.
GlückJ.WeststrateN. M. (2022). The wisdom researchers and the elephant: An integrative model of wise behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 26(4), 342–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221094650
17.
GreenfieldP. M. (2009). Linking social change and developmental change: Shifting pathways of human development. Developmental Psychology, 45(2), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014726
18.
GrossmannI.DorfmanA.OakesH.SantosH. C.VohsK. D.ScholerA. A. (2021). Training for wisdom: The distanced-self-reflection diary method. Psychological Science, 32(3), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620969170
GrossmannI.EibachR. P.KoyamaJ.SahiQ. B. (2020). Folk standards of sound judgment: Rationality versus reasonableness. Science Advances, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz0289
21.
GrossmannI.KungF. Y. H. (2019). Wisdom and culture. In CohenD.KitayamaS. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 343–364). The Guilford Press.
22.
GrossmannI.NaJ.VarnumM. E. W.KitayamaS.NisbettR. E. (2013). A route to well-being: Intelligence versus wise reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(3), 944–953. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029560
23.
GrossmannI.NaJ.VarnumM. E. W.ParkD. C.KitayamaS.NisbettR. E. (2010). Reasoning about social conflicts improves into old age. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(16), 7246–7250. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001715107
24.
GrossmannI.OakesH.SantosH. C. (2019). Wise reasoning benefits from emodiversity, irrespective of emotional intensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(5), 805–823. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000543
25.
GrossmannI.WeststrateN. M.ArdeltM.BrienzaJ. P.DongM.FerrariM.FournierM. A.HuC. S.NusbaumH. C.VervaekeJ. (2020). The science of wisdom in a polarized world: Knowns and unknowns. Psychological Inquiry, 31(2), 103–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1750917
26.
GrossmannI.WeststrateN. M.FerrariM.BrienzaJ. P. (2020). A common model is essential for a cumulative science of wisdom. Psychological Inquiry, 31(2), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1750920
27.
HaslamN.RothschildL.ErnstD. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164363
HessY. D.CarnevaleJ. J.RosarioM. (2018). A construal level approach to understanding interpersonal processes. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(8), Article e12409. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12409
30.
InglehartR.BakerW. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240006500103
31.
JayawickremeE.BlackieL. E. (2014). Post–traumatic growth as positive personality change: Evidence, controversies and future directions. European Journal of Personality, 28(4), 312–331. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1963
32.
JayawickremeE.GrimmS. R.BlackieL. E. R. (2019). Does adversity make us wiser than before? Addressing a foundational question through interdisciplinary engagement. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 53(3), 343–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-019-09710-8
33.
JayawickremeE.InfurnaF. J.AlajakK.BlackieL. E. R.ChopikW. J.ChungJ. M.DorfmanA.FleesonW.ForgeardM. J. C.FrazierP.FurrR. M.GrossmannI.HellerA. S.LaceulleO. M.LucasR. E.LuhmannM.LuongG.MeijerL.McLeanK. C., …ZonneveldR. (2021). Post-traumatic growth as positive personality change: Challenges, opportunities, and recommendations. Journal of Personality, 89(1), 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12591
34.
JayawickremeE.JayawickremeN.MillerE. (2010). Triumphalism, fear and humiliation: The psychological legacy of Sri Lanka’s civil war. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 3(3), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/17467586.2010.531031
35.
KaiserM. K.JonidesJ.AlexanderJ. (1986). Intuitive reasoning about abstract and familiar physics problems. Memory & Cognition, 14(4), 308–312. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202508
36.
Kałużna-WielobóbA. (2014). Do individual wisdom concepts depend on value. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 45(2), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.2478/ppb-2014-0016
37.
LevensonM. R.JenningsP. A.AldwinC. M.ShiraishiR. W. (2005). Self-transcendence: conceptualization and measurement. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 60(2), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.2190/XRXM-FYRA-7U0X-GRC0
38.
MarkmanK. D.GuentherC. L. (2007). Psychological momentum: Intuitive physics and naive beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(6), 800–812. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207301026
39.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
McGrathJ. C. (2006). Post-traumatic growth and the origins of early Christianity. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 9(3), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/13694670600615532
42.
McLeanK. C.SyedM. (2015). Personal, master, and alternative narratives: An integrative framework for understanding identity development in context. Human Development, 58(6), 318–349. https://doi.org/10.1159/000445817
43.
McRaeE. (2018). Suffering and the six perfections: Using adversity to attain wisdom in Mahāyāna Buddhist ethics. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 52(4), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-017-9622-9
44.
MercadoL. N. (1994). The Filipino mind. Washington D.C.: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
45.
MeyersE. A.EibachR.HanxiaoZ.GrossmannI. (2021). What is good judgment? Descriptive norms and intuitive use of rationality versus reasonableness. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fc8n6
46.
MunroeM.FerrariM. (2022). Coping with adversity through metaconscious wisdom. In MunroeM.FerrariM. (Eds.), Post-traumatic growth to psychological well-being (pp. 83–86). Lifelong Learning Book Series 30,https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15290-0_8
47.
OrwollL.PerlmutterM. (1990). The study of wise persons: Integrating a personality perspective. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development (pp. 160–178). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139173704.009
48.
PhanL. V.BlackieL. E. R.HorstmannK.JayawickremeE. (2021). An integrative framework to study wisdom. In RauthmannJ. (Ed.), Handbook of personality dynamics and processes (pp. 1159–1182). Elsevier Academic Press.
49.
RobinsonM. D.CloreG. L. (2002). Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychological Bulletin, 128(6), 934–960. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.934
50.
RossL. (2018). From the fundamental attribution error to the truly fundamental attribution error and beyond: My research journey. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(6), 750–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618769855
51.
SchwartzB.SharpeK. E. (2006). Practical wisdom: Aristotle meets positive psychology. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-005-3651-y
52.
SmithJ.BaltesP. B. (1990). Wisdom-related knowledge: Age/cohort differences in response to life-planning problems. Developmental Psychology, 26(3), 494–505. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.3.494
53.
SternbergR. J. (2019). Why people often prefer wise guys to guys who are wise: An augmented balance theory of the production and reception of wisdom. In SternbergR. J.GlückJ. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of wisdom (pp. 162–181). Cambridge University Press.
TakahashiM.BordiaP. (2000). The concept of wisdom: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Psychology, 35(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075900399475
TedeschiR. G.Shakespeare-FinchJ.TakuK.CalhounL. G. (2018). Posttraumatic growth: Theory, research, and applications. Routledge.
58.
TerryG.HayfieldN.ClarkeV.BraunV. (2017). Thematic analysis. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed., pp. 17–37). Sage.
59.
TriandisH. C. (2018). Individualism and collectivism. Routledge.
60.
VarnumM. E. W.GrossmannI.KitayamaS.NisbettR. E. (2010). The origin of cultural differences in cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359301
61.
WebsterJ. D. (2007). Measuring the character strength of wisdom. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 65(2), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.2190/AG.65.2.d
ZachryC. E.PhanL. V.BlackieL. E.JayawickremeE. (2018). Situation-based contingencies underlying wisdom-content manifestations: Examining intellectual humility in daily life. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 73(8), 1404–1415. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby016
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
