In this article, an innovative study is presented, based on the observation of unexpected shifts in lesbian and gay educators’ accounts in Greece, between two time periods. Methodologically, the mixture of Constructivist Grounded Theory and Situational Analysis was employed to capture and analyze individual shifts alongside contextual shifts, as a psychosocial unit. Results tracked the transitions of this social group from dwelling in a form of margin to spaces of in-betweenness, by drawing on border studies, borderlands framework and Turner’s concept of liminality. This work suggests an epistemological and methodological pathway toward psychosocially locating shifting sexualities, through robust situatedness and the use of symbolic spatialities. Ultimately, understanding contemporary sexualities requires attentiveness to complex ambiguities, hybridities and contradictions, positioning in-betweenness, borderlands, and liminality as key analytical frameworks.
AdamsT (2008) Learning, Living and Leaving the Closet: Making Gay Identity Relational. PhD Thesis, Department of Communication, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
2.
AlessiEJ (2014) A framework for incorporating minority stress theory into treatment with sexual minority clients. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health18(1): 47–66.
3.
AltmanD (2013) The End of the Homosexual?Brisbane, QLD: University of Queensland Press.
4.
AnastasiadouMSamaraJ (2022) ‘Where are the equal rights?’ far-right women challenging gender equality and human rights in Greece. DiGeSt - Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies9(2): 9–25.
5.
AnzaldúaG (1987) Borderlands, La Frontera: The New Mestiza. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
6.
AppaduraiA (1996) Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
7.
ArcherB (2002) The End of Gay: And the Death of Heterosexuality. London: Fusion Press.
8.
AthanasiouAKolokotroniVPapanikolaouD (2018) On the politics of queer resistance and survival: Athena Athanasiou in conversation with Vassiliki Kolocotroni and Dimitris Papanikolaou. Journal of Greek Media & Culture4(2): 269–280.
9.
AyoubP (2019) Tensions in rights: navigating emerging contradictions in the LGBT rights revolution. In: BryskAStohlM (eds) Contesting Human Rights: Norms, Institutions and Practice. England: Edward Elgar Publishing, 43–58.
10.
BankaEKolbuszewskaZ (2016) Introduction. In: BankaEKolbuszewskaZ (eds) Borderlands: Art, Literature and Culture. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL, 9–26.
11.
BaumanZ (1997) Postmodernity and Its Discontents. Oxford: Polity Press.
12.
BhabhaH (1994) The Location of Culture. London and New York: Routledge.
13.
BobbeJ (2002) Treatment with Lesbian alcoholics: healing shame and internalized homophobia for ongoing sobriety. Health & Social Work27(3): 218–222.
14.
BraidottiR (2011) Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
15.
BronfenbrennerU (1977) Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist32(7): 513–531.
16.
BrownM (2006) A geographer reads geography club: spatial metaphor and metonym in textual/sexual space. Cultural Geographies13(3): 313–339.
17.
ButlerJ (2004) Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London and New York: Verso.
18.
ButlerJ (2009) Frames of War: When is Life Grievable?London and New York: Verso.
19.
ButlerJAthanasiouA (2013) Dispossession: The Performative in the Political. Cambridge: Polity Press.
20.
CacheyJ (2017) Cosmographic cartography of the ‘perfect’ twenty-eights. In: CorbettGWebbH (eds). Vertical Readings in Dante’s Comedy. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, Vol. 3, 111–138.
21.
CastellsM (2020) Space of flows, space of places: materials for a theory of urbanism in the information age. In: LeGatesRTStoutFCavesRW (eds) The City Reader. London: Routledge, 240–251.
22.
CharmazK (2008) Grounded theory as an emergent method. In: Hesse-BiberSNLeavyP (eds) Handbook of Emergent Methods. New York: The Guilford Press, 155–172.
23.
CharmazK (2009) Shifting the grounds: constructivist grounded theory methods. In: MorseJMSternPNCorbinJ, et al. (eds) Developing Grounded Theory: The Second Generation. London and New York: Routledge, 127–193.
ClarkeAEFrieseCWashburnRS (2018) Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Interpretive Turn. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
26.
CvetkovichA (2003) An Archive of Feelings: Trauma, Sexuality, and Lesbian Public Cultures. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
27.
D'AugelliAR (1992) Teaching lesbian/gay development: from oppression to exceptionality. Journal of Homosexuality22(3-4): 213–228.
28.
DavidYHartalGPascarL (2018) The right to Jerusalem: the danger of queer safe spaces. Borderlands17(1): 1.
29.
DenticeDDietertM (2015) Liminal spaces and the transgender experience. Theory in Action8(2): 69–96.
30.
DezeuzeA (2013) How to live precariously: Lygia Clark’s Caminhando and tropicalism in 1960s Brazil. Women and Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory23(2): 226–247.
31.
Du Bois WEB (2007) The Souls of Black Folk. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
EleftheriadisK (2015) Queer responses to austerity: insights from the Greece of crisis. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies14(4): 1032–1057.
FRA – European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2014) European Union Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Survey: Main Results. Available at: https://data.europa.eu (accessed 5 July 2021).
39.
FroehlichJ (2019) Dwelling the precariousness: Ozualdo Candeias’ a Margem (the margin, 1967). ICHT3: 173–192.
40.
FrostDMMeyerIH (2009) Internalized homophobia and relationship quality among lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. Journal of Counseling Psychology56: 97–109.
41.
FussD (1991) Inside/Out: Lesbian Theories, Gay Theories. New York and London: Routledge.
42.
GiannouDIoakimidisV (2020) “Neither invisible nor abnormal!” exploring the invisibility and pathologisation of LGBT people in the Greek National Health System. Critical Social Policy40(3): 370–388.
43.
GórskaPTauschN (2022) People or ideology? Social conservatism and intergroup contact moderate heterosexuals’ responses to a state-sponsored anti-LGBT campaign. Sexuality Research and Social Policy20: 1–15.
44.
GuptaN (2020) Illuminating the trauma of the LGBTQ closet: a cinematic-phenomenological study and film about existential rights. Qualitative Research in Psychology19(3): 632–657.
45.
HesovaZ (2021) Three types of culture wars and the populist strategies in central Europe. Politologický časopis - Czech Journal of Political Science28(2): 130–150.
46.
hooksb (1984) Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Boston: South End Press.
47.
hooksb (1990) Choosing the margin as a space of radical openness. In: hooksb (ed) Yearnings: Race, Gender and Cultural Politics. Boston: South End, 203–209.
48.
ILGA-Europe (2015) Annual Review of the Human Rights Situation of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex People in Europe. Belgium: ILGA-Europe.
49.
IsinEFRygielK (2007) Abject spaces: frontiers, zones, camps. In: DauphineeEMastersC (eds) The Logics of Biopower and the War on Terror: Living, Dying, Surviving. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 181–203.
50.
KawaleR (2006) Inequalities of the heart: the performance of emotion work by lesbian and bisexual women in London, England. Social & Cultural Geography5(4): 565–581.
51.
KirbyK (1993) Thinking through the boundary: the politics of location, subjects, and space. Boundary2(20): 173–189.
52.
Klett-DaviesM (2021) Border regimes: Homophobia and LGBT place making in six ordinary cities in Europe. Religions13(1): 6.
53.
KristevaJ (1982) Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.
54.
KushnikH (2010) In the closet: a close read of the metaphor. Virtual Mentor12(8): 678–680.
55.
LalrinzualaC (2021) The Liminal Space: A Study of Sexual Ambiguity in Select Queer Narratives. PhD Thesis, Mizoram University, Aizawl.
56.
LangeACMooreCM (2017) Kaleidoscope views: using the theoretical borderlands to understand the experiences of gay cis-men. Journal of College Student Development58(6): 818–832.
57.
LennieJHatcherCMorganW (2003) Feminist discourses of (Dis) empowerment in an action research project involving rural women and communication technologies. Action Research1(1): 57–80.
LoveH (2007) Feeling Backward: Loss and the Politics of Queer History. Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.
60.
ManesiD (2020) A place to call “home”: home and belonging among lesbians and feminists in Greece. In: ClisbyS (ed) Gender, Sexuality and Identities of the Borderlands: Queering the Margins. London: Routledge, 189–205.
61.
ManesiD (2021) Queer and queering in the Greek cultural sphere: the troubles of cultural translation and the non-linearity of queer historiography. Journal of Mediterranean Studies30(2): 139–158.
62.
MarchL (2020) Queer and trans* geographies of liminality: a literature review. Progress in Human Geography45(3): 455–471.
63.
MarottaV (2008) The hybrid self and the ambivalence of boundaries. Social Identities14(3): 295–312.
64.
MarottaV (2020) Cultural hybridity. In: RitzerG (ed) The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeos1616 (accessed 20 March 2021).
65.
MasonV (2020) The liminality of Palestinian refugees: betwixt and between global politics and international law. Journal of Sociology56(1): 84–99.
66.
MisgavCHartalG (2019) Queer urban movements in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem: A comparative discussion. In: YacobiHNasasraM (eds). Routledge Handbook on Middle East Cities. 1st ed. London: Taylor and Francis, 57–74.
67.
MoawadPAndresL (2023) Refugees in abject spaces, protracted ‘waiting’ and spatialities of abjection during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social & Cultural Geography24(3-4): 467–483.
68.
Mutua-MamboCN (2020) Living in a liminal space: feminist and LGBT alliances in Kenya. Women’s Studies in Communication43(2): 125–130.
69.
NgE (2013) A “post-gay” era? Media gaystreaming, homonormativity, and the politics of LGBT integration. Communication, Culture & Critique6(2): 258–283.
70.
O'DowdL (2010) From a ‘borderless world’ to a ‘world of borders’: ‘bringing history back in. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space28(6): 1031–1050.
71.
OhmaeK (1994) The Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Global Marketplace. London: Harper Collins.
72.
Pallotta-ChiarolliM (2010) Border Sexualities, Border Families in Schools. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, INC.
73.
PapadakiV (2016) Invisible students: experiences of lesbian and gay students in social work education in Greece. Social Work Education35(1): 65–77.
74.
PapanikolaouD (2018) Critically queer and haunted: Greek identity, Crisiscapes and doing queer history in the present. Journal of Greek Media & Culture4(2): 167–186.
75.
PapanikolaouNKolokotroniM (2018) New queer Greece: performance, politics and identity in crisis. Journal of Greek Media & Culture4(2): 143–150.
76.
PinelCE (1999) Stigma consciousness: the psychological legacy of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology76(1): 114–128.
77.
RichA (1985) Notes toward a politics of location. In: Díaz-DiocaretzMZavalaIM (eds) Women, Feminist Identity and Society in the 1980s: Selected Papers. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 7–22.
78.
RidgeDPlummerDPeasleyD (2006) Remaking the masculine self and coping in the liminal world of the gay ‘scene’. Culture, Health and Sexuality8(6): 501–514.
RuitenbergCW (2007) Here be dragons: exploring cartography in educational theory and research. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education4(1): 7–24.
81.
SebastianK (2019) Distinguishing between the strains. Grounded theory: classical, interpretive and constructivist. Journal for Social Thought3(1): 1–9.
82.
SedgwickEK (1990) Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley, LA: University of California Press.
83.
SendhardtB (2013) Border types and bordering processes: a theoretical approach to the eu/polish-ukrainian border as a multi-dimensional phenomenon. In: LechevalierAWielgohsJ (eds) Borders and Border Regions in Europe: Changes, Challenges and Chances. Germany: Transcript Verlag, 21–44. Available at: https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/id/0fa60291-9c4d-48aa-809d-ab0195e0c7fd/648631.pdf (accessed 15 October 2024).
84.
ShelpSG (2003) Gaydar: visual detection of sexual orientation among gay and heterosexual men. Journal of Homosexuality44(1): 1–14.
SlootmaeckersK (2020) Constructing European Union identity through LGBT equality promotion: crises and shifting othering processes in the European Union enlargement. Political Studies Review13(3): 346–361.
87.
SojaE (1996) Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other real-and-imagined Places. Cambridge: Blackwell.
88.
StromKJMartinAD (2017) Rhizomatic inquiry. Becoming-Teacher. Imagination and Praxis: Criticality and Creativity in Education and Educational Research. Rotterdam: SensePublishers, 25–40.
89.
SzakolczaiA (2009) Liminality and experience: structuring transitory situations and transformative events. International Political Anthropology2(1): 141–172.
90.
SzymanskiDMIkizlerAS (2013) Internalized heterosexism as a mediator in the relationship between gender role conflict, heterosexist discrimination, and depression among sexual minority men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity14(2): 211–219.
91.
ThomassenB (2009) The uses and meaning of liminality. International Political Anthropology2(1): 5–28.
92.
TurnerV (1969) The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-structure. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing.
93.
TurnerV (1970) The Forest of Symbols: Aspect of Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
94.
Van GennepA (1960) The Rites of Passage. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
95.
WeintrobAHansellLZebrackiM, et al. (2021) Queer mobilities: critical LGBTQ perspectives of public transport spaces. Mobilities16(5): 775–791.
96.
WestJOldfatherP (1995) Pooled case comparison: an innovation for cross-case study. Qualitative Inquiry1(4): 452–464.
97.
WimarkT (2019) Homemaking and perpetual liminality among queer refugees. Social & Cultural Geography22(5): 647–665.
